Car Chat General discussion about Lexus, other auto manufacturers and automotive news.

Most Fuel-Efficient Luxury Brands

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-13-08, 04:58 PM
  #1  
encore888
Lexus Champion
Thread Starter
 
encore888's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: CA
Posts: 8,695
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Lightbulb Most Fuel-Efficient Luxury Brands

http://www.forbesautos.com/news/feat...rds-story.html

Ranking the Luxury Automakers on Fuel Efficiency

As a guidepost for how much ground each luxury automaker must cover by 2020 to meet the federal government's new CAFE standard, we've compiled what amount to fuel-economy scorecards for each luxury brand. The list ranks the average fuel economy for every fleet of 2008 models sold by major premium nameplates — 13 total. We excluded companies that sell fewer than 5,000 vehicles in the United States annually. Hummer didn't make the list either, because its H2 SUV is exempt from the Environmental Protection Agency's fuel-economy requirements for passenger vehicles.

Go to the slideshow for the full ranking of luxury automakers according to their corporate average fuel economies as calculated by ForbesAutos.com.
1. Lexus 20.51 mpg (8.71 kpl)
2. Volvo 20.44 mpg (8.68 kpl)
3. Acura 20.27 mpg (8.61 kpl)
4. Saab 19.41 mpg
5. Audi 19.28 mpg
6. Porsche 19.22 mpg
7. BMW 19.10 mpg
8. Jaguar
9. Infiniti
10. Cadillac

Also: Top 10 most fuel-efficient luxury cars:
http://www.forbesautos.com/advice/to...ars-story.html

And: Top 10 least-polluting luxury cars:
https://www.clublexus.com/forums/sho...east+polluting
encore888 is offline  
Old 04-13-08, 05:03 PM
  #2  
CK6Speed
Lexus Test Driver
iTrader: (1)
 
CK6Speed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: HI
Posts: 7,719
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

So that comes out to about what? $1000 of gas over a 5 year ownership between the top 10 luxury brands? That actually sounds pretty minimal for a luxury car ownership.
CK6Speed is offline  
Old 04-13-08, 05:11 PM
  #3  
LexFather
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Amazing Lexus is on top in another comparison. You would think Acura would be #1 offering no V-8s and 4 cylinders.

Big surprise with Volvo.

Infiniti and Caddy in the back, they need to seriously do something about fuel efficiency as they had made no strides in this area, though their products are much improved.
 
Old 04-13-08, 05:14 PM
  #4  
mmarshall
Lexus Fanatic
 
mmarshall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Virginia/D.C. suburbs
Posts: 91,008
Received 87 Likes on 86 Posts
Default

Mercedes would probably win the fuel-mileage contest if they would bring more of their Euro-diesels over here to the American market, but they, and, to a lesser extent, BMW and Audi, simply refuse to do so.
mmarshall is offline  
Old 04-13-08, 05:19 PM
  #5  
mmarshall
Lexus Fanatic
 
mmarshall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Virginia/D.C. suburbs
Posts: 91,008
Received 87 Likes on 86 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mmarshall
Mercedes would probably win the fuel-mileage contest if they would bring more of their Euro-diesels over here to the American market
Oops.....I might have spoken too soon. Looks like SICK just posted a thread on new Mercedes 4-cylinder diesels. The question, of course, is...will they bring them here to America?
mmarshall is offline  
Old 04-13-08, 05:27 PM
  #6  
TRDFantasy
Lexus Fanatic
 
TRDFantasy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: A better place
Posts: 7,285
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by CK6Speed
So that comes out to about what? $1000 of gas over a 5 year ownership between the top 10 luxury brands? That actually sounds pretty minimal for a luxury car ownership.
It has very little to do with actual gas savings and has a lot to do with perception. If Lexus uses this to it's advantage in its marketing, especially its hybrid marketing then it will help the perception of the Lexus brand.
TRDFantasy is offline  
Old 04-13-08, 05:31 PM
  #7  
kit cat
Moderator
iTrader: (6)
 
kit cat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: US
Posts: 6,571
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

wow, Volvo right behind Lexus w/o even having a hybrid.
kit cat is offline  
Old 04-13-08, 05:34 PM
  #8  
LexFather
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Originally Posted by Coco-bun
wow, Volvo right behind Lexus w/o even having a hybrid.
Yeah, that was a big surprise.
 
Old 04-13-08, 05:55 PM
  #9  
PhilipMSPT
Cycle Savant
iTrader: (5)
 
PhilipMSPT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: In rehab...
Posts: 21,527
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Not bad, considering that Lexus' top seller is an SUV...
PhilipMSPT is offline  
Old 04-13-08, 06:14 PM
  #10  
proximal
Driver
 
proximal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: CA
Posts: 108
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Coco-bun
wow, Volvo right behind Lexus w/o even having a hybrid.
Keep in mind that Volvo sells a lot of cars with smaller inline-5 engines.
proximal is offline  
Old 04-13-08, 08:27 PM
  #11  
SLegacy99
Lead Lap
 
SLegacy99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: MD
Posts: 4,511
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

BMW really? That can't be right behind Porsche. The only Porsche that really gulps down the fuel is the Cayenne versus the X5, X3, X6, 7 series, 6 series
SLegacy99 is offline  
Old 04-13-08, 08:39 PM
  #12  
Koma
Moderator

iTrader: (3)
 
Koma's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 4,809
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by mmarshall
Mercedes would probably win the fuel-mileage contest if they would bring more of their Euro-diesels over here to the American market, but they, and, to a lesser extent, BMW and Audi, simply refuse to do so.
That and they offer 6.3 V8s across almost the entire range.
Koma is offline  
Old 04-13-08, 08:54 PM
  #13  
SLegacy99
Lead Lap
 
SLegacy99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: MD
Posts: 4,511
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I think part of the problem with MB is that S class start with a 5.5L and that is killing the mileage. 14/21 for 0-60 performance that is Identical to the LS460 17/24.

I am surprised that we aren't seeing 6 cylinder full sized sedans and large SUVs. With the amount of power that are coming out of 6 cylinders it just makes sense now. Would be so bad if the LS took 6.5 seconds to hit 60 MPH instead of 5.5? Afterall, the first LS took 8 seconds. I just look at my parents who have money to spend, but they only want thte cars that are fuel efficient. And that seems to be Lexus.
SLegacy99 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
MBTC
IS - 2nd Gen (2006-2013)
21
05-25-23 03:07 AM
sam555
Hybrid Technology
24
01-15-19 10:38 AM
Jlacck
LS - 1st and 2nd Gen (1990-2000)
3
04-18-16 03:52 PM
djMaru
GS - 1st Gen (1993-1997)
2
07-13-11 12:00 PM
Lexus 4 ME
GX - 1st Gen (2004-2009)
5
03-03-09 08:40 AM



Quick Reply: Most Fuel-Efficient Luxury Brands



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:29 AM.