2010-2011 Motor Trend Reviews
#1
Driver
Thread Starter
2010-2011 Motor Trend Reviews
Has anyone seen the September Motor Trend? They have a short review for 168 models to come out in 2010 and 2011.
They break down their short reviews in a couple sections but ends with a section called "Sum Up". Here's what they said about the Lexus line in their "Sum Up" section...
ES350: "How to pay too much for a gussied-up Camry"
GS: "Struggling to set itself apart"
HS250h: "How to pay too much for a gussied-up Prius"
IS/ISC/ISF: "Close to a 3 series but still no cigar"
LF-A: "Ferrari money for a Lexus? We'll see"
LS: "Still nice, no longer nicest"
You would think the magazine is published by Mercedes...
C: "More people friendly than 3 series"
CL: "Grand touring, Benz style"
E Coupe: "The blue-chip coupe"
E Sedan: "Built to a standard, not a price"
S: "Benchmark sedan just raised the bar"
SL: "Benchmark sport-lux roadster"
SLK: "SL for beginners"
SLS: "Mercedes reinvents gullwing"
I would guess reliability was not a factor in their evaluations.
They break down their short reviews in a couple sections but ends with a section called "Sum Up". Here's what they said about the Lexus line in their "Sum Up" section...
ES350: "How to pay too much for a gussied-up Camry"
GS: "Struggling to set itself apart"
HS250h: "How to pay too much for a gussied-up Prius"
IS/ISC/ISF: "Close to a 3 series but still no cigar"
LF-A: "Ferrari money for a Lexus? We'll see"
LS: "Still nice, no longer nicest"
You would think the magazine is published by Mercedes...
C: "More people friendly than 3 series"
CL: "Grand touring, Benz style"
E Coupe: "The blue-chip coupe"
E Sedan: "Built to a standard, not a price"
S: "Benchmark sedan just raised the bar"
SL: "Benchmark sport-lux roadster"
SLK: "SL for beginners"
SLS: "Mercedes reinvents gullwing"
I would guess reliability was not a factor in their evaluations.
#3
Motor Trend and Car/Driver Data
Saw this on the newstand and eagerly picked it up , hoping for some good tidbits on the new model data. Should have known there would not be much on the new 460 as Lexus is always extremely guarded on letting any potential Spy Photos and detail leaks out. Anyway, was also equally dissapointed as once again, they just don't seem to like Lexus, especially when they put the marque up against BMW and MB.
Most of the Tier 1 mags are down on Lexus, despite all the critical praise for many of the items that really matter, such as Dependability, Attention to Detail, Superb Craftsmanship, Engine Design and all the associated, exteremly important deatils that make the cars exceptional. They just don't feel that they are "Drivers Cars" so they dissmiss the line time and time again. They will forgive MB, BMW and Porsche over and over again for major dependability and maintenece issues, as they just like those brands. I agree, the value of these mag's is for basic details, passing interest and general entertainment only. J.
Most of the Tier 1 mags are down on Lexus, despite all the critical praise for many of the items that really matter, such as Dependability, Attention to Detail, Superb Craftsmanship, Engine Design and all the associated, exteremly important deatils that make the cars exceptional. They just don't feel that they are "Drivers Cars" so they dissmiss the line time and time again. They will forgive MB, BMW and Porsche over and over again for major dependability and maintenece issues, as they just like those brands. I agree, the value of these mag's is for basic details, passing interest and general entertainment only. J.
Last edited by JTS09; 07-31-09 at 10:58 AM.
#4
I think those mags have an audience that caters to the all important "Drivers Car" and how exhilarating they are to drive regardless of their reliability. Lets face it - writing about how reliable a car can be is boring and doesn't sell many magazines. However, Consumer Reports, who has a very different audience, advises Lexus has some of the best cars on the planet. Therefore, one has to consider the source.
However, NewCarTestDrive.com (www.nctd.com) says:
Lexus surpasses other luxury brands in terms of quality, durability, reliability, and desirability among American buyers, an astounding performance. The flagship sedan that started out as the LS 400 and then grew up as the LS 430 is now the Lexus LS 460. The Lexus LS challenges all comers as the best luxury sedan in the world. It competes with the Mercedes-Benz E-Class and S-Class, BMW 5 Series and 7 Series, and a few others.
For more check - http://www.nctd.com/review-intro.cfm...&ReviewID=4634
However, NewCarTestDrive.com (www.nctd.com) says:
Lexus surpasses other luxury brands in terms of quality, durability, reliability, and desirability among American buyers, an astounding performance. The flagship sedan that started out as the LS 400 and then grew up as the LS 430 is now the Lexus LS 460. The Lexus LS challenges all comers as the best luxury sedan in the world. It competes with the Mercedes-Benz E-Class and S-Class, BMW 5 Series and 7 Series, and a few others.
