MT Comparo: 1) M3, 2) C63, 3) IS-F
#16
Lexus Fanatic
![Default](https://www.clublexus.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Despite deficiency in power-to-weight-ratio, the IS-F matches the M3 in acceleration and beats the C63 in lap time. Being the quietest and most fuel efficient, the IS-F is also the best daily driver. The final ranking comes down to the editors' personal preferences, as will of the regular consumers. At any rate, kudos to the M3 for the win.
#17
Lexus Champion
![Default](https://www.clublexus.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Three excellent cars ![Thumb Up](https://www.clublexus.com/forums/images/smilies/thumbsup.gif)
I can't wait to see what the second generation IS-F will bring. BMW and MB have been building Ms and AMGs for years. Great first effort by Lexus.
![Thumb Up](https://www.clublexus.com/forums/images/smilies/thumbsup.gif)
I can't wait to see what the second generation IS-F will bring. BMW and MB have been building Ms and AMGs for years. Great first effort by Lexus.
#19
![Default](https://www.clublexus.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Despite deficiency in power-to-weight-ratio, the IS-F matches the M3 in acceleration and beats the C63 in lap time. Being the quietest and most fuel efficient, the IS-F is also the best daily driver. The final ranking comes down to the editors' personal preferences, as will of the regular consumers. At any rate, kudos to the M3 for the win.
and the 8 speed on the is-f also help get the lowest rpm at freeway speed, so for daily driver that helps a bit too
#21
Lexus Fanatic
iTrader: (20)
![Default](https://www.clublexus.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Despite deficiency in power-to-weight-ratio, the IS-F matches the M3 in acceleration and beats the C63 in lap time. Being the quietest and most fuel efficient, the IS-F is also the best daily driver. The final ranking comes down to the editors' personal preferences, as will of the regular consumers. At any rate, kudos to the M3 for the win.
It's faster around the track, has better handling, better steering, and I'm sure the 8300rpm redline really makes it fun. Oh and it won in fuel economy in their thrashing.
As a daily urban driver though, yes, the quieter IS-F with low rpms on the highway and nicer interior is better than the M3.
Who buys a car like this for quietness or fuel economy though?
![Uhh...](https://www.clublexus.com/forums/images/smilies/1387914497.gif)
![Stick Out Tongue](https://www.clublexus.com/forums/images/smilies/tongue.gif)
Lexus has made a GREAT first step into this arena but there's no way their first step will catch up to decades of the others efforts.
Remember this car (IS-F) wasn't even an official Lexus project, just a skunkworks project they decided to produce.
The LF-A on the other hand, if they ever release the thing, could raise a LOT more eyebrows.
#22
Speaks French in Russian
![](https://www.clublexus.com/forums/images/ranks/rank-smod2.gif)
![Default](https://www.clublexus.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
For the power advantage the MB has, I was expecting it to be a little faster. Doesnt really seem to pull away that much.
I thought it was a pretty fair review. But I never knew the IS shared dash buttons with a Prius.
I thought it was a pretty fair review. But I never knew the IS shared dash buttons with a Prius.
![Roll Eyes (Sarcastic)](https://www.clublexus.com/forums/images/smilies/rolleyes.gif)
#24
Pole Position
![Default](https://www.clublexus.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Agreed. Now will they release it? In some ways it feels like when we kept hearing about the GT-R. That took a long time gestating but boy oh boy were the results worth it. The LF-A could be the same.
#25
Lexus Fanatic
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: A better place
Posts: 7,285
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://www.clublexus.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I have no real problem with the IS-F placing third in the review. The IS-F is a great car in the class, but it's not a class leader on Toyota's first try. Impossible to be a class leader on your first try when you're going up against the M3 which BMW has had decades of experience with, or even the C-Class AMG which Benz has some experience with as well.
I found it interesting that the IS-F has the tighest turning circle of the group, by far. I thought that the M3 would have the tighest turning circle. I also found it odd that MT managed 19 mpg with the M3. If they were thrashing the car hard and pushing it to the limit, I doubt 19mpg would be possible.
