Car Chat General discussion about Lexus, other auto manufacturers and automotive news.

Toyota: $50K Hydrogen Sedan Will Be Ready by 2015

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-12-10 | 10:18 PM
  #16  
JessePS's Avatar
JessePS
Lexus Test Driver
CL Folding 25,000
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 8,349
Likes: 0
From: QC/FRANCE
Default

Originally Posted by ntran18
I believe the gas that is in our cars is more combustible than hydrogen...
Guess its something for Mythbusters to test
Old 05-12-10 | 10:26 PM
  #17  
encore888's Avatar
encore888
Lexus Champion
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 8,695
Likes: 2
From: CA
Default

Originally Posted by 1SICKLEX
And Honda is light years behind Toyota in everything.
LOL, and being early isn't everything...case in point:

Acura 1986, about four years head start on Lexus 1989

Insight US debut 1999, ahead of Prius US debut 2000

Major props to Honda for their work on the FCX Clarity though.
Old 05-12-10 | 10:35 PM
  #18  
GSteg's Avatar
GSteg
Rookie
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 16,017
Likes: 80
From: CA
Default

The FCX will probably be Honda's greatest achievement, but competition will quickly follow and take over Honda.

One thing I'm amazed is the difference in drivetrain between the original and current FCX. The motor, battery, fuel cells, etc are so much more efficient now, and they all package in a smaller footprint. Don't quote me on this, but the original FCX had an EPA equivalent of 55mpg. The current FCX is rated around 70mpg, and it's a much bigger and more powerful car. Plus it's lighter.

I'm curious to see what Toyota has up their sleeves. They don't push hydrogen as much, but there is always someone working on it in the back room.
Old 05-13-10 | 09:26 AM
  #19  
mmarshall's Avatar
mmarshall
Lexus Fanatic
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 91,710
Likes: 89
From: Virginia/D.C. suburbs
Default

Originally Posted by encore888

Acura 1986, about four years head start on Lexus 1989
Lexus and Infiniti may have never come about, though, if it wasn't for the previous success of Acura. Acura, in the mid-late 1980s, proved that a Japanese company could sell upmarket vehicles here in America.

Insight US debut 1999, ahead of Prius US debut 2000
Remember, though......BOTH vehicles had been on sale in Japan for awhile. And the 1Gen Prius, though quirky, turned out to be a more practical, usable vehicle than the 1Gen Insight. The first Insight, though tremendously economical, was little more than a motorized Kiddy-Car.


Major props to Honda for their work on the FCX Clarity though.
Agreed.....but not major props to the way they have marketed it. Its availability to the public, so far, has been too restricted, even in the few places that have a reasonable number of hydrogen-refilling stations.
Old 05-13-10 | 11:33 AM
  #20  
bagwell's Avatar
bagwell
Lexus Champion
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 11,205
Likes: 11
From: The Woodlands, TX
Default

Originally Posted by mmarshall
One thing, of course, that could hinder not only the Honda FCX/Mercedes A/B class fuel-cell cars, but this new Toyota project as well, is the simple lack of re-fuelling stations. In most cases, you can't just pull into a neighborhood station and say "fill it up with 50,000-PSI compressed hydrogen". We've got to get moving with more alternate-fuel stations not only for hydrogen fuel-cell vehicles, but for diesel, ethanol/E85, propane, natural gas, and electric-charging stations as well.
nope...as long as Honda "provides" one of these I'm set...hahahha!!!

http://automobiles.honda.com/fcx-cla...y-station.aspx
Attached Thumbnails Toyota: K Hydrogen Sedan Will Be Ready by 2015-fcx.jpg  

Last edited by bagwell; 05-13-10 at 01:04 PM.
Old 05-13-10 | 12:50 PM
  #21  
4TehNguyen's Avatar
4TehNguyen
Lexus Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 26,060
Likes: 51
From: Houston, Texas
Default

fuel cells are nothing but a glorified battery. I can interchange both of them and they accomplish the same thing they are both sources of electric current for an electric motor. Its just the fuel cell is far more complicated and annoying to fill up than charging a battery. EVs are missing something: a high capacity battery that will make ranges more practical. Fuel cells are missing something: an economically efficient way to refine pure hydrogen, an infrastructure to delivery that hydrogen. Who's going to win first? Who knows, but it doesn't look as good for fuel cells. If a new long range battery comes out it will be the nail in the coffin for fuel cells.
Old 05-13-10 | 01:51 PM
  #22  
LexFather
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Originally Posted by GSteg
The FCX will probably be Honda's greatest achievement, but competition will quickly follow and take over Honda.