For more check - http://www.nctd.com/review-intro.cfm...&ReviewID=4634
#5
Motor Trend: Not worth the paper it's printed on!
For some reason, the 'buyer's guide' sections/issues of MT and C&D both have had it in for Lexus, although ironically enough, it seems that MT articles may be a tad more favorable (despite giving comparos to the Veracruz/SRX over the RX even when they note the latter's superiority) than their review blurbs, while C&D has both equal parts review nastiness and sometimes cruel guide info, but not always. Automobile seems to have more unbiased coverage in both.
It's funny though to see the MT and C&D guides save their 'best zingers' for the Lexus line. I skimmed through recent years' issues and they had the worst sum-ups for Lexus vs. other brands, Chevrolet, Acura, etc.
As 1SICKLEX pointed out, he's done with C&D after they claimed the HS 250h was a 'gussied-up Prius' -- that's uninformed and uneducated, and factually wrong. ES/Camry is correct, but when they resort to outright misleading statements, you know how much they value their integrity. It's likely that with magazine sales in decline, the old guard has retired and now some 20-something gearheads with a penchant for sensationalist bashing have taken the role.
It also strikes me that these so-called gearheads are more dismissive in part because of the success at Lexus. They want to deny Lexus' legitimate competition with the German old guard, and so put them down whatever chance they get.
In any case, those brief blurbs are nothing more than snippy spew and should be taken as such. By contrast, although critical, Consumer Reports and ConsumerGuide buyer's guides are much more thorough in evaluating strengths and weaknesses.
For some reason, the 'buyer's guide' sections/issues of MT and C&D both have had it in for Lexus, although ironically enough, it seems that MT articles may be a tad more favorable (despite giving comparos to the Veracruz/SRX over the RX even when they note the latter's superiority) than their review blurbs, while C&D has both equal parts review nastiness and sometimes cruel guide info, but not always. Automobile seems to have more unbiased coverage in both.
It's funny though to see the MT and C&D guides save their 'best zingers' for the Lexus line. I skimmed through recent years' issues and they had the worst sum-ups for Lexus vs. other brands, Chevrolet, Acura, etc.
As 1SICKLEX pointed out, he's done with C&D after they claimed the HS 250h was a 'gussied-up Prius' -- that's uninformed and uneducated, and factually wrong. ES/Camry is correct, but when they resort to outright misleading statements, you know how much they value their integrity. It's likely that with magazine sales in decline, the old guard has retired and now some 20-something gearheads with a penchant for sensationalist bashing have taken the role.
It also strikes me that these so-called gearheads are more dismissive in part because of the success at Lexus. They want to deny Lexus' legitimate competition with the German old guard, and so put them down whatever chance they get.
In any case, those brief blurbs are nothing more than snippy spew and should be taken as such. By contrast, although critical, Consumer Reports and ConsumerGuide buyer's guides are much more thorough in evaluating strengths and weaknesses.
#6
The thing you have to realize about these writers is that they are on a strictly "pay to play" basis. You grease their palm, they'll grease your review. It is even worse now with advertising revenue squeezing them tighter than a torque wrench.
These clowns actually make that Illinois governor who tried to sell Obama's senate seat look like a straight shooter!
These clowns actually make that Illinois governor who tried to sell Obama's senate seat look like a straight shooter!
#7
BTW, did you see the pics of the Buick Lacrosse (article on p. 44)? If imitation is the sincerest form of flattery, the LS 460 must be tickled pink!
Trending Topics
#8
They are simply myopic. If the vehicle withstands the segment review, is predominately fun and sharply styled, they place it at the top of the list. Reliability who?
Only a select few get long term tested. That said, they (I don't remember C&D or RT) said that the LS460 was one ride they all fought over and hated to let go of at the end of the term...
Only a select few get long term tested. That said, they (I don't remember C&D or RT) said that the LS460 was one ride they all fought over and hated to let go of at the end of the term...
#9
#10
Pole Position
Anyway Mods, shouldn't this discussion be in the Car Chat forum so others can comment?
#11
Lexus Test Driver
Most of the Tier 1 mags are down on Lexus, despite all the critical praise for many of the items that really matter, such as Dependability, Attention to Detail, Superb Craftsmanship, Engine Design and all the associated, exteremly important deatils that make the cars exceptional. They just don't feel that they are "Drivers Cars" so they dissmiss the line time and time again. They will forgive MB, BMW and Porsche over and over again for major dependability and maintenece issues, as they just like those brands.
