Car Chat General discussion about Lexus, other auto manufacturers and automotive news.

Hyundai says dual-clutch gearboxes fit brand's character better than CVTs

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-02-12, 09:02 AM
  #1  
Hoovey689
Moderator
Thread Starter
iTrader: (16)
 
Hoovey689's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: California
Posts: 42,294
Received 125 Likes on 83 Posts
Default Hyundai says dual-clutch gearboxes fit brand's character better than CVTs

Hyundai says dual-clutch gearboxes fit brand's character better than CVTs



Hyundai officials are not afraid to make their views known on prevailing technologies, standing by their choices and criticizing the alternatives. Previously, the Korean automaker's fuel cell boss told reporters that EV makers "jumped the gun." Now comes word that Hyundai is sticking by dual-clutch transmissions, citing the shortcomings of continuously variable transmissions.

A report from Automotive News points to words from Hyundai Motor America VP of product planning, Mike O'Brien, backing the dual-clutch technology. "Dual-clutch has a better future with us. It has better fuel economy advantages. It's better for the enthusiast driver. It matches [our product philosophy] better," said O'Brien, speaking at SEMA on Monday.

While it is noted that shifts with the dual-clutch units are not the smoothest available, O'Brien says that characteristic is outweighed by the parasitic losses experienced by CVTs resulting in poorer performance and fuel economy. According to the report, the "rubber band" effect experienced is also a setback, as is the limitation of engine size. CVTs are optimal only for smaller-displacement engines so application becomes an issue.

Hyundai currently offers the Veloster with a dual-clutch gearbox, though O'Brien has suggested that the application of such a transmission could expand in Hyundai's future.

http://www.autoblog.com/2012/11/02/h...racter-better/
Hoovey689 is offline  
Old 11-02-12, 09:08 AM
  #2  
97-SC300
Lexus Fanatic
iTrader: (17)
 
97-SC300's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Earth
Posts: 9,238
Received 130 Likes on 108 Posts
Default

That Veloster sure is fugly.... Looks like a turd driving on the roads. Sorry just had to get that off my chest.
97-SC300 is offline  
Old 11-02-12, 12:31 PM
  #3  
Hoovey689
Moderator
Thread Starter
iTrader: (16)
 
Hoovey689's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: California
Posts: 42,294
Received 125 Likes on 83 Posts
Default

its things like this though that you'd have to give them props, even the PT Cruiser or HHR. If I were head of any of the design departments that released these cars, I would have thrown the design back into my designers faces and said make it again. These automakers had ***** to release these. At least initially they sold well. Over the years they got stale and more terrible lol
Hoovey689 is offline  
Old 11-02-12, 12:37 PM
  #4  
97-SC300
Lexus Fanatic
iTrader: (17)
 
97-SC300's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Earth
Posts: 9,238
Received 130 Likes on 108 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Hoovey2411
its things like this though that you'd have to give them props, even the PT Cruiser or HHR. If I were head of any of the design departments that released these cars, I would have thrown the design back into my designers faces and said make it again. These automakers had ***** to release these. At least initially they sold well. Over the years they got stale and more terrible lol
It's not even a matter of having ***** or not. I am just saying the car looks like complete chit. It's hideous any way you look at it.

I'd rather look at a Pontiac Randevoo on the street...at least the owner of that car doesn't drive around pretending he is hip or driving some cool looking car...they know it's a piece of turd. The Hyundai driver actually (probably) thinks it's a cool looking whip which is the sad part.
97-SC300 is offline  
Old 11-02-12, 01:14 PM
  #5  
SCary400
Driver
 
SCary400's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: TX
Posts: 123
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

"Beauty is in the eye of the beholder"
SCary400 is offline  
Old 11-02-12, 04:33 PM
  #6  
T0ked
Lexus Champion
iTrader: (2)
 
T0ked's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: New York
Posts: 2,621
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

You don't like it, a lot of people do. To each their own.

On transmissions, I agree with Hyundai. I'm not a fan of CVTs at all. Nissan's CVT sucks big time.
T0ked is offline  
Old 11-12-12, 08:35 PM
  #7  
Hoovey689
Moderator
Thread Starter
iTrader: (16)
 
Hoovey689's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: California
Posts: 42,294
Received 125 Likes on 83 Posts
Default

meanwhile, Honda enjoys the 5-speed auto. "If it a'int broke, don't fix it!"
Hoovey689 is offline  
Old 11-13-12, 02:11 AM
  #8  
Blackraven
Lexus Champion
 
Blackraven's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Makati, Philippines
Posts: 3,459
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by T0ked
Nissan's CVT sucks big time.
Forgive me for saying this.......but I respectfully disagree.

