Car Chat General discussion about Lexus, other auto manufacturers and automotive news.

Review: 2013 Ford Fusion Hybrid

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-01-13, 06:24 PM
  #1  
Hoovey689
Moderator
Thread Starter
iTrader: (16)
 
Hoovey689's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: California
Posts: 42,293
Received 125 Likes on 83 Posts
Default Review: 2013 Ford Fusion Hybrid

2013 Ford Fusion Hybrid


"Your Mileage May Vary"


Gallery:
http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2013-...photo-5781989/

As difficult as it is to write this, I was actually excited about the 2013 Ford Fusion Hybrid. With the beautiful looks of the newest midsize fighter from Ford and a fuel economy estimate capable of shaming even the stalwart Camry Hybrid, the battery-augmented four-door seemed like a recipe for unabashed success. But appearances love nothing more than swapping our boundless enthusiasm for cold platters of disappointment. The 2013 Fusion Hybrid gets hobbled right out of the gate with a lofty price tag, and real-world driving keeps the sedan from even approaching those EPA figures.

With so many excellent midsize hybrids on the market, is there any reason to consider the newest Fusion Hybrid? Are sharp aesthetics, a well-executed interior and capable driving dynamics enough to overcome the machine's shortfalls? Not from where I'm standing.


Even in the I-Bought-The-Hybrid green of this tester, the 2013 Fusion looks great. Yes, the nose isn't so much derivative of an Aston Martin as it is a carbon copy of the former Ford property, but as the old saying goes, if you're going to steal from someone, steal from the best. Designers have integrated the look nicely into the four-door shape. Up front, the floating grille slats, dynamic headlamps and sculpted front fascia all give the Fusion more poise than we're accustomed to seeing in the family sedan segment, let alone the hybrid contingent.

I have to laud Ford for exercising some restraint when it came time to pen the Fusion Hybrid. There are no egregious stylistic gimmicks on hand to differentiate this car from its non-battery-powered siblings aside from some unique wheels and a few badges. While competitors like the Hyundai Sonata Hybrid turned to wild lighting and drastically tweaked valances to announce its drivetrain, the Fusion Hybrid is content to simply offer buyers the same attractive lines as the standard model.

Around back, that translates into a set of wrapped LED taillamps that follow the complex curve of the sedan's trunk lid. Designers also worked in a hexagonal license plate inset, thereby repeating the theme established by the vehicle's grille.




Indoors, the 2013 Fusion Hybrid offers up an attractive cabin with nicer materials than I expected. A leather-wrapped steering wheel greets the driver, complete with the typical passel of buttons indicative of Ford products these days. All told, there are over 22 individual buttons on this tiller. Throw any more at the wheel and it'd be like driving around with a full Qwerty at my fingertips. Likewise, the cabin looks and feels plenty familiar, complete with a nice console-mounted shifter, touch-capacitive climate controls and a large touchscreen for the MyFord Touch interface.

The gauge cluster is clean with an attractive, center-up speedometer and two small user-customizable displays to each side. While the left screen handles a variety of vehicle data, the right can be configured to display information from MyFord Touch. As with other Ford products, song titles, navigation instructions and the like are but a glance away. Meanwhile, handsome and comfortable leather seats are all part of the party thanks to the $2,000 Luxury Package. The extra coin nets buyers those heated 10-way power adjustable buckets as well as auto dimming mirrors and a leather-clad steering wheel and shift ****.

There's ample room for passengers all the way around with plenty of space for legs and heads, but with 12 cubic feet of cargo space, the Fusion Hybrid falls 1.1 cubic feet behind both the Toyota Camry Hybrid and the 2013 Hyundai Sonata Hybrid. That's a decent chunk of volume, but likely not enough to sway a buyer out of the Ford and into a competitor.


