Car Chat General discussion about Lexus, other auto manufacturers and automotive news.

Review: 2013 Audi A8L 3.0T Quattro

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-19-12, 11:11 AM
  #1  
Hoovey689
Moderator
Thread Starter
iTrader: (16)
 
Hoovey689's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: California
Posts: 42,300
Received 125 Likes on 83 Posts
Default Review: 2013 Audi A8L 3.0T Quattro

2013 Audi A8L 3.0T Quattro


"Finding Replacement For Displacement"


Gallery:
http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2013-...photo-5296221/

There are few things sweeter than the modern naturally aspirated V8 engine. In the past decade, we've been blessed to experience fine examples of free-breathing eight-pot goodness from around the globe, perhaps the best of which being the growling 6.2-liter unit that Mercedes-Benz once used in just about all of its AMG models, and a close runner-up being Audi's awesome, high-revving 4.2-liter V8.

But those fiery German V8s won't be around forever. Slowly but surely, Mercedes-Benz is replacing all of its excellent 6.2-liter V8s with lighter, quieter (boo!) twin-turbocharged 5.5-liter engines. And more to the point of this review, Audi's 4.2-liter V8 that we've loved in countless applications is now a rare find. For the 2013 model year, only the R8 supercar and RS5 sport coupe are left with this truly world-class engine, which at one point could be found in the majority of Audi models. It's a damn shame.

So here we are, the year 2012, and for every 4.2-liter V8 that Ingolstadt will no longer sell you, there is instead a supercharged 3.0-liter V6. We've tested it plenty of times in the A6, A7, S4, S5 and Q7, but now Audi's flagship A8 loses its 4.2 in favor of the forced-induction six. Displacement, meet your replacement. But don't worry – that isn't all bad.


For starters, know that this 3.0T Quattro model serves as the entry-level A8, pricing for which starts at $72,200 – nearly $6,000 less than the base 2012 model – not including $895 for destination. Our modestly equipped test car, only including options like the driver assist package, cold weather pack, LED headlamps and six-disc CD changer, stickered for $85,045 all in.

Engines aside, what else is new with the 2013 A8? Well... nothing. It's still the same big, svelte sedan it always was, incorporating every last drop of Audi goodness. We so have to admit, though, that the A8 is our least-favorite quad-ring sedan in terms of design – that front end equipped with full LED headlamps still looks a bit saggy to us – but compared to most rivals, the A8 is a handsome package, even with the smaller 19-inch wheels (20s are optional) at all four corners. It won't slap you in the face with sexiness like the Jaguar XJ, but to the eyes of this staff, it is indeed a more handsome barge than rivals like the S-Class and BMW 7 Series. No one will second-guess your street cred when they see those LED strips coming up behind them in the rearview mirror.




How about interior changes? Again, nothing. But why bother trying to update a cabin that's already brilliant in terms of design, quality and functionality? The cabin of our test car may have been awash in the sort of cold, gray German leather that's plagued these luxury sedans for centuries, but warmer, more inviting hues can be had. Optioning up for the long-wheelbase A8L ($6,300) gets you the predictable increase in rear seat legroom – 42.9 inches compared to the already-good 37.7 – and only adds a scant 33 pounds to the car's heft.

Once nestled into the 22-way power adjustable seats, you're greeted with a fantastic array of technology, the most impressive of which comes in the form of Audi's Multi-Media Interface Touch infotainment system. Gone are the days of scrolling through the MMI with the central command **** (don't panic, it's still there). Instead, if you want to find a phone contact or input an address into the navigation system, you can scribble your best handwriting onto the multifunction touchpad found just north of the gear lever. That, combined with Google Earth-based navigation and an array of optional driver safety aids including adaptive cruise control, pre-sense collision warning and lane-keeping assist, means your A8 is loaded to the brim with every bell and whistle to keep you safe and informed at all times.


The 3.0T engine is available on both the short- and long-wheelbase A8 (we tested the latter), and while it offers less power than the outgoing 4.2, its one major benefit is weight savings. The V6 is 44 pounds lighter than the outgoing V8, for a total of 4,409 pounds in the A8L. The only long-wheelbase luxury flagship that's lighter is the Jaguar XJL, and that includes the new-for-2013 all-wheel-drive model.

That overall lightness is what we've always liked best when it came to driving the A8, and we're happy to report that fitting the 3.0T under the hood doesn't take away from the big Audi's overall nimbleness – if anything, the weight loss up front helps matters. Like in every other application, the supercharged V6 produces 333 horsepower and 325 pound-feet of torque here, routed to all four wheels through a slick-shifting eight-speed Tiptronic automatic with plastic paddles fixed to the steering wheel.

Yes, the 3.0 may lose 39 horsepower and three pound-feet compared to the 4.2, but the A8L's 0-60 time has actually fallen by three-tenths of a second (5.5 versus 5.8). It's certainly no slouch, this A8, and that quicker off-the-line time is thanks largely to the 3.0T's better power delivery characteristics. In the 4.2, all 372 hp and 328 lb-ft didn't fully come on until 6,800 RPM and 3,500 RPM, respectively, but with the supercharged six, those 333 horses are available at 5,500 RPM and the 325 lb-ft fully arrives at just 2,900 RPM. That said, one supercharger can't do the work of two turbos, and the heavier, less-powerful BMW 740i xDrive will still hit 60 miles per hour one tenth of a second sooner than the Audi.


If there's one thing we definitely miss about the 4.2-liter engine, it's the aural stimulation. That high-revving V8 made a truly spectacular noise when you wound it up, and while there's nothing to complain about in terms of the 3.0T's performance, it's simply too quiet for our tastes, though that's less of an issue here in the comfort-above-all A8.

