Car Chat General discussion about Lexus, other auto manufacturers and automotive news.

US News & World Report: 2010's Best/Worst

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-10-10, 01:09 PM
  #1  
GS69
Lead Lap
Thread Starter
 
GS69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: NC
Posts: 4,247
Received 10 Likes on 8 Posts
Post US News & World Report: 2010's Best/Worst


Just because a car is brand-new doesn’t mean that it’s a good buy. In fact, many 2010 models suffer from the same woes as older models -- not enough power, poor fuel economy and questionable reliability. Others, however, make great choices.

With so many new-car options available, it can be difficult to separate the best from the worst. Making an informed buying decision requires that car shoppers research and compare every vehicle in a given class. Who really has time for that?

To make the process easier, we’ve identified five of the best and worst new cars offered in 2010. While most are entirely new, others are redesigned or refreshed. Be sure to add the better ones to your short list and consider crossing the worst ones off.

2010s You Should Buy
Hyundai Genesis Coupe

A newcomer to the class of affordable sports cars, the Genesis Coupe provides real rear-wheel-drive sports performance for a fraction of the price. Shoppers can choose between a 210-horsepower turbo I4 engine and a 306-horsepower V6. Plus it features a sleek exterior design, an accommodating four-passenger cabin and good scores in federal government crash tests. Not surprisingly, it debuts near the top of its class.

MSRP: $22,000 - $31,000

Ford Transit Connect


The all-new Ford Transit Connect may be the best thing that’s happened to small businesses since QuickBooks. This workman’s van provides a whopping 135 cubic feet of cargo space, an impressive city/highway fuel economy of 22/25 mpg, and loads of business-friendly features. These include an available in-car computer system that uses 2G and 3G networks to access records and track fleet activity. The Transit Connect is so well-liked that it was recently voted North American Truck of the Year.

MSRP: $20,780 - $22,350

Mercedes-Benz E-Class

Redesigned for 2010, the E-Class is an all-around better car than the model it replaces. It provides sportier handling dynamics, an elegant exterior design, a lavish cabin and an old-world feel that few luxury large cars can match. It also features revolutionary safety systems like Attention Assist, which utilizes behavioral detection technology to alarm drowsy drivers -- and comes standard. Best of all, the new E-Class is cheaper than last year’s model.

MSRP: $48,600 - $58,800

GMC Terrain

The newly-introduced GMC Terrain adds one heck of a value package to the class of affordable compact SUVs. It shares its mechanical elements with the Chevrolet Equinox, but provides a bolder exterior design and loads of snazzy yet practical interior features. Among them is a standard rearview camera, an iPod interface and a sliding rear seat. Best of all, the Terrain affords excellent fuel economy and even leads its class with a highway fuel economy rating of 32 mpg.

MSRP: $24,250 - $31,000

Cadillac CTS Sport Wagon

For 2010, Cadillac set out to create a vehicle that combines the sporty driving dynamics of its CTS sedan with the utility of a station wagon -- and that’s exactly what it did. The CTS Sport Wagon leaves critics impressed with its superb performance abilities and stylish design, inside and out. Among its many selling points, the CTS Sport Wagon is available with either rear-wheel or all-wheel drivetrains. It also features a five-year/100,000-mile powertrain warranty, which is the longest in its class.

MSRP: $39,830 - $53,620

2010s You Should Think Twice About
Honda Accord Crosstour

Given the popularity of its coupe and sedan siblings, much was expected of the new Accord Crosstour, an affordable midsize SUV. Sadly, it doesn’t match the hype. It’s luxurious and is backed by Honda’s superb history of reliability, but commands an expensive price tag. Plus, with only 25.7 to 51.3 cubic feet of cargo space, it doesn’t provide much utility. Critics are also split over its odd exterior styling. Because of these cons, the Accord Crosstour ranks near the bottom of its class.

MSRP: $29,670 - $36,220

Dodge Caliber


Despite receiving a mild refresh, the 2010 Caliber still trails behind in the class of affordable compact wagons. It looks bold and provides a respectable 18.5 to 48 cubic feet of cargo room, but is marked by subpar interior materials, underpowered engine options and sloppy handling. For 2010, Dodge has discontinued the relatively sporty SRT trim and no longer offers a lifetime powertrain warranty. With such cutbacks, it’s difficult to justify buying the 2010 Caliber.

