Car Chat General discussion about Lexus, other auto manufacturers and automotive news.

MT's "The big test" of IS350/335i/S4/S60/ATS

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-16-13, 07:21 PM
  #46  
dsadsauser
Pole Position
 
dsadsauser's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 271
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by spwolf
since you are quoting those articles, why not read them? Both MotorTrend and Car and Driver said BMW have worse handling than IS350, especially C&D that tested IS350 F-Sport and placed it first.

They disliked poor steering feel and poor body control of 335i.





http://www.caranddriver.com/comparis...m-sport-page-3

For a road car, skidpad means crap... My 3GS had great skidpad numbers, yet it was not a fun car to drive around the corners... You didnt feel much, especially breaking point, and bumps would send it flying around... It was pretty fast for the time though. Heck - thats pretty much like BMW compared to IS350 now. Numbers are great, but doesnt feel top 5 car, let alone #1.
If your criteria for handling is strictly "feel", then yes, both publications agree. Using that logic, the Ford Model T would out-handle the 335i as well. You could feel every inch of the road in with that suspension. lol. You see, your way of measuring handling is flawed and based off the criteria of the media, not what yields better performance. When it comes to verifiable handling data, the BMW bests the IS350 in most cases. I think you and I both know the 335i would be the choice car of any of us at a track day.

Pretty much all of your credibility is gone, though, when you make statements like your last one. First, when you say for a road car skidpad means crap- as opposed to an off-road car, where skidpad is everything? Skidpad is an excellent measuring tool to gage the car's ability to maintain speed through a turn. Secondly, you stated your 3GS had "great" skidpad numbers.

1st google result was 0.79g
http://www.roadandtrack.com/car-revi...xus-gs-350-awd

2nd result 0.81g
http://www.edmunds.com/hyundai/genes...ison-test.html

I'm sure if I looked I could find something better, but let's just agree the 3GS isn't a skidpad nor track monster. It is a nice car though.
dsadsauser is offline  
Old 07-16-13, 07:55 PM
  #47  
Hoovey689
Moderator
iTrader: (16)
 
Hoovey689's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: California
Posts: 42,294
Received 125 Likes on 83 Posts
Default

Seems like they packaged all these cars wrong and was more biased to the BMW. Call me the odd ball but I really like the S60 with the Polestar performance upgrade. Interior on the Volvo is not my favorite
Hoovey689 is offline  
Old 07-16-13, 09:07 PM
  #48  
LeX2K
Lexus Champion
 
LeX2K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Alberta
Posts: 19,835
Received 2,825 Likes on 2,388 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jbayse99
If your criteria for handling is strictly "feel", then yes, both publications agree. Using that logic, the Ford Model T would out-handle the 335i as well.
Better lay off the
LeX2K is offline  
Old 07-16-13, 09:24 PM
  #49  
natnut
Pole Position
 
natnut's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Singapore
Posts: 2,602
Received 88 Likes on 53 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jbayse99
If your criteria for handling is strictly "feel", then yes, both publications agree. Using that logic, the Ford Model T would out-handle the 335i as well. You could feel every inch of the road in with that suspension. lol. You see, your way of measuring handling is flawed and based off the criteria of the media, not what yields better performance. When it comes to verifiable handling data, the BMW bests the IS350 in most cases. I think you and I both know the 335i would be the choice car of any of us at a track day.

Pretty much all of your credibility is gone, though, when you make statements like your last one. First, when you say for a road car skidpad means crap- as opposed to an off-road car, where skidpad is everything? Skidpad is an excellent measuring tool to gage the car's ability to maintain speed through a turn. Secondly, you stated your 3GS had "great" skidpad numbers.

1st google result was 0.79g
http://www.roadandtrack.com/car-revi...xus-gs-350-awd

2nd result 0.81g
http://www.edmunds.com/hyundai/genes...ison-test.html

I'm sure if I looked I could find something better, but let's just agree the 3GS isn't a skidpad nor track monster. It is a nice car though.
Like spywolf and myself have been saying, why are you so hung up on skidpad when the 3 series' slalom is definitely inferior to the IS and the slalom is a far better summation of the car's overall handling ability.

