When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Saab hasn't made a competitive car for the US market for close to 20 years. I have never ever been impressed by the vehicles. the reliability was nothing to brag about.
I used to always tell people the reason Saab is such a crappy company is because they sell cars at European prices but give you American car reliability . They wont be missed.... kinda like Pontiac
Nor has it turned a profit in that time frame either. Who on earth would want it? They are ok cars, but that's it.
I used to always tell people the reason Saab is such a crappy company is because they sell cars at European prices but give you American car reliability . They wont be missed.... kinda like Pontiac
The older, Swedish-designed Saabs also delayed too long in clinging to 4 cylinders and turbos. When you spend close to 40K for a car, as top-line Saabs cost (at the time), you expect at least an in-line or V6 as an option. GM did put larger engines in some of the newer Saabs (some, of course, of its own design), but it still did not rejuvinate the company.
Originally Posted by replica
Saw a 9-3 aero wagon the other day on the freeway....if only Toyota made something that looked like that, sigh.
I assume you're talking about the 9-3 SportCombi wagon. The only reason GM came out with that was as a sop to the Saab traditionalists for dropping all the hatchback models that the traditionalists liked. Even so, like other Saabs, it has not sold well.
I called this in the early 2000s here...next is Mitsubishi....
Not necessarily. If the new Kizashi doesn't catch on, I don't think Suzuki will be in the automobile buisness here in America much longer......they may fold before Mitsubishi or Mercury does......Mercury is another doubtful company in the long run.