Car Chat General discussion about Lexus, other auto manufacturers and automotive news.

The most troubled automaker of 2010? It's not Toyota...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-12-10, 10:01 PM
  #31  
jadu
live.love.laugh.lexus
Forum Moderator
iTrader: (42)
 
jadu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: CALI
Posts: 11,581
Received 89 Likes on 71 Posts
Default

poor chrysler
jadu is offline  
Old 03-13-10, 04:35 AM
  #32  
caddyowner
Lead Lap
 
caddyowner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: MI
Posts: 4,810
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

^^^^

Exactly. If Chrysler didn't have bad luck, they'd have no luck at all:

1 - Bought out by MB. Excuse me, they touted that as a "Merger of equals" all over the Detroit media. Yeah, red-headed stepchildren get treated better than Chrysler did under MB. The folks in Auburn Hills had the German version of cooties in the eyes of their masters in Stuttgart.

2 - Bought by a private capital firm and completely disemboweled of engineering talent and product pipeline to try to flip the purchase. The goal was to sell the brand names to a foreign automaker looking to have an instant U.S. dealer network and brand recognition.

3 - "Bailed out" by the U.S. government at the behest of the UAW and midwest Democratic politicians.

4 - Bought by the perpetually mismanaged Fiat, who gets the assistance of rigged bankruptcy court proceedings to further hack up the company and steal what little was left of Chrysler with no investment on their part. Fiat management then expresses shock, yes shock, when they arrive in Auburn Hills and discover that there are no engineers left who know how to put an engine in a car.

At least train wrecks happen quickly. I suspect this one is going to limp along for some time, showing some glimmers of hope (like the new Ram), before expiring.
caddyowner is offline  
Old 03-13-10, 10:00 AM
  #33  
LexFather
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Originally Posted by caddyowner
^^^^

Exactly. If Chrysler didn't have bad luck, they'd have no luck at all:

1 - Bought out by MB. Excuse me, they touted that as a "Merger of equals" all over the Detroit media. Yeah, red-headed stepchildren get treated better than Chrysler did under MB. The folks in Auburn Hills had the German version of cooties in the eyes of their masters in Stuttgart.

2 - Bought by a private capital firm and completely disemboweled of engineering talent and product pipeline to try to flip the purchase. The goal was to sell the brand names to a foreign automaker looking to have an instant U.S. dealer network and brand recognition.

3 - "Bailed out" by the U.S. government at the behest of the UAW and midwest Democratic politicians.

4 - Bought by the perpetually mismanaged Fiat, who gets the assistance of rigged bankruptcy court proceedings to further hack up the company and steal what little was left of Chrysler with no investment on their part. Fiat management then expresses shock, yes shock, when they arrive in Auburn Hills and discover that there are no engineers left who know how to put an engine in a car.

At least train wrecks happen quickly. I suspect this one is going to limp along for some time, showing some glimmers of hope (like the new Ram), before expiring.
Good post. They never recovered from the rape that Benz gave them. Chrysler had money in the bank, exciting designs and concepts in the late 1990s...

Benz took the money and left them for dead.
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
speedflex
Car Chat
12
01-28-11 07:28 AM
LexFather
Car Chat
11
01-25-11 09:15 AM
GFerg
Car Chat
75
10-25-10 04:09 PM
bagwell
Car Chat
73
09-01-09 10:28 PM
GFerg
Car Chat
1
05-04-06 04:50 AM



Quick Reply: The most troubled automaker of 2010? It's not Toyota...



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:09 PM.