Autoguide: 2010 Lexus ES350 vs 2010 Buick LaCrosse
#16
Congrats to the ES 350 for winning this comparo!
Agreed! Autoguide gave the Buick more points for style but in the end the Lexus won the comparison on its refinement, performance, and quality.
Agreed! Autoguide gave the Buick more points for style but in the end the Lexus won the comparison on its refinement, performance, and quality.
#17
Lexus Fanatic
i like the 2007 ES better than the current refreshed one.
the front styling on the 2010 ES is a total miss. It looks more like a evolution of the 1998 camry than a lexus. WTF is up with the foglights.
this review is only another man's opinion. I think the buick looks too chunky.
and no matter what positive review there is for the buick, the lexus will always sell better anyway
the front styling on the 2010 ES is a total miss. It looks more like a evolution of the 1998 camry than a lexus. WTF is up with the foglights.
this review is only another man's opinion. I think the buick looks too chunky.
and no matter what positive review there is for the buick, the lexus will always sell better anyway
#18
Lexus Fanatic
I think both are good cars but don't be fooled by all the wins by the Lacrosse, it still is behind with its interior, materials, MPG and ride.
Don't forget, though, Mike, that the ES350 was a disappointment in 2006-2007 when it first came out....much, of course, has been discussed on CL about that. Lexus has given it significant interior trim/quality improvements for 2010 (I noted them in my review), which it did not have as recently as just a couple of years ago.
BTW, have you driven a new LaCrosse? If not, forget Grandpa's Buick. You will be amazed at how quick the steering response is on the CXL model......and yes, to compensate, some of the Buick magic-carpet ride is gone, but, again, it is surprising how much of that smooth ride (and Buick's smooth transmission) is still left with that much-improved steering. You know how I am about ride comfort....I'd b***h if I thought the car was now uncomfortable. It isn't....the engineers, for a mid-sized family sedan, have done a superb job on this car's chassis. The AWD option, of course, is just icing on the cake. But, as you noted, the interior trim/parts still have some of that cheap GM plastic, though glittery.
Last edited by mmarshall; 04-16-10 at 07:03 PM.
#19
Lexus Champion
The quality of the interior trim in the ES350 isn't really any different in the 2010 vs. the 2007. For 2010 they added a couple of wood strips to the nav/dash area, as well as chrome accents around the door wood trim areas. Both improvments IMO. But quality wise the materials are the same. Small changes but well done.
#20
Lexus Fanatic
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 7,864
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Glad they did the comparo. GM set themselves up for comparisons to be made thinking they'd be an easy winner. Turns out they may have embarrassed themselves.
The Lacrosse is a tremendous effort from GM and a winning design. But Lexus caliber refinement is hard to touch. A majority will still prefer the Lexus name and unmatched quality and long term dependability. I stress long term, because as good as GM is getting, there's no way they will be as reliable during a 300-400K run even if they prove to be trouble free for the first 5 years. There's also the importance of holding it's value. A Buick will never match Lexus in that category as well.
I don't know why all the complaints about the ES's styling. Is it as exciting as the Lacrosse's? No. But it isn't ugly (like many cars are). It's a simple, elegant, non-polarizing design. The ES will always be a safe design. It's a bread and butter model for Lexus and has a large conservative buyer base it can't afford to lose. That's why Lexus chose to also build the IS for the other type of buyer.
The Lacrosse is a tremendous effort from GM and a winning design. But Lexus caliber refinement is hard to touch. A majority will still prefer the Lexus name and unmatched quality and long term dependability. I stress long term, because as good as GM is getting, there's no way they will be as reliable during a 300-400K run even if they prove to be trouble free for the first 5 years. There's also the importance of holding it's value. A Buick will never match Lexus in that category as well.
I don't know why all the complaints about the ES's styling. Is it as exciting as the Lacrosse's? No. But it isn't ugly (like many cars are). It's a simple, elegant, non-polarizing design. The ES will always be a safe design. It's a bread and butter model for Lexus and has a large conservative buyer base it can't afford to lose. That's why Lexus chose to also build the IS for the other type of buyer.
#21
Lexus Fanatic
The quality of the interior trim in the ES350 isn't really any different in the 2010 vs. the 2007. For 2010 they added a couple of wood strips to the nav/dash area, as well as chrome accents around the door wood trim areas. Both improvments IMO. But quality wise the materials are the same. Small changes but well done.
#22
Lexus Champion
I owned an '07 for nearly 4 years and have had a '10 for three months, and from the ownership experience of both, see no difference in the material quality.
