Car Chat General discussion about Lexus, other auto manufacturers and automotive news.

GM bankruptcy

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-03-09, 04:24 PM
  #136  
DASHOCKER
Lexus Fanatic
iTrader: (2)
 
DASHOCKER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: NYC
Posts: 12,191
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 1SICKLEX
You give it up. You are comparing a complete bailout, 2 companies in bankruptcy and loans of what over $50 billion to Toyota who is FINANCIALLY VERY VERY VERY sound who is asking for $2 billion. When they have more than 2 billion in the bank.

Its complete apples and oranges and this article was posted by people who tried to attack Toyota months ago (across different forums) who didn't begin to read what it said.

You do realize that was in March. Since then Chrysler and Gm are BANKRUPT. Toyota while reporting losses (like everyone else) is moving forward.

Has Toyota asked for more money since then?
Originally Posted by Trexus
You gotta be kinding me right? Toyota's finance unit borrowed $2 Billion dollars. That's pocket change for Toyota. Toyota can pay that back without a doubt. GM can not pay back the $50 Billion they received from us tax payers. Let's look at Toyota's financials shall we...

Fiscal Year Ending March 2005 - Net Income $10,900,000,000
Fiscal Year Ending March 2006 - Net Income $11,681,000,000
Fiscal Year Ending March 2007 - Net Income $13,927,000,000
Fiscal Year Ending March 2008 - Net Income $17,146,000,000
Fiscal Year Ending March 2009 - Net Loss <$4,491,000,000>

Toyota's current market cap is 123.77 Billion.
GM's current market cap is 500 Million (not even a billion)...weak...very weak...

http://finance.yahoo.com/q/is?s=TM&annual
http://research.scottrade.com/public...s.asp?period=A

Now let's look at GM's financials shall we...

Calendar Year 2002 Net Income of $1,736,000,000
Calendar Year 2003 Net Income of $3,822,000,000
Calendar Year 2004 Net Income of $2,805,000,000
Calendar Year 2005 Net Loss of <$10,567,000,000>
Calendar Year 2006 Net Loss of <$1,987,000,000>
Calendar Year 2007 Net Loss of <$38,732,000,000>
Calendar Year 2008 Net Loss of <$30,860,000,000>
1st Qtr. 2009 Net Loss of <$6,000,000,000>

As you can see Toyota is way more profitable than GM. Toyota is the big dawg...buddy...
Gotta love the diehards.. Have you guys taken up Economics during your college/high school years?? There is something called factors of production take off the Toyota/Lexus embroidered glasses for a moment & I will give you a brief synopsis. Toyota can make $50,000,000,000 for calender year 2009 but you forget about factors of production. The factors of production used to produce a good, in this case a Toyota, provide the basic measure of economic cost. The costs are measured by the amounts of land, labor & capital it requires. That $17 billion net icome for Toyomoco you posted for calender year 2008 is a lot of cash right Trexus? Toyota should be living large & in charge with that amount of paper. It is spent rather quickly.. Guess how? Let me give you guys an example.. You could pay me $2 per hour typing this post & still end up paying a lot for typing. Truth is, I type only about ten words a minute with a lot of misteaks. The cost of producing goods depends not only on the price of inputs (e.g. labor) but also on how much they produce. Toyota produces a lot of vehicles.. You guys pound on your chests everyday about them being the sales champs. Guess what? It comes at a price..
DASHOCKER is offline  
Old 06-03-09, 04:35 PM
  #137  
Pearlpower
Lexus Fanatic

iTrader: (2)
 
Pearlpower's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: California
Posts: 7,075
Likes: 0
Received 19 Likes on 15 Posts
Default

Comes down to simple terms, the American taxpayer gave $7 billion to Chrysler which no longer has to pay it back through their BK proceeding. Done deal. Thank you Americans.
Now Americans are once again told to bend over as we fork over $100 billion total for the industry.
At this time I care less about Toyota, who cares? If they were asking for American taxpayer money I would give them the same finger as I do to the so called American companies.

