Car Chat General discussion about Lexus, other auto manufacturers and automotive news.

Toyota to cut auto parts costs by 30%, reports say

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-23-09, 08:35 AM
  #16  
LexFather
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Unlike other car makers, Toyota actually WORKS with suppliers to find solutions to issues, including trying to build cheaper parts. This is not GM etc here, putting a gun to a suppliers head to just make things cheaper. Toyota uses its vast engineering might to send engineers to suppliers to help make things cheaper.

I am cautious and wary like everyone in here but it simply is a part of their kaizen cycle.
 
Old 12-23-09, 08:39 AM
  #17  
Threxx
Lexus Champion
 
Threxx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 3,474
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

I'd rather see them reduce cost via reducing complexity and variation than reduce cost via reducing material and build cost.

There's no question in my mind that this will impact quality and reliability. It's just a question of 'how much'. You know the savings aren't going to be passed on to us... they're going to be pocketed by Toyota who's trying to make huge profits like they were before, but this time in a depressed economy.

I think this is a bad reaction that may impact their reputation. It's no surprise they're not making money in a depressed economy. If I were them I'd just accept that and wait for a recovery whilst holding on to my reputation.

Keep in mind there have already been a lot of complaints about Toyota and Lexus quality declining in some of their models. So you already know the direction they're heading, and you know they're seeking to take it further.
Threxx is offline  
Old 12-23-09, 08:46 AM
  #18  
mmarshall
Lexus Fanatic
 
mmarshall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Virginia/D.C. suburbs
Posts: 91,496
Received 88 Likes on 87 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by The G Man
Not so much relaibility but material quality. The newer Toyotas' materials are already getting cheaper and cheaper, Toyota should really try to find a way to improve material quality instead of trying to cut cost by reducing material quality. I guess Toyota has its heart set on following GM's foot step, first becoming the world biggest auto manfacturing, secondly, start produce cheap interiors like GM
A number of GM interiors are not that cheap any more. For example, check out a new Malibu, Aura, CTS, SRX, LaCrosse, or even the small Aveo 2LT (not the base Aveo). What you find inside might surprise you.
mmarshall is offline  
Old 12-23-09, 08:51 AM
  #19  
mmarshall
Lexus Fanatic
 
mmarshall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Virginia/D.C. suburbs
Posts: 91,496
Received 88 Likes on 87 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Threxx
Keep in mind there have already been a lot of complaints about Toyota and Lexus quality declining in some of their models. So you already know the direction they're heading, and you know they're seeking to take it further.
That was quite evident in the newer Camrys, Tundra, and the 2006 Lexus ES350. The new 2010 ES350, though, has rectified a number of those former material problems.

The Camry, for example, is not a bad car by any means (actually, a quite good one), but the dash plastics and *****, IMO, border on junk.

One thing that might (?) help you personally is if Toyota can drop the price on any sensors or fuel pumps your hard-starting 4Runnner may need.....if the repairs are not factory-covered or on the house.
mmarshall is offline  
Old 12-23-09, 08:53 AM
  #20  
Threxx
Lexus Champion
 
Threxx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 3,474
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mmarshall
That was quite evident in the newer Camrys, Tundra, and the 2006 Lexus ES350. The new 2010 ES350, though, has rectified a number of those former material problems.

The Camry, for example, is not a bad car by any means (actually, a quite good one), but the dash plastics and *****, IMO, border on junk.

What materials did they change on the 2010 ES? It's pretty unusual for a manufacturer to actually change what a part is made out of in the middle of a generation.
Threxx is offline  
Old 12-23-09, 09:18 AM
  #21  
mmarshall
Lexus Fanatic
 
mmarshall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Virginia/D.C. suburbs
Posts: 91,496
Received 88 Likes on 87 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Threxx
What materials did they change on the 2010 ES? It's pretty unusual for a manufacturer to actually change what a part is made out of in the middle of a generation.
The car itself, of course, has not been redesigned (more of a minor refreshening), but the dash and trim (a major shortcoming of earlier models) has been redone and given more and better-quality trim. So has some of the door-panel trim. Check one out and you'll see for yourself.....IMO, it makes the interior noticeably more pleasant.....almost as nice as that of the superb last-generation ES330.

