Car Chat General discussion about Lexus, other auto manufacturers and automotive news.

Formula One change in 2013

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-10-10, 06:07 PM
  #1  
JessePS
Lexus Test Driver

Thread Starter
 
JessePS's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: QC/FRANCE
Posts: 8,349
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Formula One change in 2013

The grid has been all a-bluster with talk of the coming engine changes for 2013 for months now, but today, it's official: the 18,000 rpm, 2.4-liter V-8 is now on its deathbed in Formula 1, its 12,000 rpm 1.6-liter four-cylinder turbo replacement announced today for the 2013 season. The goal: a "greener" series, cutting fuel consumption by 35 percent.

Of course, a 35 percent improvement in F1 engines equates to about 1 mpg, but that's a significant amount of emissions and fuel across 24-26 cars and about 20 races, practice days, and qualifying sessions.

The new engines will be limited to a maximum of 12,000 rpms--still a rather high figure for an engine with two-thirds the displacement but only half the cylinder count of the outgoing V-8s. In addition to turbocharging (which isn't specificaly mentioned in the release, but is expected), the engines will feature high-pressure direct fuel injection at up to 500 bar, or 7,252 psi. Gasoline is still the requisite fuel.

Energy recovery systems and "additional energy management" will also play a role, meaning KERS is due to come back, though likely in a heavily revised and evolved form by the time the 2013 season arrives.

For those afraid to see turbos and four-cylinders in F1, look back to the early 1980s when manufacturers like BMW managed to extract 900+ horsepower from 1.5-liter turbo fours on 55 psi of boost with a redline around 11,500 rpm--very close to the specs of the 2013 engines, but with another 20 years of technology to draw on. Even better: some of those engines were turned up to 80 psi of boost or more for qualifying, generating as much as 1,300 horsepower. From a 1.5-liter four-banger. In the 1980s. Yeah.
(Courtesy of Motor Authority)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eG-4s...layer_embedded
JessePS is offline  
Old 12-12-10, 08:08 PM
  #2  
Marzabella
Pit Crew
 
Marzabella's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Qld
Posts: 131
Received 11 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

Unfortunately it won't be anything like the 80's turbos. Those things had as much boost as they could shove into them, no fuelling limit and were grenades that often only had to last one qualifying session. The new regs have a boost limit and only 5(!) engines per year. It'll take em a few years to get perforamce back up, on the plus side we might see a bit more F1 stuff getting into road cars.
Marzabella is offline  
Old 12-12-10, 08:24 PM
  #3  
GiantsFan
Lexus Fanatic
iTrader: (9)
 
GiantsFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: CA - Norcal
Posts: 7,550
Received 9 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Is this one of those joke articles or something...?
GiantsFan is offline  
Old 12-12-10, 08:47 PM
  #4  
Marzabella
Pit Crew
 
Marzabella's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Qld
Posts: 131
Received 11 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

Nope, its for real, F1, WRC and a bunch of touring formulas all using 1.6L turbos in the not to distant future.
Marzabella is offline  
Old 12-12-10, 08:56 PM
  #5  
LexFather
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I have absolutely no interest in watching or hearing turbo I-4s. I can listen to that at my local Target or anywhere Hondas hang out

Damn recession
 
Old 12-12-10, 09:00 PM
  #6  
GlobeCLK
Lexus Fanatic
iTrader: (5)
 
GlobeCLK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: California
Posts: 7,402
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 1SICKLEX
I have absolutely no interest in watching or hearing turbo I-4s. I can listen to that at my local Target or anywhere Hondas hang out

Damn recession
LOL
GlobeCLK is offline  
Old 12-12-10, 09:22 PM
  #7  
Blackraven
Lexus Champion
 
Blackraven's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Makati, Philippines
Posts: 3,459
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Hehe you can primarily blame tree hugger extremists (like Greenpeace) for that.

However for me, the day they mandate the use of diesel fuel in this sport will serve as the last time I'd ever dare to watch Formula 1.

Diesel fuel for Formula 1 = epic fail at its best.