In my book, once you fail you take it upon yourself to get yourself up and running. No more welfare for those that put themselves in the position they are in. Bailouts should be placed on a ballot before any money goes into any industry. Case point California where we told the governor and legislator to $%^&*! off. More power to the people.
Pearlpower is offline  
Old 06-03-09, 08:53 PM
  #138  
4TehNguyen
Lexus Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
4TehNguyen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 26,058
Received 51 Likes on 46 Posts
Default

man this 31 year old kid they are putting in charge of dismantling GM:
1) no formal business training
2) no business or economics education
3) no automotive industry experience
4) never worked in private sector
5) didnt finish his Yale law degree

GM still failed with people that had most of the above experiences. Set sail for fail

wow despair.com is quick:
http://site.despair.com/governmentmotors/

Last edited by 4TehNguyen; 06-03-09 at 09:11 PM.
4TehNguyen is offline  
Old 06-03-09, 08:54 PM
  #139  
Trexus
Moderator
 
Trexus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: California
Posts: 4,326
Received 54 Likes on 31 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by DASHOCKER
Gotta love the diehards.. Have you guys taken up Economics during your college/high school years?? There is something called factors of production take off the Toyota/Lexus embroidered glasses for a moment & I will give you a brief synopsis. Toyota can make $50,000,000,000 for calender year 2009 but you forget about factors of production. The factors of production used to produce a good, in this case a Toyota, provide the basic measure of economic cost. The costs are measured by the amounts of land, labor & capital it requires. That $17 billion net icome for Toyomoco you posted for calender year 2008 is a lot of cash right Trexus? Toyota should be living large & in charge with that amount of paper. It is spent rather quickly.. Guess how? Let me give you guys an example.. You could pay me $2 per hour typing this post & still end up paying a lot for typing. Truth is, I type only about ten words a minute with a lot of misteaks. The cost of producing goods depends not only on the price of inputs (e.g. labor) but also on how much they produce. Toyota produces a lot of vehicles.. You guys pound on your chests everyday about them being the sales champs. Guess what? It comes at a price..
Are you an economics major? Thanks for teaching a CPA economics. Have you heard of JIT manufacturing, variable costing or absorption costing?

Fact of the matter is GM and ChyrCo are bankrupt. They are insolvent. They don't have enough money to pay their bills as they come due. GM made the wrong business moves and look where they are now. That's right; a burden to the U.S. taxpayers and hopelessly trying to make a come back. Who in their right mind will buy a GM car now? Warranties backed by the U.S. Government (think DMV, long lines at the Post Office, Immigration Office, Social Security Office or Internal Revenue Service)? Be my guest, let me know how that goes.

Last edited by Trexus; 06-04-09 at 12:32 AM.
Trexus is offline  
Old 06-03-09, 09:05 PM
  #140  
Trexus
Moderator
 
Trexus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: California
Posts: 4,326
Received 54 Likes on 31 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by DASHOCKER
That $17 billion net icome for Toyomoco you posted for calender year 2008 is a lot of cash right Trexus? Toyota should be living large & in charge with that amount of paper.
Man...you really don't know how accounting works do you? That $17 Billion net income gets closed into retained earnings. As of March 31, 2008 Toyota's retained earnings was at $123,850,000,000. Toyota's cash and cash equivalents alone was $17,600,000,000 at March 31, 2008

http://finance.yahoo.com/q/bs?s=TM&annual

Accounting is the language of business. I advise you to take some accounting classes so you can understand the language...

Last edited by Trexus; 06-03-09 at 09:49 PM.
Trexus is offline  
Old 06-03-09, 09:12 PM
  #141  
Pearlpower
Lexus Fanatic

iTrader: (2)
 
Pearlpower's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: California
Posts: 7,075
Likes: 0
Received 19 Likes on 15 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 4TehNguyen
man this 31 year old kid they are putting in charge of dismantling GM:
1) no formal business training
2) no business or economics education
3) no automotive industry experience
4) never worked in private sector
5) didnt finish his Yale law degree

GM still failed with people that had most of the above experiences. Set sail for fail
I once knew a San Diego State BS graduate that did not know how to put staples in a simple Swingline. Got fired 2 months later. Could tell you everything he learned to obtain his degree, though most of it never applied to real business.

