Car Chat General discussion about Lexus, other auto manufacturers and automotive news.

Honda Settles Class-Action Lawsuit Over Brakes

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-07-10, 09:28 AM
  #1  
GSteg
Rookie
Thread Starter
iTrader: (15)
 
GSteg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: CA
Posts: 16,017
Likes: 0
Received 79 Likes on 61 Posts
Default Honda Settles Class-Action Lawsuit Over Brakes

Honda has agreed to settle a class-action suit that claims the rear brakes in 750,000 late model Accords and Acura TSXs are wearing out more than twice as fast as they should.

The suit was filed in September, claiming that unreasonable wear was due to a defective design that caused “excessive force to be applied to the vehicle’s rear wheels.”

It covers 2008–9 Accords and 2009 Acura TSXs as well as a small number of 2010 models. The suit says the rear pads wear out in 15,000-20,000 miles when they should last at about 70,000 miles, that Honda has refused to provide repairs under the new-car warranty and failed to warn new buyers that the rear brakes would require such frequent repairs.
The suit attributes the problem to a new braking system that included four-wheel discs and an electronic brake distribution system that became standard on the 2008 Accord and 2009 TSX.

On its Web site, Honda described electronic brake distribution as “a more exacting method of ensuring that proportionate braking forces are applied to the brakes. In order to avoid needless ABS cycling during a nonemergency stop, E.B.D. uses the ABS sensors to detect impending rear-wheel lockup. Then it signals an additional ABS solenoid to reduce braking force to the rear and add more to the front.”

Honda has come up with a new brake pad and can make adjustments to the braking system that will “greatly increase the lifespan of those rear brake pads,” said Eric Gibbs of San Francisco, one of the lawyers who filed the case.

Chris Martin, a Honda spokesman, said the automaker did not comment on pending litigation.

The proposed settlement says that Honda denies there is a defect or that it has done anything wrong. The settlement also says neither Honda nor the plaintiffs’ lawyers have identified a safety problem.
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration has about 350 owner complaints about the issue on its Web site.

Jerry Ongaro of Naperville, Ill., filed his complaint with the Center for Auto Safety. Mr. Ongaro said he was charged $256 for new rear brakes on his 2008 Accord after only 26,000 miles. “Most of the miles I put on this particular car have been expressway. No stop and go. Strictly zoom, zoom. Back and forth. I was dumbfounded,” he said in an interview.
“I just got very angry at the seeming indifference Honda had with this,” he said. “I was really frustrated, this is my eighth Honda. They have been great cars.”

Judge Margaret M. Morrow of the United States District Court for the Central District of California is scheduled in May to consider whether the settlement is fair to owners and deserves preliminary approval. If she grants preliminary approval, interested parties have the opportunity to comment. She would consider final approval later this year.
Here’s what is proposed:

• Owners who had the pads replaced and rotors resurfaced before approval of the settlement would be reimbursed for one half of the cost, or a maximum of $125, “whichever is less.” That would be for repairs in which the original worn pads were replaced with pads of the same type. Owners can file claims for multiple repairs, and the work does not need to have been done at a Honda dealership.

Owners who complained on the N.H.T.S.A. Web site typically said they paid from $100 to $300 for the repair, which sometimes included the brake rotors being smoothed out.

• Owners will also be given a one-time payment of up to $150 to have the new, redesigned brake pads installed.
Mr. Gibbs said the $150 should pay for most repairs, but some consumers might have to pay an extra $10 or $20. He said that seemed like the best deal possible because there would be no guarantee that consumers would get more after a trial.

“Cases like this, when you are alleging that a wear part is defective, are extraordinarily difficult to prove and to win,” Mr. Gibbs said.
The settlement proposes that $2 million for fees and expenses be shared by Mr. Gibbs and the other lawyers in the case, including those from Berk Law of Washington.
Link: http://wheels.blogs.nytimes.com/2010...t-over-brakes/
GSteg is offline  
Old 04-07-10, 09:31 AM
  #2  
GSteg
Rookie
Thread Starter
iTrader: (15)
 
GSteg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: CA
Posts: 16,017
Likes: 0
Received 79 Likes on 61 Posts
Default

Brake pads, especially the rears, should last MUCH more than 15-20k miles. After all, these aren't race cars. I've personally had to replace the rear brakes for a friend's 2006 Honda Accord and it only had 25k at most. It's not even on the list of 'affected' cars.
GSteg is offline  
Old 04-07-10, 09:33 AM
  #3  
bagwell
Lexus Champion
 
bagwell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: The Woodlands, TX
Posts: 11,205
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by GSteg
Brake pads, especially the rears, should last MUCH more than 15-20k miles. After all, these aren't race cars. I've personally had to replace the rear brakes for a friend's 2006 Honda Accord and it only had 25k at most. It's not even on the list of 'affected' cars.
unless they like to leave the parking brake on and drive off....
bagwell is offline  
Old 04-07-10, 09:36 AM
  #4  
GSteg
Rookie
Thread Starter
iTrader: (15)
 
