Car Chat General discussion about Lexus, other auto manufacturers and automotive news.

New Toyota Camry Excels in Consumer Reports’ Tests, VW Passat Not So Much

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-01-12, 01:41 PM
  #31  
ydooby
Lexus Champion
 
ydooby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: CA
Posts: 2,010
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by LexBob2
In this test it shows the TDI EPA rated at 26/51 and the Camry Hybrid EPA rated at 32/43.

In their road test the TDI got 37 mpg overall and the hybrid got 38 mpg.
Huh? The TDI isn't "EPA rated" at 26/51 and the Camry Hybrid isn't "EPA rated" at 32/43. You must mean CR's own road tests.
ydooby is offline  
Old 01-01-12, 01:47 PM
  #32  
LexBob2
Lexus Champion
 
LexBob2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Illinois
Posts: 11,195
Received 139 Likes on 113 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ydooby
Huh? The TDI isn't "EPA rated" at 26/51 and the Camry Hybrid isn't "EPA rated" at 32/43. You must mean CR's own road tests.
Maybe it is their own tests. The description the the cart read "Overall MPG" and "City/Highway MPG".
LexBob2 is offline  
Old 01-01-12, 01:51 PM
  #33  
Fizzboy7
Lexus Test Driver
 
Fizzboy7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: California
Posts: 9,727
Received 167 Likes on 99 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ydooby
Huh? The TDI isn't "EPA rated" at 26/51 and the Camry Hybrid isn't "EPA rated" at 32/43. You must mean CR's own road tests.
The 26/51 are the EPA numbers, but they are the ones buried in the fine print at the bottom of the window sticker. The tag line would read, "Under bad driving conditions, you may receive as low as 26 mpg's in the city. In optimum, ideal conditions, you may receive 51 mpg's on the highway." As I mentioned, these numbers are rare because they fall under unique conditions which most people will not experience. That's why it's so retarded for CR to use them as their final numbers they publish in their tests. This does a disservice to the public and causes mass confusion, as seen here in this thread.
The Passat TDI is officially rated from the EPA at 30 city/40 highway. These are the numbers most people will likely experience and should go by in predicting their mileage.
Fizzboy7 is offline  
Old 01-01-12, 02:07 PM
  #34  
ydooby
Lexus Champion
 
ydooby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: CA
Posts: 2,010
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Fizzboy7
The 26/51 are the EPA numbers, but they are the ones buried in the fine print at the bottom of the window sticker. The tag line would read, "Under bad driving conditions, you may receive as low as 26 mpg's in the city. In optimum, ideal conditions, you may receive 51 mpg's on the highway." As I mentioned, these numbers are rare because they fall under unique conditions which most people will not experience. That's why it's so retarded for CR to use them as their final numbers they publish in their tests. This does a disservice to the public and causes mass confusion, as seen here in this thread.
The Passat TDI is officially rated from the EPA at 30 city/40 highway. These are the numbers most people will likely experience and should go by in predicting their mileage.
Ah... I see thanks...very interesting. Never noticed these numbers in the fine prints myself. If CR indeed uses these "special condition" numbers instead of the regular numbers then yeah I agree that CR's being irrational here.
ydooby is offline  
Old 01-01-12, 03:24 PM
  #35  
mmarshall
Lexus Fanatic
 
mmarshall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Virginia/D.C. suburbs
Posts: 91,327
Received 87 Likes on 86 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by spwolf
no they did not... there is no other way to give reliability recommendations for new cars.
I never said otherwise....and I was not implying as such. With a new or significantly redesigned vehicle, only time in the actual hands of consumers will give an accurate record. Of course, the LIKELIHOOD of a company that consistantly produces well-made cars suddenly producing a lemon is not very good, but occasionally it happens.