What I do have a problem with is some of the comments made by MT in the review, some of which are just flat-out wrong. MT for the most part is usually accurate with it's comments but this time they were almost as bad as Edmunds in terms of inaccuracy
.
Here's a few shining examples:
If MT had bothered to do the research, they would know that side vents on the IS-F are fully functional.
Good point MT, styling is subjective. Nonetheless, it's funny how they liked the M3 interior but not the IS-F interior. And the nav screen is straight from a Prius? I wonder what gives it away, is it the hybrid system diagram on the IS-F navigation
. Pretty silly comment there, with no basis for the comment in the first place. As for the comment about the buttons from the Prius, the M3's buttons are also shared with the 1 Series, and I'm sure I can find some buttons on the C63 that are shared with a B-Class. Why single out the IS-F when all the vehicles here do that?
Weight distribution isn't everything. There are cars on the market that have good weight distribution, yet mediocre handling.
Not going to happen, at least for now. BMW has said M cars will remain strictly N/A. Packaging will also be an issue with the 4.4L TT V8. It's a larger engine than the 4.0L V8, and it's also heavier. I doubt the 4.4L will even fit in the M3's engine bay, considering the twin turbos and all other ancillary accessories.
I found it interesting that the IS-F has the tighest turning circle of the group, by far. I thought that the M3 would have the tighest turning circle. I also found it odd that MT managed 19 mpg with the M3. If they were thrashing the car hard and pushing it to the limit, I doubt 19mpg would be possible.
What I do have a problem with is some of the comments made by MT in the review, some of which are just flat-out wrong. MT for the most part is usually accurate with it's comments but this time they were almost as bad as Edmunds in terms of inaccuracy
![Thumb Down](https://www.clublexus.com/forums/images/smilies/thumbsdown.gif)
Here's a few shining examples:
Originally Posted by MotorTrend
All four fenders are flared, although the side vents in the front appear to be only for style.
Originally Posted by MotorTrend
The BMW's cabin is somber, or businesslike, depending on how you view it, but we liked the carbon-fiber patterned leather that adorned the I.P. and armrests. Lexus fell a few steps short inside. The console and other areas are splashed with an aluminized carbon-fiber-looking stuff that won't be to everyone's taste. And the nav screen and buttons come right out of the Prius, although the setup works well enough.
![Roll Eyes (Sarcastic)](https://www.clublexus.com/forums/images/smilies/rolleyes.gif)
Not going to happen, at least for now. BMW has said M cars will remain strictly N/A. Packaging will also be an issue with the 4.4L TT V8. It's a larger engine than the 4.0L V8, and it's also heavier. I doubt the 4.4L will even fit in the M3's engine bay, considering the twin turbos and all other ancillary accessories.
#27
Lexus Fanatic
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: A better place
Posts: 7,285
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://www.clublexus.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Even if the engine will fit, which is up for debate, let's not forget BMW's comments that M cars would continue to be strictly N/A.
#28
Lexus Test Driver
#29
Lexus Test Driver
![Default](https://www.clublexus.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
A good read, although we have all known this would be the ranking order and MT is still clearly biased against Lexus with their commentary.
I hope not. Let's at least keep the M's pure.
I hope not. Let's at least keep the M's pure.
#30
Lexus Champion
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Stuttgart
Posts: 1,651
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://www.clublexus.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
![Thumb Down](https://www.clublexus.com/forums/images/smilies/thumbsdown.gif)
I own the new C200 CDI and the interior is just fine. It's extremely well-made and feels premium. The Lexus IS doesn't use matt black plastic buttons but shiny plastic buttons in silver and that makes it visually more upscale looking. If you spend time in both cars, you will see that the interiors are practically equal in terms of build and material quality.
As for the review, you can't go wrong with any car here. The M3 is the king, as expected. The IS-F has done well so far, especially since this is the first sports sedan from Lexus. The C63 AMG convinces with brutal acceleration and now the handling to back it up and be a more serious competitor to the M3 and others. I don't see what the problem is with this review. It doesn't matter if the M3 finished last and the IS-F first - they're all great cars. I'd be happy with any of them in my garage (provided somebody else pays for the fuel!).