Edmunds.com 2013 Honda Accord vs. 2014 Mazda 6 vs. 2013 Nissan Altima Comparison Test
#17
No way would I buy that Altima. Not my kind of style, and no on the CVT.
And I'd have to test drive the Accord and 6 before I could decide, that would be a close call for me. That Mazda interior looks pretty stark, but the exterior has a lot of potential. And I am sure I would like the way the Maxa drives.
That Honda is just a solid vehicle. Nothing spectacular, but it does a lot well.
And I'd have to test drive the Accord and 6 before I could decide, that would be a close call for me. That Mazda interior looks pretty stark, but the exterior has a lot of potential. And I am sure I would like the way the Maxa drives.
That Honda is just a solid vehicle. Nothing spectacular, but it does a lot well.
Last edited by KevinGS; 04-23-13 at 03:36 PM.
#18
what blows me away is the kind of features and creature comforts these belly button cars have. Insanely common but nicely appointed. I like the Altima but it is WAY too common for me . In fact all of them are. I like the styling on the Fusion the most but if it was my money I would go with the regular cookie cutter models like the Accord, Altima, and Camry
#20
No way would I buy that Altima. Not my kind of style, and no on the CVT.
And I'd have to test drive the Accord and 6 before I could decide, that would be a close call for me. That Mazda interior looks pretty stark, but the exterior has a lot of potential. And I am sure I would like the way the Maxa drives.
That Honda is just a solid vehicle. Nothing spectacular, but it does a lot well.
And I'd have to test drive the Accord and 6 before I could decide, that would be a close call for me. That Mazda interior looks pretty stark, but the exterior has a lot of potential. And I am sure I would like the way the Maxa drives.
That Honda is just a solid vehicle. Nothing spectacular, but it does a lot well.
#22
The new Altima is one of those very few cars that actually looked better in pictures than in person. Something about the back-end doesn't line up right. I think it's the bottom of the taillights, which angle upward ever so slightly. They are skewed just enough to make the observer wonder if the factory assembled them in a sloppy manner. The new Sentra has tidier lines, dare I say.
Still, there are no losers here exept for maybe the Camry. What a dated and doudy dud compared to all it's modern an sleek brethren.
BTW, I believe the cars tested here were chosen due to newness. All are very recent additions or newly introduced. The Camry, Passat, and Fusion were last year's news.
Still, there are no losers here exept for maybe the Camry. What a dated and doudy dud compared to all it's modern an sleek brethren.
BTW, I believe the cars tested here were chosen due to newness. All are very recent additions or newly introduced. The Camry, Passat, and Fusion were last year's news.
#25
What gets me about these mid sizers... any of them, is that they are as well-equipped and in many ways just as sophisticated as some luxury cars of only a few years ago. The parity in the car market seems to be getting closer all the time.
#26
The new Altima is one of those very few cars that actually looked better in pictures than in person. Something about the back-end doesn't line up right. I think it's the bottom of the taillights, which angle upward ever so slightly. They are skewed just enough to make the observer wonder if the factory assembled them in a sloppy manner. The new Sentra has tidier lines, dare I say.
#27
Completely agree with this. I notice the awkward back-end of the new Altima every time I get behind one and can't help but obsess over the off angle of those tail lights. IMO, it turns a luxurious design into a cheap one. It also makes the car appear smaller than it is, but not in a good way. Hopefully they will fix the tail lights and straighten them out on the refresh in a couple years?
#28
Completely agree with this. I notice the awkward back-end of the new Altima every time I get behind one and can't help but obsess over the off angle of those tail lights. IMO, it turns a luxurious design into a cheap one. It also makes the car appear smaller than it is, but not in a good way. Hopefully they will fix the tail lights and straighten them out on the refresh in a couple years?
#29
No riots from me. But I will say, though, that, in comparing the latest-generation (2013) Accord and (2012) Camry interiors, I found the two about equal in overall quality of materials and execution. I really couldn't tell much difference now between the two. But, IMO, that was clearly not the case in the last-generation (2006-2011) Camry, where a number of interior trim pieces and hardware seemed done in thin, budget-grade plastic, and, in the manual-climate-control versions, large cheap ***** that wobbled and felt loose as you gripped and rotated them. The last Accord, to my senses, didn't have that problem.
#30
It's about buying the badge!
The 6 is a REALLY good looking car. I always thought the outgoing 6 was better looking than the rest, but this one aesthetically blows them all away. I like how Mazda's designs usually do a good job of not imitating.
And the fact that they can keep a non CVT going with similar mileage is pretty cool too.