And then you have cases like with the Honda Passport SUV of the 90s, which was actually a rebadged Isuzu Rodeo. Its worse-than-average repair record did some damage to Honda's previously stellar reliability image.
mmarshall is offline  
Old 01-01-12, 03:39 PM
  #36  
mmarshall
Lexus Fanatic
 
mmarshall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Virginia/D.C. suburbs
Posts: 91,327
Received 87 Likes on 86 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by bitkahuna

thank you my friend! CR's "ratings" based on consumers' feedback are useful, although the sample set is obviously tiny for MANY models (how many rolls royce owners read CR and get polled? ). but making recommendations for new models based on old, mechanically, electronically, physically vastly different vehicles is ludicrous.
Thanks, Paul. While I admit they are not perfect and occasionally make an error, I'm not actually changing my mind or overall assessment, of CR. They are, IMO, still the best auto-reliability source out there. Like with any publication, though, some things can slip through the cracks.


because CR isn't objective on some things. can't blame them for having a soft spot for toyota, which has made the best overall quality vehicles for over a decade. to quote a politician: they're entitled to their own opinions, but they're not entitled to their own facts.
A strong argument can be made (and a lot of CR data/recommendations supports it) that Hondas are the most-reliable vehicles overall. They seem to need the fewest number-or-repairs of vehicles actually in the hands of CR customers. Toyota, though, admittedly also ranks well-above average in reliability, too....not quite to the extent of several years ago.

I'm not going to defend Honda in all categories, though. We both know the recent shortcomings in controversial styling and cost-cutting that some of their latest products exibit. But they still seem to rank at the top for reliability.

Last edited by mmarshall; 01-01-12 at 03:42 PM.
mmarshall is offline  
Old 01-01-12, 07:57 PM
  #37  
bitkahuna
Lexus Fanatic
iTrader: (20)
 
bitkahuna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Present
Posts: 74,988
Received 2,465 Likes on 1,617 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by spwolf
once again, statistically, CR is right.

You problem with it is that you would like TDI to be rated better... well sorry. Doesnt mean CR is wrong.

:-)
my post had nothing to do with the passat.

new camry is no doubt a good car! cr and new car owners liking it - perfectly reasonable!

recommending it since prior gen one was reliable still makes no sense.
bitkahuna is offline  
Old 01-01-12, 08:06 PM
  #38  
Toys4RJill
Lexus Fanatic
 
Toys4RJill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: ON/NY
Posts: 31,232
Received 64 Likes on 55 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by spwolf
no they did not... there is no other way to give reliability recommendations for new cars.

they said they will stop giving recommendations automatically for all of the same brand models, but rather focus on car itself... meaning old Camry V6 got more complaints, hence new one is not automatically recommended.

there is no other way, and actually CR has really good history with recommendations.

I think CR has very very good way of rating cars overall, that really does apply to general public a lot more than other magazines like Motortrend and Car and Driver.

However that doesnt mean that we should all drive same cars and that all of us should have same priorities when buying cars.

As to the sound comment, it was overstressed in the carscoop article, actual CR article (i watched video), said slightly worse interior noise.
Its a big win for Toyota for CR to recommend the new Camry. It finally that Toyota has finally started to listen to the customers and the press about the quality of their last generation of cars.

There is not much wrong with the new Camry, in my honest opinion, the new Camry is nicer, more interesting and a better interior design than the boring ES. Toyota finally has made another outstanding Camry unlike the last generation junk.
Toys4RJill is offline  
Old 01-01-12, 08:10 PM
  #39  
Toys4RJill
Lexus Fanatic
 
Toys4RJill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: ON/NY
Posts: 31,232
Received 64 Likes on 55 Posts
Default

As for CR. I don't take much of what they say all the seriously.