I will take someone with street smarts and common sense over education anytime. As long as he knows the color RED and understands what the symbol - (minus) is, he will do just fine at GM.

Last edited by Pearlpower; 06-03-09 at 09:23 PM.
Pearlpower is offline  
Old 06-03-09, 09:29 PM
  #142  
bitkahuna
Lexus Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (20)
 
bitkahuna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Present
Posts: 74,991
Received 2,466 Likes on 1,618 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Trexus
Toyota did it on their own fair and square. Toyota was never a burden to any country's taxpayers. Toyota won fair and square
i HIGHLY doubt that's true. japans' MITI was HUGELY invested into japan's major corps for decades.
bitkahuna is online now  
Old 06-03-09, 09:52 PM
  #143  
Trexus
Moderator
 
Trexus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: California
Posts: 4,326
Received 54 Likes on 31 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by bitkahuna
i HIGHLY doubt that's true. japans' MITI was HUGELY invested into japan's major corps for decades.
MITI's investment in Toyota seems to have paid off...
Trexus is offline  
Old 06-04-09, 07:50 AM
  #144  
IS-SV
Lexus Fanatic
 
IS-SV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: tech capital
Posts: 14,100
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Trexus
Man...you really don't know how accounting works do you? That $17 Billion net income gets closed into retained earnings. As of March 31, 2008 Toyota's retained earnings was at $123,850,000,000. Toyota's cash and cash equivalents alone was $17,600,000,000 at March 31, 2008

http://finance.yahoo.com/q/bs?s=TM&annual

Accounting is the language of business. I advise you to take some accounting classes so you can understand the language...
I agree, LOL, that was some of the worst financial analysis that I've seen in decades. Better that some people stick to their day jobs.
IS-SV is offline  
Old 06-04-09, 07:52 AM
  #145  
LexFather
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

[/
 
Old 06-04-09, 08:40 AM
  #146  
DASHOCKER
Lexus Fanatic
iTrader: (2)
 
DASHOCKER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: NYC
Posts: 12,191
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by DASHOCKER
Gotta love the diehards.. Have you guys taken up Economics during your college/high school years?? There is something called factors of production. Take off the Toyota/Lexus embroidered glasses for a moment & I will give you a brief synopsis. Toyota can make $50,000,000,000 for calender year 2009 but you forget about factors of production. The factors of production used to produce a good, in this case a Toyota, provide the basic measure of economic cost. The costs are measured by the amounts of land, labor & capital it requires. That $17 billion net icome for Toyomoco you posted for calender year 2008 is a lot of cash right Trexus? Toyota should be living large & in charge with that amount of paper. It is spent rather quickly.. Guess how? Let me give you guys an example.. You could pay me $2 per hour typing this post & still end up paying a lot for typing. Truth is, I type only about ten words a minute with a lot of misteaks. The cost of producing goods depends not only on the price of inputs (e.g. labor) but also on how much they produce. Toyota produces a lot of vehicles.. You guys pound on your chests everyday about them being the sales champs. Guess what? It comes at a price..
Originally Posted by Trexus
Are you an economics major? Thanks for teaching a CPA economics. Have you heard of JIT manufacturing, variable costing or absorption costing?

Fact of the matter is GM and ChyrCo are bankrupt. They are insolvent. They don't have enough money to pay their bills as they come due. GM made the wrong business moves and look where they are now. That's right; a burden to the U.S. taxpayers and hopelessly trying to make a come back. Who in their right mind will buy a GM car now? Warranties backed by the U.S. Government (think DMV, long lines at the Post Office, Immigration Office, Social Security Office or Internal Revenue Service)? Be my guest, let me know how that goes.
Wow a CPA.. You must be doing well for yourself congrats! I have a crappy career & it does not compare Anywho, "Not enough money to pay their bills" you say? I thought I explained above You could make $120k per year with 50k in the bank yet have a mortgage, car notes, utilities.. Bingo! Its called bills!
Well, Toyota has them too Trexus.. Why did request a $2 billion loan?? Don't they have enough money in the bank to cover costs & stay off potential bankruptcy ??? Was that $2 billion loan for a 5 year supply of sushi? With a $120k salary, that $40k Lexus should be paid off in full right? In the case of GM, the UAW was squeezing their necks in costs (health care, retirement, salaries) to the point of no return on top of the costs of overall operations..

