Car Chat General discussion about Lexus, other auto manufacturers and automotive news.

BMW & Mercedes-Benz reportedly considering four-cylinders in US, pending new fuel ...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-27-09, 06:02 PM
  #16  
I8ABMR
Lexus Fanatic
 
I8ABMR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Waiting for next track day
Posts: 22,608
Received 102 Likes on 67 Posts
Default

I am not opposed to 4 cylinder motors, I just prefer them with a manual transmission.
I8ABMR is offline  
Old 04-27-09, 06:16 PM
  #17  
mmarshall
Lexus Fanatic
 
mmarshall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Virginia/D.C. suburbs
Posts: 91,335
Received 87 Likes on 86 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by DASHOCKER
Choices is what tier 1 automakers are supposed to provide to the customer...

I agree, but choices, though, cost money to offer. The budget situation with a lot of carmakers is limiting what will soon be offered.....GM is a prime example, where whole divisions may soon be gone.

The real problem, and no one seems to be addressing it, like I said years ago: The luxury-nameplate auto makers should have offered less-expensive models with smaller engines several years ago, when they HAD the money, resourses, and budget to do so. BMW, for instance, brought out the 1-series, but it was WAY too overpriced (virtually the same as the 3-series) because it used the 3-series engines instead of a cheaper four. Mercedes did a nice little hatchback C230 Kompressor coupe, but simply didn't keep it here long enough.....you can't sell what you don't offer. Audi didn't introduce the A3 here until years after it should have.

Another problem, to a large extent, is the "image" factor. Luxury-car marketers, and a large part of the auto press, seem to think that that there is something wrong with upmarket vehicles with 4-cylinder powertrains, and that they won't sell in the U.S. The Audi A3, alone, among others, proved them wrong. Saab, an upmarket nameplate, has been doing (mostly) 4-cylinder turbo models for decades, and is still plugging away, although their popularity in the U.S. has not been what the German and Japanese makes are.
mmarshall is offline  
Old 04-27-09, 06:41 PM
  #18  
bitkahuna
Lexus Fanatic
iTrader: (20)
 
bitkahuna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Present
Posts: 74,989
Received 2,465 Likes on 1,617 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 1SICKLEX
Suddenly the Lexus HS looks like a genius move (again).
Originally Posted by mmarshall
I think the HS is a marvelous idea. I've said for years (and took some flak for it here on CL) that Lexus should do vehicles with smaller engines and four-bangers.
it may be genius or marvelous in theory, but in execution it's so ugly and cheap looking it is NOT a luxury car.

1. The vast majority of luxury cars sold are the entry level vehicles and people are more make a decision based on fuel economy.
i recently saw the original ES300. it looks WORLDS better looking than that HS250.

Lexus has proved here that people do want more economical luxury cars WITHOUT sacrificing the "luxury" part.
true, lexus has stood for 'prudent luxury' or something like that... but the HS250 misses at least half of that equation.

but you're probably right, maybe it will sell well...

Remember, America is the Germans most profitable market and that is b/c we love their big engine vehicles in comparison to Europe where the small engines are the vast majority of sales.
if that hasn't already changed, i believe it will soon. with all the discounts and credit collapse, i wouldn't think those brands are proftable in the u.s. right now. regardless, i expect the middle east and asia to still become by far the dominant markets for upscale vehicles.

america, we knew the then...

if competition and economic problems don't hurt enough, government regulation AND HUGE taxation are going to REALLY hurt.
bitkahuna is offline  
Old 04-28-09, 08:48 AM
  #19  
SLegacy99
Lead Lap
 
SLegacy99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: MD
Posts: 4,511
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

It's a changing world and that's not a bad thing.
SLegacy99 is offline  
Old 04-28-09, 09:38 AM
  #20  
IS-SV
Lexus Fanatic
 
IS-SV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: tech capital
Posts: 14,100
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by SLegacy99
It's a changing world and that's not a bad thing.
Yes, more specifically the US market is gradually changing, the rest of the Western world for example had already moved towards fuel efficient cars.
IS-SV is offline  
Old 04-28-09, 04:48 PM
  #21  
DustinV
Lexus Champion
 
DustinV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Stuttgart
Posts: 1,651
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Exactly. Give the people a choice.