Seems like you're relying on skidpad as a crutch to save the F30 3 series' reputation as a driver's car.

It's not Lexus fans who are saying it. The criticism is EVERYWHERE : MotorTrend, Car and Driver, Edmund's and even here :


EVERYONE, including your fellow 3 series owners on BMW forums, are complaining of the worse handling, steering feel and feedback of the F30.

No one is saying the F30 is a crap car, it does most things well in other categories of judging a car like speed, acceleration, interior space, comfort etc

But let anyone say that the IS is a better handling car than the F30 and that the F30 is no longer the driver's car in its segment and you come out all defensive and dismissive of objective data and labelling us as BMW haters.

The reason I'm so hard on BMW is that no other car company claims that it is THE ULTIMATE DRIVING MACHINE or enjoys so much mainstream hype of being a "driver's car".

If it has that label of "UDM", it better well back it up with actual performance or it's just another case of an over-rated car living off past glories.

As a 3 series fan, you should be welcoming criticisms from people like me as it will force BMW not to go down the wrong path of luxury but return to its roots/core values.

Your current behavior seems more like emotional over-investment in your car purchase rather than a clear minded assessment of the 3 series weaknesses.
natnut is offline  
Old 07-17-13, 05:59 AM
  #50  
mrraider
Pole Position
 
mrraider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Montreal, QC
Posts: 392
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Hoovey2411
Seems like they packaged all these cars wrong and was more biased to the BMW. Call me the odd ball but I really like the S60 with the Polestar performance upgrade. Interior on the Volvo is not my favorite
If you read between the lines, the Volvo did very well. Decent acceleration, decent skidpad numbers, decent in the figure eight. Excellent safety, comfort and interior room. Very well in purchase price and depreciation. A lot of real world factors favor the Volvo, and make it a lot easier to live with day to day.

BTW, this car was not the T6 with Polestar flash. It was the R design which includes teh Polestar flash, better tires, and an upgraded suspension. It's about 3000$ more than a run of the mill T6.

My opinion of course, is unbiased
mrraider is offline  
Old 07-17-13, 06:08 AM
  #51  
dsadsauser
Pole Position
 
dsadsauser's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 271
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by natnut
Like spywolf and myself have been saying, why are you so hung up on skidpad when the 3 series' slalom is definitely inferior to the IS and the slalom is a far better summation of the car's overall handling ability.

Seems like you're relying on skidpad as a crutch to save the F30 3 series' reputation as a driver's car.

It's not Lexus fans who are saying it. The criticism is EVERYWHERE : MotorTrend, Car and Driver, Edmund's and even here :

http://youtu.be/_QISsSXtBGA

EVERYONE, including your fellow 3 series owners on BMW forums, are complaining of the worse handling, steering feel and feedback of the F30.

No one is saying the F30 is a crap car, it does most things well in other categories of judging a car like speed, acceleration, interior space, comfort etc

But let anyone say that the IS is a better handling car than the F30 and that the F30 is no longer the driver's car in its segment and you come out all defensive and dismissive of objective data and labelling us as BMW haters.

The reason I'm so hard on BMW is that no other car company claims that it is THE ULTIMATE DRIVING MACHINE or enjoys so much mainstream hype of being a "driver's car".

If it has that label of "UDM", it better well back it up with actual performance or it's just another case of an over-rated car living off past glories.

As a 3 series fan, you should be welcoming criticisms from people like me as it will force BMW not to go down the wrong path of luxury but return to its roots/core values.

Your current behavior seems more like emotional over-investment in your car purchase rather than a clear minded assessment of the 3 series weaknesses.
Maybe the F30's mannerism on the road aren't what the auto journalists are used to as EPS is shaking things up quickly, but it's very possibly the future of steering. Porsche changed over, BMW now, Ferrari is starting to as well. It's really the only complaint anyone can make about the 335i.

