Car Chat General discussion about Lexus, other auto manufacturers and automotive news.

Compared: 1. 2010 Lincoln MKT Vs. 2. Acura MDX

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-25-09, 12:32 PM
  #16  
LexBob2
Lexus Champion
 
LexBob2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Illinois
Posts: 11,136
Received 138 Likes on 112 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by IS-SV
Yes indeed, been there (Europe).

Yes and look at the fuel prices in those markets, tax incentives, no surprise at all.

But what does that have to do with the Lincoln M-whatever SUV in the US market, weighing in at 5000 pounds and Ford wisely selecting something other than a 2.0L 4 banger for it's intended American market, not much.
I agree that a 2.0L turbo 4 cyl is not the right engine for a 5k lb beast like the Lincoln M-something. Might be better suited for duty in an Escape size/weight vehicle. It might even be too small for the Edge and its Lincoln cousin which are well over 4,000 lbs.
LexBob2 is online now  
Old 08-25-09, 01:17 PM
  #17  
The G Man
Lexus Test Driver
 
The G Man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: MA
Posts: 8,698
Received 68 Likes on 56 Posts
Default

The battle of the ugly grills
The G Man is offline  
Old 08-25-09, 04:01 PM
  #18  
SLegacy99
Lead Lap
 
SLegacy99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: MD
Posts: 4,511
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by LexBob2
I agree that a 2.0L turbo 4 cyl is not the right engine for a 5k lb beast like the Lincoln M-something. Might be better suited for duty in an Escape size/weight vehicle. It might even be too small for the Edge and its Lincoln cousin which are well over 4,000 lbs.
I disagree. One, 4 cylinder engines are lighter, obviously, thus reducing weight. Secondly, this idea that "there is no replacement for displacement" is becoming less and less valid. I guess we will see with the 2.0L Explorer.
SLegacy99 is offline  
Old 08-25-09, 04:10 PM
  #19  
IS-SV
Lexus Fanatic
 
IS-SV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: tech capital
Posts: 14,100
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by SLegacy99
I disagree. One, 4 cylinder engines are lighter, obviously, thus reducing weight. Secondly, this idea that "there is no replacement for displacement" is becoming less and less valid. I guess we will see with the 2.0L Explorer.
Except we are talking about the 5000 pound, huge MKT.

But if we change the topic to the new unreleased 2011 Ford Explorer, then the 2.0L 4 cylinder motor should be a much better match I agree. The 2011 Ford Explorer is estimated to weigh about 4400 pounds.

Again, it sounds like Ford's making a couple good decisions for the US market.
IS-SV is offline  
Old 08-25-09, 04:14 PM
  #20  
PHXSC
Lead Lap
 
PHXSC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Arizona
Posts: 465
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

The Lincoln looks like this
PHXSC is offline  
Old 08-25-09, 04:16 PM
  #21  
IS-SV
Lexus Fanatic
 
IS-SV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: tech capital
Posts: 14,100
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by 1SICKLEX

2010 lincoln mkt 039
2010 Lincoln MKT


IMO, the Lincoln looks like this.
IS-SV is offline  
Old 08-25-09, 04:19 PM
  #22  
SLegacy99
Lead Lap
 
SLegacy99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: MD
Posts: 4,511
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

The turbo AWD model weighs 5000 lbs. The 3.7L, FWD model weighs in at 4,499 lbs. A 4 cylinder model would be lighter.

http://www.leftlanenews.com/lincoln-...specifications
SLegacy99 is offline  
Old 08-25-09, 04:22 PM
  #23  
IS-SV
Lexus Fanatic
 
IS-SV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: tech capital
Posts: 14,100
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by SLegacy99
The turbo AWD model weighs 5000 lbs. The 3.7L, FWD model weighs in at 4,499 lbs. A 4 cylinder model would be lighter.

http://www.leftlanenews.com/lincoln-...specifications
Certainly interesting info to know for us sitting on the sidelines with no interest in owning this Robocop SUV, but it happens to be a Lincoln with the challenges associated with selling anything from that division.
IS-SV is offline  
Old 08-25-09, 04:29 PM
  #24  
SLegacy99
Lead Lap
 
SLegacy99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: MD
Posts: 4,511
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Agreed....
SLegacy99 is offline  
Old 08-25-09, 07:17 PM
  #25  
bitkahuna
Lexus Fanatic
iTrader: (20)
 
bitkahuna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Present
Posts: 74,724
Received 2,405 Likes on 1,577 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by SLegacy99
The turbo AWD model weighs 5000 lbs. The 3.7L, FWD model weighs in at 4,499 lbs. A 4 cylinder model would be lighter.

http://www.leftlanenews.com/lincoln-...specifications
must you turn every thread into one about fuel economy? some people don't care.
bitkahuna is online now  
Old 08-25-09, 10:05 PM
  #26  
CDNROCKIES
Lexus Champion
 
CDNROCKIES's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Alberta
Posts: 3,054
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by bitkahuna
never even heard of an mkt until i saw this thread.

and the acura is dated already...
Me too...lol. I wondered wth this thread was about as well.

I would be hesitant to take the advice of a car mag/website that seems to think that the Q7 is a competitor to the other vehicles listed however.
CDNROCKIES is offline  
Old 08-26-09, 08:42 AM
  #27  
SLegacy99
Lead Lap
 
SLegacy99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: MD
Posts: 4,511
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by bitkahuna
must you turn every thread into one about fuel economy? some people don't care.
Then you don't have to read my posts.
SLegacy99 is offline  
Old 08-26-09, 09:27 AM
  #28  
IS-SV
Lexus Fanatic
 
IS-SV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: tech capital
Posts: 14,100
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by SLegacy99
Then you don't have to read my posts.
I think he dozed off trying to sift through the 2.0L 4 banger discussion in a huge Lincoln SUV that hopes to have some sales traction in the US market.

But there were a few factors that made the discussion academic at best:

. Lincoln is one sad division amongst premium vehicle brands
. Average gas prices in the US contributes to the point that buyers in this class of vehicle and price range don't car as much about mpg. Fuel costs are only a small part of the premium vehicle buyers' budget.
. Adding a 4 banger to a Lincoln this huge and heavy will do little to improve market acceptance or profitability of this model.

Should stimulants and fresh air be applied he might finish reading.....................zzzzzzzzzzzzzz....................
IS-SV is offline  
Old 08-26-09, 09:31 AM
  #29  
IS-SV
Lexus Fanatic
 
IS-SV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: tech capital
Posts: 14,100
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Most people will never remember or even care about the lame MKT (another meaningless alphabet soup name from Lincoln), what were these dopes in Marketing thinking............................................
IS-SV is offline  
Old 08-26-09, 11:33 AM
  #30  
SLegacy99
Lead Lap
 
SLegacy99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: MD
Posts: 4,511
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I'd comment, but I wouldn't want anyone on clublexus to be bored......
SLegacy99 is offline  


Quick Reply: Compared: 1. 2010 Lincoln MKT Vs. 2. Acura MDX



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:36 AM.