FrankReynoldsCPA

Yup, but as far as half-tons, I think they'll be bought in higher % by individuals who want to be asphalt cowboys compared to the 3/4 or 1 ton pickups.

Hoovey689

iTrader: (16)

Most automakers won't do anything too risky on a cash cow. Not saying it hasn't been done, but "why mess with success" kinda ordeal

trexlexus

Ya cylinder deactivation is a really cool feature, but i think you misread my question. I was asking about if there are any plans to introduce strictly 4 cylinders as base engines for future trucks.

Seeing as most of them aren't bought for yard/ranch work, sales should have a pretty big blip. MPG will be a good bonus for those that want it.

Hoovey689

iTrader: (16)

unless it's a "compact" truck or a 4 cylinder diesel, I don't think you'll see them in 1/2 tons. Even a turbo 4 would have to work hard to tow/haul and to make up for it's small displacement vs a 6 or 8 it could possible get the same mileage when under load. Not to mention With the higher engine compression and more parts, the longevity comes into question

FrankReynoldsCPA

A 4 banger in a 6000 lb truck would be downright anemic under any conditions.

trexlexus

Yup, i didnt think it'd be likely. Was just wondering if anyone has heard anything over the grapevine about 4 cyls and half tons.

It will be interesting to see how many drops of gas they can squeeze out of their current V6's in the future though.

T0ked

iTrader: (2)

It's a conservative design strategy that has worked for Chevy. No need to change anything if it works for them. Even though this grill is large, it's still looks more conservative than the Fords or Tundras, which I prefer. Either way, most people who buy this truck for work or fleet are already sold by the name/badge or the efficiency numbers.

SteVTEC

That's a serious amount of power for the 5.3L now. Very impressive!