View Poll Results: G35 vs C350
G35
39
54.17%
C350
33
45.83%
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 72. You may not vote on this poll
G35 vs C350
05-18-09, 07:13 AM
#61
[QUOTE=bad co;4530854]
Have you driven a recent model G35/G37?
I had the same doubts until I drove one and ended up buying one even though I was dead set on buying a 335i.
I had the same doubts until I drove one and ended up buying one even though I was dead set on buying a 335i.
05-18-09, 08:58 AM
#62
More on-topic: I'd choose the G35 over the C350. Although a gorgeous car, I can't see much that justifies the price vs the G35.
So far as turning heads, both cars are common enough that in stock form, neither will really excite the general public.
05-18-09, 11:09 AM
#64
Lexus Test Driver
If one is looking for value, the new Hyundai Genesis coupe is a better value than the Infinity G37. What the MB C-class has over the G37 cannot be seen on spec sheets. We are talking about small components, transmisson, chassis or alternator etc.
05-18-09, 12:15 PM
#65
Lexus Test Driver
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: CA
Posts: 1,279
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
^It's called attention to detail and design. Take the high strength steel cage used throughout the C350 - the 7-speed automatic, the solidness of the doors - it's a highly engineered vehicle. Not saying the g37 isn't, but there is a lot more to a car than simply just acceleration and handling figures. The c350 is a genuine tuetonic balance of comfort, sport and luxury. For some, that's all they need to be sold. Of course, I would look at the larger A4 and 3-Series BMW if I suddenly ran into $40,000, but that's just me. We all have our individual preferences.
Last edited by FKL; 05-18-09 at 12:19 PM.
05-18-09, 12:34 PM
#66
05-18-09, 02:11 PM
#67
I'm gonna put my five cents into this thread, for all its worth.
Now, I cant really comment on the new C class or the G37, because I havent had much experience with them... actually no experience at all with the new C.
However, my brother owned a 2002 C320 that I drove on many occasions, and there was simply nothing to like about the car. The exterior was blah and boring, but somewhat classy, and generally well built. The reliability was pretty good as well, for the major part - my parents got it for him with 40k, and it was sold with around 80k on the clock. The only thing that got replaced was the alternator, everything else was maintenance - battery, brakes, tires, etc.
The interior looked and felt cheap, everything was ugly, and there were a bunch of interior problems - the shade broke, cigarette lighters were failing, some lights and switches had problems. Interior comfort was non existant. The rear seat was a joke, perhaps even worse than the IS. The front seats were ok, but the driving positing was horrible, the door armrest wasnt comfortable at all when the seat is moved all the way back. I'm 6'4 and I just couldnt make myself comfortable in that car, and my brother is only 5'-11, and still the biggest reason he got rid of that car is because he could never feel comfortable inside.
The only positive thing I will say about the interior is it was rattle free. Thats it.
Now to the suspension, it wasnt sporty of luxury, just somewhere in the middle. Overall I cant complain, nor brag about it.
Now to the engine and drivetrain. The old 3.2 had very decent power, took off the line fast and accelerated very well, with no lag at all. It would feel a bit sluggish on the highway speeds - after 60mph. I guess that had to do with the gearing. Also it returned decent fuel mileage. The transmission however was jerky, and while it was fast to react and shift, the jerkiness it produced during shifts defenately do not belong in a premium car. On a side note, that is also a problem with BMW 5 series.
As far as the previous gen G35, I think it was an excellent car, overall the best bang for the buck, but it did have very cheap, horrible, fugly interior. The plastics inside looked like they belong in a chrysler, orange cluster lighting was downright fugly, and generally the controls sucked. Also the exterior while nicely curved and finished with great HID projector headlights and LED tails, was poorly painted - the paint would fade and show swirlmarks right away. But it drove great, had very good suspension and drivetrain, and was surprisingly roomy inside.
All in all, if I had to chose between the previous gen C and G, I'd go with the G. If you added previous gen IS300 and 330 into the mix, I'd still go with the G. But if you added a previous gen TL-type S in there, I'd pick the TL.
Today, if you took these same competitors, its a much harder decision. Of course, the new TL is out of the question because its too backwards and ugly, but IS, C, G, and 3 are better than ever, and theres another legit competitor - thats the new A4. If I had to chose between them, I'd do it in the following order
#1 - A4 - Just because its purely stunning and gorgeous
#2 - 335 - Because it has major *****, but its interior quality is pretty bad
#3 - IS350 - A nice overall package, nice performance, good looks, and great interior
#4 - G37 - A great overall package, but lagging behind A4 in looks, 335 in performance and IS350 in interior. Makes up for it with interior spaciousness, without compromising sportiness.
#5 - C class - Also a decent package, but lags behind the pack in performance and still seems to have cheap and crumpled interior. Reason I put it last is because I dont seem to find a single clear advantage it has over the rest of the pack.
Now, I cant really comment on the new C class or the G37, because I havent had much experience with them... actually no experience at all with the new C.
However, my brother owned a 2002 C320 that I drove on many occasions, and there was simply nothing to like about the car. The exterior was blah and boring, but somewhat classy, and generally well built. The reliability was pretty good as well, for the major part - my parents got it for him with 40k, and it was sold with around 80k on the clock. The only thing that got replaced was the alternator, everything else was maintenance - battery, brakes, tires, etc.