One thing I'm amazed is the difference in drivetrain between the original and current FCX. The motor, battery, fuel cells, etc are so much more efficient now, and they all package in a smaller footprint. Don't quote me on this, but the original FCX had an EPA equivalent of 55mpg. The current FCX is rated around 70mpg, and it's a much bigger and more powerful car. Plus it's lighter.

I'm curious to see what Toyota has up their sleeves. They don't push hydrogen as much, but there is always someone working on it in the back room.
I agree the FCX is a fantastic vehicle from what I've read and heard. I hope they really learn what they can and apply it soon as Honda has bet on hydrogen, Nissan on EV and Toyota has its hand in everything but is most known for hybrids.

Originally Posted by mmarshall
Lexus and Infiniti may have never come about, though, if it wasn't for the previous success of Acura. Acura, in the mid-late 1980s, proved that a Japanese company could sell upmarket vehicles here in America.


.
Lexus and Infiniti were planned in the early 1980s, clearly Honda came first with Acura but its not like they spent anywhere as much R&D thus it was a lot easier to produce and well, the results today speak for themselves. Lexus is by far the #1 Japanese luxury brand, Infiniti has some of the product but sells worse than Acura and Acura is simply Honda plus then and now.

Their only upmarket product was the Legend, the Integra sold at the same price as the Accord in the 1980s.
Old 05-13-10 | 04:52 PM
  #23  
GSteg's Avatar
GSteg
Rookie
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 16,017
Likes: 80
From: CA
Default

Originally Posted by 4TehNguyen
Its just the fuel cell is far more complicated and annoying to fill up than charging a battery.
The FCX is not that complicated. It's basically like pumping at your local gas station. You put the nozzle into the car, lock it, and then just pump. Nothing hard about it. One thing it has over an EV is the time it takes to refuel. The FCX takes about 15 minutes. And EV takes how long?

Infrastructure is always going to be a problem for any new technology. It was a problem back then when gasoline engines were first invented. People rode on horses. It takes time but if we do something about it, we can make it happen. I still love my gasoline car though
Old 05-13-10 | 05:21 PM
  #24  
mmarshall's Avatar
mmarshall
Lexus Fanatic
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 91,710
Likes: 89
From: Virginia/D.C. suburbs
Default

Originally Posted by bagwell
nope...as long as Honda "provides" one of these I'm set...hahahha!!!
Might affect the lease price some.
Old 05-13-10 | 05:28 PM
  #25  
mmarshall's Avatar
mmarshall
Lexus Fanatic
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 91,710
Likes: 89
From: Virginia/D.C. suburbs
Default

Originally Posted by 1SICKLEX

Lexus and Infiniti were planned in the early 1980s, clearly Honda came first with Acura but its not like they spent anywhere as much R&D thus it was a lot easier to produce and well, the results today speak for themselves. Lexus is by far the #1 Japanese luxury brand, Infiniti has some of the product but sells worse than Acura and Acura is simply Honda plus then and now.
Part of this is product superiority, but part of it, no doubt, is that Lexus has been able to market their products in America better than either Infiniti or Acura. Infiniti, in particular, did a terrible marketing job with the Q45, and almost as bad with the M30 and J30. Acura (I thought) started to go go downhill with the unimpressive Vigor, and has never totally recovered since.


Their only upmarket product was the Legend, the Integra sold at the same price as the Accord in the 1980s.
Also the case, to some extent, with Lexus. The first ES250, though almost an identically-rebadged Camry, sold for a significantly higher price, and was, IMO, a rather poor value. And the two-door Integra turned out to be a wild hit with the young, caps-on-backwards crowd.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Hoovey689
Car Chat
3
05-25-11 09:19 AM
GS69
Car Chat
3
03-25-09 03:01 PM
Gojirra99
Lexus Prototypes and Next-Gen Technology
8
04-26-06 02:19 PM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:13 PM.