Car Chat General discussion about Lexus, other auto manufacturers and automotive news.

GX 460 4/19 VSC recall (Consumer Reports "don't buy" label lifted 5/7)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-13-10, 10:00 AM
  #46  
rominl
exclusive matchup

iTrader: (4)
 
rominl's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Lovely OC
Posts: 81,673
Received 190 Likes on 148 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by oohpapi44
I never said it wasn't an issue, it is and needs to be fixed ('save' the car sooner) but 'safety risk' needs to quantified with an actual number of likelihood to occur. .



What speed would initiate a large enough oversteer to cause a slide?
What speed would initiate a roll over if an object was bumped during the slide (if it occurs)
Is either a real life driving situation?
i agree, and that's why i said i am not at a position to quantify that. but i am only in the position to assume that CR would be making these statements and observations based on their "standard" that's used across different suv. but of course, otherwise, then CR is doing something wrong
rominl is offline  
Old 04-13-10, 10:26 AM
  #47  
RXSF
Moderator
 
RXSF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 12,054
Likes: 0
Received 74 Likes on 45 Posts
Default

looks like there just wasnt any stability control kicking in. However, it still looks very composed
RXSF is offline  
Old 04-13-10, 10:40 AM
  #48  
I8ABMR
Lexus Fanatic
 
I8ABMR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Waiting for next track day
Posts: 22,608
Received 102 Likes on 67 Posts
Default

you know whats funny is like 3 months ago on a saturday morning I was driving to work in the left lane. 2 lanes over there was a lady in a white GX. I dont know how she lost control but the next thing I knew was her car had over steered and she was heading right for me. I swerved to the left and floored it and watched as she spun , skidded ,and stopped in the shoulder. I think she swerved and then over corrected. Thats what happens when you put makeup on in the car
I8ABMR is offline  
Old 04-13-10, 10:59 AM
  #49  
SNiiP3R
Lead Lap
iTrader: (3)
 
SNiiP3R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Fuhgeddaboudit
Posts: 4,086
Received 35 Likes on 26 Posts
Default

Last month we had Priuses w/ breaking issues, now here comes a new wave of bs. I bet some will now attempt to flip their GX, so they could sue Lexus.
SNiiP3R is offline  
Old 04-13-10, 11:29 AM
  #50  
darkdream
Lexus Champion
 
darkdream's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Socal
Posts: 2,368
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

People are too reliant on electronic gadgets. My very first car was a SUV with no stability control and this issue has occurred numerous of times both in the wet and in the dry and I had always been able to control the car despite myself being a new driver even if the rear was kicked out to an extreme. I in general do not like SUVs which is why I do not have one now, but I am sure people who drive SUVs know of the decrease maneuverability of them.
darkdream is offline  
Old 04-13-10, 11:35 AM
  #51  
J.P.
Lexus Test Driver

 
J.P.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Treasury
Posts: 8,764
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by darkdream
People are too reliant on electronic gadgets. My very first car was a SUV with no stability control and this issue has occurred numerous of times both in the wet and in the dry and I had always been able to control the car despite myself being a new driver even if the rear was kicked out to an extreme. I in general do not like SUVs which is why I do not have one now, but I am sure people who drive SUVs know of the decrease maneuverability of them.
Live by the sword……..

Not pointing at Lexus in particular, most Luxury brands use their safety gadgets as selling \ marketing points, the consumer is dropping 55k on this SUV buying into the hype of all those gadgets making their automobile more safe.
J.P. is offline  
Old 04-13-10, 11:59 AM
  #52  
TRDFantasy
Lexus Fanatic
 
TRDFantasy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: A better place
Posts: 7,285
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

First off, the 4Runner is NOT affected. For those jumping to conclusions that Lexus should get rid of the GX or that it has a suspension/tire issue, that's incorrect.

The 4Runner using the SAME platform/chassis does not exhibit this problem.

Clearly, this is a problem that is unique to the GX and the way the stability control behaves.

I'm seeing this news spreading like fire in the media. Toyota needs to fix this quick!

