Car Chat General discussion about Lexus, other auto manufacturers and automotive news.

AZ Police cruiser gets hit, ignites killing suspect

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-09-09 | 11:07 AM
  #1  
oohpapi44's Avatar
oohpapi44
Thread Starter
Lexus Fanatic
CL Folding 100000
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 5,922
Likes: 5
From: SouthSide Qns
Default AZ Police cruiser gets hit, ignites killing suspect

Last thing Ford needed right now.

A woman who had been arrested and placed in the back of a police cruiser was fatally burned Wednesday when another car slammed into the parked cruiser, igniting both vehicles and another cruiser in front, authorities said.

It was the latest death in the past decade attributed to a fuel tank rupture in a Ford Motor Co.-made Crown Victoria during a rear-end collision.

Lt. James Warriner, an Arizona Department of Public Safety spokesman, said investigators are looking into why the gas tank exploded this time since both Ford Crown Victoria Police Interceptors at the scene were equipped with fire suppression systems that deployed.

An officer stopped the 45-year-old motorist at about 1:15 a.m., arrested her and put her in the back of a cruiser along Interstate 10 northwest of Tucson, Warriner said.

Another westbound car traveling at least 65 mph then drifted into the emergency lane and plowed into the back of that vehicle, Warriner said.

He said the cruiser ignited instantly, and the officers were unable to rescue the woman inside because of the intensity and heat of the fire.

The impact pushed the first cruiser's trunk into its back seat, and rammed the car into the patrol cruiser in front, severely damaging its rear end as well. The second cruiser continued the chain reaction, striking the woman's parked vehicle.

The officers were able to remove the driver of the moving car, which vaulted over a guard rail and sustained fire and crash damage, Warriner said.

He said the 28-year-old driver was taken to a hospital with undetermined injuries.

There have been no charges, with the investigation continuing, Warriner said.

Over the past decade, Crown Victorias have been the subject of significant controversy and lawsuits over numerous rear-end collisions that ruptured fuel tanks and caused horrific fires, killing or disfiguring a number of police officers and others. Since 2005, Ford has installed a powder-emitting device designed to suppress fire in its Crown Victorias.


Story
Old 06-09-09 | 11:09 AM
  #2  
plex's Avatar
plex
1UZFE/2JZGTE
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 13,273
Likes: 75
From: MD
Default

Damn........this is a sad story on so many levels.
Old 06-09-09 | 11:10 AM
  #3  
bruce van's Avatar
bruce van
Lexus Champion
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,068
Likes: 1
From: California
Default

Wow. What a tragic accident.
Old 06-09-09 | 11:15 AM
  #4  
vwynn's Avatar
vwynn
Lexus Fanatic
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 5,945
Likes: 53
From: CA
Default

wow.. people cant drive straight now... sigh..
Old 06-09-09 | 12:40 PM
  #5  
LexFather
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Damn that is sad
Old 06-09-09 | 12:48 PM
  #6  
Stage3's Avatar
Stage3
Lexus Fanatic
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 7,379
Likes: 0
From: Tampa, FL
Default

Crap! That's horrible! I don't think many cars on the road would have been able to save that woman. Not many things survive what essentially amounts to be a head on collision at 130MPH...
Old 06-09-09 | 01:52 PM
  #7  
Jewcano's Avatar
Jewcano
No Sir, I Don't Like It
CL Folding 1M
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 8,754
Likes: 11
From: Jax, FL
Default

And to think this issue has been prevalent with Ford for a long time now, and they still can't fix that issue. They had an episode on TLC about facial restructuring a while back and the victim was an officer who was rear ended, in his Crown Vic, and it caught fire.

Now we have another victim here. How many people need to get injured or die because of this stupid issue, until Ford corrects that problem?
Old 06-09-09 | 02:39 PM
  #8  
IS-SV's Avatar
IS-SV
Lexus Fanatic
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 14,100
Likes: 1
From: tech capital
Default

Remember when Nasser said something about Safety is Job No 1 at Ford, during the Explorer fiasco............
Old 06-09-09 | 02:48 PM
  #9  
leedogg's Avatar
leedogg
Lead Lap
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 476
Likes: 0
From: md
Default

the light patterns on cruisers have been shown to lure drunk drivers into them.
Old 06-09-09 | 04:24 PM
  #10  
Big Mack's Avatar
Big Mack
Lexus Champion
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 2,673
Likes: 0
From: Arizona
Exclamation

While I agree that the accident is tragic, there aren't a whole lot of cars on the road today that could survive a full tilt collision at 65+ MPH. If you hit an Accord at 70 MPH and all momentum was moving forward (IE - no brakes applied), it could very well end up in a similar situation. Look at the side tanks in GM trucks from a while back - hit on the side, and instant flames. The placement of the fuel tank in the Crown Vics does make them a bit more susceptible, I agree, but it's still a matter of people should be paying attention when driving at freeway speeds.

The officer that was burned previously is also in AZ, BTW.

Originally Posted by IS-SV
Remember when Nasser said something about Safety is Job No 1 at Ford, during the Explorer fiasco............
That is nothing more than a cheap shot, man, and completely unnecessary. Someone died in this and several of the Explorer incidents.

Big Mack
Old 06-09-09 | 05:37 PM
  #11  
IS-SV's Avatar
IS-SV
Lexus Fanatic
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 14,100
Likes: 1
From: tech capital
Default

Originally Posted by Big Mack



That is nothing more than a cheap shot, man, and completely unnecessary. Someone died in this and several of the Explorer incidents.

Big Mack
Man it might be a cheap shot, so be it, and Ford deserves it. And maybe it's necessary, because I didn't buy into their PR campaign back then. I do agree about the tragic results. I'll talk about Ford in a frank way because I'm an insider via family connections.

I remember too many of those lame Ford commercials with Nasser talking about Ford working day and night on the Explorer issue. What he really meant was the huge army of lawyers were trying to cover their a**. A lot of poor and careless engineering went into the creation of the Explorer fiasco.
Old 06-09-09 | 05:42 PM
  #12  
LiCelsior's Avatar
LiCelsior
Retired
CL Folding 500000
iTrader: (32)
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 12,364
Likes: 17
From: NY
Default

man what a tragic accident.
Old 06-09-09 | 06:04 PM
  #13  
4TehNguyen's Avatar
4TehNguyen
Lexus Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 26,060
Likes: 51
From: Houston, Texas
Default

wow that really sucks, didnt the crown vic back then have some fuel tank problems
Old 06-09-09 | 06:46 PM
  #14  
Mr Johnson's Avatar
Mr Johnson
Pole Position
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 2,465
Likes: 0
From: Illinois
Default

This is sad. However to the people commenting about how Ford should do something about this. Really? What car do you think can take a shot like that and survive better? You *don't* hear about the numerous 60+ MPH accidents where the officers are fine after being rear-ended. I know they happen. How many cars do you think would protect them as well? Ask some officers if they think some other passenger car will protect them better. IMO we all need to stop being sensationalists.
Old 06-09-09 | 07:04 PM
  #15  
herbvdh's Avatar
herbvdh
Lexus Test Driver
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 810
Likes: 0
From: USA
Default

Originally Posted by 4TehNguyen
wow that really sucks, didnt the crown vic back then have some fuel tank problems
YES they did all was done was a bracket was put in place so when the car gets rear ended it does not catch fire. Some dealers also would only do a police car they did not care about other town departments. Our department has several of these cars in service. I remember we made a claim it was used by the police to get it done.



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:54 PM.