You should check out the CVT of the Murano and especially the newer ones like the in Altima or Maxima.

CVTs are great =)
Blackraven is offline  
Old 11-13-12, 06:45 AM
  #9  
bitkahuna
Lexus Fanatic
iTrader: (20)
 
bitkahuna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Present
Posts: 74,620
Received 2,371 Likes on 1,556 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Hoovey2411
meanwhile, Honda enjoys the 5-speed auto. "If it a'int broke, don't fix it!"
meanwhile, a new corolla still has a FOUR speed auto. what's your point?
http://www.toyota.com/corolla/specs.html
bitkahuna is offline  
Old 11-13-12, 08:11 AM
  #10  
LexFather
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Originally Posted by bitkahuna
meanwhile, a new corolla still has a FOUR speed auto. what's your point?
http://www.toyota.com/corolla/specs.html
meanwhile "Acura' a supposed "luxury brand" offers this

http://www.freep.com/article/2012102...-is-off-target

5 speed auto or a CVT with less hp than a Corolla, 111hp to be exact.
 
Old 11-13-12, 09:36 AM
  #11  
mmarshall
Lexus Fanatic
 
mmarshall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Virginia/D.C. suburbs
Posts: 91,068
Received 87 Likes on 86 Posts
Default

it is noted that shifts with the dual-clutch units are not the smoothest available.
I disagree. Just because Ford put some vibration-prone dual-clutch units in their smaller vehicles (and BMW's old SMT shifted like a sledge-hammer) does not mean that other manufacturers also have. The dual-clutch VW/Audi DSG/S-Tronic, for example, shifts as smoothly as any recent torque-converter automatic I've tried.

Last edited by mmarshall; 11-13-12 at 09:40 AM.
mmarshall is offline  
Old 11-13-12, 12:08 PM
  #12  
Hoovey689
Moderator
Thread Starter
iTrader: (16)
 
Hoovey689's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: California
Posts: 42,294
Received 125 Likes on 83 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by bitkahuna
meanwhile, a new corolla still has a FOUR speed auto. what's your point?
http://www.toyota.com/corolla/specs.html
Your forgetting the Rav4 too
Hoovey689 is offline  
Old 11-13-12, 10:26 PM
  #13  
bitkahuna
Lexus Fanatic
iTrader: (20)
 
bitkahuna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Present
Posts: 74,620
Received 2,371 Likes on 1,556 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Blueprint
meanwhile "Acura' a supposed "luxury brand" offers this

http://www.freep.com/article/2012102...-is-off-target

5 speed auto or a CVT with less hp than a Corolla, 111hp to be exact.
the "111hp to be exact" you refer to is the hybrid setup i believe. the engine most will likely get is the 2.0 good for 150HP.

but i don't disagree that the ILX is pretty weak overall and should have at least 6 speeds.

perhaps you agree though that the prestigious auto maker's corolla (and apparently rav4 also) having a 4 speed auto at this point is pretty pathetic.
bitkahuna is offline  
Old 11-13-12, 10:27 PM
  #14  
bitkahuna
Lexus Fanatic
iTrader: (20)
 
bitkahuna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Present
Posts: 74,620
Received 2,371 Likes on 1,556 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mmarshall
I disagree. Just because Ford put some vibration-prone dual-clutch units in their smaller vehicles (and BMW's old SMT shifted like a sledge-hammer) does not mean that other manufacturers also have. The dual-clutch VW/Audi DSG/S-Tronic, for example, shifts as smoothly as any recent torque-converter automatic I've tried.
amen to that. in fact i'd go further to say the vw dsg is the smoothest non-cvt auto i've ever driven.
bitkahuna is offline  
Old 11-14-12, 09:12 PM
  #15  
T0ked
Lexus Champion
iTrader: (2)
 
T0ked's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: New York
Posts: 2,621
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Blackraven
Forgive me for saying this.......but I respectfully disagree.

You should check out the CVT of the Murano and especially the newer ones like the in Altima or Maxima.

CVTs are great =)
To each their own. The CVT in the previous Altima was crap. The rubberbanding effect was very apparent. Test drove the newer Altima and while it is improved, it is still apparent. CVTs are getting better but I prefer a DCT or a regular slushbox to it. And the reliability...
T0ked is offline  


Quick Reply: Hyundai says dual-clutch gearboxes fit brand's character better than CVTs



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:39 PM.