Car Chat General discussion about Lexus, other auto manufacturers and automotive news.

Nissan sees loss, to cut jobs . . .

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-09-09, 12:05 AM
  #1  
dsp979
Lead Lap
Thread Starter
 
dsp979's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: CA
Posts: 715
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default Nissan sees loss, to cut jobs . . .

Article dated Feb. 9, 2009:

Nissan to slash 20,000 jobs and sees annual loss
By YURI KAGEYAMA
AP Business Writer
TOKYO (AP) — Nissan sank into a loss for the fiscal third quarter and forecast its first full-year loss in nearly a decade on Monday, forcing Japan’s third-biggest automaker to slash 20,000 jobs, or 8.5 percent of its global work force.
‘‘The global auto industry is in turmoil, and Nissan is no exception,’’ Chief Executive Carlos Ghosn told reporters in Tokyo.
Nissan Motor Co. now expects a 265 billion yen ($2.9 billion) net loss for the fiscal year through March — the first time in nine years it’s tumbling into an annual loss.
The maker of the Z sports car and the March compact reported a net loss of 83.2 billion yen for the October-December period, a reversal from the 132.2 billion yen profit it earned the same period the previous year. That was its first quarterly net loss since it began reporting quarterly earnings in 2003.
Like other Japanese automakers, Nissan has been battered by the global slump and the U.S. credit crunch, which has undermined sales in its vital North American market. A strong yen also ate into profits by eroding overseas earnings when converted back to yen.
As one key step in response to the dismal results, Ghosn said Nissan’s global work force will be reduced by 20,000 through March 2010, to 215,000 from 235,000.
Directors on the board will forego bonus pay for the year ending March. Their salaries, as well as the salaries of corporate officers, will be reduced by 10 percent, while managers’ salaries will be reduced by 5 percent, the company said.
Nissan sold 731,000 vehicles worldwide in the quarter ending Dec. 31, down 18.6 percent from the same period a year earlier.
Just another victim of the global downturn, I guess.

Last edited by dsp979; 02-09-09 at 12:56 AM.
dsp979 is offline  
Old 02-09-09, 12:40 AM
  #2  
LexFather
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

They slashed jobs when Ghosen came along nearly 10 years ago. I hope they turn it around as their products and lineups continue to improve.
 
Old 02-09-09, 02:54 AM
  #3  
mmarshall
Lexus Fanatic
 
mmarshall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Virginia/D.C. suburbs
Posts: 91,247
Received 87 Likes on 86 Posts
Default

What do 20,000 laid-off workers mean? 20,000 potential new cars (probably from Nissan itself) that will NOT be sold. Laid-off workers can't buy new cars, which companies desperately need to sell to stay in buisness.

One of these days, the bean-counters at the auto companies will figure that out, and think twice before issuing those pink-slips. They can't have their cake and eat it, too.
mmarshall is offline  
Old 02-09-09, 04:12 AM
  #4  
GS300Rich
Lexus Fanatic
 
GS300Rich's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Florida
Posts: 9,392
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

How many of those 20k workers would have bought new cars in this economic environment?
GS300Rich is offline  
Old 02-09-09, 08:55 AM
  #5  
Trexus
Moderator
 
Trexus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: California
Posts: 4,326
Received 54 Likes on 31 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mmarshall
What do 20,000 laid-off workers mean? 20,000 potential new cars (probably from Nissan itself) that will NOT be sold. Laid-off workers can't buy new cars, which companies desperately need to sell to stay in buisness.

One of these days, the bean-counters at the auto companies will figure that out, and think twice before issuing those pink-slips. They can't have their cake and eat it, too.
Hey, hey, hey, I take offense with your comment of bean-counters. I know your kidding but the reality is a company needs to survive and by laying off employees that alleviates some of the expenses that the company can no longer afford.

Salaries and wages expense is the number one or number two second to cost of goods sold that most companies incur.

Obviously you're not an accountant and that you don't understand the language of business. That's okay, that's what accountants are for...
Trexus is offline  
Old 02-09-09, 10:04 AM
  #6  
mmarshall
Lexus Fanatic
 
mmarshall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Virginia/D.C. suburbs
Posts: 91,247
Received 87 Likes on 86 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Trexus
Hey, hey, hey, I take offense with your comment of bean-counters. I know your kidding but the reality is a company needs to survive and by laying off employees that alleviates some of the expenses that the company can no longer afford.

Salaries and wages expense is the number one or number two second to cost of goods sold that most companies incur.

Obviously you're not an accountant and that you don't understand the language of business. That's okay, that's what accountants are for...
Relax. My comments were not aimed at you personally. I understand where you are coming from, the complexities of modern buisness, and what it costs to keep workers on board, but there is nothing untrue about the statements I made. Because most factory employees buy from their own company, each worker that an auto manufacturer lays off generally means one (potential) less new-vehicle sale, at least until that person is re-hired. That is a fact, not an opinion. And auto firms, in general, HAVE to sell new vehicles to stay in buisness. I stand with my comments.