Originally Posted by rominl
sigh, another bad press on toyota, they definitely need to get things together...

this is not about how a car is driven, it's about how the car reacts when it's likely to be driven not the way it should be, ie an accident situation. it's all about how toyota tunes the system and activate the stability control. they can definitely activate the system earlier (if needed) and take control on the car, rather than letting it continue to slide.

toyota has even more work to do
Totally agreed.

What I don't understand is that KDSS is standard, so the GX should not be leaning so much. Or is KDSS performing at the limit in this scenario and keeping all 4 tires on the ground ?

Originally Posted by GS3Tek

they have the optional KDSS
KDSS is standard on the new GX460.
TRDFantasy is offline  
Old 04-13-10, 12:19 PM
  #53  
4TehNguyen
Lexus Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
4TehNguyen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 26,059
Received 51 Likes on 46 Posts
Default

would be nice to see a video of the other SUVs to see how a SUV "should" look like doing that maneuver. The 4Runner apparently works which the GX is based off.

Lift-throttle oversteer because the weight shifted to the front during a turn? Welcome to RWD vehicles.

In real-world driving, lift-off oversteer could occur when a driver enters a highway’s exit ramp or drives through a sweeping turn and encounters an unexpected obstacle or suddenly finds that the turn is too tight for the vehicle’s speed. A natural impulse is to quickly lift off the accelerator pedal. If that were to happen in the GX, the rear could slide around far enough that a wheel could strike a curb or slide off the pavement.

Current GX 460 owners: If you own a 2010 Lexus GX 460, we recommend exercising care when exiting the highway or traveling twisty roads. Obeying the speed limit and being alert for potential road hazards should limit the risk of experiencing a problem, like that recorded at the test track. We hope that Toyota can quickly develop a software update for the stability control system and update current models with revised programming.
what?

We hope Toyota fixes these problems so you can lull yourself into a false sense of security, drive more recklessly, and depend on an ESC system instead of your own skill, get into an accident, and sue Toyota

How did we ever survive without ESC?
4TehNguyen is offline  
Old 04-13-10, 12:19 PM
  #54  
IS-SV
Lexus Fanatic
 
IS-SV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: tech capital
Posts: 14,100
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by TRDFantasy
What I don't understand is that KDSS is standard, so the GX should not be leaning so much. Or is KDSS performing at the limit in this scenario and keeping all 4 tires on the ground ?


KDSS is standard on the new GX460.
Yes, KDSS is standard. KDSS is working, meaning sway bars are coupled.

But I wouldn't expect the body roll to be anything less than a non-KDSS vehicle with the exact same roll bars. From a body roll/sway bar standpoint, the advantage with KDSS is the ability to decouple sway bars for better offroad articulation.

I agree with you, something with how the stability management system is behaving is causing this.
IS-SV is offline  
Old 04-13-10, 12:28 PM
  #55  
MR_F1
Lexus Champion
 
MR_F1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: NY
Posts: 3,370
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 1SICKLEX
CR would **** their pants seeing how the GX, Prado, Montero, Pajero, Xtrail, Petrol, etc are driven overseas.

I know I did. Never was a fan of the GX/Prado until I visited Jamrock and I was in utter amazement how people drove these SUVs with 7 people in them on awful roads and in the mountains.

Hell they drift buses and trucks filled with people. It was utterly amazing to watch quite frankly.


I have yet to drive the 460 but if I did I wouldn't really push it at all here. The ones I've seen so far have been at the mall.

To me its just beat up Toyota or save Toyota (like MT placing the Camry first last month).
This man speaketh the truth.

Originally Posted by darkdream
People are too reliant on electronic gadgets. My very first car was a SUV with no stability control and this issue has occurred numerous of times both in the wet and in the dry and I had always been able to control the car despite myself being a new driver even if the rear was kicked out to an extreme. I in general do not like SUVs which is why I do not have one now, but I am sure people who drive SUVs know of the decrease maneuverability of them.
+100000000000000000000000.

Driver aids will never replace a capable driver.
MR_F1 is offline  
Old 04-13-10, 12:44 PM
  #56  
CleanSC
Pole Position
 
CleanSC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Florida
Posts: 2,361
Received 26 Likes on 20 Posts
Default

Well whether we should rely on it or not, the government is mandating it to be standard equipment on all cars.

