WSJ:Acura Flagship Performs Well, But Doesn’t Inspire Lust
#31
Lexus Fanatic
#32
Lexus Champion
![Default](https://www.clublexus.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
GS: 771/2,947
Of course, to be fair, those numbers would also include the GS460, which shouldn't be compared to the 6-cyl RL--but even if the GS350 was 50% of sales (probably a higher %), it's still way more than the RL. I didn't see the Infiniti M sales numbers in that thread, but with the 2011 M out, I think the 2010 numbers would be skewed (but I'd still rather have a 2010 M over an RL).
#33
Lexus Fanatic
![Default](https://www.clublexus.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Depends on what you mean by "overpriced". In my case, for example, 50K is simply more than I care to spend on a new car (which would probably be 35-40K max). So, a brand-new RL is out of the question for me....I can afford one, if I wanted it, but simply don't care to spend that much on a car. And, in general, I stick with new cars.
But, if I WERE spending 50K on a new car, you can bet the monthly rent that one of three vehicles would be in my condo parking space....a new RL, a Lexus GS AWD, or an AWD BMW 335xi, though I have some reservations about the BMW's electrical and fuel-pump reliability. But, in general, I find those three vehicles the three best on the road for 50K brand-new.
(for 40-45K, BTW, if I chose to spend that, I'd choose a new Lexus RX350)
But, if I WERE spending 50K on a new car, you can bet the monthly rent that one of three vehicles would be in my condo parking space....a new RL, a Lexus GS AWD, or an AWD BMW 335xi, though I have some reservations about the BMW's electrical and fuel-pump reliability. But, in general, I find those three vehicles the three best on the road for 50K brand-new.
(for 40-45K, BTW, if I chose to spend that, I'd choose a new Lexus RX350)
#34
Lexus Fanatic
![Default](https://www.clublexus.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
The exterior, of course, is rather muted in its design (Accord-like is probably the best way to describe it). There, I agree....you don't see much "flash".
#35
Lexus Fanatic
![Default](https://www.clublexus.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
^^^Exactly, the choices listed (GS AWD, 335Xi, RX350 AWD) and some others are all better use of that kind of automotive money. Obviously selective buyers have decided in droves to select something other than the RL.
#36
Lexus Fanatic
![Default](https://www.clublexus.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
And, judging by what Acuras today DO sell, most of those potential who DO go to an Acura shop are coming home with MDX's. But then, again, that's not surprising....the MDX is a totally different vehicle than the RL, and appeals (mostly) to those cross-shopping the Lexus RX, its prime competitor. It's a sad fact, though, that the Acura stylists have hurt the company's image......and all of the models, except maybe the MDX, are suffering for it, although that alone doesn't account for the RL's low sales.
Incendentally I (and ironically), that's one choice where I do agree with you.....given the choice, I'd take an RX over the MDX, for several reasons.
Like many CL posters, I was rather ho-hum in my opinion of the 2Gen, AWD RL, too, at first, as I initially didn't care for it as much as the plush-seat, soft-riding, Buick-Like FWD 1Gen model. But when I went to review it, the 2Gen model amazed me with its build quality and the competence of the SH-AWD system......still does today, though, for me, 50K is probably out of the question.
Last edited by mmarshall; 06-16-10 at 05:40 PM.
#37
Lexus Fanatic
![Default](https://www.clublexus.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I don't think it's quite that simple. One other factor, today, that is probably depressing RL sales is that a number of Acura designs, today (especially with the ZDX, TL front AND rear, and parrot-beak grilles across the board) are simply so ugly and/or awkward-looking that they are keeping out (or driving away) potential Acura shoppers who aren't going to the showrooms to look at Acuras in the first place. If you don't go to an Acura shop to start with, you're probably not going to see the flagship, of course.
And, judging by what Acuras today DO sell, most of those potential who DO go to an Acura shop are coming home with MDX's. But then, again, that's not surprising....the MDX is a totally different vehicle than the RL, and appeals (mostly) to those cross-shopping the Lexus RX, its prime competitor.
Incendentally I (and ironically), that's one choice where I do agree with you.....given the choice, I'd take an RX over the MDX, for several reasons.
I was rather ho-hum in my opinion of the 2Gen, AWD RL, too, at first, as I initially didn't care for it as much as the plush-seat, soft-riding, Buick-Like FWD 1Gen model. But when I went to review it, the 2Gen model amazed me with its build quality and the competence of the SH-AWD system......still does today, though, for me, 50K is probably out of the question.