GSteg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: CA
Posts: 16,017
Likes: 0
Received 79 Likes on 61 Posts
Default

That could be a possibility, but I think most would have enough common sense to figure that out. That is, unless the "BRAKE" lights are turning off before the parking brakes completely disengages.
GSteg is offline  
Old 04-07-10, 09:47 AM
  #5  
mmarshall
Lexus Fanatic
 
mmarshall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Virginia/D.C. suburbs
Posts: 91,097
Received 87 Likes on 86 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by bagwell
unless they like to leave the parking brake on and drive off....
Don't laugh. It sometimes happens, especially if the brake lining/pad is only contacting (and dragging) very lightly.
mmarshall is offline  
Old 04-07-10, 09:57 AM
  #6  
mmarshall
Lexus Fanatic
 
mmarshall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Virginia/D.C. suburbs
Posts: 91,097
Received 87 Likes on 86 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by GSteg
Brake pads, especially the rears, should last MUCH more than 15-20k miles. After all, these aren't race cars. I've personally had to replace the rear brakes for a friend's 2006 Honda Accord and it only had 25k at most. It's not even on the list of 'affected' cars.
Mr. Ongaro said he was charged $256 for new rear brakes on his 2008 Accord after only 26,000 miles. “Most of the miles I put on this particular car have been expressway. No stop and go.
Although many pads/linings last for 40-50K miles or more, replacing them at 25 or 26K is not, IMO, considered excessive, especially since some auto manufacturers use a softer, less-durable pad/lining compound that is designed to avoid squealing/grating noise in the brakes......brake noise itself is sometimes the source of owner complaints. So, in general, I don't see where a lawsuit is justified, but the fact that Mr. Ongaro's car needed new brakes at that mileage, under expressway conditions, where the brakes are not used much, may be cause for some concern.

Hondas, traditionally, have had rather weak brake performance and spongy pedal action, meaning that the pedal must be pushed harder to get the same amount of respose than in some other vehicles. That, of course, doesn't do much for brake life either.
mmarshall is offline  
Old 04-07-10, 12:38 PM
  #7  
TRDFantasy
Lexus Fanatic
 
TRDFantasy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: A better place
Posts: 7,285
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by GSteg
Brake pads, especially the rears, should last MUCH more than 15-20k miles. After all, these aren't race cars. I've personally had to replace the rear brakes for a friend's 2006 Honda Accord and it only had 25k at most. It's not even on the list of 'affected' cars.
Agreed. I am not surprised at all regarding this bit of news. I guess it's better than having brake fade problems, but this is still an inexcusable problem.
TRDFantasy is offline  
Old 04-07-10, 01:36 PM
  #8  
mmarshall
Lexus Fanatic
 
mmarshall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Virginia/D.C. suburbs
Posts: 91,097
Received 87 Likes on 86 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by TRDFantasy
Agreed. I am not surprised at all regarding this bit of news. I guess it's better than having brake fade problems, but this is still an inexcusable problem.

Fade, as I understand it, does not come from wear of the lining/pad material, but from heat buildup with repeated use, causing the drums or calipers to expand to the point where you have to push the pedal harder (and generate more hydraulic pressure) to keep the linings/pads in contact with the rotor or drum. Perhaps I misunderstood your post, but I don't see where fade would be an issue with the problems that the thread topic describes.
mmarshall is offline  
Old 04-07-10, 01:54 PM
  #9  
IS-SV
Lexus Fanatic
 
IS-SV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: tech capital
Posts: 14,100
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Sure is a bit of marginal and not very useful or accurate discussion of brakes in this thread, maybe we can have a real qualified technician chime in the the braking issue(s) with Hondas.
IS-SV is offline  
Old 04-07-10, 02:03 PM
  #10  
GSteg
Rookie
Thread Starter
iTrader: (15)
 
GSteg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: CA
Posts: 16,017
Likes: 0
Received 79 Likes on 61 Posts
Default

Honda likes to undersize their brake on many of their cars. While they pose no real safety issue, they're somewhat inadequate if you plan to stop repeatedly within a short period of time. I've had lots of Honda cars before and yes they do feel spongy and weak on some cars, but never did they put me in a harmful situation.