MSRP: $17,090 - $20,925

Lexus HS Hybrid


Drivers don’t know what to make of the Lexus HS -- the first luxury car to emphasize fuel economy over all else. Its interior comes jam-packed with loads of easy-to-use convenience and safety features, but doesn’t meet typical high levels of Lexus quality. And while its combined 35 mpg fuel economy is great for an entry-level luxury car, it’s nowhere near as impressive as the 50-mpg Prius. As such, it doesn’t excel as either a Lexus or a hybrid. The all-new HS ranks at the bottom of the Upscale Midsize Car class. On top of everything else, the HS has also been included in a global safety recall, along with the Prius, due to a defect with the cars' braking systems.

MSRP: $34,200 - $36,970

Chrysler Sebring

Don’t be fooled by the elimination of its hood strafes -- which most reviewers found hideous -- the 2010 Sebring is the same bad investment as it ever was. While its lower trim engine options are underpowered, its strongest engine features dismal fuel economy. Reviewers also complain that its cabin features low-quality materials and not much cargo room. The Sebring’s long-term cost of ownership is also a cause of concern, especially now that Chrysler is no longer offering a lifetime powertrain warranty. Not surprisingly, the Sebring ranks near the bottom of the Affordable Midsize Car class.

MSRP: $22,115 - $34,705

Land Rover LR4

Last year’s LR3 is redesigned for 2010 to provide greater on-road performance and more intuitive controls. However, auto writers point out that the LR4's lackluster city/highway fuel economy (12/17 mpg), Land Rover's poor reputation for reliability and high sticker price significantly detract from its overall value. And while it’s a superior off-road performer, it’s highly unlikely that anyone would take an SUV this expensive and luxurious over rough terrain. The LR4 ranks near the bottom of the Luxury Midsize SUV class.

MSRP: $47,250 - $47,250
GS69 is offline  
Old 02-10-10, 01:15 PM
  #2  
I8ABMR
Lexus Fanatic
 
I8ABMR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Waiting for next track day
Posts: 22,608
Received 102 Likes on 67 Posts
Default

I have to agree. Some 2010's are duds and some are studs. I agree that the Lexus HS and Honda crosstour are not as competitive as they need to be or have offerings from the same company that are cheaper and more efficient
I8ABMR is offline  
Old 02-10-10, 01:29 PM
  #3  
(Cj)
Lexus Test Driver
 
(Cj)'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: somewhere out there
Posts: 1,227
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by I8ABMR
...the Lexus HS and Honda crosstour are not as competitive as they need to be...
I think this sums up my thoughts. The Lexus HS should be getting 40+mpg combined and be more powerful, and the Crosstour needs to not be ugly.

Honda should have just made the Crosstour a jacked up Accord Wagon, NOT a poor mans BMW 5 series GT.

Lexus should have developed a unique powerplant for the HS (since it's supposed to be a unique dedicated hybrid vehicle) using Toyota newer 2.5L engine and not used a slightly modified Camry drivetrain.
(Cj) is offline  
Old 02-10-10, 01:35 PM
  #4  
flipside909
Lexus Connoisseur
 
flipside909's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: USA
Posts: 19,802
Received 534 Likes on 283 Posts
Default

Yep, leave it to news magazine which ranks colleges and healthcare to rank and rate cars.
flipside909 is offline  
Old 02-10-10, 01:38 PM
  #5  
flipside909
Lexus Connoisseur
 
flipside909's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: USA
Posts: 19,802
Received 534 Likes on 283 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by (Cj)
I think this sums up my thoughts. The Lexus HS should be getting 40+mpg combined and be more powerful, and the Crosstour needs to not be ugly.

Honda should have just made the Crosstour a jacked up Accord Wagon, NOT a poor mans BMW 5 series GT.