Last edited by mmarshall; 02-09-09 at 10:17 AM.
mmarshall is offline  
Old 02-09-09, 10:10 AM
  #7  
IS-SV
Lexus Fanatic
 
IS-SV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: tech capital
Posts: 14,100
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Nissan workers tend to buy cars with deep discounts and little profit for the company. But really this bad news is more about the general economy and how it impacts all the auto makers.
IS-SV is offline  
Old 02-09-09, 10:16 AM
  #8  
mmarshall
Lexus Fanatic
 
mmarshall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Virginia/D.C. suburbs
Posts: 91,247
Received 87 Likes on 86 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by IS-SV
Nissan workers tend to buy cars with deep discounts and little profit for the company. But really this bad news is more about the general economy and how it impacts all the auto makers.
In Nissan's case, it isn't just Nissan....it's their Renault ownership also.

Yes, auto workers do get a discount, but with companies as large as Nissan and Renault and the number of workers they have, those "little" profits can add up. Fewer workers mean fewer sales.
mmarshall is offline  
Old 02-09-09, 10:16 AM
  #9  
Big Andy
Pole Position
 
Big Andy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 2,798
Received 7 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Nissan, like most car manufacturers, allows employees and their family to buy new cars at a large discount on list price. Even if all 20,000 employees bought two new cars the profits realised for the company would not go anywhere near offsetting the costs involved in their employment.

If the way to a profitable car business was as simple as employing people to buy your cars, GM and Ford would have workforces in the millions.
Big Andy is offline  
Old 02-09-09, 10:19 AM
  #10  
Big Andy
Pole Position
 
Big Andy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 2,798
Received 7 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mmarshall

Yes, auto workers do get a discount, but with companies as large as Nissan and Renault and the number of workers they have, those "little" profits can add up. Fewer workers mean fewer sales.
That's the point though - they are making a loss - there are no "little" profits - especially in discounted sales.
Big Andy is offline  
Old 02-09-09, 10:20 AM
  #11  
mmarshall
Lexus Fanatic
 
mmarshall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Virginia/D.C. suburbs
Posts: 91,247
Received 87 Likes on 86 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Big Andy
If the way to a profitable car business was as simple as employing people to buy your cars, GM and Ford would have workforces in the millions.
I agree. It's not necessarily that simple. I wasn't trying to illustrate the whole picture.....only one part of it. Still, fewer workers mean fewer sales. And if OTHER companies are laying off, too, as is happening with today's economy, an auto firm can't rely on Laid-Off Joe Blow's neighbor down the street for a sale either.
mmarshall is offline  
Old 02-09-09, 10:27 AM
  #12  
IS-SV
Lexus Fanatic
 
IS-SV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: tech capital
Posts: 14,100
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by mmarshall
In Nissan's case, it isn't just Nissan....it's their Renault ownership also.

Yes, auto workers do get a discount, but with companies as large as Nissan and Renault and the number of workers they have, those "little" profits can add up. Fewer workers mean fewer sales.
It's a poor way to generate revenue with low profit margin contribution. Justifying excess workers this way will never fly with a strong board of directors.

Another example of the classic, "making it up with volume" approach is the Big 3, with their addiction to fleet/rental car sales, again low profit.
IS-SV is offline  
Old 02-09-09, 10:27 AM
  #13  
LexFather
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Originally Posted by mmarshall
I agree. It's not necessarily that simple. I wasn't trying to illustrate the whole picture.....only one part of it. Still, fewer workers mean fewer sales. And if OTHER companies are laying off, too, as is happening with today's economy, an auto firm can't rely on Laid-Off Joe Blow's neighbor down the street for a sale either.
Yeah but Nissan with Ghosn at the helm is about cutting costs. I am worried about the next set of products and Infiniti's development in Europe.
 
Old 02-09-09, 10:27 AM
  #14  
Big Andy
Pole Position
 
Big Andy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 2,798
Received 7 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mmarshall
I agree. It's not necessarily that simple. I wasn't trying to illustrate the whole picture.....only one part of it. Still, fewer workers mean fewer sales. And if OTHER companies are laying off, too, as is happening with today's economy, an auto firm can't rely on Laid-Off Joe Blow's neighbor down the street for a sale either.
I know what you mean - we become trapped in a cycle of layoffs, reduced consumer confidence, reduced spending, more layoffs etc. etc. It's breaking the vicious cycle that is the difficult thing - and that's where the arguments about economic stimulous packages come in - will they restore some confidence?
Big Andy is offline  
Old 02-09-09, 10:33 AM
  #15  
IS-SV
Lexus Fanatic
 
IS-SV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: tech capital
Posts: 14,100
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Big Andy
I know what you mean - we become trapped in a cycle of layoffs, reduced consumer confidence, reduced spending, more layoffs etc. etc. It's breaking the vicious cycle that is the difficult thing - and that's where the arguments about economic stimulous packages come in - will they restore some confidence?
What you are describing sounds exactly like a recession, I agree with your observations.
IS-SV is offline  


Quick Reply: Nissan sees loss, to cut jobs . . .



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:53 PM.