MM Review: 2011 Lexus GX460
#31
I recently was in the market for a 3 row SUV to replace my RX350. I am a big fan of Lexus, but the GX460 just doesn't cut it, imo. I can't get past the barn door tailgate, the archaic third row seat design, and the high stance. I bought a GL450, which I notice is outselling the GX460 even though it costs a lot more. Memo to Lexus: convert the GX to a unibody design similar to the GL450 (but lighter, without the off-road capability) and I'll be the first to buy one. Leave the off-road capability to the LX.
#32
Lexus Fanatic
Thread Starter
I recently was in the market for a 3 row SUV to replace my RX350. I am a big fan of Lexus, but the GX460 just doesn't cut it, imo. I can't get past the barn door tailgate, the archaic third row seat design, and the high stance. I bought a GL450, which I notice is outselling the GX460 even though it costs a lot more.
Memo to Lexus: convert the GX to a unibody design similar to the GL450 (but lighter, without the off-road capability) and I'll be the first to buy one. Leave the off-road capability to the LX.
Ford also does the Flex SUV with a 3rd-row-seat, but it has square, shoe-box styling....I don't know if it willl appeal to you or not. But the square-styling is space-efficient. Lincoln does a version on the same platform, called the MKT, but it is awkward-looking, and nothing like the Flex, style-wise.
Last edited by mmarshall; 03-21-11 at 10:45 AM.
#33
I test drove the new Explorer, but I didn't like it enough to buy one. The Flex probably fits my needs better than anything else out there, but it's not really a luxury vehicle. Incidentally, my GL 450 has the blind spot detection, which is an awfully nice feature. I wouldn't buy another car without it.
I looked at the MKT, but the 3rd row seat is useless for anything but little kids.
I looked at the MKT, but the 3rd row seat is useless for anything but little kids.
#34
Lexus Fanatic
iTrader: (20)
I test drove the new Explorer, but I didn't like it enough to buy one. The Flex probably fits my needs better than anything else out there, but it's not really a luxury vehicle. Incidentally, my GL 450 has the blind spot detection, which is an awfully nice feature. I wouldn't buy another car without it.
I looked at the MKT, but the 3rd row seat is useless for anything but little kids.
I looked at the MKT, but the 3rd row seat is useless for anything but little kids.
#35
Thanks for the in depth and objective review mmarshall. I was one of those that had requested this and I appreciate the time and energy it took for you to do this review, so again thanks!
I'd say my own personal observations are very much in line with what you've observed about the interior, exterior and on the road characteristics of the vehicle. I found the drivers seat and its surroundings a delightful place to spend time and, as you stated in your review, very Lexus like in details.
One thing I would use the GX for is long highway drives for work and family vacations and felt this would be an excellent vehicle for that and it would also give me the comfort to know when it was time to come home, no matter what the weather, the GX would get me their safely. I was hoping for an LS on stilts. Of course the GX doesn't quite deliver that but I do think for a BOF truck it rides/drives nicely. I think I gathered correctly from your review it would do that to some extent.
Funny you should mention the RX as I have looked closely at that as a possibility too. On the surface comparing the two may seem like apples and oranges but see what my needs are above and it's really not that far off.
2 Questions please
1) Day in and day out livability. Is the GX a vehicle you could personally get in and out of everyday and enjoy driving?
2) Speaking of apples and oranges did the Lexus dealer have any comments about your request to drive a GX after driving a CT a few weeks ago? I know you have a good relationship with them but that is quite a swing in interests
I'd say my own personal observations are very much in line with what you've observed about the interior, exterior and on the road characteristics of the vehicle. I found the drivers seat and its surroundings a delightful place to spend time and, as you stated in your review, very Lexus like in details.
One thing I would use the GX for is long highway drives for work and family vacations and felt this would be an excellent vehicle for that and it would also give me the comfort to know when it was time to come home, no matter what the weather, the GX would get me their safely. I was hoping for an LS on stilts. Of course the GX doesn't quite deliver that but I do think for a BOF truck it rides/drives nicely. I think I gathered correctly from your review it would do that to some extent.
Funny you should mention the RX as I have looked closely at that as a possibility too. On the surface comparing the two may seem like apples and oranges but see what my needs are above and it's really not that far off.
2 Questions please
1) Day in and day out livability. Is the GX a vehicle you could personally get in and out of everyday and enjoy driving?
2) Speaking of apples and oranges did the Lexus dealer have any comments about your request to drive a GX after driving a CT a few weeks ago? I know you have a good relationship with them but that is quite a swing in interests
#36
I think Prado and GX have always offered quite good driving skills... it has independent suspension and sure it is a truck, but i had a lot of fun bending it in curves... KDSS helps a lot and AVS should help a little bit more, but even without AVS it is quite decent.
it is billion times better car IMHO than RX450h...
it is billion times better car IMHO than RX450h...
#37
it would be quite cool if they offered 3.0l D4D engine in 4Runner. It would probably get easy 25-28mpg, which is pretty much the best you will get in true truck. It is pretty slow though, nothing like V6 but that kind of goes together with it being truck.
