Car Chat General discussion about Lexus, other auto manufacturers and automotive news.

Autobild Comparison - 550i vs. E550 vs. S6 vs. XF

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-20-10, 08:27 PM
  #1  
LexFather
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post Autobild Comparison - 550i vs. E550 vs. S6 vs. XF



1st place - BMW 550i
V8, biturbo
407 hp, 600 Nm
8-speed-aut.
Weight: 2013 kg
Vmax.: 250 km/h (limited)
0-100 km/h in 5,0 s
0-200 km/h in 16,7 s
Braking 100-0 km/h (warm): 38,1 m
Price: €70.500,-

2nd place - Mercedes-Benz E550
V8
388 hp, 530 Nm
7-speed-aut.
Weight: 1828 kg
Vmax.: 250 km/h (limited)
0-100 km/h in 5,2 s
0-200 km/h in 18,7 s
Braking 100-0 km/h (warm): 35,7
Price: €68.068,-

3rd place - Audi S6
V10
435 hp, 540 Nm
6-speed-aut.
Weight: 1990 kg
Vmax.: 250 km/h (limited)
0-100 km/h in 6,0 s
0-200 km/h in 20,2 s
Braking 100-0 km/h (warm): 35,5
Price: €85.000,-

4th place - Jaguar XF
V8
385 hp, 515 Nm
6-speed-aut.
Weight: 1894 kg
Vmax.: 250 km/h (limited)
0-100 km/h in 5,7 s
0-200 km/h in 19,8 s
Braking 100-0 km/h (warm): 35,2
Price: €68.800,-
 
Old 07-20-10, 08:49 PM
  #2  
MPLexus301
Lexus Fanatic
iTrader: (3)
 
MPLexus301's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Friend Zone
Posts: 9,044
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Did they include the XJ or XF? Their graph shows Xj, which makes little sense, IMO.
MPLexus301 is offline  
Old 07-20-10, 08:57 PM
  #3  
LexFather
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Typo...they included the XF
 
Old 07-20-10, 09:58 PM
  #4  
Slvr surfr
Lexus Test Driver
iTrader: (1)
 
Slvr surfr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: dc
Posts: 1,284
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Wonder how the GS/h would stack up against them.
Slvr surfr is offline  
Old 07-20-10, 10:31 PM
  #5  
GFerg
Speaks French in Russian

 
GFerg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: What is G?
Posts: 13,274
Received 62 Likes on 48 Posts
Default

^ I think it could hold its own. Of course they would say something about it being a hybrid and not as connected as the others.

WOndering how they got the slowest time with the highest hp car that also has AWD to help on launch. Unless that is a typo as well.
GFerg is offline  
Old 07-20-10, 11:09 PM
  #6  
KILLERGS4
Lexus Champion
 
KILLERGS4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Maryland
Posts: 2,159
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

kinda lame A6 4.2 could not compete with these cars. who here thinks the new 5-series look too much like the 3-series
KILLERGS4 is offline  
Old 07-21-10, 12:02 AM
  #7  
LexFather
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

That is the V-10 S6 not the 4.2

I much prefer the big 3 series look of the 5 to the ugly, bland mess of the Eclass.
 
Old 07-21-10, 05:07 AM
  #8  
rdgdawg
Pole Position
 
rdgdawg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Lake Country, WI
Posts: 2,794
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 1SICKLEX
That is the V-10 S6 not the 4.2

I much prefer the big 3 series look of the 5 to the ugly, bland mess of the Eclass.
+1 on the V10... I've been looking at that lately, Lambo engine makes car front-end heavy...

I'd take the 550i and not surprised it won... that car is running some serious numbers and yeah, I like as a big 3 series or "small" 7 series... all 3 Germans are molding all their models into one, so pick the one that works for you!!!!
rdgdawg is offline  
Old 07-21-10, 07:43 AM
  #9  
DustinV
Lexus Champion
 
DustinV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Stuttgart
Posts: 1,651
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I'm seeing the new 5er on the streets more often these days. What looked good in the pictures all of a sudden doesn't look as good in real life. It's not an ugly car, but it has become so bland and, well, boring. I'm just not feeling it. I wasn't a fan of the E60, but in terms of design it's more striking and even more elegant than the F10.
DustinV is offline  
Old 07-21-10, 08:27 AM
  #10  
MPLexus301
Lexus Fanatic
iTrader: (3)
 
MPLexus301's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Friend Zone
Posts: 9,044
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by DustinV
I'm seeing the new 5er on the streets more often these days. What looked good in the pictures all of a sudden doesn't look as good in real life. It's not an ugly car, but it has become so bland and, well, boring. I'm just not feeling it. I wasn't a fan of the E60, but in terms of design it's more striking and even more elegant than the F10.
I have to agree with you. I saw my first one on the street the other and just thought, "Oh...ok..."

No striking, long lasting impression like a BMW usually has when it first comes out. Just...ok.
MPLexus301 is offline  
Old 07-21-10, 01:57 PM
  #11  
DrDrilZ
Lead Lap
 
DrDrilZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Georgia
Posts: 656
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by MPLexus301
I have to agree with you. I saw my first one on the street the other and just thought, "Oh...ok..."

No striking, long lasting impression like a BMW usually has when it first comes out. Just...ok.
i really think its the wheel gap that we're not used to seeing on bmw's
DrDrilZ is offline  
Old 07-21-10, 02:08 PM
  #12  
LexFather
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

^^Yeah I said that when I first saw it. Wheel gap on a BMW. The 5 is now based off the 7 series so its no longer the light different car we know. Its bigger, more refined and relaxed but still a great handler.

I agree with the looks, its nice but not breathtaking or anything with the front being a mess.

Quattroporte is looking like genius...
 
Old 07-21-10, 06:57 PM
  #13  
byung
Driver
iTrader: (1)
 
byung's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: nj
Posts: 110
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

poor S6...
byung is offline  
Old 07-21-10, 07:15 PM
  #14  
syzygy
Lexus Champion
 
syzygy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: N/A
Posts: 1,727
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Am I the only one who finds something strikingly wrong with a V10 435 HP S6 doing 0 to 100 km/hr in 6 seconds?

It's lighter and has more peak horsepower than the 550i and gets to 100 km/hr a full second slower.

Now, obviously acceleration - particularly 0 to 60, is hardly just a function of peak horsepower and weight, but even still -

That S6 must have awful (for dig acceleration) gearing, or something.

I can't be the only one who noticed that, it's the first thing I noticed.
syzygy is offline  
Old 07-27-10, 08:49 PM
  #15  
tadtaggert
Driver School Candidate
 
tadtaggert's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: OH
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by carLx
Am I the only one who finds something strikingly wrong with a V10 435 HP S6 doing 0 to 100 km/hr in 6 seconds?

It's lighter and has more peak horsepower than the 550i and gets to 100 km/hr a full second slower.

Now, obviously acceleration - particularly 0 to 60, is hardly just a function of peak horsepower and weight, but even still -

That S6 must have awful (for dig acceleration) gearing, or something.

I can't be the only one who noticed that, it's the first thing I noticed.
Acceleration is more of a measure of torque, torque over rpm range, and how tall or short gearing is to get that torque to the road.

There are a number of sources out there on these comparisons, but they all show that the numbers in the test are accurate.

The 550i is a beast.
tadtaggert is offline  


Quick Reply: Autobild Comparison - 550i vs. E550 vs. S6 vs. XF



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:00 AM.