So whether you like it or not, Big Bro is making us drive with it.

Hopefully a quick reflash is all that is needed and we can simply move on before this snowballs any more than necessary. Toyota really doesn't need any more of this right now.
CleanSC is offline  
Old 04-13-10, 12:52 PM
  #57  
dsp979
Lead Lap
 
dsp979's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: CA
Posts: 715
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by darkdream
People are too reliant on electronic gadgets. My very first car was a SUV with no stability control and this issue has occurred numerous of times both in the wet and in the dry and I had always been able to control the car despite myself being a new driver even if the rear was kicked out to an extreme. I in general do not like SUVs which is why I do not have one now, but I am sure people who drive SUVs know of the decrease maneuverability of them.
+1!

When I drive my uncle's 1994 4runner (stick shift!), I take corners slowly because it always feels like its going to tip over. My other uncle's 1990 Ford Explorer (again stick shift) is a lot more stable on corners.

My '89 240sx doesn't have ABS!
dsp979 is offline  
Old 04-13-10, 03:16 PM
  #58  
mmarshall
Lexus Fanatic
 
mmarshall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Virginia/D.C. suburbs
Posts: 91,385
Received 87 Likes on 86 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by IS-SV
Ok, now we have all kinds of trivia and the usual internet stuff posted, lol. Yes, no kidding it has a high center of gravity, not unlike many SUVs that behave better. Programming fixes to the vehicle stability management system can easily rectify this behavior.

The stability control systems should intervene more aggressively to minimize this kind of oversteer. Some sports and pony cars allow a certain measured degree of oversteer (less aggressive stability management up to a point), but that's not the kind of behavior that's preferred on a SUV or truck.

Of course nobody should drive at excessive speeds on a racetrack with this kind of vehicle. But the point here is that at typical highway speeds in an emergency evasive the vehicle might exhibit marginally dangerous behavior. SUV's and trucks that tend to get sideways often "trip" on objects such as curbs and soft shoulders resulting in rollovers.
No one is arguing with what you are saying here. I used the GX as an example because it is quite narrow in relation to its height, which does not help matters any. The Samurai was not mentioned to be "trivia", but as a classic example of automakers not heeding the basic laws of physics (Daihatsu, when it introduced the Rocky, learned from that and widened the Rocky's narrow track for the American market, but not Japan). The GX, fortunately, was a less-extreme example. I don't believe a post like that merits an LOL...if you do, then I disagree.
mmarshall is offline  
Old 04-13-10, 03:21 PM
  #59  
mmarshall
Lexus Fanatic
 
mmarshall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Virginia/D.C. suburbs
Posts: 91,385
Received 87 Likes on 86 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by darkdream
People are too reliant on electronic gadgets. My very first car was a SUV with no stability control and this issue has occurred numerous of times both in the wet and in the dry and I had always been able to control the car despite myself being a new driver even if the rear was kicked out to an extreme. I in general do not like SUVs which is why I do not have one now, but I am sure people who drive SUVs know of the decrease maneuverability of them.
In general, yes, I agree that people are too dependent on electronic driving/safety aids today (same thing, to an extent, in aviation and flying). But there are some things that it is good to have the aids for. No matter how good a driver you are,or how attentive you are in driving school, there are some things that the driver simply cannot control (or expect). Black ice is one of them...it can sometimes be invisible, especially at night. Water-filled, invisible potholes are another.
mmarshall is offline  
Old 04-13-10, 03:32 PM
  #60  
LexFather
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I guess if anything I would expect the last model to be the "dangerous" one, it sits taller with a taller center of gravity with less tech I believe.

The new one is lower, with a lower center of gravity with more tech and all of a sudden CR says its "dangerous".

We have seen for ourselves in the Toyota witchhunt that multiple sources were doing whatever it took to make Toyota look bad and sell newspapers/get web hits.

I would like to see all the SUVs tested and vids of each.

Its not coincidence to me that they found something wrong. Sorry.
 


Quick Reply: GX 460 4/19 VSC recall (Consumer Reports "don't buy" label lifted 5/7)



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:52 AM.