Article-Acura takes dead aim... at mediocrity
#16
Lexus Test Driver
![Default](https://www.clublexus.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
^Wow that aged horribly!!.......This is a few months old but shows how much Acura is really going downhill fast. This is supposed to be their flagship?
.... I wish them the best of luck as I am one of the few who like ZDX (only in black). My neighbor has a black pre-facelift TL Sh-AWD with stock gold wheels that's actually quite nice on the eyes but I am afraid of the way they're running things now.![Egads!](https://www.clublexus.com/forums/images/smilies/pat.gif)
http://youtu.be/VA4p7N5Emj4
![Sad](https://www.clublexus.com/forums/images/smilies/sad.gif)
![Egads!](https://www.clublexus.com/forums/images/smilies/pat.gif)
http://youtu.be/VA4p7N5Emj4
#20
Pole Position
![Default](https://www.clublexus.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
What I think of Acura in the US today:
TSX: Never was ugly, but the base engine needs a tune as the current car is not exactly a featherweight. Available V6 makes it nose-heavy and is probably too much engine for this platform. Also, the wagon doesn't get a V6. Rest of the car is great, although the Nav could be more modern. 8/10
TL: The debut in 2009 really turned buyers off, but the TL finally escaped ugly with the 2012 facelift. Like the TSX, a great car and actually a very competitive sports sedan despite the base model being FWD. Journos usually rave about the SH-AWD 3.7, but that one costs. Very good interior except the nav is a little old-school. 8/10
RL: Powertrain and body styling are hopelessly out of date. The cabin is undersized to compete with the Euros. I don't think Honda absolutely needs to put a V8 in the Legend/RL, but the powertrain needs to be at least innovative and more fuel-efficient to attract luxury buyers. Needs a new body. 3/10
MDX: Despite its aging design, the MDX still manages to look decent and have good tech features and a rich cabin. Powertrain is adequate, although Honda really needs to put more cogs in the gearboxes to improve city pick-up and hwy fuel economy. 7/10
RDX: This smaller model has aged well. Features and interior quality are excellent as usual with Acura, but turbo engine is thirsty and that is a big no-no in the compact CUV segment. Facelift and more MPGs are needed to attract buyers. 6/10
ZDX: On another planet, this could have been a great flagship but it's priced too high, the powertrain doesn't provide competitive performance, and the cabin is too impractical to compete with the more desirable BMW X6 (rear seat is hopeless). Features and interior quality are great as usual with Acura, but the concept was executed poorly and the car only manages to look good--nothing else. 5/10
I think Acura has improved from 2009, but still needs work. And a worthy flagship.
TSX: Never was ugly, but the base engine needs a tune as the current car is not exactly a featherweight. Available V6 makes it nose-heavy and is probably too much engine for this platform. Also, the wagon doesn't get a V6. Rest of the car is great, although the Nav could be more modern. 8/10
TL: The debut in 2009 really turned buyers off, but the TL finally escaped ugly with the 2012 facelift. Like the TSX, a great car and actually a very competitive sports sedan despite the base model being FWD. Journos usually rave about the SH-AWD 3.7, but that one costs. Very good interior except the nav is a little old-school. 8/10
RL: Powertrain and body styling are hopelessly out of date. The cabin is undersized to compete with the Euros. I don't think Honda absolutely needs to put a V8 in the Legend/RL, but the powertrain needs to be at least innovative and more fuel-efficient to attract luxury buyers. Needs a new body. 3/10
MDX: Despite its aging design, the MDX still manages to look decent and have good tech features and a rich cabin. Powertrain is adequate, although Honda really needs to put more cogs in the gearboxes to improve city pick-up and hwy fuel economy. 7/10
RDX: This smaller model has aged well. Features and interior quality are excellent as usual with Acura, but turbo engine is thirsty and that is a big no-no in the compact CUV segment. Facelift and more MPGs are needed to attract buyers. 6/10
ZDX: On another planet, this could have been a great flagship but it's priced too high, the powertrain doesn't provide competitive performance, and the cabin is too impractical to compete with the more desirable BMW X6 (rear seat is hopeless). Features and interior quality are great as usual with Acura, but the concept was executed poorly and the car only manages to look good--nothing else. 5/10
I think Acura has improved from 2009, but still needs work. And a worthy flagship.
