Car Chat General discussion about Lexus, other auto manufacturers and automotive news.

GM President: Buyers don't know Saturn brand

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-14-08, 10:58 AM
  #16  
Faymester
Lexus Fanatic
 
Faymester's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 7,468
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

My friend had an Ion redline and I drove it around for a couple months while I reminded myself how to drive a stick. Not a bad car. I wasn't terribly impressed with the materials but it wasn't nearly as bad as some other things I've had to drive.

When he was getting rid of the Ion, I went with him to look at the Sky. I was rasonably impressed with the Sky; it was better than I thought it would have been even though it was missing a couple features I would have liked it to have.

But when you think 'roadster' ... I think 'saturn' isn't a logical jump for most people.

AND, there aren't even that many dealerships, we drove nearly an hr to get to the nearest one (most dealerships for us are within 10 - 15 min max). So marketing asside, even if you DO concider Saturn ... do you even know where to go to get one? And are you willing to drive that far just to see if you like it? - maybe that's just the area I live in though ... how many of you know where a Saturn dealership is?
Faymester is offline  
Old 05-14-08, 02:06 PM
  #17  
mmarshall
Lexus Fanatic
 
mmarshall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Virginia/D.C. suburbs
Posts: 91,477
Received 88 Likes on 87 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Faymester
My friend had an Ion redline and I drove it around for a couple months while I reminded myself how to drive a stick. Not a bad car. I wasn't terribly impressed with the materials but it wasn't nearly as bad as some other things I've had to drive.
You didn't find the ION's center-mount gauges maddening? I do. And, as you note, it had toy-car plastics inside.

I went with him to look at the Sky. I was reasonably impressed with the Sky; it was better than I thought it would have been even though it was missing a couple features I would have liked it to have.

But when you think 'roadster' ... I think 'saturn' isn't a logical jump for most people.
Yes, the Sky is fun to drive, has a turbo option, and, IMO, looks somewhat better than its brother Pontiac Solstice. But the Sky has some cheap materials inside (better than the Ion's, I'll admit), is not particularly well-assembled, has a manual top that is much harder to operate than the Miata's, lacks significant rollover protection, and, according to Consumer Reports, has been well below average in reliability.
mmarshall is offline  
Old 05-14-08, 02:31 PM
  #18  
rsantiago
Pole Position
 
rsantiago's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Carson, California currently in Makati City, PI
Posts: 380
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I think GM's biggest problem is their executives seem to care more about the $$$ rather than producing a quality car, GM is run by a bunch of bean counters.

I wonder how GM would be like if Lutz was CEO instead of Wagner ??
rsantiago is offline  
Old 05-14-08, 02:33 PM
  #19  
Threxx
Lexus Champion
 
Threxx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 3,474
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by rsantiago
I think GM's biggest problem is their executives seem to care more about the $$$ rather than producing a quality car, GM is run by a bunch of bean counters.
It seems that has changed recently for the better, as has their hindrance by the union (though not entirely, at least partially) and retirees.
Threxx is offline  
Old 05-14-08, 04:23 PM
  #20  
Faymester
Lexus Fanatic
 
Faymester's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 7,468
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mmarshall
You didn't find the ION's center-mount gauges maddening? I do. And, as you note, it had toy-car plastics inside.
omg yes that did drive me insane! .. but it wasn't my car so how mad could I get


Originally Posted by mmarshall
Yes, the Sky is fun to drive, has a turbo option, and, IMO, looks somewhat better than its brother Pontiac Solstice. But the Sky has some cheap materials inside (better than the Ion's, I'll admit), is not particularly well-assembled, has a manual top that is much harder to operate than the Miata's, lacks significant rollover protection, and, according to Consumer Reports, has been well below average in reliability.
The manual top was one of the things I wasn't a fan of for sure. We didn't try and rollovers nor did we have it long enough to see how reliable it would be.

HOWEVER, as a friends car that you get to borrow, it seemed like a fun idea.
Faymester is offline  
Old 05-14-08, 05:22 PM
  #21  
JessePS
Lexus Test Driver

 
JessePS's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: QC/FRANCE
Posts: 8,349
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I heard a while ago. GM wanted to rebadge the Saab as a Saturn lol
JessePS is offline  
Old 05-14-08, 05:32 PM
  #22  
geko29
Super Moderator
Senior Moderator
 
geko29's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: IL
Posts: 8,053
Received 311 Likes on 239 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mmarshall
GM had a great winning formula in the 90's with the plastic-bodied S-Series cars (I owned one), and gradually started ruining the division in 1999 with the L-series. It's been downhill ever since.
You could not be more right. About 5 years ago, I got an L200 as a rental, and it's absolutely one of the worst cars I've ever driven in my life. At that time, I drove an E150 for a living, and getting back in that 5,000lb beast with a crappy V6 felt like taking a Ferrari out for a spin in comparison to that awful Saturn.
geko29 is offline  
Old 05-14-08, 06:03 PM
  #23  
mmarshall
Lexus Fanatic
 
