Suzuki makes Navi standard on 2009 SX4
#1
Speaks French in Russian
Thread Starter
Suzuki makes Navi standard on 2009 SX4
2009 Suzuki SX4 getting nav system as standard equipment
Integrated nav systems are cash cows for the automakers. We've discussed this here before. While you can run to the local Target and buy a perfectly useful portable unit for around two-hundred bucks, clicking the nav checkbox on a car or truck's option sheet will probably run you ten times as much. That's painful. For the 2009 model year, however, Suzuki's looking to give shoppers some relief by making touchscreen nav standard equipment in the four-door SX4 Sport and front-wheel-drive SX4 crossover (the enclosed PR makes no mention of the 4WD crossover, but we're assuming that it also benefits from this). This makes Suzuki the first automaker to offer the feature as standard equipment in a sub-$16,000 vehicle. What a novel concept: using desirable equipment as the carrot instead of the stick.
The flip-up unit, supplied by Garmin and dubbed "T.R.I.P", also delivers Bluetooth connectivity, features live traffic info, helps locate the lowest gas prices, and is pre-loaded with a number of points of interest. The automaker is even launching a social networking-type website where owners can upload and share their favorite routes and places to go. Will standard nav help Suzuki win over new customers? It sure isn't going to hurt. Given that the technology has dropped in price so precipitously, it's probably not even costing Suzuki too much in the grand scheme of things. And if the presence of that nav unit gets some fence-sitting new car shoppers to write out a check for at least $16,000, it's probably worth whatever it cost to integrate it into the base package. Maybe Suzuki's onto something.
The flip-up unit, supplied by Garmin and dubbed "T.R.I.P", also delivers Bluetooth connectivity, features live traffic info, helps locate the lowest gas prices, and is pre-loaded with a number of points of interest. The automaker is even launching a social networking-type website where owners can upload and share their favorite routes and places to go. Will standard nav help Suzuki win over new customers? It sure isn't going to hurt. Given that the technology has dropped in price so precipitously, it's probably not even costing Suzuki too much in the grand scheme of things. And if the presence of that nav unit gets some fence-sitting new car shoppers to write out a check for at least $16,000, it's probably worth whatever it cost to integrate it into the base package. Maybe Suzuki's onto something.
#2
Lexus Fanatic
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 7,864
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Impressive. There are still a good amount of LUXURY cars that have it as only an option.
Automakers do rip off the consumers in the Nav dept. Generally it's at least a $2k option and probably costs the automaker only a few hundred to add at most.
This will certainly bring needed attention to Suzuki. The SX4 really isn't a bad car anyway.
Automakers do rip off the consumers in the Nav dept. Generally it's at least a $2k option and probably costs the automaker only a few hundred to add at most.
This will certainly bring needed attention to Suzuki. The SX4 really isn't a bad car anyway.
#5
Lexus Fanatic
Good job Suzuki for making the NAV standard instead of ripping people off with it being a 2K+ option. That would certainly help sway my decision if choosing between a similiar car just like it that does not have NAV standard. NAV systems are no longer really that luxurious as they can be had in econo cars and portable systems that can be put in different cars can be had for $175-$300. If I was buying a new car I just can't justify wasting 2K or more on the NAV system option I will hardly ever use just because it looks cool or some other silly reason. If I need a NAV system then I will just get a much less expensive portable unit that I can put in any car I choose to drive instead of a way overpriced option being built into one car that can't be removed.
Maybe luxury automakers will get the message after Suzuki and most likely more less expensive cars/makes offer NAV standard that they seem a little petty making people pay for an extra 2K or more for an option that really should only costs about $200 to $400 and should be standard considering the cost of their expensive vehicles. Luxury is not being screwed over and having to keep ticking boxes and paying extra for a bunch of things that should be standard at that price range and are often standard on non luxury cars costing much less. It is odd to me that some people think that paying extra for a bunch of options that should be standard is somehow luxury or what is great about luxury cars. I can't believe some luxury makes have the nerve to charge extra for leather, metallic paint, HIDs, heated seats, heated mirrors, CD changers, etc when many other less expensive vehicles have this stuff standard and many inexpensive family sedans offer most of those features at no extra cost or that really expensive luxury flagships like S classes, A8, 7 series, LS460, etc still have NAV as an option you have to pay thousands extra for.