Under the hood, the Fusion Hybrid features an Atkinson-cycle 2.0-liter four-cylinder engine with 141 horsepower and 129 pound-feet of torque paired with a 118-horsepower AC electric motor. A 35 kW, 1.4 kWh air-cooled lithium-ion battery serves up electricity. Combined, the electric motor and internal combustion engine can work together to deliver a maximum of 188 hp, and the drivetrain never feels taxed despite lugging around 3,615 pounds worth of sedan. Power gets put to the front wheels via a continuously variable transmission, and while I typically recoil in either genuine horror from any gearbox with bands instead of gears CVT, the transmission does its job just fine. Surges in engine RPM, vibration and noise are all kept to a minimum.

It should come as no shock to hear the Fusion Hybrid makes use of an electronic power steering system, though Ford has put in the hours to make sure this bit of electromechanical wizardry doesn't feel as over-assisted or numb as the kit found on the Camry Hybrid. Engineers have also reworked the vehicle's regenerative brakes, and as a result, the hardware can now recapture up to 95 percent of the energy that would otherwise be wasted when the four-door scrubs speed. While the stoppers aren't as progressive as traditional brakes, they are better than some regens I've had my feet on in the past.


Get underway and the 2013 Fusion Hybrid delivers a competitive drive. The electric motor provides quiet, confident acceleration until the four-cylinder engine takes over, and the handoff between the two is smooth enough that noticing the transition takes some focus. The cabin is nicely quiet even at highway speeds, and the chassis feels solid enough, but buyers who wind up laying down their cash for a midsize hybrid primarily care about something else altogether: fuel economy. The EPA says the sedan should return 47 miles per gallon in both city and highway driving, and thus 47 mpg combined.

That's a big number, and it bests the Camry Hybrid by a whopping 8 mpg city and 4 mpg highway, or at least it would if I were able to get the Fusion anywhere near those estimates. During my time with the Fusion Hybrid, the best I was able to accomplish was just over 40 mpg, and this isn't a case of me driving with the soles of my boots buried in the carpet. After a few days of disappointing returns, I began actively courting better fuel economy with lower speeds and gentler throttle inputs to click past the big four-oh. But that's not how most owners are going to drive this car. Under normal use, the Fusion Hybrid managed closer to 37 mpg.


It doesn't take a math degree to come up with a 10-mpg difference between what we observed and what Ford says the hybrid should yield. Had I laid down my family's cash for the car only to see fuel economy short of the advertised estimates by some 22 percent, my local dealer would have a fun time extracting the entirety of this car from the dark recesses of his body.

Speaking of dollar bills, our tester tipped the scales at $34,770 thanks to additions like the Luxury Package, SE Technology Package and electronic bits like navigation, adaptive cruise control and a Driver Assist Package. Technically, you can scoot out the door with a Fusion Hybrid for $27,200, plus a $795 destination fee. Even so, that puts the car north of its competitors by a decent spread. The Camry Hybrid will hit your wallet for $26,140 plus destination while the Sonata Hybrid comes in at $25,650. I've never had any trouble hitting the EPA figures for those models, either – even if they are lower.

While the 2013 Ford Fusion Hybrid is a gorgeous creation outside, the mechanicals can't back up the company's big fuel economy claims. Combine that fact with a price tag that's north of the competition and there's little reason to wind up with one of these in your driveway.

http://www.autoblog.com/2013/04/01/2...hybrid-review/
Hoovey689 is offline  
Old 04-01-13, 09:21 PM
  #2  
Fly4u
Banned
 
Fly4u's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Banned
Posts: 499
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Great review; highlights the attributes of an effective and attractive design but exposes a terrible mileage shortfall.

I drove a 2010 first gen Fusion Hybrid for nearly 4 years and had my heart set on acquiring the 2013 revamp. Overall MPG average of my example was 41, measurably better than EPA forecast. Sadly, stories of inadequate fuel efficiency yielded by 2013 models circulated, particularly compelling on enthusiast forums populated by experienced Ford hybrid drivers. I generally enjoyed several test-drives, but turned attention to alternatives. Hadn't previously considered the Lexus ES300h, but determined it to be the best fusion (pun intended) of fuel efficiency, interior space, and features.
Fly4u is offline  
Old 04-02-13, 01:46 AM
  #3  
Chocolate
Instructor
 
Chocolate's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: U.S.
Posts: 1,138
Received 25 Likes on 22 Posts
Default

http://www.nbcnews.com/business/ford...aims-1C7755875

They still haven't shied away from putting their outrageous fuel mileage lie on their homepage. P.S. The 4000 pound GMC Terrain and Chevrolet Equinox also achieve 32mpg highway.