mmarshall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Virginia/D.C. suburbs
Posts: 91,477
Received 88 Likes on 87 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by geko29
You could not be more right. About 5 years ago, I got an L200 as a rental, and it's absolutely one of the worst cars I've ever driven in my life. At that time, I drove an E150 for a living, and getting back in that 5,000lb beast with a crappy V6 felt like taking a Ferrari out for a spin in comparison to that awful Saturn.
In July 1999, as a Saturn SL-2 owner, I was invited, as a select group of customers by the Saturn dealership I had ordered my SL-2 from (perhaps because they knew I was one of the more car-savvy ones), to come up for a special presentation of the then-brand-new L-series and help evaluate it. Its interior had OK fit and finish, and the V6 was peppy, but that was about it. Brand-new, right off the truck that day, the V6 L300 I test-drove had wind noise from ill-fitting doors and windows, multiple dash/body rattles and creaks, especially over bumps, warps/shimmies in the brake rotors, and numb power steering. I also noticed that the rear fenders were metal, unlike the S-series, and the Opel-derived automatic transmission lacked the nice, handy spin-off transmission filter the S-series cars had.

I'll never forget that evening. From this day, I still remember it as the start of Saturn's long drop downhill.
mmarshall is offline  
Old 05-14-08, 06:56 PM
  #24  
Stormwind
Racer
 
Stormwind's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: CA
Posts: 1,935
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mmarshall
Opel-derived automatic transmission lacked the nice, handy spin-off transmission filter the S-series cars had.
.
Can you go in detail on what this spin off transmission filter is? What does it do and what are the advantages over the traditional tranny?
Stormwind is offline  
Old 05-14-08, 10:32 PM
  #25  
Iceman
Lexus Champion
 
Iceman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Redondo Beach, CA
Posts: 2,212
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mmarshall
I'll never forget that evening. From this day, I still remember it as the start of Saturn's long drop downhill.
I realize that to you, that moment marked the start of the decline. I saw it quite a bit before that--I won't got into the VERY long story, but as early as 1994 it was clear that Saturn was getting diluted as a brand and they were losing the magic. It may be just because I was deeply into the Saturn brand (I was made an honorary salesman at my local dealer due to the number of referalls I brought in, and I was in pretty regular communication with Saturn's lead engineer due to some research projects I did in college) that I saw the rot starting from within. For you, it took as long as 1999 to see the introduction of a very non-Saturn product, but of course the corporate decisions that led up to that car being designed, produced, marketed, etc. were set in motion a number of years earlier.
Iceman is offline  
Old 05-15-08, 06:23 AM
  #26  
mmarshall
Lexus Fanatic
 
mmarshall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Virginia/D.C. suburbs
Posts: 91,477
Received 88 Likes on 87 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Iceman
I realize that to you, that moment marked the start of the decline. I saw it quite a bit before that--I won't got into the VERY long story, but as early as 1994 it was clear that Saturn was getting diluted as a brand and they were losing the magic. It may be just because I was deeply into the Saturn brand (I was made an honorary salesman at my local dealer due to the number of referalls I brought in, and I was in pretty regular communication with Saturn's lead engineer due to some research projects I did in college) that I saw the rot starting from within. For you, it took as long as 1999 to see the introduction of a very non-Saturn product, but of course the corporate decisions that led up to that car being designed, produced, marketed, etc. were set in motion a number of years earlier.

Thanks, Iceman..........I suspected that was the case. Leave it to GM to screw something up........they do it every time. Let's hope they don't screw up the recent advances they've made in SOME of their interiors.
mmarshall is offline  
Old 05-15-08, 06:39 AM
  #27  
mmarshall
Lexus Fanatic
 
mmarshall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Virginia/D.C. suburbs
Posts: 91,477
Received 88 Likes on 87 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Stormwind
Can you go in detail on what this spin off transmission filter is? What does it do and what are the advantages over the traditional tranny?


The Saturn spin-off transmission filter, which was about the size and shape of a regular oil filter, was patented and used almost exclusively on Saturn S-series models, from 1990 until the Ion replaced the S-series. It took the place of a regular automatic transmission filter, which, in order to change fluid or flush, you had to take off with numerous screws and gaskets. The spin-off filter made it MUCH easier to do transmission service because it was just like an oil change. All you did was open a transmission drain plug, let the old transmission fluid run out, unscrew the transmission filter, take out the magnets that caught the metal particles, clean off the magnets, put the magnets back into a new filter, put a thin coat of transmission fluid on the new filter's O-ring, screw the new filter back on, refill the transmission with new fluid, and Bingo, you were ready to go. Once in a while, a careless technician/mechanic would get the oil and transmission filters and drain plugs mixed up and unscrew the wrong one, but even so, it was not big deal, and only took a few minutes to correct the problem because both were so simple.

Last edited by mmarshall; 05-15-08 at 06:43 AM.
mmarshall is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
LexFather
Car Chat
8
01-25-09 07:23 AM
videcormeum
Car Chat
16
06-18-05 12:21 PM
LexFather
Car Chat
3
01-12-05 07:06 PM



Quick Reply: GM President: Buyers don't know Saturn brand



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:15 PM.