Last edited by mmarshall; 12-23-09 at 09:21 AM.
mmarshall is offline  
Old 12-23-09, 09:42 AM
  #22  
Threxx
Lexus Champion
 
Threxx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 3,474
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mmarshall
The car itself, of course, has not been redesigned (more of a minor refreshening), but the dash and trim (a major shortcoming of earlier models) has been redone and given more and better-quality trim. So has some of the door-panel trim. Check one out and you'll see for yourself.....IMO, it makes the interior noticeably more pleasant.....almost as nice as that of the superb last-generation ES330.

Are you talking about cosmetic improvements or structural improvements? In other words did they make the materials more padded, solid, flex-resistant, etc or are you just saying the wood trim is more convincing?

Improved wood trim doesn't surprise me... that's a fairly easy mid cycle refresh change, but it's also not nearly enough for me to change my overall opinion of a car from sub-par interior to impressive interior quality such as you seem to have done for the 06 to 10 ES350. Then again I don't tend to put much focus onto wood trim since I don't care for it whether or not it's fake.
Threxx is offline  
Old 12-23-09, 09:53 AM
  #23  
mmarshall
Lexus Fanatic
 
mmarshall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Virginia/D.C. suburbs
Posts: 91,496
Received 88 Likes on 87 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Threxx
Are you talking about cosmetic improvements or structural improvements? In other words did they make the materials more padded, solid, flex-resistant, etc or are you just saying the wood trim is more convincing?
Mostly cosmetic impovements. Structually, the 2010 isn't much, if any, different from the 2006-2009 models.....but I personally find it somewhat more pleasent to sit inside and drive.


Improved wood trim doesn't surprise me... that's a fairly easy mid cycle refresh change, but it's also not nearly enough for me to change my overall opinion of a car from sub-par interior to impressive interior quality such as you seem to have done for the 06 to 10 ES350. Then again I don't tend to put much focus onto wood trim since I don't care for it whether or not it's fake.
Yeah, I tend to be a wood junkie myself....but it's not mandatory by any means. Good, textured carbon-fiber or brushed-metal trim can also be very pleasant if done right.

Here's an excellent example, IMO, of superb non-wood trim....the console on the Lexus IS-F.

mmarshall is offline  
Old 12-23-09, 10:17 AM
  #24  
The G Man
Lexus Test Driver
 
The G Man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: MA
Posts: 8,698
Received 68 Likes on 56 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Threxx
I'd rather see them reduce cost via reducing complexity and variation than reduce cost via reducing material and build cost.
Toyota is already the master at reducing complexity and variation. They share a lot of platforms and parts as it is, if they share anymore, it might cross the line of their different class of vehicle.

As far as engineering a lower cost part, that is hit ior miss. A good example is Lexus using plastic gears in their mirror, is it really worth the $3 or $4 Lexus save by going to plastic gears?
The G Man is offline  
Old 12-23-09, 10:45 AM
  #25  
spwolf
Lexus Champion
 
spwolf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 19,934
Received 163 Likes on 121 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Threxx
Are you talking about cosmetic improvements or structural improvements? In other words did they make the materials more padded, solid, flex-resistant, etc or are you just saying the wood trim is more convincing?

Improved wood trim doesn't surprise me... that's a fairly easy mid cycle refresh change, but it's also not nearly enough for me to change my overall opinion of a car from sub-par interior to impressive interior quality such as you seem to have done for the 06 to 10 ES350. Then again I don't tend to put much focus onto wood trim since I don't care for it whether or not it's fake.
there were no big interior improvements there, it is case of seeing something in 2007 and then seeing it in 2009 again and then convincing yourself it is better ;-).

but again, this is not about interior materials... they mentioned 2-3 years ago how they will focus on lowering number of parts in car through smart engineering... for instance, example then was how average vehicle has 23 different computers for various things, and how their goal was to reduce that to 2-3 per vehicle and saving a lot of money with that, while improving customer experience and features.
spwolf is offline  
Old 12-23-09, 10:57 AM
  #26  
The G Man
Lexus Test Driver
 
The G Man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: MA
Posts: 8,698
Received 68 Likes on 56 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by spwolf
they mentioned 2-3 years ago how they will focus on lowering number of parts in car through smart engineering... for instance, example then was how average vehicle has 23 different computers for various things, and how their goal was to reduce that to 2-3 per vehicle and saving a lot of money with that, while improving customer experience and features.
Isnt that the mistake BMW had when they put the i-drive computer together with the transmission computer, when the i-drive computer crashed, you are shiz out of luck. Since then, BMW had fix the problem.