Last edited by Chocolate; 04-02-13 at 01:51 AM.
Chocolate is offline  
Old 04-02-13, 04:50 AM
  #4  
spwolf
Lexus Champion
 
spwolf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 19,910
Received 156 Likes on 116 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Fly4u
Great review; highlights the attributes of an effective and attractive design but exposes a terrible mileage shortfall.

I drove a 2010 first gen Fusion Hybrid for nearly 4 years and had my heart set on acquiring the 2013 revamp. Overall MPG average of my example was 41, measurably better than EPA forecast. Sadly, stories of inadequate fuel efficiency yielded by 2013 models circulated, particularly compelling on enthusiast forums populated by experienced Ford hybrid drivers. I generally enjoyed several test-drives, but turned attention to alternatives. Hadn't previously considered the Lexus ES300h, but determined it to be the best fusion (pun intended) of fuel efficiency, interior space, and features.
funny thing is - people who had 2010 FFH and purchased 2013 , say 2010 gets better real life mpg than 2013 :-)
spwolf is offline  
Old 04-02-13, 06:04 AM
  #5  
Fly4u
Banned
 
Fly4u's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Banned
Posts: 499
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by spwolf
funny thing is - people who had 2010 FFH and purchased 2013 , say 2010 gets better real life mpg than 2013 :-)
Exactly, and this only reinforces my decision not to acquire a 2013 example! Ford continues to advertise the 47/47/47 EPA mileage; they are all-in and won't recant until forced to do so. They may have realized those parameters using the arcane rules of hybrid testing, quite different than the realistic guidelines used today with conventional drivetrains. What puzzles me is whether the hybrid factors have changed since the 2010 certification? Regardless, their defense is likely the concept of "your mileage may vary."
Fly4u is offline  
Old 04-02-13, 09:41 AM
  #6  
mmarshall
Lexus Fanatic
 
mmarshall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Virginia/D.C. suburbs
Posts: 91,066
Received 87 Likes on 86 Posts
Default

I used the $50 pre-paid Mastercard test-drive offer Ford promotes at major auto shows for the new 2013 Fusion Hybrid (I did a brief write-up on it for CAR CHAT). I was glad I did....this car is impressive (if you can get used to the frustrating Ford MyTouch system). I was substantially more impressed with it than I was its more expensive Lincoln MKZ brother....it ranks very high as a car I would actually buy and take home.

Consumer Reports, though, in testing a couple different new Fusions, found a more-than-average number of Issembly and fit/finish slip-ups on each one....perhaps some early teething-problems in an all-new model. They also were not impressed with the mileage and performance of the non-hybrid four-cylinder EcoBoost engines.

In one way, though, the (IMO) less-impressive Lincoln MKZ version (as I stated in my recent MKZ full-review) may actually not be a bad deal. Its base price is essentially the same as the base-model non-hybrid MKZ (which makes it even less with tax-credits), where the Fusion Hybrid costs substantially more than its non-hybrid Fusion cousins.
mmarshall is offline  
Old 04-02-13, 11:42 AM
  #7  
spwolf
Lexus Champion
 
spwolf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 19,910
Received 156 Likes on 116 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Fly4u
What puzzles me is whether the hybrid factors have changed since the 2010 certification? Regardless, their defense is likely the concept of "your mileage may vary."
new model means they were able to optimize the engine ecu for EPA procedure... just like those 40 MPG hwy cars that get same MPG as old 4AT Corolla.
spwolf is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Hoovey689
Car Chat
19
10-18-13 12:33 AM
Hoovey689
Car Chat
27
05-17-13 07:07 AM
Hoovey689
Car Chat
5
03-30-13 12:16 PM
Hoovey689
Car Chat
13
03-07-13 05:43 PM
Hoovey689
Car Chat
8
10-04-12 06:59 PM



Quick Reply: Review: 2013 Ford Fusion Hybrid



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:48 AM.