Lexus should have developed a unique powerplant for the HS (since it's supposed to be a unique dedicated hybrid vehicle) using Toyota newer 2.5L engine and not used a slightly modified Camry drivetrain.
We can compare the HS to the Prius and Camry all day. Fact of the matter is, they're not targeted towards the same demographic. The HS gets a combined 35 mpg, sure not stellar or record breaking, but it's the best amongst the luxury name plates. No other luxury car manufacturer has anything to offer to date.
flipside909 is offline  
Old 02-10-10, 01:58 PM
  #6  
SecPole14
Lexus Champion
 
SecPole14's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: I wonder why I live alone here...
Posts: 4,330
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by flipside909
We can compare the HS to the Prius and Camry all day. Fact of the matter is, they're not targeted towards the same demographic. The HS gets a combined 35 mpg, sure not stellar or record breaking, but it's the best amongst the luxury name plates. No other luxury car manufacturer has anything to offer to date.
Does the HS belong on the list of 10 worst? No, but the point stands: It's not a particularly good hybrid, and it's not a particularly good Lexus.
SecPole14 is offline  
Old 02-10-10, 02:01 PM
  #7  
projectdna
Lexus Fanatic
iTrader: (56)
 
projectdna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: California
Posts: 7,371
Received 25 Likes on 23 Posts
Default

wait, what's the criteria that they're basing their recommendations on?

and in other news, i would like to thank mainstream media for repeatedly hitting the panic button.
projectdna is offline  
Old 02-10-10, 02:01 PM
  #8  
flipside909
Lexus Connoisseur
 
flipside909's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: USA
Posts: 19,802
Received 534 Likes on 283 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by AdrianXT
No, but the point stands: It's not a particularly good hybrid, and it's not a particularly good Lexus.
So what you're concluding is that it's not a good hybrid because it doesn't get Prius hyper mileage and it's not a good Lexus because it looks like a Corolla right?

Have you seen or driven the HS? Just wondering.
flipside909 is offline  
Old 02-10-10, 02:01 PM
  #9  
(Cj)
Lexus Test Driver
 
(Cj)'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: somewhere out there
Posts: 1,227
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by AdrianXT
Does the HS belong on the list of 10 worst? No, but the point stands: It's not a particularly good hybrid, and it's not a particularly good Lexus.
amen
(Cj) is offline  
Old 02-10-10, 02:06 PM
  #10  
(Cj)
Lexus Test Driver
 
(Cj)'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: somewhere out there
Posts: 1,227
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by flipside909
So what you're concluding is that it's not a good hybrid because it doesn't get Prius hyper mileage and it's not a good Lexus because it looks like a Corolla right?

Have you seen or driven the HS? Just wondering.
It doesn't have to get Prius mileage, but for a compact dedicated hybrid with an I4 mileage should be better. If the big heavy V6 300hp RXh can get 32mpg, the HS should be getting way better than 35mpg since its lighter and 4 cylinder.

It's not a good Lexus because it doesn't embody Lexus's theme of the pursuit of perfection. For Lexus's first ever dedicated hybrid it should have been more groundbreaking.

I'm more impressed with the RXh and that's not even a dedicated hybrid letalone a sedan.
(Cj) is offline  
Old 02-10-10, 02:12 PM
  #11  
flipside909
Lexus Connoisseur
 
flipside909's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: USA
Posts: 19,802
Received 534 Likes on 283 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by (Cj)
It doesn't have to get Prius mileage, but for a compact dedicated hybrid with an I4 mileage should be better. If the big heavy V6 300hp RXh can get 32mpg, the HS should be getting way better than 35mpg since its lighter and 4 cylinder.
Actually it does get better mileage than the EPA's combined rating of 35mpg. From my personal experience I've gotten 40.1 mpg consistently in an HS on the highway on long hauls, cruise control at 75mph, A/C on, passengers, and a load of luggage. I think people are more obsessed by numbers on paper, rather than actual real world numbers. I think the HS is a great car for what it is. But that's my opinion.

It's not a good Lexus because it doesn't embody Lexus's theme of the pursuit of perfection. For Lexus's first ever dedicated hybrid it should have been more groundbreaking.

I'm more impressed with the RXh and that's not even a dedicated hybrid letalone a sedan.
Everyone's tastes are different. I love my personal 2009 ISF but i'm more impressed with the features and options the HS has to offer (Remote Touch, Pre Collision/Radar Cruise, Lane Keep Assist, front wide view camera, LED headlamps). Other than the PCS/Radar Cruise, you can't find those options on the ISF.
flipside909 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
GS69
Car Chat
9
07-15-10 12:06 PM
GS69
Car Chat
45
07-05-10 11:22 PM
GS69
Car Chat
23
05-09-10 10:08 AM
Gojirra99
Car Chat
16
11-04-09 07:20 AM
GS69
Car Chat
12
04-03-08 06:17 PM



Quick Reply: US News & World Report: 2010's Best/Worst



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:24 PM.