MM Review....2008 Toyota Sequoia Limited 4WD
#62
Lexus Fanatic
Thread Starter
#63
...
As for the Sequoia, does Toyota not care for it anymore? With competition in the segment heating up you would think they would update it, the Tundra has a much nicer interior. This leads me to believe they will drop it. I remember hearing a while back they could introduce a cheaper lower spec Land Cruiser to replace it, but obviously the interior size will be smaller than the Sequoia. Maybe they will wait until the next gen LC is out with a larger interior?
Last edited by UZJ100GXR; 07-29-14 at 06:51 PM.
#64
Lexus Fanatic
People here seem to do it better or so i'd like to believe. Especially with well informed members like yourself.
...
As for the Sequoia, does Toyota not care for it anymore? With competition in the segment heating up you would think they would update it, the Tundra has a much nicer interior. This leads me to believe they will drop it. I remember hearing a while back they could introduce a cheaper lower spec Land Cruiser to replace it, but obviously the interior size will be smaller than the Sequoia. Maybe they will wait until the next gen LC is out with a larger interior?
...
As for the Sequoia, does Toyota not care for it anymore? With competition in the segment heating up you would think they would update it, the Tundra has a much nicer interior. This leads me to believe they will drop it. I remember hearing a while back they could introduce a cheaper lower spec Land Cruiser to replace it, but obviously the interior size will be smaller than the Sequoia. Maybe they will wait until the next gen LC is out with a larger interior?
BTW, Toyota Canada just recently updated the fuel economy specs for the Sequoia to better reflect the changes by the Canadian EPA. The new testing reveals how thirsty the Sequoia really is.
16.6/100km combined hwy/CTY while a Tahoe is something like 13.2 combined.
#65
Lexus Fanatic
Thread Starter
Originally Posted by LexsCTJill
BTW, Toyota Canada just recently updated the fuel economy specs for the Sequoia to better reflect the changes by the Canadian EPA. The new testing reveals how thirsty the Sequoia really is.
16.6/100km combined hwy/CTY while a Tahoe is something like 13.2 combined.
#66
It's always liters per 100 km. Just use some logic, would it make sense that a car uses 16.6 imperial gallons, which is nearly 20 U.S. gallons, to drive just 100 km, or 62 miles? Sequoia luckily is rated at more than 3 miles per gallon.
#67
Lexus Fanatic
Yes that is liters per 100 km. For a time Canada had conservative fuel ratings but for 2015 they have updated the methods to better reflect real world situations.
I am curious to see what the Lexus LX is rated.
The GM SUVs get very good 2015 ratings which is impressive.
I am curious to see what the Lexus LX is rated.
The GM SUVs get very good 2015 ratings which is impressive.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Curated Content Editor
Car Chat
0
06-17-19 08:18 PM