And, judging by what Acuras today DO sell, most of those potential who DO go to an Acura shop are coming home with MDX's. But then, again, that's not surprising....the MDX is a totally different vehicle than the RL, and appeals (mostly) to those cross-shopping the Lexus RX, its prime competitor.
Incendentally I (and ironically), that's one choice where I do agree with you.....given the choice, I'd take an RX over the MDX, for several reasons.
I was rather ho-hum in my opinion of the 2Gen, AWD RL, too, at first, as I initially didn't care for it as much as the plush-seat, soft-riding, Buick-Like FWD 1Gen model. But when I went to review it, the 2Gen model amazed me with its build quality and the competence of the SH-AWD system......still does today, though, for me, 50K is probably out of the question.
But the fact remains, none of the competition is selling these cars at a ultra low rate of 170 units/month.
#38
Lexus Fanatic
![Default](https://www.clublexus.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Even doing that, though, carries somewhat of a risk. Mazda ended up selling the upmarket Millenia under its own nameplate, even though it was originally designed for Mazda's Amanti luxury division that Ford cancelled. Toyota sold the upmarket Avalon under its own nameplate instead of making it a Lexus. And Hyundai is marketing the upcoming Equus as a Hyundai instead of waiting for its own luxury division to debut. The Millenia was ultimately not a success; the Avalon, while successful, has never come close to Camry's sales, and only time will tell for the Equus.
In fact, that gives me an idea...........I think I'm going to start another thread on it.
Last edited by mmarshall; 06-16-10 at 06:26 PM.
#39
Lexus Fanatic
![Default](https://www.clublexus.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
After all of the other companies we've lost lately (Olds, Plymouth, Saturn, Pontiac, Hummer, Isuzu, and now Mercury), the last thing I personally want to see is another division fold. But, sadly, the Acura stylists have screwed up the company up so much (your opinion noted, but I still think that is their main problem, speculation or not), that I'm begining to think that Honda may be better off just dropping the division and marketing the former Acura products as up-market Hondas, under the Honda nameplates (and, yes, with more-conventional Honda grilles instead of the parrot-beaks). Honda, of course, does this in a number of other countries.....the Acura nameplate is not used world-wide. The MDX continues to sell under the Acura nameplate, but, IMO, would probably sell just as well as a Honda.
.
.
IMO, I don't see the failure of the RL and RDX leading to a shutdown of Acura division.
But Acura as a tier 1 premium car maker seems to be a fading possibility....
#40
Lexus Champion
![Default](https://www.clublexus.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
When we talk price please don't go there. Is the S550 worth 10 -15k more than the LS460. Yes, it's obvious b/c it's a Benz and it looks better than the LS460 in imo. It’s a number of reasons the car didn’t sell but the most important one is style/bland. Is my CLS worth 10 - 12k more than E500? Not to some people but to me it does.
![Uhh...](https://www.clublexus.com/forums/images/smilies/1387914497.gif)
So you're willing to pay $10-15K for the emblem on the hood? Kinda screams badge hoor.
#42
Lexus Champion
![Default](https://www.clublexus.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Acura RL is for the inconspicuous Luxury car buyer. "Most" peeps who spend 50k+ don't want to be inconspicuous. Therefore RL = FAIL, even though I like the car for what it is. Plus, didn't the Accord copy/took RL platform not the other way around? Because the RL was out sooner (2005), and only the Newer Bigger (2008) Accord uses the same platform???
#43
#44
Lexus Fanatic
iTrader: (20)
![Default](https://www.clublexus.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
laughable that a bland overpriced car with so few sales evokes a 3 page thread on a lexus forum. ![Stick Out Tongue](https://www.clublexus.com/forums/images/smilies/tongue.gif)
the rl has a NICE interior (way nicer IMO than an ES and competitive at least with GS). the rl exterior is weak - wherever it isn't bland (front), it's ugly.
it's also too small to sell at its price point.
when i see one on the road from behind it though, it looks nice. but not 55k nice.
![Stick Out Tongue](https://www.clublexus.com/forums/images/smilies/tongue.gif)
the rl has a NICE interior (way nicer IMO than an ES and competitive at least with GS). the rl exterior is weak - wherever it isn't bland (front), it's ugly.
it's also too small to sell at its price point.
when i see one on the road from behind it though, it looks nice. but not 55k nice.
#45
Lexus Champion
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: georgia
Posts: 1,679
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://www.clublexus.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I love the 05-08 rl they look nice but the new acuras are garbage how did this crap make it past r&d. Must be politics involved cause there is no common sense in this design.