No, if you look at objective data, the 335i is superior to the IS 350. It wins easily in the skidpad and in the figure 8. The only test the IS 350 has won is the slalom. Put the 2 cars head to head on the 'Ring, Lightning Lap, etc. and the 335i will handedly beat the IS 350.

This "critic" of the 335i doesn't seem to mind it too much on an actual track:


No emotions here. The 335i wins in nearly every objective category. The IS 350 is better suited for comparisons to the ATS. The 335i is better compared to the S4. They are more equals in performance comparison.
dsadsauser is offline  
Old 07-17-13, 06:28 AM
  #52  
spwolf
Lexus Champion
 
spwolf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 19,910
Received 156 Likes on 116 Posts
Default

it is getting sad when BMW fans have to point out "objective" data and not "feel" anymore.

Tables have turned.

:-)
spwolf is offline  
Old 07-17-13, 06:40 AM
  #53  
SecPole14
Lexus Champion
 
SecPole14's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: I wonder why I live alone here...
Posts: 4,330
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

EPS is fine if you do it RIGHT. BMW is doing it WRONG.

My Mustang GT has selectable EPS, and it has argulably the best steering feel of any American car ever, and probably one of the best EPS systems on the market in terms of "feel".

I test drove a 3 Series coupe w/sport pkg before I bought my GT. The steering felt so artificially heavy and numb it was unbelievable. It was the first time in years I had driven any of the newer-school BMWs and came away thoroughly disgusted. Like, that's it??? Why do people buy these cars?

Plenty of cars do EPS right, and HAVE been doing EPS right...

NSX
RX-8
current Mustang
etc.

What's BMW's excuse now? Their usual arrogance that we know best and you'll just have to accept our crappy EPS and still keep calling it the Ultimate Driving Machine? Fail.
SecPole14 is offline  
Old 07-17-13, 07:10 AM
  #54  
LexBob2
Lexus Champion
 
LexBob2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Illinois
Posts: 11,120
Received 138 Likes on 112 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by pman6
The takehome from all of this is-

1. MT is just 3 guys with an opinion. Only difference between them and you is that they work for an auto mag.
2. You draw your own conclusions and buy what you like. Doesn't matter if it's ranked first or last.

Judging by sales figures, clearly more people prefer the bmw regardless what reviews say.
Whether it's consumer reports or motor trend, it's just a starting point for your purchase decision.

On a different note, why couldn't lexus put the ISF 8 speed in the AWD???
Very good points to keep in mind. It's just a comparison test.

I enjoy reading them, but don't take it personally if my fav doesn't win. I do enjoy reading the letters to the editor, and their replies, after a compare won.
LexBob2 is online now  
Old 07-17-13, 08:42 AM
  #55  
dsadsauser
Pole Position
 
dsadsauser's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 271
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by spwolf
it is getting sad when BMW fans have to point out "objective" data and not "feel" anymore.

Tables have turned.

:-)
I can buy that for sure. The only problem is Lexus has never really had objective data in their favor. So, I guess you could say one small victory in the category of "feel". Now, time to address the many other deficiencies. Sales will certainly show how many entusiasts speak with their dollar.

Originally Posted by AdrianXT
EPS is fine if you do it RIGHT. BMW is doing it WRONG.

My Mustang GT has selectable EPS, and it has argulably the best steering feel of any American car ever, and probably one of the best EPS systems on the market in terms of "feel".

I test drove a 3 Series coupe w/sport pkg before I bought my GT. The steering felt so artificially heavy and numb it was unbelievable. It was the first time in years I had driven any of the newer-school BMWs and came away thoroughly disgusted. Like, that's it??? Why do people buy these cars?

Plenty of cars do EPS right, and HAVE been doing EPS right...

NSX
RX-8
current Mustang
etc.

What's BMW's excuse now? Their usual arrogance that we know best and you'll just have to accept our crappy EPS and still keep calling it the Ultimate Driving Machine? Fail.
The first part of what you are saying is exactly right- the current debate. Is the software of the BMW correct or not? It is subjective. I do know that BMW has come out with an update to the EPS steering system, which can changes the feel dynamics.

