Originally Posted by knihc2008

I wonder if the new E-Class Coupe is actually based on the E class now or still based on the C class and will sell for way more money because of the badge.

Because if it's based on the E then I see it being way more expensive than the CLK was.

Originally Posted by drunk_dave

people, quality and reliability are two diffrent things. quality is how good are the materials how well will they stand up to the test of time, how nice are they to the touch? etc. I have rearly seen a mb with worn out leather or a cracked dash on the other hand the leather in my is looked like **** after only a couple k. reliability is how well is the product designed where was money cut where was it thrown at. older mercs may have had reliability problems i wont deny but the new ones are leaps into the right direction.

Originally Posted by Ice350

Although I understand your point, some people see things differently. For me, reliability is part of quality. I wouldn't buy anything I know is going to give me less than average reliability.

Originally Posted by IS-SV

I won't miss it, especially since I know it's based on the old C-class which was not one of Mercedes better cars.

Originally Posted by DustinV

It was based on the C class chassis, that's about it. The suspension and other systems for the CLK would have been different to suit the character of that car. Besides, the last generation C class chassis was pretty solid and proven. The car itself I suppose wasn't bad but not really competitive enough. Not the case with the current C class, which is phenomenal. I miss my previous C200 CDI!