BMW brings 4-cylinder back to U.S. to hit new MPG requirements
#18
Lexus Champion
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Stuttgart
Posts: 1,651
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The reality couldn't be more different. And that applies to all luxury brands and their cars. There are plenty of people out there who can afford these cars but want good fuel economy.
#19
So you're implying that everyone who can afford a BMW doesn't care about fuel economy?
The reality couldn't be more different. And that applies to all luxury brands and their cars. There are plenty of people out there who can afford these cars but want good fuel economy.
The reality couldn't be more different. And that applies to all luxury brands and their cars. There are plenty of people out there who can afford these cars but want good fuel economy.
#20
In the last few month's the Lexus surveys I receive in email have had many questions about 4cyl engines and specifically 4cyl turbos.
I think they have a place in our future due to the CAFE regs but to date I've yet to drive a 4cyl turbo that is "Lexus smooth". I'd say the Audi 2.0T is closest and a fantastic engine in that class but I'd still take a small fuel efficient v6 for a daily driver.
I guess time will tell though as with competition being tight and standards high maybe we'll have some ground breaking technology coming out way.
I think they have a place in our future due to the CAFE regs but to date I've yet to drive a 4cyl turbo that is "Lexus smooth". I'd say the Audi 2.0T is closest and a fantastic engine in that class but I'd still take a small fuel efficient v6 for a daily driver.
I guess time will tell though as with competition being tight and standards high maybe we'll have some ground breaking technology coming out way.
#21
Lexus Test Driver
The only way to make four cylinders something people want is to make them better. Smooth, quiet, efficient, torquey... just like a V6. With these qualities, people will forget about the title over time. Some idea is happening with people forgetting about the lowly name "Hyundai." It's not going to happen overnight, but it will happen if they are all-achieving.
For the record, Audi has been doing 4 pots in their entry sedan for decades. Welcome to today, BMW.
For the record, Audi has been doing 4 pots in their entry sedan for decades. Welcome to today, BMW.
#22
Lexus Champion
iTrader: (3)
Sounds like BMW is using the while "MPG requirements" as an excuse for cost cutting. If you do some simple math, the fine is 220m for 200k vehicles sold - so that works out to $1,100 per car, which they will just pass onto the customers. At the price point that BMW's sell for, the measly $1,100 just doesn't matter. They will lose far more customers if they go with a 4 banger vs rising price by $1,100... Especially that turbo motors are not even economical, they can just be cheated to produce better economy in lab environment, in real world they guzzle a lot worse than NA engines.
And as far as EPA and their MPG requirements, it's a clear scam. They set unattainable goals, and eventually all manufacturers will have to pay the fine, which they will just pass onto the consumers. Another hidden tax from our wonderful government.
And as far as EPA and their MPG requirements, it's a clear scam. They set unattainable goals, and eventually all manufacturers will have to pay the fine, which they will just pass onto the consumers. Another hidden tax from our wonderful government.
#23
The only way to make four cylinders something people want is to make them better. Smooth, quiet, efficient, torquey... just like a V6. With these qualities, people will forget about the title over time. Some idea is happening with people forgetting about the lowly name "Hyundai." It's not going to happen overnight, but it will happen if they are all-achieving.
For the record, Audi has been doing 4 pots in their entry sedan for decades. Welcome to today, BMW.
For the record, Audi has been doing 4 pots in their entry sedan for decades. Welcome to today, BMW.
Audi's usage of VAG engines can hardly be an positive point. It is what it is.
#24
Sounds like BMW is using the while "MPG requirements" as an excuse for cost cutting. If you do some simple math, the fine is 220m for 200k vehicles sold - so that works out to $1,100 per car, which they will just pass onto the customers. At the price point that BMW's sell for, the measly $1,100 just doesn't matter. They will lose far more customers if they go with a 4 banger vs rising price by $1,100... Especially that turbo motors are not even economical, they can just be cheated to produce better economy in lab environment, in real world they guzzle a lot worse than NA engines.
And as far as EPA and their MPG requirements, it's a clear scam. They set unattainable goals, and eventually all manufacturers will have to pay the fine, which they will just pass onto the consumers. Another hidden tax from our wonderful government.
And as far as EPA and their MPG requirements, it's a clear scam. They set unattainable goals, and eventually all manufacturers will have to pay the fine, which they will just pass onto the consumers. Another hidden tax from our wonderful government.
Also, Auto Motor und Sport (AMS) had series of articles how these 4cly turbo's cant have real life average nothing like their EU cycle, because in EU cycle they accelerate very slowly.
http://www.auto-motor-und-sport.de/b...t-3957863.html
So with turbo's, what happens is they adjust the ecu so turbo works as little as possible during the EU cycle but when you press the pedal to get it to work, it spends a LOT more fuel than what it should. I believe 0-62mph in EU cycle is tested at 40 seconds :-).
So these high end figures are in the end just for the official show, and not something you can see in real life driving normally. Just like for instance, how these 40 MPG cars have a lot of drivers averaging 30 MPG and then people complain on the forums.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Overclocker
Car Chat
30
12-01-08 08:19 PM