Car Chat General discussion about Lexus, other auto manufacturers and automotive news.

Large American SUVs killing GS in Fuel Economy?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-15-10, 07:56 PM
  #1  
BinaryJay
Pole Position
Thread Starter
 
BinaryJay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Toronto
Posts: 3,154
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 13 Posts
Default Large American SUVs killing GS in Fuel Economy?

Lately I've been seeing a lot of Chrysler and GMC commercials stating fuel economy numbers that have been making me scratch my head. I finally decided to look into it after the last commercial for a GMC Terrain came on...

Then I realized why, they are putting small engines into these things. The Terrain comes with a 2.4L linline 4. What the heck? These things aren't that small (3800 lb base curb weight). Are they putting weak little engines into large vehicles just to claim these amazing fuel economy numbers. Do people not drive them and leave immediately when they discover they probably drive like school buses?

I don't get it. I got used to thinking of my car as having a small engine, but it seems like the trend these days is going towards grossly under powering everything. Has anybody ever driven one of these things, are they better than they sound on paper? Just curious.
BinaryJay is offline  
Old 04-15-10, 08:35 PM
  #2  
*Batman*
Lexus Champion
 
*Batman*'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 3,277
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

There are lies, damned lies and statistics.
*Batman* is offline  
Old 04-15-10, 09:18 PM
  #3  
ivanz
Lead Lap
 
ivanz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 504
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Most people just want a car to go from A to B using as little gas as possible...they couldn't care less about performance. Most of these cars are programmed so that the first 10% of pedal travel gives you ~40% of the available power...hence making them feel more powerful than they really are. They perform adequately for most peoples needs, and are hardly underpowered in terms of what they are used for most of the time (i.e soccer mom/mall duty).
ivanz is offline  
Old 04-15-10, 09:58 PM
  #4  
LexFather
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

GS 450h ftw
 
Old 04-16-10, 04:10 AM
  #5  
IS350jet
Pole Position
 
IS350jet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Coral Springs, Fl
Posts: 2,882
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Marketing hype. I remember a commercial for the 32 MPG Chevy Equinox. At first, I couldn't believe it. 32 MPG from an SUV? They make the Equinox look huge on TV. It even looks quite large on Chevy's web page. I had to LOL when I actually saw one on the road. Yikes! is that thing small. It appears to be smaller than a Rav4. Tiny SUV + 4 cylinder = good (slow) MPG.
BTW, the GMC Terrain is the Equinox twin, and it's not a large SUV. It's not even a mid-sized SUV, it's a crossover. Large SUV's don't weigh 3,800 lbs.

Last edited by IS350jet; 04-16-10 at 04:17 AM.
IS350jet is offline  
Old 04-16-10, 06:02 AM
  #6  
SLegacy99
Lead Lap
 
SLegacy99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: MD
Posts: 4,511
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I'm not getting thte correlation here. Put a 4 banger in the GS and you could havea 32 MPG as well.
SLegacy99 is offline  
Old 04-16-10, 07:19 AM
  #7  
BinaryJay
Pole Position
Thread Starter
 
BinaryJay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Toronto
Posts: 3,154
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by SLegacy99
I'm not getting thte correlation here. Put a 4 banger in the GS and you could havea 32 MPG as well.
I get pretty close to 30mpg on the highway as it is when the wind is at my back. =) 4 banger be damned.
BinaryJay is offline  
Old 04-16-10, 09:50 AM
  #8  
Lexus 4 ME
Lead Lap
 
Lexus 4 ME's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: CA
Posts: 591
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

What the Chevy claims cannot be achieved with normal driving, unless you go down the hill. They claim 24 MPG for GMC Sierra V6, my neighboor has Sierra V6 the most he got was 17 MPG.
Lexus 4 ME is offline  
Old 04-16-10, 10:08 AM
  #9  
IS-SV
Lexus Fanatic
 
