Car Chat General discussion about Lexus, other auto manufacturers and automotive news.

Sharing platforms.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-09-10, 12:32 PM
  #1  
Slvr surfr
Lexus Test Driver
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Slvr surfr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: dc
Posts: 1,284
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 6 Posts
Default Sharing platforms.

Do you think platform sharing cheapens a car or line of cars. What if the LS shared a stretched platform with say avalon or camry, do you think it would still be prestigest. Opinions anyone?
Slvr surfr is offline  
Old 04-09-10, 12:39 PM
  #2  
IS350jet
Pole Position
 
IS350jet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Coral Springs, Fl
Posts: 2,882
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Slvr surfr
Do you think platform sharing cheapens a car or line of cars.
No, not at all.
IS350jet is offline  
Old 04-09-10, 12:50 PM
  #3  
IS-SV
Lexus Fanatic
 
IS-SV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: tech capital
Posts: 14,100
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Slvr surfr
Do you think platform sharing cheapens a car or line of cars. What if the LS shared a stretched platform with say avalon or camry, do you think it would still be prestigest. Opinions anyone?
1. No.

2. Poor unrealistic example given (a rwd LS based on fwd Avalon/Camry). Of course that would make for a crappy LS, that's why it's not being done.
IS-SV is offline  
Old 04-09-10, 02:15 PM
  #4  
I8ABMR
Lexus Fanatic
 
I8ABMR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Waiting for next track day
Posts: 22,608
Received 102 Likes on 67 Posts
Default

I think with the massive losses that the auto industry has sustained we will be seeing more and more platform sharing
I8ABMR is offline  
Old 04-09-10, 03:41 PM
  #5  
Slvr surfr
Lexus Test Driver
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Slvr surfr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: dc
Posts: 1,284
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by IS-SV
1. No.

2. Poor unrealistic example given (a rwd LS based on fwd Avalon/Camry). Of course that would make for a crappy LS, that's why it's not being done.
Ok then what toyota did have a large rear drive sedan and they based the LS on that platform. Would you then feel that it would cheapen the LS any. From what i seen only the US base there flagships on lesser models. Mayve you can say by doing that it saves money but it also adds a "oh its just a xxx" to the cars imo. I8ABMR maybe right giving the sign of the times plus with a little more styling differentiation a 2016 LS based on a large rear drive Scion might work!! LMAO
Slvr surfr is offline  
Old 04-09-10, 03:47 PM
  #6  
IS-SV
Lexus Fanatic
 
IS-SV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: tech capital
Posts: 14,100
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

^^^ rightohh, what-if Lexus was owned by GM.........., NA.

Platform sharing can be done intelligently and effectively as proven by some of the best auto companies.
IS-SV is offline  
Old 04-09-10, 08:27 PM
  #7  
LexFather
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Well the 7 series and 5 series now share platforms. Hasn't really bugged me.
The Phaeton shares platforms with Bentley. Nice move.
The IS is based off the GS platform. Works well.
The Fuga/M37 etc is FM based. Doesn't bug me as much anymore.
 
Old 04-09-10, 11:07 PM
  #8  
eyezack87
Lexus Test Driver
iTrader: (4)
 
eyezack87's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: CA
Posts: 5,004
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

If they make a good car out of sharing a platform, then it is fine by me
eyezack87 is offline  
Old 04-10-10, 02:34 PM
  #9  
IS-SV
Lexus Fanatic
 
IS-SV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: tech capital
Posts: 14,100
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by eyezack87
If they make a good car out of sharing a platform, then it is fine by me
Exactly, some of the best cars are based on shared platforms. And how closely they resemble the original car varies considerably. Many are rather loosely derived from the original car.
IS-SV is offline  
Old 04-10-10, 04:19 PM
  #10  
encore888
Lexus Champion
 
encore888's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: CA
Posts: 8,695
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Default

For prestige reasons, it helps IMO that the LS is on its own platform, not say Avalon on stretched Camry platform. For the smaller models, say IS on GS platform, that seems fine, especially as both models are targeting a similar focus of sporty luxury. Say the 7 were said to be on a stretched 5 platform would seem a bit less prestigious, but it seems that the 5 may be on a shrunken 7 platform...(in the end it gets to parsing words).
encore888 is offline  
Old 04-10-10, 04:26 PM
  #11  
un4given
Driver School Candidate
 
un4given's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: CA
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Doesn't really bother me if they shared platforms as long as they do it right.

Nobody seems to care of complain that the LX and LC share platforms nor does anyone ever mention the link between the FJ, 4runner and GX460
un4given is offline  
Old 04-11-10, 07:15 PM
  #12  
CK6Speed
Lexus Test Driver
iTrader: (1)
 
CK6Speed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: HI
Posts: 7,719
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Who cares if it gets the job done. Too many people are willing to buy the piece of crap because of its prestige and name brand vs something else that doesn't have the name brand recognition. Too me that is stupid. If the over all final product is good, it is good. If it works, it works. If today's LS460 was all the car it is today, but built off a stretched Camry platform I'd still buy it because of how the car performs. If people aren't willing to buy that same car just because.....they are stupid. But, like I always said, it's not my money so people can choose to buy or not buy whatever they want. It's all just my opinion.
CK6Speed is offline  
Old 04-12-10, 09:16 AM
  #13  
IS-SV
Lexus Fanatic
 
IS-SV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: tech capital
Posts: 14,100
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

My opinion is Lexus as a first-rate premium manufacturer would not make a LS out of a common Camry FWD stretched chassis, the discussion is pretty much pointless.

But I agree platform sharing is not a problem, every car must stand on its own merits.
IS-SV is offline  
Old 04-12-10, 09:19 AM
  #14  
mmarshall
Lexus Fanatic
 
mmarshall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Virginia/D.C. suburbs
Posts: 91,066
Received 87 Likes on 86 Posts
Default

I agree that the platform itself is not as important as the individual vehicle's merits. And, one has to consider that it it were not for platform-sharing, many new vehicles would (likely) cost substantially more than they do now, simply for the automakers to recoup the extra expense in research and development.

But that still doesn't excuse the (often) needlessly cheap, cost-cutting short cuts that I often see in new vehicles, including, unfortunately, one of my favorite manufacturers...Subaru, as well as others. A perfect example.....one I saw just the other day when I reviewed the 2011 Honda Pilot, was the manual hood prop-rod and no underhood insulation in a potentially 40K+ vehicle.

Last edited by mmarshall; 04-12-10 at 09:26 AM.
mmarshall is offline  
Old 04-12-10, 06:35 PM
  #15  
lamar411
Pole Position
 
lamar411's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: IL
Posts: 2,666
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Platform sharing seems common nowadays especially with GM? Escalade-Yukon-and Tahoe are the same platform and the escalade esv-yukon xl-suburban share platforms. its more annoying with GM vehicles because they look so much alike.
lamar411 is offline  


Quick Reply: Sharing platforms.



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:27 PM.