Hoovey689

iTrader: (16)

2013 Honda Accord Coupe V6 6MT

Gallery:
http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2013-...photo-5512713/


One of the first cars I reviewed for Autoblog was – say it with me now – a 2010 Honda Accord Coupe EX-L V6 w/Navi 6MT, perhaps the rarest of all modern Accord models. I mean, think about it: Of all the different Accord variants on the road, how many are coupes? And how many of those have the larger V6 engine? And how many of those are fully loaded with leather, navigation and all the trimmings? And finally, how many of those have option sheets where the only box that isn't checked is the automatic transmission?

That has to be something like one percent of one percent, right?

So when Honda started rolling its all-new 2013 Accord into the test fleet, I was happy to hear that yet another Coupe EX-L V6 w/Navi 6MT model was available out of the Detroit pool. And while this really isn't the car that serves as the control for judging the entire Accord line, it's still one heck of a sweetheart.

It's the Journalist Special all over again

Driving Notes

• This thing is quick. Honda's revised Earth Dreams 3.5-liter V6 produces 278 horsepower and 252 pound-feet of torque in this application, and that's plenty in a car that weighs in at just 3,400 pounds. Honda does not release performance data, but instrumented buff-book testing has revealed 0-60 times as low as 5.6 seconds. For reference, that's three-tenths of a second quicker than the bonkers Ford Focus ST.
• Straight-line acceleration isn't the only bit of behind-the-wheel joy here. The steering is nicely weighted with plenty of feedback, the chassis is well-tuned to handle the V6 grunt (though you can get the front wheels to spin on hard launches), and the whole package feels tossable and nimble. As Executive Editor Chris Paukert said to me, it's sort of like a lux'd-out latter-day Honda Prelude. Or to my mind, a more civilized, grown-up version of the current Civic Si.
• Accord V6 sedans aren't available with the six-speed manual transmission found here in the coupe, and for those who do opt for it, they're in for a treat. Quick shifts are easy to knock off thanks to pleasantly short throws and well-placed pedals with a nicely weighted clutch.
• I've really warmed to the Accord's new styling... mostly. The front fascia with its LED running lamps is an attractive, aggressive sight, and I like the profile stance with the handsome 18-inch alloy wheels of this test car, but I'm not too keen on those small faux air vents with reflector strips that are housed above the dual exhaust pipes. The chrome trim on the bottom of the rear bumper could certainly go away, too.
• There's a lot to like inside the Accord, too. Everything in the cabin feels solid and well-built, and the overall design is fresh and modern. I don't quite get the whole dual-screen center console design, and I'm still not a big fan of Honda's new Lane Watch blind spot monitoring system. Yeah, it's cool, but it'd be even cooler if it showed the driver's side trouble spots. Even with the camera in place, I still find myself using the mirrors.
• But here's the tough part: this whole package, as tested, is $33,140. It's a fantastic car, this Accord Coupe, and for the enthusiast who wants a sort of sporty, larger, surprisingly luxurious coupe, you could certainly do worse. That said, we imagine this build combination will account for maybe one percent of all Accord sales, and at the end of the day, it's a $33k Honda coupe. Fun and stylish, for sure, but a car that is seemingly destined to be more commonly spotted with manufacturer plates than hard tags.

http://www.autoblog.com/2012/12/21/2...k-spin-review/

Hoovey689

iTrader: (16)

Not bad. Hope this is a sign of a turn around for Honda design, innovation, tech, passion etc.

KillaIS250

iTrader: (1)

Haven't seen one of these coupes on the road yet, but I've seen the new sedan a few times. A much better looking car then the last Accord!

jadu

iTrader: (42)

best looking accord yet

I8ABMR

To bad they sell so few of them. I think most consumers are more concerned with the sedan

KevinGS

Nice front end, but rear end too busy for me. Not clean enough. Chrome strip, vents, light protruding from the body.... they tried too hard, and failed.

rkyat

I applaud Honda for at least still offering this car in an MT capacity. I've driven one and it wasn't bad. (last gen v6 6MT)

mmarshall

Absolutely....big time. Most people who want a coupe in a vehicle of this size, especially one of a sporting or semi-sporting nature, usually look first at a BMW 3-series, though the 3-series costs more, especially with a six. But the fact is that Honda just doesn't sell many Accord coupes, at least in the U.S...in that, you are correct. That's why the Toyota Camry Coupes were discontinued long ago in the American market...and why, today, most of the Accord's American-market competitors don't offer coupes either.

Honda, though, IMO, would do well to once again market a Accord wagon here....especially with AWD. The Crosstour is just too quirky-looking and doesn't have a well-shaped cargo-area, and the (IMO) good-looking Acura TSX Sportwagon costs more and doesn't offer either a Six or AWD. Like Toyota with the Camry wagon, Honda marketed an Accord wagon here in the states well into the 90s, then both were dropped, despite the fact that, unlike the coupes, the wagons did seem to sell in reasonable numbers.

mmarshall

I haven't sampled a manual recently in an Accord, but, judging from my experience in other manual-transmission Hondas, I'd probably have to agree. In general, few, if any manufacturers can do a better FWD manual shift linkage than Honda. They are some of the very few cars that I can usually shift simply by feel alone without looking at the shift-lever.