Does anybody have interior pictures of the 2010 ES vs 2009? Usually Lexus only make minor changes in the interior in the mid-cycle refresh.
The G Man is offline  
Old 12-23-09, 11:10 AM
  #27  
Joeb427
Lexus Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Joeb427's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: SC
Posts: 11,670
Received 17 Likes on 16 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by The G Man
Does anybody have interior pictures of the 2010 ES vs 2009? Usually Lexus only make minor changes in the interior in the mid-cycle refresh.
I don't have a pic but for me it was a simple chrome accent on the wood pieces and the added chrome wood piece on the glove box that really changed the look of the interior for me.Especially in person with black leather when comparing to my neighbor's '07 ES 350 black leather interior..
Also the center console is larger with more storage and I believe the steering wheels controls were changed.
Joeb427 is offline  
Old 12-23-09, 11:26 AM
  #28  
spwolf
Lexus Champion
 
spwolf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 19,934
Received 163 Likes on 121 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by The G Man
Isnt that the mistake BMW had when they put the i-drive computer together with the transmission computer, when the i-drive computer crashed, you are shiz out of luck. Since then, BMW had fix the problem.

Does anybody have interior pictures of the 2010 ES vs 2009? Usually Lexus only make minor changes in the interior in the mid-cycle refresh.
it is a mistake if it is problematic, on the other hand, sharing these ECUs means that there will be less problematic parts for individual units.

In fact, all of japanese manufacturers formed joint engineering venture that is doing this interface, and it will be used on all cars, not just Toyotas.

Materials and fit and finish on ES are the same, they added some chrome surrounds and few minor pieces, just like any other toyota/lexus interior refresh.

but again, thinking about how this relates to perception of quality of interior materials (this is what look at feel is called), is wrong... Germans always had better perception of quality when it comes to interior, and look how they fare in surveys, even in Germany, let alone USA. Thats why when you push and poke around interior, that is called perception of quality.

Toyotas of early had very bad perception of quality, hard interiors in ugly gray colors. They actually improved this in every new Toyota model (I am thinking of European Yaris, Corolla, Verso, Avensis, Rav4, LC120/150 that i am used to seeing in the shop and driving around... it could be only worse in USA as they use cheaper materials there). For instance 99-2006 Yaris was rattle trap with light gray interior and everyone who bought it, bought it despite the interior and not because of it. Yet in quality surveys, that Yaris is top of the crop.
spwolf is offline  
Old 12-23-09, 11:37 AM
  #29  
The G Man
Lexus Test Driver
 
The G Man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: MA
Posts: 8,698
Received 68 Likes on 56 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by spwolf
it is a mistake if it is problematic, on the other hand, sharing these ECUs means that there will be less problematic parts for individual units.

In fact, all of japanese manufacturers formed joint engineering venture that is doing this interface, and it will be used on all cars, not just Toyotas.
Let’s take a machine or a computer system that has to be as reliable as possible, a nuclear power plant is a good example. A nuclear power plant is not run by one computer, it is run by a number of redundant industrial computers network connected to a server which has a back up. If one computer goes down, the plant is still capable of running.

Sharing CPUs on a car is a way for the maufacturers to reduce cost, not increase reliability.

Last edited by The G Man; 12-23-09 at 11:47 AM.
The G Man is offline  
Old 12-23-09, 11:46 AM
  #30  
spwolf
Lexus Champion
 
spwolf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 19,934
Received 163 Likes on 121 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by The G Man
Let’s take a machine or a computer system that has to be as reliable as possible, a nuclear power plant is a good example. A nuclear power plant is not run by one computer, it is run by a number of redundant industrial computers network connected to a server which has a back up. If one computer goes down, the plant is still capable of running.
why are you assuming that there would be no failovers? There are always failovers in vehicles... Prius's brake by wire system, has 3 different failover systems. Brake by wire system destroyed MB's reputation on the other hand... Why would it be different for unified ecu?
spwolf is offline  


Quick Reply: Toyota to cut auto parts costs by 30%, reports say



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:05 PM.