The interior looked and felt cheap, everything was ugly, and there were a bunch of interior problems - the shade broke, cigarette lighters were failing, some lights and switches had problems. Interior comfort was non existant. The rear seat was a joke, perhaps even worse than the IS. The front seats were ok, but the driving positing was horrible, the door armrest wasnt comfortable at all when the seat is moved all the way back. I'm 6'4 and I just couldnt make myself comfortable in that car, and my brother is only 5'-11, and still the biggest reason he got rid of that car is because he could never feel comfortable inside.
The only positive thing I will say about the interior is it was rattle free. Thats it.
Now to the suspension, it wasnt sporty of luxury, just somewhere in the middle. Overall I cant complain, nor brag about it.
Now to the engine and drivetrain. The old 3.2 had very decent power, took off the line fast and accelerated very well, with no lag at all. It would feel a bit sluggish on the highway speeds - after 60mph. I guess that had to do with the gearing. Also it returned decent fuel mileage. The transmission however was jerky, and while it was fast to react and shift, the jerkiness it produced during shifts defenately do not belong in a premium car. On a side note, that is also a problem with BMW 5 series.
As far as the previous gen G35, I think it was an excellent car, overall the best bang for the buck, but it did have very cheap, horrible, fugly interior. The plastics inside looked like they belong in a chrysler, orange cluster lighting was downright fugly, and generally the controls sucked. Also the exterior while nicely curved and finished with great HID projector headlights and LED tails, was poorly painted - the paint would fade and show swirlmarks right away. But it drove great, had very good suspension and drivetrain, and was surprisingly roomy inside.
All in all, if I had to chose between the previous gen C and G, I'd go with the G. If you added previous gen IS300 and 330 into the mix, I'd still go with the G. But if you added a previous gen TL-type S in there, I'd pick the TL.
Today, if you took these same competitors, its a much harder decision. Of course, the new TL is out of the question because its too backwards and ugly, but IS, C, G, and 3 are better than ever, and theres another legit competitor - thats the new A4. If I had to chose between them, I'd do it in the following order
#1 - A4 - Just because its purely stunning and gorgeous
#2 - 335 - Because it has major *****, but its interior quality is pretty bad
#3 - IS350 - A nice overall package, nice performance, good looks, and great interior
#4 - G37 - A great overall package, but lagging behind A4 in looks, 335 in performance and IS350 in interior. Makes up for it with interior spaciousness, without compromising sportiness.
#5 - C class - Also a decent package, but lags behind the pack in performance and still seems to have cheap and crumpled interior. Reason I put it last is because I dont seem to find a single clear advantage it has over the rest of the pack.
05-18-09, 03:35 PM
#68
Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 12,050
Likes: 0
Received 73 Likes
on
44 Posts
while it is clear that I am biased on the C350 seeing as how i own one, i will throw in a few points that make it uniquely a mercedes.
its the attention to detail, german precision
1) headlights that automatically increase in brightness at highway speeds to see further
2) When using the CD player: turning off the car will turn off the audio. When you start up the car again, the CD will be rewinded (sp?) about 5 seconds so you dont miss anything
3) When equipped with Pana Roof: When the rain sensing windshield wipers are activated, the roof automatically closes
4) brakes that automatically clinch together when rain sensing wipers are activated to dry them
5) an actual vent connected to HVAC syste in the glove box to keep things cool
6) brilliant 7 speed auto
7) nav directions that can be seen directly in the center of the guages
8) i think its the only car in this class that has cross drilled rotors
its the attention to detail, german precision
1) headlights that automatically increase in brightness at highway speeds to see further
2) When using the CD player: turning off the car will turn off the audio. When you start up the car again, the CD will be rewinded (sp?) about 5 seconds so you dont miss anything
3) When equipped with Pana Roof: When the rain sensing windshield wipers are activated, the roof automatically closes
4) brakes that automatically clinch together when rain sensing wipers are activated to dry them
5) an actual vent connected to HVAC syste in the glove box to keep things cool
6) brilliant 7 speed auto
7) nav directions that can be seen directly in the center of the guages
8) i think its the only car in this class that has cross drilled rotors
05-18-09, 03:44 PM
#69
Guest
Posts: n/a
Och, the C230 IMO was a complete POS, but I loved the design. I reviewed it and it was horrid to drive and quality was horrid as well.
The new one is a great step back in teh right direction.
Guys we are compared teh G35 to the C350, not coupes and not the G37.
The new one is a great step back in teh right direction.
Guys we are compared teh G35 to the C350, not coupes and not the G37.
05-18-09, 03:48 PM
#70
I didn't say C230, it was the C320. As far as the design standpoint, between the previous gen IS, C, 3, A4, TL, G - my favorite is the IS because its wickid followed by the TL, especially TL-S. The design of the previous gen 3 series of course deserves a praise, but the A4, C, and G were just so-so in my book. Not offensive or tacky, but too boring and conservative.
05-18-09, 06:07 PM
#74
Lexus Fanatic