Granted it's a subjective area and opinions on the subject will vary.
Granted it's a subjective area and opinions on the subject will vary.
#23
Lexus Fanatic
Other than that, I think we agree 98-99%
#25
The LaCrosse drives/handles better, but for those looking for a smooth, cushy comfort ride, the ES is hard to beat.
Edmunds and MT prefer the LaCrosse.
http://www.insideline.com/lexus/es-3...and-video.html
http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/...n/results.html
And a virtual draw in The Globe and Mail comparison.
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/globe...t-rail-reviews
Edmunds and MT prefer the LaCrosse.
http://www.insideline.com/lexus/es-3...and-video.html
http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/...n/results.html
And a virtual draw in The Globe and Mail comparison.
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/globe...t-rail-reviews
#26
Lexus Fanatic
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: A better place
Posts: 7,285
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
An excellent review....and, in most areas, is right on the money.
I've reviewed and driven both cars, and agree almost 100%.
The only significant disagreement I have with them is the idea of the ES being "dull" in the styling department. Actually, it looks like a CAR. Too many vehicles these days look like space ships.
But the Buick does offer AWD, and the Lexus doesn't.....that's a big plus for the Buick.
I've reviewed and driven both cars, and agree almost 100%.
The only significant disagreement I have with them is the idea of the ES being "dull" in the styling department. Actually, it looks like a CAR. Too many vehicles these days look like space ships.
But the Buick does offer AWD, and the Lexus doesn't.....that's a big plus for the Buick.
IMHO the mid-cycle refresh Lexus did on the ES makes it look sharper and more expensive.
Having seen both the new LaCrosse and 2010 ES plenty of times on the road, I must say the ES IMHO does look sharper and more expensive.
The LaCrosse to me looks bloated, and like some sort of space ship, not a car. When you're talking about the luxury market, I think making a car look like a space ship is not a good idea. Arguably of course, Buick doesn't really compete in the luxury market.
The LaCrosse drives/handles better, but for those looking for a smooth, cushy comfort ride, the ES is hard to beat.
Edmunds and MT prefer the LaCrosse.
http://www.insideline.com/lexus/es-3...and-video.html
http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/...n/results.html
And a virtual draw in The Globe and Mail comparison.
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/globe...t-rail-reviews
Edmunds and MT prefer the LaCrosse.
http://www.insideline.com/lexus/es-3...and-video.html
http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/...n/results.html
And a virtual draw in The Globe and Mail comparison.
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/globe...t-rail-reviews
It's a matter of simple physics. The LaCrosse is larger and heavier than the ES, so it makes sense the ES will be more agile and handle better. Looking at all comparisons of the ES and LaCrosse, overall it seems the Buick still can't beat the Lexus ride quality.
#27
Several publications disagree, and say the ES rides and handles better.
It's a matter of simple physics. The LaCrosse is larger and heavier than the ES, so it makes sense the ES will be more agile and handle better. Looking at all comparisons of the ES and LaCrosse, overall it seems the Buick still can't beat the Lexus ride quality.
It's a matter of simple physics. The LaCrosse is larger and heavier than the ES, so it makes sense the ES will be more agile and handle better. Looking at all comparisons of the ES and LaCrosse, overall it seems the Buick still can't beat the Lexus ride quality.
Remember, the LaCrosse's chassis was basically engineered in Europe and thus, has more of a European driving feel (and let's not forget the overly numb steering of the ES).
#28
Lexus Fanatic
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: A better place
Posts: 7,285
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
While the ES may have a better ride for those who prefer the soft, cushy type - I'd like to see the reviews where they say the ES is more agile and handles better.
Remember, the LaCrosse's chassis was basically engineered in Europe and thus, has more of a European driving feel (and let's not forget the overly numb steering of the ES).
Remember, the LaCrosse's chassis was basically engineered in Europe and thus, has more of a European driving feel (and let's not forget the overly numb steering of the ES).
#29
Lexus Test Driver
What irks me is the Buick commercial keep comparing their car to the 2009 ES and not the 2010. While differences are slim, it's still inaccurate. It's April 2010, and they are still showing the 2009 model on TV. If I were Lexus, I'd have some lawyers making some phone calls.
#30
Lexus Fanatic
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 7,864
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Just saying that it's not the clear winner that Buick portrays it as. I love the Lacrosse, don't get me wrong. It's just that if you're going to run ads like GM has about the Lacrosse going specifically after a particular model, you better be certain that it will be the winner each time, not a toss up.