#12
How often does someone "drive" beyond the capabilities of any car? Yes, BMW and MB class for class probably bests Lexus in "handling" but beyond jamming it on a merge, or busting through a curve, how often are you "feeling the road?" So, for those perhaps 10% that you max out a vehicle, you'd take the 90% of the time that it's harsher as a cruiser?
That's like dating the hot, drop dead gorgeous blonde, who's great in bed for four days out of the month, but can't do lick around the house... rather than dating the very attractive brunette, who also can cook, clean, and make money.
I'll take the brunette Lexus any day... the blonde will probably end up being unfaithful anyway...
That's like dating the hot, drop dead gorgeous blonde, who's great in bed for four days out of the month, but can't do lick around the house... rather than dating the very attractive brunette, who also can cook, clean, and make money.
I'll take the brunette Lexus any day... the blonde will probably end up being unfaithful anyway...
#13
Guest
Posts: n/a
Has anyone seen the September Motor Trend? They have a short review for 168 models to come out in 2010 and 2011.
They break down their short reviews in a couple sections but ends with a section called "Sum Up". Here's what they said about the Lexus line in their "Sum Up" section...
ES350: "How to pay too much for a gussied-up Camry"
GS: "Struggling to set itself apart"
HS250h: "How to pay too much for a gussied-up Prius"
IS/ISC/ISF: "Close to a 3 series but still no cigar"
LF-A: "Ferrari money for a Lexus? We'll see"
LS: "Still nice, no longer nicest"
You would think the magazine is published by Mercedes...
C: "More people friendly than 3 series"
CL: "Grand touring, Benz style"
E Coupe: "The blue-chip coupe"
E Sedan: "Built to a standard, not a price"
S: "Benchmark sedan just raised the bar"
SL: "Benchmark sport-lux roadster"
SLK: "SL for beginners"
SLS: "Mercedes reinvents gullwing"
I would guess reliability was not a factor in their evaluations.
They break down their short reviews in a couple sections but ends with a section called "Sum Up". Here's what they said about the Lexus line in their "Sum Up" section...
ES350: "How to pay too much for a gussied-up Camry"
GS: "Struggling to set itself apart"
HS250h: "How to pay too much for a gussied-up Prius"
IS/ISC/ISF: "Close to a 3 series but still no cigar"
LF-A: "Ferrari money for a Lexus? We'll see"
LS: "Still nice, no longer nicest"
You would think the magazine is published by Mercedes...
C: "More people friendly than 3 series"
CL: "Grand touring, Benz style"
E Coupe: "The blue-chip coupe"
E Sedan: "Built to a standard, not a price"
S: "Benchmark sedan just raised the bar"
SL: "Benchmark sport-lux roadster"
SLK: "SL for beginners"
SLS: "Mercedes reinvents gullwing"
I would guess reliability was not a factor in their evaluations.
You would think today's cars are HORRIFIC according to their ratings. We have NEVER had better cars. They just BLASTED most anything for whatever childish reason.
That is why I get this magazines FREE. Complete garbage journalism.
I am seriously contemplating starting my own magazine. The same old comments and crap reviews are tired and redundant. People deserve beter.
#14
Lexus Fanatic
Not really. The days of the big auto mags worshipping at BMW's feet are over, despite their admiration for the 3-series. For several years now, you have started to see some non-BMW's win comparisons. That is also the case with the Honda Accord, another car that has been idolized by the auto press. Accords don't always come in first place any more, either.
However, I myself agree with them on one point....something they still espouse. Nothing, IMO, not even Porsche, compares with non-active BMW power-steering systems. They are in a class by themselves.
However, I myself agree with them on one point....something they still espouse. Nothing, IMO, not even Porsche, compares with non-active BMW power-steering systems. They are in a class by themselves.
#15
exclusive matchup
iTrader: (4)
How often does someone "drive" beyond the capabilities of any car? Yes, BMW and MB class for class probably bests Lexus in "handling" but beyond jamming it on a merge, or busting through a curve, how often are you "feeling the road?" So, for those perhaps 10% that you max out a vehicle, you'd take the 90% of the time that it's harsher as a cruiser?
That's like dating the hot, drop dead gorgeous blonde, who's great in bed for four days out of the month, but can't do lick around the house... rather than dating the very attractive brunette, who also can cook, clean, and make money.
I'll take the brunette Lexus any day... the blonde will probably end up being unfaithful anyway...
That's like dating the hot, drop dead gorgeous blonde, who's great in bed for four days out of the month, but can't do lick around the house... rather than dating the very attractive brunette, who also can cook, clean, and make money.
I'll take the brunette Lexus any day... the blonde will probably end up being unfaithful anyway...
in the end, it's up to the owner to choose what kind of car he/she wants. comfort vs road feel