But on the road, it's not just about what you hear, it's about what you feel. The aluminum-intensive construction of the A8 means it feels more nimble and sporty than the rest of its competitive set, and things like the standard Audi Drive Select (driver-adjustable settings for nearly every aspect of the drivetrain and suspension) and adaptive air suspension ensure that you'll be hugging corners with confidence while still gliding over road imperfections. The driver-adjustable steering rack is precise and nicely weighted at speed, but eases up a bit to aid for slow-going parking maneuvers. Simply put, the A8 continues to feel just as tossable as it ever did, and even with the less-powerful engine on board, it's still the best-handling big luxury sedan money can buy.


Here's the one eyebrow-raising part of this whole 3.0T equation: fuel economy. The EPA rates the long-wheelbase 2013 A8 at 18/28 miles per gallon (city/highway), and while you'd think that is an improvement over the outgoing 4.2, you'd be wrong. It matches those numbers exactly, all the way down to the 21-mpg combined rating. Audi has fitted the 3.0-liter mill with start/stop, and since the EPA doesn't factor that tech into its testing cycles yet, don't be surprised if you see combined ratings closer to the 23.5 mpg that we managed during our week with the car. Regardless, in a boat this size, 28 mpg is indeed impressive. The only comparable vehicle that beats it is the Mercedes-Benz S350 Bluetec, thanks to its torquey, efficient diesel engine. And who knows, that all could chance once the oil-burning A8 3.0 TDI arrives.

So what exactly are you getting with the 2013 A8 3.0T? A more affordable entry point into the range that doesn't lose anything in the way of driving dynamics while still offering relatively good looks, top-notch comfort and absolute class-leading tech. And if having a V6 under your bonnet really upsets you that much, know that Audi will sell you an A8 with the same new 420-hp, 4.0-liter turbocharged V8 as the potent S6 and S7... for $8,700 more. Yes, we really miss the sound of that excellent 4.2, but when a car's main objective is to coddle before commove, the A8 3.0T is really all you need.

http://www.autoblog.com/2012/09/19/2...uattro-review/
Hoovey689 is offline  
Old 09-19-12, 01:27 PM
  #2  
Hoovey689
Moderator
Thread Starter
iTrader: (16)
 
Hoovey689's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: California
Posts: 42,300
Received 125 Likes on 83 Posts
Default

3.0T is a nice option, but I need a V8 in a flagship
Hoovey689 is offline  
Old 09-19-12, 04:58 PM
  #3  
Toys4RJill
Lexus Fanatic
 
Toys4RJill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: ON/NY
Posts: 31,118
Received 64 Likes on 55 Posts
Default

Driving feel of a turbo is different than a V8. It is a nice car, not sure why Audi would not have the V8 as an option at least.
Toys4RJill is offline  
Old 09-19-12, 05:05 PM
  #4  
rocks
Driver
 
rocks's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: State of Euphoria
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I never cared for the A8, to me it's the most boring looking flagship sedan. I'd take an LS, 7er or S class over it any day.
rocks is offline  
Old 09-19-12, 07:28 PM
  #5  
blacksc400
Car Chat Moderator
iTrader: (4)
 
blacksc400's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Las Vegas!
Posts: 10,143
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

A8 is the most difficult to spot Luxury flagship on the road today. It looks way to similar as the A4/A6.
blacksc400 is offline  
Old 09-19-12, 07:34 PM
  #6  
GFerg
Speaks French in Russian

 
GFerg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: What is G?
Posts: 13,288
Received 64 Likes on 49 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by LexsCTJill
Driving feel of a turbo is different than a V8. It is a nice car, not sure why Audi would not have the V8 as an option at least.
Quickly checking the Audi site, they still offer a V8 in the A8. 420hp 4.0T. Also the W12 and the 520 hp S8.

But agree with others, I find this generation to be the least attractive big body lux car.
GFerg is offline  
Old 09-19-12, 07:40 PM
  #7  
bitkahuna
Lexus Fanatic
iTrader: (20)
 
bitkahuna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Present
Posts: 74,845
Received 2,429 Likes on 1,592 Posts
Default

welcome to the new world order where govts have effectively killed the v8.
bitkahuna is online now  
Old 09-19-12, 10:12 PM
  #8  
jwong77
Pole Position
 
jwong77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: CA
Posts: 2,366
Received 15 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

Too much front overhang on that car.
jwong77 is offline  
Old 09-19-12, 10:27 PM
  #9  
Fizzboy7
Lexus Test Driver
 
Fizzboy7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: California
Posts: 9,719
Received 167 Likes on 99 Posts
Default

Car could have looked better. The rear is extremely plain and there's not enough surface variation with the front end. Same could be said with the sides. It's just too plain. Audi needs to rethink their greenhouse shape, as the quarter moon look has been seen on 20 different Audi models since the 90's, as well as the 1990 Caprice. The A7's rear pillar kink does the trick nicely and would do wonders to the A4, 6, and 8.
Fizzboy7 is offline  
Old 09-19-12, 10:29 PM
  #10  
IceIridium
Lexus Test Driver
iTrader: (2)
 
IceIridium's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: BC
Posts: 983
Received 10 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

One of, or perhaps THE least attractively designed Audi in recent memory.

IceIridium is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Hoovey689
Car Chat
7
09-10-13 12:15 PM
Hoovey689
Car Chat
7
03-04-13 06:11 PM
Hoovey689
Car Chat
6
04-26-12 12:14 PM



Quick Reply: Review: 2013 Audi A8L 3.0T Quattro



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:22 PM.