Car Chat General discussion about Lexus, other auto manufacturers and automotive news.

2010 IS350C F-Sport Review: $62K of not much win

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-03-10, 02:45 PM
  #31  
Oleg400
Advanced
iTrader: (7)
 
Oleg400's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Corrupt IL
Posts: 675
Received 15 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Who here would choose the IS-c over an IS-f,M3,C63?
Kay tanx.
Oleg400 is offline  
Old 02-03-10, 03:18 PM
  #32  
4TehNguyen
Lexus Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
4TehNguyen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 26,059
Received 51 Likes on 46 Posts
Default

moral of the story: dont buy a slew of factory performance parts at MSRP
4TehNguyen is offline  
Old 02-03-10, 04:15 PM
  #33  
bad co
Lexus Champion
 
bad co's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Park Ridge IL
Posts: 2,485
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Im sorry but the G37 vert is better value, the is-c f sport just matches it and the g37 vert is way cheeper. But out of all of those I would go with the with the mustang vert
bad co is offline  
Old 02-03-10, 04:20 PM
  #34  
spwolf
Lexus Champion
 
spwolf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 19,934
Received 163 Likes on 121 Posts
Default

Money Well Spent
If you're looking to spend good money on a modified IS convertible, look no further than the $2,346 wheel/tire upgrade and add it to the $1,588 for springs, shocks and antiroll bars. The resulting $3,934 is a reasonable amount to spend on the 2010 Lexus IS 350C's chassis, and here's why.

The forged-aluminum wheels reduce unsprung weight by 21 pounds (5.5 pounds at each 19-by-8-inch front wheel; 5 pounds at each 19-by-9-inch rear wheel), plus they look undeniably cool. Combined with supple Bilstein dampers, the new springs reduce ride height by 1.3 inches in the front and 0.9 inch in the rear. The antiroll bars are 105 percent stiffer up front and 320 percent stiffer in the rear. What does this all mean? It means the lower chassis is more responsive, the handling balance is a little livelier and the tauter suspension calibration works the new Michelin Sport PS2 tires harder.

As is usually the case with such suspension kits — especially when they're applied to convertibles — we were guardedly optimistic (a.k.a. "suspicious") about this one's ability to deliver a car that works well both at the track and in the real world. But the F-Sport hardware comes through.

With a slalom speed of 68.2 mph and an average lateral acceleration of 0.89g around the skid pad, the 2010 Lexus IS 350C F-Sport has improved by 1.4 mph and 0.02g respectively over the much lighter IS 350 sedan. Moreover, there's only a negligible decline in ride quality and almost no increase in road noise. What's more, the convertible's sturdy structure doesn't mind the added firmness and remains taut and rattle-free. Better grip, more control, better stance and virtually the same ride qualities. Sign us up.
Inside line article is million times better... who in their right mind would buy all of the F-Sport accessories?

Edmunds Inside Line:
http://www.insideline.com/lexus/is-3...and-video.html
spwolf is offline  
Old 02-03-10, 06:01 PM
  #35  
flipside909
Lexus Connoisseur
 
flipside909's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: USA
Posts: 19,802
Received 534 Likes on 283 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 4TehNguyen
moral of the story: dont buy a slew of factory performance parts at MSRP
Very true.

We know damn well that people here on CL don't buy parts at MSRP, let alone cars.
flipside909 is offline  
Old 02-03-10, 08:04 PM
  #36  
MR_F1
Lexus Champion
 
MR_F1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: NY
Posts: 3,370
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by (Cj)
That could be a selling point for F sport cars, but this goes back to what I've said before. Lexus needs an F-Sport package instead of F-Sport accessory kits. I'm sure the LS Sport model is selling better than any of the GS F-Sport accessory models.

Wholeheartedly, 199% agreed. Of course, still sell the parts, but an F-Sport trim model at a much better price (Face it, $62k is a LOT of coin.... more than an IS F ) would be very, very welcome and I'm sure would be worth their while.
MR_F1 is offline  
Old 02-03-10, 08:40 PM
  #37  
Stage3
Lexus Fanatic
iTrader: (3)
 
Stage3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 7,379
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

That's an absurd price...

Stage3 is offline  
Old 02-03-10, 09:26 PM
  #38  
I8ABMR
Lexus Fanatic
 
I8ABMR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Waiting for next track day
Posts: 22,608
Received 102 Likes on 67 Posts
Default

There was a little article in Super Street magazine and they said the same thing . Its nice, but dated, and not worth 62k.
I8ABMR is offline  
Old 02-04-10, 12:33 AM
  #39  
balutsc300
Lead Lap
iTrader: (1)
 
balutsc300's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: ca
Posts: 480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

jeezus 62k? thats all i can say :O
balutsc300 is offline  
Old 02-04-10, 06:58 AM
  #40  
Pitman
Rookie
 
Pitman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: NYC
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

$62K

NEVER!
Pitman is offline  
Old 02-04-10, 08:56 AM
  #41  
LexFather
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Another example of failed reading comprehension.

No one is going to buy it for 62k and no dealership is going to load one up at 62k. This is for reference purposes.
 
Old 02-04-10, 09:02 AM
  #42  
spwolf
Lexus Champion
 
spwolf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 19,934
Received 163 Likes on 121 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 1SICKLEX
Another example of failed reading comprehension.

No one is going to buy it for 62k and no dealership is going to load one up at 62k. This is for reference purposes.
yep... well whole article was set that way, Edmunds got the point - you only need $4k for significant stuff.
spwolf is offline  
Old 02-04-10, 07:33 PM
  #43  
IS-SV
Lexus Fanatic
 
IS-SV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: tech capital
Posts: 14,100
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by 1SICKLEX
No one is going to buy it for 62k and no dealership is going to load one up at 62k. This is for reference purposes.
To showcase the full spectrum of F-hardware.
IS-SV is offline  
Old 02-05-10, 07:51 AM
  #44  
Infra
Lexus Test Driver
iTrader: (1)
 
Infra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: TX
Posts: 1,091
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Joeb427
For $62K,I go M3 in a heartbeat.
That includes $12K of F-sport parts. $50k is pretty reasonable for the car. You could make an argument for the sway bars, intake, & exhaust, but I don't really see the point to spending $8-9k on brakes and wheels on a heavy convertible.
Infra is offline  
Old 02-05-10, 09:34 AM
  #45  
flipside909
Lexus Connoisseur
 
flipside909's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: USA
Posts: 19,802
Received 534 Likes on 283 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Infra
That includes $12K of F-sport parts. $50k is pretty reasonable for the car. You could make an argument for the sway bars, intake, & exhaust, but I don't really see the point to spending $8-9k on brakes and wheels on a heavy convertible.
If you look at it on the opposite end, you need bigger and better brakes to stop a heavy convertible.
flipside909 is offline  


Quick Reply: 2010 IS350C F-Sport Review: $62K of not much win



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:47 PM.