IS-SV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: tech capital
Posts: 14,100
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by BinaryJay
I get pretty close to 30mpg on the highway as it is when the wind is at my back. =) 4 banger be damned.
I'm making an attempt to always drive with the wind at my back, if I remember.
IS-SV is offline  
Old 04-16-10, 10:13 AM
  #10  
Och
Lexus Champion
iTrader: (3)
 
Och's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: NY
Posts: 16,436
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

Fuel economy ratings are nonsense. All moderns cars are more or less the same, as long as their weight and drag coefficient are equal, everything else is all about your driving style, period.
Och is offline  
Old 04-16-10, 12:21 PM
  #11  
nthach
Lexus Champion
 
nthach's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: California
Posts: 3,350
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

GM's using tall gearing, different tranny programming and some other superfluous tweaks to their MPG figures to be approved by CEO Obama.

BS I call. GM's bread and butter has always been V8s.
nthach is offline  
Old 04-16-10, 02:13 PM
  #12  
Fizzboy7
Lexus Test Driver
 
Fizzboy7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: California
Posts: 9,706
Received 167 Likes on 99 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ivanz
Most people just want a car to go from A to B using as little gas as possible...they couldn't care less about performance. Most of these cars are programmed so that the first 10% of pedal travel gives you ~40% of the available power...hence making them feel more powerful than they really are. They perform adequately for most peoples needs, and are hardly underpowered in terms of what they are used for most of the time (i.e soccer mom/mall duty).
^^^ That is the answer. The average buyer is not an enthusiast like we are here. They are more concerned with eocnomy and safety than straight line performance. Of course, the true leading manufacturers are the ones who can build an efficient engine WITH some decent performance. I credit Toyota for their powerful 3.5 V6 getting good economy. I believe Car & Driver and Consumer Reports have also pointed this out in some recent tests.
Fizzboy7 is offline  
Old 04-16-10, 02:17 PM
  #13  
IS-SV
Lexus Fanatic
 
IS-SV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: tech capital
Posts: 14,100
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Current (2008 on) EPA gas mileage data is useful for comparison purposes mainly.

But since I generally treat most advertisements as casual garbage, I haven't noticed. But I know GM is a bit better than some at gaming the EPA gas mileage ratings with junk like variable displacement, specialized economy tires, forced upshifts on manual trannys and ultra tall OD gears (this is nothing new).
IS-SV is offline  
Old 04-16-10, 02:22 PM
  #14  
I8ABMR
Lexus Fanatic
 
I8ABMR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Waiting for next track day
Posts: 22,608
Received 102 Likes on 67 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by BinaryJay
Lately I've been seeing a lot of Chrysler and GMC commercials stating fuel economy numbers that have been making me scratch my head. I finally decided to look into it after the last commercial for a GMC Terrain came on...

Then I realized why, they are putting small engines into these things. The Terrain comes with a 2.4L linline 4. What the heck? These things aren't that small (3800 lb base curb weight). Are they putting weak little engines into large vehicles just to claim these amazing fuel economy numbers. Do people not drive them and leave immediately when they discover they probably drive like school buses?

I don't get it. I got used to thinking of my car as having a small engine, but it seems like the trend these days is going towards grossly under powering everything. Has anybody ever driven one of these things, are they better than they sound on paper? Just curious.

yup its the 70's all over again. The muscle era is ending (again) and we are going into HP hybernation. That is what makes cars like the Veyron, v12 Ferraris, etc so unique and special. They are a dying species of car
I8ABMR is offline  
Old 04-16-10, 02:23 PM
  #15  
J.P.
Lexus Test Driver

 
J.P.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Treasury
Posts: 8,764
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Thinking of my second gen GS's and my FJ, they did not hit the EPA numbers either, nothing really new here.

Unless you baby a car people never hit any of those numbers.............

BTW my Silverado over the last few tanks is at about 17mpg in the city, I average about 22mpg towing my small boat at 55mph on CC.
J.P. is offline  


Quick Reply: Large American SUVs killing GS in Fuel Economy?



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:12 AM.