Maybe luxury automakers will get the message after Suzuki and most likely more less expensive cars/makes offer NAV standard that they seem a little petty making people pay for an extra 2K or more for an option that really should only costs about $200 to $400 and should be standard considering the cost of their expensive vehicles. Luxury is not being screwed over and having to keep ticking boxes and paying extra for a bunch of things that should be standard at that price range and are often standard on non luxury cars costing much less. It is odd to me that some people think that paying extra for a bunch of options that should be standard is somehow luxury or what is great about luxury cars. I can't believe some luxury makes have the nerve to charge extra for leather, metallic paint, HIDs, heated seats, heated mirrors, CD changers, etc when many other less expensive vehicles have this stuff standard and many inexpensive family sedans offer most of those features at no extra cost or that really expensive luxury flagships like S classes, A8, 7 series, LS460, etc still have NAV as an option you have to pay thousands extra for.
#6
Lexus Champion
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: California
Posts: 1,832
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It is a good thing for the consumers, only if Suzuki doesn't raise up the MSRP of the car by $1500 in order to make up the cost of integrating this navigation system.
#7
Pole Position
These are the best news I've heard in a while. This will definitely make manufacturers like Mitsubishi, Subaru, Nissan to think about their future strategies and than hopefully they will force Toyota and Honda to think trough too.
Trending Topics
#8
Lexus Fanatic
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 7,864
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The SX4 is the next class up (Corolla, Civic, ect..). Although, the SX4 offers more for the money in the same fashion as Hyundai.
It is a good car that will be overlooked because of the "Suzuki" badge glued to it. That's why this standard Nav will be a great attention grabber.
#9
Guest
Posts: n/a
Good job Suzuki for making the NAV standard instead of ripping people off with it being a 2K+ option. That would certainly help sway my decision if choosing between a similiar car just like it that does not have NAV standard. NAV systems are no longer really that luxurious as they can be had in econo cars and portable systems that can be put in different cars can be had for $175-$300. If I was buying a new car I just can't justify wasting 2K or more on the NAV system option I will hardly ever use just because it looks cool or some other silly reason. If I need a NAV system then I will just get a much less expensive portable unit that I can put in any car I choose to drive instead of a way overpriced option being built into one car that can't be removed.
Maybe luxury automakers will get the message after Suzuki and most likely more less expensive cars/makes offer NAV standard that they seem a little petty making people pay for an extra 2K or more for an option that really should only costs about $200 to $400 and should be standard considering the cost of their expensive vehicles. Luxury is not being screwed over and having to keep ticking boxes and paying extra for a bunch of things that should be standard at that price range and are often standard on non luxury cars costing much less. It is odd to me that some people think that paying extra for a bunch of options that should be standard is somehow luxury or what is great about luxury cars. I can't believe some luxury makes have the nerve to charge extra for leather, metallic paint, HIDs, heated seats, heated mirrors, CD changers, etc when many other less expensive vehicles have this stuff standard and many inexpensive family sedans offer most of those features at no extra cost or that really expensive luxury flagships like S classes, A8, 7 series, LS460, etc still have NAV as an option you have to pay thousands extra for.
Maybe luxury automakers will get the message after Suzuki and most likely more less expensive cars/makes offer NAV standard that they seem a little petty making people pay for an extra 2K or more for an option that really should only costs about $200 to $400 and should be standard considering the cost of their expensive vehicles. Luxury is not being screwed over and having to keep ticking boxes and paying extra for a bunch of things that should be standard at that price range and are often standard on non luxury cars costing much less. It is odd to me that some people think that paying extra for a bunch of options that should be standard is somehow luxury or what is great about luxury cars. I can't believe some luxury makes have the nerve to charge extra for leather, metallic paint, HIDs, heated seats, heated mirrors, CD changers, etc when many other less expensive vehicles have this stuff standard and many inexpensive family sedans offer most of those features at no extra cost or that really expensive luxury flagships like S classes, A8, 7 series, LS460, etc still have NAV as an option you have to pay thousands extra for.