It seems CR has recoginized that the new Camry is really good and CR is trying to feed off of it by saying they will use last ears data.
Toys4RJill is offline  
Old 01-02-12, 07:02 AM
  #40  
LexBob2
Lexus Champion
 
LexBob2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Illinois
Posts: 11,195
Received 139 Likes on 113 Posts
Default

CR's top rated Family Sedans in order are Camry Hybrid, Altima SR V6, Camry XLE V6, Accord EX-L V6 and Sonata 2.0T

Entry level Family Sedans in order (mainly 4 cyl in lower trim levels) are Altima S 4cyl, Sonata GLS 4cyl, Camry LE 4 cyl, Subaru Legacy 2.5i Premium and Suzuki Kizashi.
LexBob2 is offline  
Old 01-02-12, 12:46 PM
  #41  
bitkahuna
Lexus Fanatic
iTrader: (20)
 
bitkahuna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Present
Posts: 74,988
Received 2,465 Likes on 1,617 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by LexBob2
CR's top rated Family Sedans in order are Camry Hybrid, Altima SR V6, Camry XLE V6, Accord EX-L V6 and Sonata 2.0T

Entry level Family Sedans in order (mainly 4 cyl in lower trim levels) are Altima S 4cyl, Sonata GLS 4cyl, Camry LE 4 cyl, Subaru Legacy 2.5i Premium and Suzuki Kizashi.
as an aside, i think the term 'family sedan' is becoming outdated, as most families buy CUV/SUV/minivans instead which are much more versatile/useful and family-friendly.
bitkahuna is offline  
Old 01-02-12, 01:38 PM
  #42  
Toys4RJill
Lexus Fanatic
 
Toys4RJill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: ON/NY
Posts: 31,232
Received 64 Likes on 55 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by bitkahuna
as an aside, i think the term 'family sedan' is becoming outdated, as most families buy CUV/SUV/minivans instead which are much more versatile/useful and family-friendly.
Yeah I agree. There is nothing family about the Camry. I guess they call it family sedan because it appeals to the average family income etc etc.
Toys4RJill is offline  
Old 01-02-12, 05:49 PM
  #43  
TF109B
Lexus Champion
 
TF109B's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Washington
Posts: 2,266
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Not every family has more than 1 or 2 kids. They don't need minivans and don't want SUV's. The SUV craze fell off when gas got too expensive. Midsize 'family' sedans are just right for a lot of people.
TF109B is offline  
Old 01-03-12, 05:45 AM
  #44  
Joeb427
Lexus Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Joeb427's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: SC
Posts: 11,670
Received 17 Likes on 16 Posts
Default

The last two Camry I owned were a '07 XLE and '11 loaded Hybrid.The '11 was a great car with no rattles or creaks but was rear ended with $8K damage Dec '10 and never the same so I dumped it. I then decided to go with something quicker and sportier for awhile and bought a 'new' leftover IS350 with 95 miles and got what I feel was a very good deal on the car and trade in.The IS350 is a quick fun car.Eventually I'll get back to a smooth riding quiet car but for now I'm having fun with the IS.

Anyway,when I read that the Camry now has a less smoother ride and noisier interior than the Gen 6.I won't buy one because that's the only reasons I bought the Gen 6 Camry over other vehicles in it's class.Also don't the taillights and fog light trim on the XLE and hybrid but that will change in the next year or two.
Joeb427 is offline  
Old 01-03-12, 07:26 AM
  #45  
spwolf
Lexus Champion
 
spwolf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 19,923
Received 161 Likes on 119 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by bitkahuna
my post had nothing to do with the passat.

new camry is no doubt a good car! cr and new car owners liking it - perfectly reasonable!

recommending it since prior gen one was reliable still makes no sense.
well how would you recommend your readers reliability of NEW car except for its past reliability?

it is just as when JD Powers release dependability data - it is based on 3 year old cars. Not cars in the showroom today.

But as you know, those things really dont change that much. Sure, people how that suddenly their unreliable german manufacturer fixed all of their issues in 2012 MY, but as history shows us, it doesnt happen... If 2.0 TDI has issues in previous Passat and current Jetta, most likely it wont miraculously jump ahead of the pack in 2012.
spwolf is offline  


Quick Reply: New Toyota Camry Excels in Consumer Reports’ Tests, VW Passat Not So Much



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:30 AM.