Review: 2011 Lexus IS350AWD
#31
Thread Starter
Lexus Fanatic
Thanks.
If you are used to the IS250AWD's sluggishness, you will find the 350AWD a pleasant surprise. It's not quite as strong as the regular RWD 350, though, because of the added weight/drag of the AWD hardware, but it will get out of its own way.
I think you will also notice the nice interior....especially in the two-tones. They seem to have refined the inteior fit/finish a little in the last couple of years.
Now I gotta test drive one .
I think you will also notice the nice interior....especially in the two-tones. They seem to have refined the inteior fit/finish a little in the last couple of years.
#32
Thread Starter
Lexus Fanatic
Whether they will discount the AWD 350 as easily as the RWD model remains to be seen. I did not make a serious offer on either of the two I looked at yesterday...that wasn't my purpose.
#33
Another great review, thank you! I have owned a 2006 IS250AWD and now a 2008 IS350 with sport pkg. I agree that the extra power with the 350 is hugely appreciated. I really like the sports suspension being firmer and I believe the 2008 got re-calibrated steering(with more weight & feel).
One thing I will struggle to decide on is what model to get next time around. Currently living in WI I needed Blizzaks for the winter months and use the summers the rest of the year. If I snag a 350AWD next time around, it probably comes with all seasons.....did you happen to notice? What do you all think? Cost wise, the AWD adds upfront costs, maybe better resale here, but the RWD model needs about $1200 in tires/wheels for winter......hmmm.
One thing I will struggle to decide on is what model to get next time around. Currently living in WI I needed Blizzaks for the winter months and use the summers the rest of the year. If I snag a 350AWD next time around, it probably comes with all seasons.....did you happen to notice? What do you all think? Cost wise, the AWD adds upfront costs, maybe better resale here, but the RWD model needs about $1200 in tires/wheels for winter......hmmm.
#34
Thread Starter
Lexus Fanatic
Sure...anytime.
[/QUOTE] I have owned a 2006 IS250AWD and now a 2008 IS350 with sport pkg. I agree that the extra power with the 350 is hugely appreciated. I really like the sports suspension being firmer and I believe the 2008 got re-calibrated steering(with more weight & feel).[/QUOTE]
The steering is not quite BMW 3-series in tactile feel, but, as you note, I don't think you wll be disappointed. Don't expect the 350AWD model to have quite as crisp an initial steering response, though, as the RWD 350....to my senses, the AWD has slightly less initial response (in other words, understeer), because of the extra hardware ansd spinning driveshafts on the front wheels. But, once you do get into a corner, the extra AWD traction really helps you to hang onto it. I didn't do any sliding/drifting, of course, on dry pavement with a brand-new car, but, with AWD, it's usually harder to get the rear end to swing around with drop-throttle.
According to the literature, AWD models, both 250 and 350, get standard 225/45VR-17s (all-season) both front and rear. That is different from the RWD models, which get different tire-width all-seasons from front and rear (so you can't rotate the tires front-to-back). 40-series 18-inchers (summer-only) are an option, but, IMO, would ride too stiffly...and they would also be unsuitable for slippery roads.
If you really need to get through a Wisconsin winter, with deep snow, the low ground clearance (and low-profile tires) on all the IS models may not cut it.......you might (?) be better-off looking at an RX350.
[/QUOTE] I have owned a 2006 IS250AWD and now a 2008 IS350 with sport pkg. I agree that the extra power with the 350 is hugely appreciated. I really like the sports suspension being firmer and I believe the 2008 got re-calibrated steering(with more weight & feel).[/QUOTE]
The steering is not quite BMW 3-series in tactile feel, but, as you note, I don't think you wll be disappointed. Don't expect the 350AWD model to have quite as crisp an initial steering response, though, as the RWD 350....to my senses, the AWD has slightly less initial response (in other words, understeer), because of the extra hardware ansd spinning driveshafts on the front wheels. But, once you do get into a corner, the extra AWD traction really helps you to hang onto it. I didn't do any sliding/drifting, of course, on dry pavement with a brand-new car, but, with AWD, it's usually harder to get the rear end to swing around with drop-throttle.
One thing I will struggle to decide on is what model to get next time around. Currently living in WI I needed Blizzaks for the winter months and use the summers the rest of the year. If I snag a 350AWD next time around, it probably comes with all seasons.....did you happen to notice? What do you all think? Cost wise, the AWD adds upfront costs, maybe better resale here, but the RWD model needs about $1200 in tires/wheels for winter......hmmm.
If you really need to get through a Wisconsin winter, with deep snow, the low ground clearance (and low-profile tires) on all the IS models may not cut it.......you might (?) be better-off looking at an RX350.
#35
mmarshall,
I agree, you would lose some of the "sporty" driving characteristics of the RWD model by going AWD. Thanks for the info on the tires. As for switching to a RX, not a chance I probably would have bought one over my 2010 4runner, but the cargo area is so small with its sharp roof line compared to my 4runner. I have a large dog and on occasion pack it to capacity with stuff for trips and etc. Plus, its nice having a fun little sedan to cruise around with versus 2 SUV's.......got to enjoy life a little!
I agree, you would lose some of the "sporty" driving characteristics of the RWD model by going AWD. Thanks for the info on the tires. As for switching to a RX, not a chance I probably would have bought one over my 2010 4runner, but the cargo area is so small with its sharp roof line compared to my 4runner. I have a large dog and on occasion pack it to capacity with stuff for trips and etc. Plus, its nice having a fun little sedan to cruise around with versus 2 SUV's.......got to enjoy life a little!
#36
Thread Starter
Lexus Fanatic
mmarshall,
I agree, you would lose some of the "sporty" driving characteristics of the RWD model by going AWD. Thanks for the info on the tires. As for switching to a RX, not a chance I probably would have bought one over my 2010 4runner, but the cargo area is so small with its sharp roof line compared to my 4runner. I have a large dog and on occasion pack it to capacity with stuff for trips and etc. Plus, its nice having a fun little sedan to cruise around with versus 2 SUV's.......got to enjoy life a little!
I agree, you would lose some of the "sporty" driving characteristics of the RWD model by going AWD. Thanks for the info on the tires. As for switching to a RX, not a chance I probably would have bought one over my 2010 4runner, but the cargo area is so small with its sharp roof line compared to my 4runner. I have a large dog and on occasion pack it to capacity with stuff for trips and etc. Plus, its nice having a fun little sedan to cruise around with versus 2 SUV's.......got to enjoy life a little!
#37
Thread Starter
Lexus Fanatic
Unfortunately, the GS300's reliability, according to Consumer Reports, turned out below average.........a rarity for a Lexus product. That held over, to a leser extent, in the GS350.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post