Having driven plenty of miles in a TL, RL and MDX. I each have a friend that drive "company cars" that are Acuras, and one of my best friends have an MDX.
The TL actually is quite sporty, almost too sporty. The gas pedal is overly sensitive, almost like the car has unintended acceleration. I had to get used to it. Otherwise, the car is roomy, content relatively high, the steering is excellent, and the car has good pickup....feeling very sporty sitting when sitting behind the wheel. The car grows on me everytime I'm in it. The exterior is still too polarizing for me, but in midnight blue, it has some decent lines.
The RL isn't bad either. It's not real fast (of course), but it has good content, a sporty upscalish interior and it's not awful looking. I could see how an Acura fan would think the car is worthwhile. Again, it's not overly sporty, but it has good steering and an aggressive gas pedal...so it feels a little sportier than it actually is....which is likely fine for a lot of people. It's like an overly-sophisticated Accord, which for many, it's all they need. But for those moving into upscale brands, it's not enough....that's why sales are awful.
The MDX is a fine crossover to me. It has that same great steering, same sporty feeling, yet much more functional in terms of usable space (for those that need it). I like the MDX a lot, so much so that I could see buying a used one. Indeed, I recommended a used 2010 model to a friend. The quality of the materials feels even better than in the TL and RL, almost as if they built it better to take more abuse. I have no problem with the MDX, except the starting sales price. But in the used car market, it's a great deal (price drops relatively quickly).
----------
So, I think Ac has some decent vehicles. No, they can't compete with Lexus, Bimmers and Mercedes'....but I'd consider one next to an Infinity for sure. In that $35,000-$40,000 range, I'd definitly consider one next to an ES, and I LIKE the ES. But the ES is like a Buick done right. A loaded TL is wayyyy sportier feeling, and more polarizing on the road as well. Probably too polarizing for me, but if I liked the exterior, it would be a likely thumbs-up over a similarly-priced ES.
And I'd rather have an MDX than the RX, for the same reasons. And I actually kinda like the MDX exterior, so for me, an MDX is a no-brainer since I can likely find a better deal than on an RX.
The RL never leaves the lot.
![Stick Out Tongue](https://www.clublexus.com/forums/images/smilies/tongue.gif)
#21
Lexus Test Driver
iTrader: (2)
![Default](https://www.clublexus.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I miss acuras like the 95 legend, 03 tl, 05 mdx, 04 rl and 91-03/4 (can't remember) NSX. Acuras just seem a lot cheaper then cars in their price range the way they are made, even new ones, for some reason, just tend to seem of lesser quality then bmw lexus mercedes, and even infiniti, who have really stepped their game up. I always liked acuras, a lot, but its a shame to see them settling for what they have when they have a lot of potential
#23
![Default](https://www.clublexus.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Honestly, aside from the buck tooth that got fixed for 2012, I thought the current TL was a great looking car. I've never driven one, but it seems like it would be a lot of fun, and it has a great interior, too.
#24
![Default](https://www.clublexus.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
putting the diminutive 1 series aside, what can you get in a bmw at $40k price point? driving dynamics perhaps, but not much else: leatherette, no nav, basic audio, spartan interior
audi? for $58K, you can get an a5 cabriolet with a 211hp engine
mb? 228hp, no nav, awd system that is the envy of nobody
if acura sedans simply lost weight and ditched fwd, they could move to the front of the class. since they choose not to, they will toil in the netherworld as the author described
#25
![Default](https://www.clublexus.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Acura is getting a major overhaul, changes are on the way.
TSX likely gone, ISX incoming. Totally new flagship sedan (unconfirmed if it will still be called RL). New NSX finally.
TSX likely gone, ISX incoming. Totally new flagship sedan (unconfirmed if it will still be called RL). New NSX finally.
#26
Guest
Posts: n/a
![Default](https://www.clublexus.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
![Big Grin](https://www.clublexus.com/forums/images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
#28
Lexus Test Driver
#30
Lexus Fanatic
![Default](https://www.clublexus.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
They should first at least wait long enough to see if the SH-AWD versions sell. That was one of the things that held up some TSX sales before...lack of the AWD. They also, IMO, screwed up the marketing of the nice-looking TSX Wagon (which, IMO, is far-better-looking than the Honda Crosstour), by not giving it a V6, raised-suspension, and AWD options so it could compete with the good-selling Volvo XC-70.