#38
Lexus Fanatic
Thread Starter
Originally Posted by TripleL
Thanks for the in depth and objective review mmarshall.
I was one of those that had requested this and I appreciate the time and energy it took for you to do this review, so again thanks!
I was one of those that had requested this and I appreciate the time and energy it took for you to do this review, so again thanks!
I was hoping for an LS on stilts. Of course the GX doesn't quite deliver that but I do think for a BOF truck it rides/drives nicely. I think I gathered correctly from your review it would do that to some extent.
Funny you should mention the RX as I have looked closely at that as a possibility too. On the surface comparing the two may seem like apples and oranges but see what my needs are above and it's really not that far off.
1) Day in and day out livability. Is the GX a vehicle you could personally get in and out of everyday and enjoy driving?
2) Speaking of apples and oranges did the Lexus dealer have any comments about your request to drive a GX after driving a CT a few weeks ago? I know you have a good relationship with them but that is quite a swing in interests
Last edited by mmarshall; 03-21-11 at 08:58 PM.
#39
Lexus Fanatic
Thread Starter
it is billion times better car IMHO than RX450h...
#40
Lexus Fanatic
Thread Starter
I'm not familiar with the "D4D" designation...is that a diesel? If so, I'm with you............I favor more diesels coming to America, but most manufacturers, except for a couple of German makes, have been reluctant to bring them here. And, any diesel used in the GX had better have some spunk to it.....you are talking about a vehicle that is well over two and a half tons (5400 lbs.), empty. The 4Runner, with less equipment, is a little lighter, but still no featherweight.
Last edited by mmarshall; 03-21-11 at 09:19 PM.
#41
AS you indicate, the KDSS and stability systems do help, but, given this vehicle's high, narrow stance and (potential) tipsiness, I still wouldn't push it in sharp corners, or with too-sharp steering-inputs at higher speeds. VSC can save you only to a certain extent. Sports cars and sports-sedans are designed to be driven aggressively.....truck-based SUVs are not. The laws of physics still apply at the limits.
For the average American driver, as a daily-driving machine in typical conditions, I can't agree. I think that, unless you need the extra towing, carrying, or 7-seat capacity of the GX, the RX makes more sense.
For the average American driver, as a daily-driving machine in typical conditions, I can't agree. I think that, unless you need the extra towing, carrying, or 7-seat capacity of the GX, the RX makes more sense.
you can push this baby as much as you want, you will get nice 4 wheel slide :-).
it has been built from components that are significantly higher quality and more durable than RX... it is going to last... forever.
#42
The RX350, for a number of people, is not only, IMO, a better and less-expensive overall daily-driver for on-pavement work, but is also very refined, and drives like a silk purse.
I liked the GX's plush interior, basic control-layout, ride comfort, and ruggedness of build-quality, but the high, narrow stance and high center-of-gravity, even with the stability-control, makes me a little nervous in sudden sharp corners or if you have to swerve abruptly to aavoid hitting something. It also doesn't seem as quiet and refined in noise-control as the RX. The RX, besides costing less, will also use significantly less (and less-expensive regular) fuel.
I don't always go the same dealerships. For instance, there are 4 or 5 Lexus dealers within reasonable driving distance of my house. That is one of the advantages of living in the car-rich D.C. area....the second-largest new-car market in the country behind Southern California. We have auto dealerships up the kazoo in this area....they are almost everywhere, especially for popular brands like Ford, Chevy, Toyota, Honda, etc..... That's why it is usually, but not always, relatively easy fo me to do reviews.
#43
Lexus Fanatic
Thread Starter
I'll stop if you will do me the courtesy of answering the question I asked you above, in post #40......is the D4D a diesel?
An inward-banked track, because the G-forces push down rather than out, will help overcome the effects of any tipsiness. A level or outward-crowned road won't.
Maybe so. But I use common sense when I review a vehicle, and don't push it past anything that I feel is unsafe or would put undue stress on it. After all, it is (usually) the dealership's property, not mine, and a brand-new vehicle.
Here I agree with you.....it is indeed durable, but, for most drivers, under most conditions, the RX350 makes a better and more-sensible daily driver.
car passed all the tests, it is not going to tip anywhere... we were driving it very fast on 40% angled test track and it didnt tip... not sure why are you even mentioning it.
you can push this baby as much as you want, you will get nice 4 wheel slide :-).
it has been built from components that are significantly higher quality and more durable than RX... it is going to last... forever.
Last edited by mmarshall; 03-22-11 at 06:11 AM.
#44
Lexus Fanatic
Thread Starter
WOW! I did realize how big a car market DC was, that's great. I'm not complaining though as we have 'one of each' dealer here in RI and Boston is only 80 minutes away.
#45
Lexus Champion
MM, are you sure that the metro DC new car market is larger than the metro NYC, Chicago, Dallas-Ft. Worth, Philadelphia, Houston, Miami etc.?
All of these areas have larger populations, with varying degrees of public transportation systems, meaning potentially more new car buyers.
All of these areas have larger populations, with varying degrees of public transportation systems, meaning potentially more new car buyers.