The brakes work... just not as well as other brands out there.
GSteg is offline  
Old 04-07-10, 02:07 PM
  #11  
GSteg
Rookie
Thread Starter
iTrader: (15)
 
GSteg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: CA
Posts: 16,017
Likes: 0
Received 79 Likes on 61 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mmarshall
Although many pads/linings last for 40-50K miles or more, replacing them at 25 or 26K is not, IMO, considered excessive, especially since some auto manufacturers use a softer, less-durable pad/lining compound that is designed to avoid squealing/grating noise in the brakes......
In my experience, the front pads will tend to wear out faster than the rear pads. I just find it odd that the rear pads need replacement when the front pads still has 70-75% life left. It's even more unusual since most of those miles are from highway mileage.
GSteg is offline  
Old 04-07-10, 02:34 PM
  #12  
mmarshall
Lexus Fanatic
 
mmarshall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Virginia/D.C. suburbs
Posts: 91,097
Received 87 Likes on 86 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by IS-SV
Sure is a bit of marginal and not very useful or accurate discussion of brakes in this thread, maybe we can have a real qualified technician chime in the the braking issue(s) with Hondas.
Unfortunately, technicians, regardless of the issue or amount of training, won't be making the settlements in this case. If the past is any guide, it will probably be lawyers, government officials, and company reps.
mmarshall is offline  
Old 04-07-10, 02:47 PM
  #13  
IS-SV
Lexus Fanatic
 
IS-SV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: tech capital
Posts: 14,100
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by mmarshall
Unfortunately, technicians, regardless of the issue or amount of training, won't be making the settlements in this case. If the past is any guide, it will probably be lawyers, government officials, and company reps.
Agreed on above statement regarding settlement. But I was talking more about the discussion of brake fade and other technical aspects of Honda's brakes.
IS-SV is offline  
Old 04-07-10, 03:00 PM
  #14  
mmarshall
Lexus Fanatic
 
mmarshall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Virginia/D.C. suburbs
Posts: 91,097
Received 87 Likes on 86 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by IS-SV
Agreed on above statement regarding settlement. But I was talking more about the discussion of brake fade and other technical aspects of Honda's brakes.
It's fairly well-known, though, even outside of technician classes, that Honda tends to use smallish brakes on their vehicles, and that can cause sub-standard brake performance. Some of the most die-hard Honda fans I've come across have also had that complaint. The old CRX was a classic example, but, of course, many newer ones as well.

I don't want to take the thread off-topic, but think back to some of the Chrysler products you and I learned to drive on some 40 years ago. Their drum brakes, especially the non-power ones, had the same problem.....too small for the car's weight. Fade, short life, and poor brake performance were generally a fact of life with them.

Last edited by mmarshall; 04-07-10 at 03:06 PM.
mmarshall is offline  
Old 04-07-10, 03:21 PM
  #15  
TRDFantasy
Lexus Fanatic
 
TRDFantasy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: A better place
Posts: 7,285
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mmarshall
Fade, as I understand it, does not come from wear of the lining/pad material, but from heat buildup with repeated use, causing the drums or calipers to expand to the point where you have to push the pedal harder (and generate more hydraulic pressure) to keep the linings/pads in contact with the rotor or drum. Perhaps I misunderstood your post, but I don't see where fade would be an issue with the problems that the thread topic describes.
I didn't mean the pad problem here is causing fade. Rather, I was merely pointing out brake fade as a separate issue that affects certain Honda models.

Originally Posted by GSteg
Honda likes to undersize their brake on many of their cars. While they pose no real safety issue, they're somewhat inadequate if you plan to stop repeatedly within a short period of time. I've had lots of Honda cars before and yes they do feel spongy and weak on some cars, but never did they put me in a harmful situation.

The brakes work... just not as well as other brands out there.
Exactly. It's a "bare minimum" approach that Honda has in terms of engineering on a lot of parts, not just brakes.

Honda always tries to do as much as possible with the bare minimum, rather than spending the time and money to over-engineer a part and make it more robust than the minimum requirements.

I personal have experienced harmful situations with Honda brakes, one of the many reasons I am no longer a Honda fan.

Originally Posted by mmarshall
It's fairly well-known, though, even outside of technician classes, that Honda tends to use smallish brakes on their vehicles, and that can cause sub-standard brake performance. Some of the most die-hard Honda fans I've come across have also had that complaint. The old CRX was a classic example, but, of course, many newer ones as well.

I don't want to take the thread off-topic, but think back to some of the Chrysler products you and I learned to drive on some 40 years ago. Their drum brakes, especially the non-power ones, had the same problem.....too small for the car's weight. Fade, short life, and poor brake performance were generally a fact of life with them.
As a former die-hard Honda fan, you can include me in that group.
TRDFantasy is offline  


Quick Reply: Honda Settles Class-Action Lawsuit Over Brakes



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:26 PM.