When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Out of curiousity I checked Impala sales for 2010. 172,000 units sold, +4%. Amazing!
Maybe too profitable to pull the plug on right now, even though its time has come and gone a long time ago. The classic company/rental car.
Pretty good at 14K units sold per month.
Typically profit margin per unit is very low on fleet/rental sales. But at that volume a business case can be made to continue because of it's contribution in terms of total profits (a case at least strictly by the numbers, a case where better auto companies won't bother to entertain).
An 8-year run?? How can GM honestly excuse this when they've been on such a role releasing top notch contenders in every other category? They must have run out of money developing the Volt.
Very poor decision to prolong this car's change. It is one of the darkest spots in GM's line-up right now and needs the most fixing. With a new Malibu just around the corner, it doesn't make sense the not so old Malibu gets changed before the way too old Impala does. Back to backward thinking at GM I guess.
The Malibu is more impt. to GM for retail sales than the Impala; the segment that the Impala competes in (Taurus, Avalon, Maxima, etc.) is a much smaller segment.
Originally Posted by LexBob2
Out of curiousity I checked Impala sales for 2010. 172,000 units sold, +4%. Amazing!
Maybe too profitable to pull the plug on right now, even though its time has come and gone a long time ago. The classic company/rental car.
As long a enough people and fleet operators continue to buy the Impala, it can wait while GM concentrates on shoring up its models in the bigger selling segments.