Toyota is just as immune as depicted in the many threads posted by the faithful..

https://www.clublexus.com/forums/car...roduction.html

Last edited by DASHOCKER; 06-04-09 at 08:50 AM.
DASHOCKER is offline  
Old 06-04-09, 09:02 AM
  #147  
DaveGS4
Forum Administrator

iTrader: (2)
 
DaveGS4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 31,577
Received 2,285 Likes on 1,391 Posts
Default

Guys keep the personal commentary out of this thread please.
DaveGS4 is offline  
Old 06-04-09, 09:11 AM
  #148  
-J-P-L-
Lexus Fanatic
 
-J-P-L-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 7,864
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 1SICKLEX
[/
Hahaha!!!

-J-P-L- is offline  
Old 06-04-09, 09:28 AM
  #149  
nthach
Lexus Champion
 
nthach's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: California
Posts: 3,350
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Pearlpower
I once knew a San Diego State BS graduate that did not know how to put staples in a simple Swingline. Got fired 2 months later. Could tell you everything he learned to obtain his degree, though most of it never applied to real business.
Unfortunately, this is becoming too common of a case these days.
nthach is offline  
Old 06-04-09, 10:26 AM
  #150  
Trexus
Moderator
 
Trexus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: California
Posts: 4,326
Received 54 Likes on 31 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by DASHOCKER
Why did request a $2 billion loan?? Don't they have enough money in the bank to cover costs & stay off potential bankruptcy ??? Was that $2 billion loan for a 5 year supply of sushi? With a $120k salary, that $40k Lexus should be paid off in full right? In the case of GM, the UAW was squeezing their necks in costs (health care, retirement, salaries) to the point of no return on top of the costs of overall operations..

Toyota is just as immune as depicted in the many threads posted by the faithful..

https://www.clublexus.com/forums/car...roduction.html
Did you not see Toyota's financials? Toyota has a lot of money. Who knows why Toyota requested a $2 Billion loan? Maybe the interest rate is low and it was a good deal to get the loan. We don't know. Either way Toyota can pay that back.

GM is such a burden to the U.S. taxpayers that many cannot even phathom how big that burden is. The media states that GM and ChryCo received $50 Billion of U.S. taxpayers money via our Government and we most likely won't see that money ever paid back.

In the U.S. individuals and corporations that make money have to pay income taxes. Well guess what GM hasn't been making money since 2005 so they haven't been paying any income taxes. As we all know GM has massive amounts of NOL's (Net Operating Losses). Here's a tax trick. GM can carryback those NOL's to prior years that had income and offset those incomes to zero it out and the income taxes they paid in those prior years gets refunded back to GM. So see how GM's been a big burden to the economy and the United States taxpayers...

Whereas Toyota makes tons of money and they pay income taxes here in the U.S. (They get a tax credit in Japan, wouldn't want to get double taxed now would we?) Those income taxes Toyota pays for making profits here in the U.S. pays for the roads for which we drive on, pays for the police to protect our cities and neighborhoods and pays for the military to protect our very own freedoms. Toyota has plants here in the U.S. that employ American people and sell those same cars built right here in the good 'ol U.S.of A

As you can see GM is a very big burden to the economy and the United States taxpayers.

That's great that some people see GM as the underdog and is rooting for them but GM is a dead dog.

Why would anyone support an entity that is lifeless???

Last edited by Trexus; 06-04-09 at 11:58 AM.
Trexus is offline  


Quick Reply: GM bankruptcy



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:22 PM.