Toyota: $50K Hydrogen Sedan Will Be Ready by 2015
#17
LOL, and being early isn't everything...case in point:
Acura 1986, about four years head start on Lexus 1989
Insight US debut 1999, ahead of Prius US debut 2000
Major props to Honda for their work on the FCX Clarity though.
Acura 1986, about four years head start on Lexus 1989
Insight US debut 1999, ahead of Prius US debut 2000
Major props to Honda for their work on the FCX Clarity though.
#18
The FCX will probably be Honda's greatest achievement, but competition will quickly follow and take over Honda.
One thing I'm amazed is the difference in drivetrain between the original and current FCX. The motor, battery, fuel cells, etc are so much more efficient now, and they all package in a smaller footprint. Don't quote me on this, but the original FCX had an EPA equivalent of 55mpg. The current FCX is rated around 70mpg, and it's a much bigger and more powerful car. Plus it's lighter.
I'm curious to see what Toyota has up their sleeves. They don't push hydrogen as much, but there is always someone working on it in the back room.
One thing I'm amazed is the difference in drivetrain between the original and current FCX. The motor, battery, fuel cells, etc are so much more efficient now, and they all package in a smaller footprint. Don't quote me on this, but the original FCX had an EPA equivalent of 55mpg. The current FCX is rated around 70mpg, and it's a much bigger and more powerful car. Plus it's lighter.
I'm curious to see what Toyota has up their sleeves. They don't push hydrogen as much, but there is always someone working on it in the back room.
#19
Lexus and Infiniti may have never come about, though, if it wasn't for the previous success of Acura. Acura, in the mid-late 1980s, proved that a Japanese company could sell upmarket vehicles here in America.
Remember, though......BOTH vehicles had been on sale in Japan for awhile. And the 1Gen Prius, though quirky, turned out to be a more practical, usable vehicle than the 1Gen Insight. The first Insight, though tremendously economical, was little more than a motorized Kiddy-Car.
Agreed.....but not major props to the way they have marketed it. Its availability to the public, so far, has been too restricted, even in the few places that have a reasonable number of hydrogen-refilling stations.
Insight US debut 1999, ahead of Prius US debut 2000
Major props to Honda for their work on the FCX Clarity though.
#20
One thing, of course, that could hinder not only the Honda FCX/Mercedes A/B class fuel-cell cars, but this new Toyota project as well, is the simple lack of re-fuelling stations. In most cases, you can't just pull into a neighborhood station and say "fill it up with 50,000-PSI compressed hydrogen". We've got to get moving with more alternate-fuel stations not only for hydrogen fuel-cell vehicles, but for diesel, ethanol/E85, propane, natural gas, and electric-charging stations as well.
http://automobiles.honda.com/fcx-cla...y-station.aspx
Last edited by bagwell; 05-13-10 at 01:04 PM.
#21
fuel cells are nothing but a glorified battery. I can interchange both of them and they accomplish the same thing they are both sources of electric current for an electric motor. Its just the fuel cell is far more complicated and annoying to fill up than charging a battery. EVs are missing something: a high capacity battery that will make ranges more practical. Fuel cells are missing something: an economically efficient way to refine pure hydrogen, an infrastructure to delivery that hydrogen. Who's going to win first? Who knows, but it doesn't look as good for fuel cells. If a new long range battery comes out it will be the nail in the coffin for fuel cells.
#22
Guest
Posts: n/a
The FCX will probably be Honda's greatest achievement, but competition will quickly follow and take over Honda.
One thing I'm amazed is the difference in drivetrain between the original and current FCX. The motor, battery, fuel cells, etc are so much more efficient now, and they all package in a smaller footprint. Don't quote me on this, but the original FCX had an EPA equivalent of 55mpg. The current FCX is rated around 70mpg, and it's a much bigger and more powerful car. Plus it's lighter.
I'm curious to see what Toyota has up their sleeves. They don't push hydrogen as much, but there is always someone working on it in the back room.
One thing I'm amazed is the difference in drivetrain between the original and current FCX. The motor, battery, fuel cells, etc are so much more efficient now, and they all package in a smaller footprint. Don't quote me on this, but the original FCX had an EPA equivalent of 55mpg. The current FCX is rated around 70mpg, and it's a much bigger and more powerful car. Plus it's lighter.
I'm curious to see what Toyota has up their sleeves. They don't push hydrogen as much, but there is always someone working on it in the back room.
Their only upmarket product was the Legend, the Integra sold at the same price as the Accord in the 1980s.
#23
Infrastructure is always going to be a problem for any new technology. It was a problem back then when gasoline engines were first invented. People rode on horses. It takes time but if we do something about it, we can make it happen. I still love my gasoline car though
#25
Lexus and Infiniti were planned in the early 1980s, clearly Honda came first with Acura but its not like they spent anywhere as much R&D thus it was a lot easier to produce and well, the results today speak for themselves. Lexus is by far the #1 Japanese luxury brand, Infiniti has some of the product but sells worse than Acura and Acura is simply Honda plus then and now.
Their only upmarket product was the Legend, the Integra sold at the same price as the Accord in the 1980s.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
I8ABMR
Car Chat
26
07-06-09 09:56 PM
Gojirra99
Lexus Prototypes and Next-Gen Technology
8
04-26-06 02:19 PM