Mercedes to Up The Ante in Transmission Wars With 9-speed?
#61
Lexus Champion
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: NYC/ATL
Posts: 2,618
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://www.clublexus.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Interesting fact the 8 speed Lexus unit is 210lbs, the 6 speed it replaced was 10% lighter not bad, can't seem to find the weight on the MB 7speed, or the 5speed they still use in some of their cars
#62
Lexus Fanatic
![Default](https://www.clublexus.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
All else equal (which it often isn't), more shifting does mean (potentially) more wear.....that isn't just hearsay; but I did mention in this thread, in an earlier post, essentially what you just said......that good engineering and materials in a transmission can hopefully overcome that.
The fact is the multispeed Lexus and Mercedes trannys of recent years are factually proven to be very reliable. Yes progress in the form of good engineering and materials does make a difference, agreed 100%.
#65
Guest
Posts: n/a
![Default](https://www.clublexus.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
It is PROVEN that more gears give two HUGE benefits. Better acceleration AND better MPG. There is no counter argument here. Those brands that are stuck in the past get worse MPG and get laughed at for not being up to par in the area of transmissions.
If 9 speeds allows Benz to build 500hp cars with better MPG what is not to love?
#66
![Default](https://www.clublexus.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
but then to some point, going with cvt is a better idea. problem with more gears is shifting. i am not saying it can't be done of course, but it's a lot of work. with lexus 8 speed, what i notice is there is a lot of shifting, especially from stop, but i always have a feeling the car tries to get to 4th gear "asap"
#67
Moderator
![](https://www.clublexus.com/forums/images/ranks/rank-mod2.gif)
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 12,051
Likes: 0
Received 73 Likes
on
44 Posts
![Default](https://www.clublexus.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I thought the Lexus 8 speed was actually lighter than the 6 it replaced.
Im all for more gears. Imagine cruising at 80mph and still turning over at 1500 rpm. Imagine the fuel savings and engine noise reduction.
Im all for more gears. Imagine cruising at 80mph and still turning over at 1500 rpm. Imagine the fuel savings and engine noise reduction.
#69
Moderator
![](https://www.clublexus.com/forums/images/ranks/rank-mod2.gif)
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 12,051
Likes: 0
Received 73 Likes
on
44 Posts
![Default](https://www.clublexus.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
as for Lexus, they have 6 and 8 speeds...will they even come out with 7 for their lower models?
#70
Lexus Fanatic
![Default](https://www.clublexus.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
1. The 3.5L (DOHC) has not been used by Mercedes for the last decade, the previous SOHC was less powerful and less fuel efficient which is the dated engine of early 2000's.
2. The current DOHC 3.5L is reasonably fuel-efficient and I agree would benefit from DI. I have actual experience for thousands of miles while owning a 2006 ML350 and found it to be very powerful and fuel efficient considering it was a tall boxy 4800 pound AWD SUV. The 7 speed tranny was a major contributor in it's strong (instrumented-tested by C&D) performance capabilities.
Last edited by IS-SV; 07-22-10 at 07:43 PM. Reason: sp
#71
Lexus Fanatic
![Default](https://www.clublexus.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
but then to some point, going with cvt is a better idea. problem with more gears is shifting. i am not saying it can't be done of course, but it's a lot of work. with lexus 8 speed, what i notice is there is a lot of shifting, especially from stop, but i always have a feeling the car tries to get to 4th gear "asap"
I'm with Henry on this one. I don't own an LS like he does, but my limited experience with them bears some of this out.
It is PROVEN that more gears give two HUGE benefits. Better acceleration AND better MPG. There is no counter argument here. Those brands that are stuck in the past get worse MPG and get laughed at for not being up to par in the area of transmissions.
Some M-B automatics also are programmed to start in 2nd instead of first, unless you floor it. First gear is essentially a max-performance gear, and not used for MPG.
#72
Lexus Fanatic
![Default](https://www.clublexus.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Sorry to drift off topic regarding the GM SHIP-SHIFT, but that is certainly an example of how the GM of the past came up with crappy and cheap designs to achieve better economy. It contributed to improved economy (for a dated iron block pushrod, 2 valve motor of the past) and was very noticeable and very annoying to astute drivers, not a good comprimise. In short here is a great example of how not to win the transmission war where both good performance/good drivability/good economy is required.
Back on topic, the multispeed auto trannys and CVT trannys have advanced tremendously in the past decade.
Back on topic, the multispeed auto trannys and CVT trannys have advanced tremendously in the past decade.
#73
Lexus Test Driver
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: SF
Posts: 6,467
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#74
Lexus Fanatic
![Default](https://www.clublexus.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Back on topic, the multispeed auto trannys and CVT trannys have advanced tremendously in the past decade.
And, of course, there is usually more difference between a 4 and a 5-speed, in gear ratios, than between a 5 and 6-speed....and so on up the line. In general, the more gears, the narrower the ratio beteen gears.....but also the less difference between the transmisions correspondingly. That is why, if you look at the opening post, even the engineers feel that they are now at or past the point where you start to get diminishing returns, so any more gears are unlikely. And, the better that CVT's get, that will tend to discourage more gears even more.
#75
Lexus Fanatic
![Default](https://www.clublexus.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
"Regarding the GM SHIP-SHIFT, but that is certainly an example of how the GM of the past came up with crappy and cheap designs to achieve better economy." <---- The fact remains it is a poor design from the past, even if it's still in production.
This was not necessarily a design of the present, in fact it was a design of the past which is exactly what I said.
None of the nitpicking changes the facts that it contributed to improved economy (for a dated iron block pushrod, 2 valve motor of the past back then when it was invented) and was very noticeable and very annoying to astute drivers, not a good compremise.
Again I'm sorry for allowing this to drift off topic, and the crappy feature is not how any of the top automakers chose to "up the ante", therefore not applicable.
Last edited by IS-SV; 07-23-10 at 09:29 PM. Reason: sp