They don't have to stop offering their 6 and 8 cylinder motors but they can bring over some smaller gasoline and diesel engines that are geared towards efficiency. Thus, the folks interested in fuel economy but who do not want to forgo luxury amenities can purchase a model that suits their needs while those looking for a more performance can go for the appropriate model from the higher end.
DustinV is offline  
Old 04-28-09, 05:39 PM
  #22  
mmarshall
Lexus Fanatic
 
mmarshall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Virginia/D.C. suburbs
Posts: 91,335
Received 87 Likes on 86 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by bitkahuna
it may be genius or marvelous in theory, but in execution it's so ugly and cheap looking it is NOT a luxury car.
Well, OK, I haven't seen it in person and can't comment first-hand, but, in pictures, it's a LONG way from the Corolla it's obviously based on.....just like the Infiniti G20 was a long way from a standard Sentra, and the Audi A3 a long way from a VW Golf.
mmarshall is offline  
Old 04-28-09, 08:22 PM
  #23  
Hoovey689
Moderator
iTrader: (16)
 
Hoovey689's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: California
Posts: 42,308
Received 125 Likes on 83 Posts
Default

What I'm excited for, is direct injection as a more common application for future engines
Hoovey689 is offline  
Old 04-29-09, 03:17 AM
  #24  
DASHOCKER
Lexus Fanatic
iTrader: (2)
 
DASHOCKER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: NYC
Posts: 12,191
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mmarshall
Well, OK, I haven't seen it in person and can't comment first-hand, but, in pictures, it's a LONG way from the Corolla it's obviously based on.....just like the Infiniti G20 was a long way from a standard Sentra, and the Audi A3 a long way from a VW Golf.
I saw it in person at the NYIAS and believe me when I tell you that the exterior screams Corolla. Hell it appears to be the same size w/o a ruler in hand. My gf thought that it was a new Corolla & I told her that it is the new baby Lexus.
DASHOCKER is offline  
Old 04-29-09, 09:18 PM
  #25  
Nextourer
Lexus Champion
 
Nextourer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: none
Posts: 4,192
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mmarshall
I agree, but choices, though, cost money to offer. The budget situation with a lot of carmakers is limiting what will soon be offered.....GM is a prime example, where whole divisions may soon be gone.

The real problem, and no one seems to be addressing it, like I said years ago: The luxury-nameplate auto makers should have offered less-expensive models with smaller engines several years ago, when they HAD the money, resourses, and budget to do so. BMW, for instance, brought out the 1-series, but it was WAY too overpriced (virtually the same as the 3-series) because it used the 3-series engines instead of a cheaper four. Mercedes did a nice little hatchback C230 Kompressor coupe, but simply didn't keep it here long enough.....you can't sell what you don't offer. Audi didn't introduce the A3 here until years after it should have.

Another problem, to a large extent, is the "image" factor. Luxury-car marketers, and a large part of the auto press, seem to think that that there is something wrong with upmarket vehicles with 4-cylinder powertrains, and that they won't sell in the U.S. The Audi A3, alone, among others, proved them wrong. Saab, an upmarket nameplate, has been doing (mostly) 4-cylinder turbo models for decades, and is still plugging away, although their popularity in the U.S. has not been what the German and Japanese makes are.
Not to mention the TSX but then again Acura is going to offer a TSX V6.
Nextourer is offline  
Old 04-29-09, 09:31 PM
  #26  
LexFather
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Originally Posted by DASHOCKER
I saw it in person at the NYIAS and believe me when I tell you that the exterior screams Corolla. Hell it appears to be the same size w/o a ruler in hand. My gf thought that it was a new Corolla & I told her that it is the new baby Lexus.
Agreed. I will wait till I see it in person but the styling will do NOTHING to help convince those that think they are just tarted up Toyotas. They didn't try hard enough.

Originally Posted by Nextourer
Not to mention the TSX but then again Acura is going to offer a TSX V6.
Thing is the TSX has that awfully weak I-4 that has LESS hp than before in a much larger car, nearly the size of the new TL. That said it clearly sells to people who want more space and don't mind being the slowest person in traffic.
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ffpowerLN
Car Chat
23
01-20-09 09:10 PM
rg_gibson
Car Chat
0
07-30-08 04:31 PM
GFerg
Car Chat
1
06-06-06 05:49 AM
GFerg
Car Chat
7
03-13-06 12:27 PM



Quick Reply: BMW & Mercedes-Benz reportedly considering four-cylinders in US, pending new fuel ...



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:52 PM.