A lot of people still don't want it and would rather a choice.
Will there be a "change" of what equipment is standard in a car? Possibly. Sort of how A/C and Power everything is standard in most cars today. Maybe NAV will slowly be added to that list.
#10
Lexus Fanatic
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 7,864
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Well I guess before I accuse luxury makers of anything, do the majority of people really want it? I am Not sure. I was one of the people that thought it was a gimmick but I do see myself buying cars with NAV from now on.
A lot of people still don't want it and would rather a choice.
Will there be a "change" of what equipment is standard in a car? Possibly. Sort of how A/C and Power everything is standard in most cars today. Maybe NAV will slowly be added to that list.
A lot of people still don't want it and would rather a choice.
Will there be a "change" of what equipment is standard in a car? Possibly. Sort of how A/C and Power everything is standard in most cars today. Maybe NAV will slowly be added to that list.
But the price of the car shouldn't be offset by more than $400 or so.
Also, a Nav unit shouldn't take manual controls away (climate/audio). This is one of the things that bug me the most. Some cars, for example, only let you control climate fan speed through the nav screen which takes more steps to complete.
#11
Guest
Posts: n/a
I guess it would depend on the standard/base price of the car. If automakers stop ripping people off with the cost of the Nav option, then I think most people would prefer to have it standard even if they barely use it.
But the price of the car shouldn't be offset by more than $400 or so.
Also, a Nav unit shouldn't take manual controls away (climate/audio). This is one of the things that bug me the most. Some cars, for example, only let you control climate fan speed through the nav screen which takes more steps to complete.
But the price of the car shouldn't be offset by more than $400 or so.
Also, a Nav unit shouldn't take manual controls away (climate/audio). This is one of the things that bug me the most. Some cars, for example, only let you control climate fan speed through the nav screen which takes more steps to complete.
I believe this NAV unit in the Suzuki is basically a Garmin system you can buy in the store. They just have it installed in the car (cannot be removed).
#12
Lexus Fanatic
Well I guess before I accuse luxury makers of anything, do the majority of people really want it? I am Not sure. I was one of the people that thought it was a gimmick but I do see myself buying cars with NAV from now on.
A lot of people still don't want it and would rather a choice.
Will there be a "change" of what equipment is standard in a car? Possibly. Sort of how A/C and Power everything is standard in most cars today. Maybe NAV will slowly be added to that list.
A lot of people still don't want it and would rather a choice.
Will there be a "change" of what equipment is standard in a car? Possibly. Sort of how A/C and Power everything is standard in most cars today. Maybe NAV will slowly be added to that list.
Car manufactures have to spend alot of extra money and resources to design and engineer different dashes, electronics, buttons, and switches for NAV/non NAV models where they could save a bunch of money and just make NAV standard so they don't have 2 different designs. I would not mind paying an extra 2 or 3 hundred for this but that is about it. I guess since they overcharge so much on NAV systems in their cars they somehow worked the numbers where they still make a profit even if they have to spend a bunch of money/resources designing and integrating two different dashes. Once more and more less expensive cars have NAV standard or only a 2 or 3 hundred dollar option customers are going to complain more about NAV being 2K or more extra and many may just say they know they are getting ripped off and not get it.
#13
Lexus Fanatic
Now, Suzuki needs to come up with an answer to why AWD is not offered in the SX4 sedan...only the hatchback? The Suzuki reps at the D.C. auto show, when I asked them that, were clueless.
#14
Lexus Fanatic
back in the day, cd players cost $200 extra. now they're standard.
now it's time for the navigation to be standard.
this just looks like a simple $200 portable unit bolted into a dash compartment.
now it's time for the navigation to be standard.
this just looks like a simple $200 portable unit bolted into a dash compartment.
#15
Lexus Fanatic
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 7,864
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Only expensive cars have fully integrated/encased nav screens. Check out a Civic with Nav and it is clearly just a square Nav inserted into a square whole in the dash.