Enjoy your soul-less and revless (probably won't even reach 10,000 rpm) motorsport till then
Blackraven is offline  
Old 12-12-10, 09:35 PM
  #8  
Och
Lexus Champion
iTrader: (3)
 
Och's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: NY
Posts: 16,436
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

Thanks God for Nascar
Och is offline  
Old 12-12-10, 09:40 PM
  #9  
Blackraven
Lexus Champion
 
Blackraven's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Makati, Philippines
Posts: 3,459
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Och
Thanks God for Nascar
Lolz

But unfortunately
I too am sadly not a fan of NASCAR because there is basically no thrill or level of technicality by just driving endlessly along an oval track for hours. (I know mmarshall will argue with me on this)

That's just what I think though.

Thankfully, even with these cost-cutting and downgrading, I still don't mind. As long as they don't commit the ultimate sin of mandating diesel fuel for F1, then I still think it's okay.
Blackraven is offline  
Old 12-12-10, 10:14 PM
  #10  
MR_F1
Lexus Champion
 
MR_F1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: NY
Posts: 3,370
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 1SICKLEX
I have absolutely no interest in watching or hearing turbo I-4s. I can listen to that at my local Target or anywhere Hondas hang out

Damn recession
.

12,000 rpm is so mortal. Where is A1GP when you need it?
MR_F1 is offline  
Old 12-12-10, 10:25 PM
  #11  
Marzabella
Pit Crew
 
Marzabella's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Qld
Posts: 131
Received 11 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

A1GP? They would be in the hands of receivers trying to get what money they can. That ain't going to happen. Funny thing is though no one is claiming that the engine change is to cut costs, far from it, going to be pricey to re-engineer everything.
Marzabella is offline  
Old 12-12-10, 10:33 PM
  #12  
Och
Lexus Champion
iTrader: (3)
 
Och's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: NY
Posts: 16,436
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 1SICKLEX
I have absolutely no interest in watching or hearing turbo I-4s. I can listen to that at my local Target or anywhere Hondas hang out

Damn recession
At least those Honda rice-races can sometimes be fairly amusing, something that can't be said about the sissified boredom that F1 has become.

And at the rate F1 has been going, these Hondas will soon be faster too
Och is offline  
Old 12-12-10, 10:36 PM
  #13  
Och
Lexus Champion
iTrader: (3)
 
Och's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: NY
Posts: 16,436
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JessePS
For those afraid to see turbos and four-cylinders in F1, look back to the early 1980s when manufacturers like BMW managed to extract 900+ horsepower from 1.5-liter turbo fours on 55 psi of boost with a redline around 11,500 rpm
Orly? Then why can't they do HPFP right in 2010?
Och is offline  
Old 12-12-10, 10:57 PM
  #14  
gengar
Lexus Test Driver

 
gengar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: NV
Posts: 5,285
Received 43 Likes on 33 Posts
Default

Total marketing sham, pure and simple. F1 just wants to look like they care about the environment. If they really did care, they wouldn't have a dozen racing teams ferry around dozens of team staff and literal tons and tons of equipment to nearly twenty races amounting to over 100,000 travel miles in every single season.

Originally Posted by 1SICKLEX
I have absolutely no interest in watching or hearing turbo I-4s. I can listen to that at my local Target or anywhere Hondas hang out
Ya, seems every day I'm getting happier that I decided to buy the LFA. Cars like this simply may not exist in the rather near future.
gengar is offline  
Old 12-12-10, 11:46 PM
  #15  
projectdna
Lexus Fanatic
iTrader: (56)
 
projectdna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: California
Posts: 7,371
Received 25 Likes on 23 Posts
Default

combined with KERS (kinetic energy recovery system), the move from normally-aspirated v8's to turbocharged inline 4's can be seen as a "green" initiative by formula one.

however, keeping in line with formula one's desire to keep R&D/operating costs for the teams "manageable" (i use the term loosely), the move is also to attract new equipment suppliers and teams, as suppliers and manufacturers balked at the skyrocketing budgets to operate a formula one team for an entire season.

case in point, historically-successful teams such as ferrari and mclaren have operating budgets in excess of $50M - and that may not even guarantee a winning formula (see: red bull racing).

that's why manufacturers such as honda, toyota, and BMW have left formula one, other manufacturers are very reluctant to enter (porsche/audi has been rumored to enter formula one as a supplier as of late, though the rumors have been flatly denied), and why there are very few "new" teams on the grid (bernie ecclestone/formula one requires a $13M guarantee, last i read).
projectdna is offline  


Quick Reply: Formula One change in 2013



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:21 AM.