Although, your second point makes me think you never drove the 335i or don't know how to drive. I actually had a 2013 Mustang GT as well (grabber blue) until my wife got pregnant. I can't have a car with a 3-star rear crash test rating with kids, so, I got the next best alternative. I have never heard anyone say the 335i is too "heavy". Everyone states the feeling is too light and soft. However, most 335i don't have the DHP (dynamic handling pkg.)- kind of like most GTs don't have the Track Pkg.- they mostly have the Brembo pkg. The actual Track Pkg. with the diff is somewhat rare. The DHP completely changes the feel of the car. This is what most of the people on here can't seem to grasp. The 335i in the MT article I'm guessing had it with a hefty MSRP. The real argument should be, the DHP should be standard equipment on the 335i. My 335i handles every bit as good as my GT did. I take the same corners in the GT as I do in my 335i at the same speed limits. Obviously, it doesn't feel nearly as fast. I ran a 12.7 @ 112 in my GT with a crappy 1.95 60 foot with 28 psi.

Last edited by dsadsauser; 07-17-13 at 08:46 AM.
dsadsauser is offline  
Old 07-17-13, 08:53 AM
  #56  
mmarshall
Lexus Fanatic
 
mmarshall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Virginia/D.C. suburbs
Posts: 91,068
Received 87 Likes on 86 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by TwiBlueG35
MotorTrend should wait a couple more months for the Infiniti Q50 to do this comparison test.
The Q50 will be a company-flagship...not in the same price (or maybe size) class as these tested cars.
mmarshall is offline  
Old 07-17-13, 09:15 AM
  #57  
Lexuslvr91
Lead Lap
 
Lexuslvr91's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: NC
Posts: 437
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mmarshall
The Q50 will be a company-flagship...not in the same price (or maybe size) class as these tested cars.
The G37/Q50 will be the entry level sport sedan. Since 2003 the essence of this car (I mean that since they changed the name of it) has always been targeted toward the 3-series. Granted it has always been classified as a midsize it still competes directly with the 3-series and every other car in the compact luxury sport sedan segment.

The M37/56/Q60 is the company flagship.
Lexuslvr91 is offline  
Old 07-17-13, 09:25 AM
  #58  
Lexuslvr91
Lead Lap
 
Lexuslvr91's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: NC
Posts: 437
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Honestly I feel they should have simply used the sportiest version of each car.

Audi S4 quattro
Lexus IS350 F-Sport RWD
Cadillac ATS 3.6 RWD with sport package
BMW 335i with M-Sport package
Volvo S60 R-Design Polestar

Only the Audi and Volvo was engineered for Its highest performance to be had with an AWD system. Every other automaker's best performance vehicle is RWD. I will say BMW has been investing highly in AWD and MBs AMG division has been observing AWD as well.
Lexuslvr91 is offline  
Old 07-17-13, 09:33 AM
  #59  
mmarshall
Lexus Fanatic
 
mmarshall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Virginia/D.C. suburbs
Posts: 91,068
Received 87 Likes on 86 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Lexuslvr91
The G37/Q50 will be the entry level sport sedan. Since 2003 the essence of this car (I mean that since they changed the name of it) has always been targeted toward the 3-series. Granted it has always been classified as a midsize it still competes directly with the 3-series and every other car in the compact luxury sport sedan segment.

The M37/56/Q60 is the company flagship.
Actually, the Q60, from what I can tell, is destined to be a G-sized coupe version of the Q50. Otherwise, I agree with you....I was partly wrong, and you were correct in pointing out that the Q50 will not be the large flagship Infiniti needs. But that seems to be because Infiniti might have changed their story. What they originally said (and I believed) about the new Q-series sedan was that it was supposed to be their new flagship (presumably above the M-series). That, as you point out, is not going to be the case. (and thanks for pointing that out).
mmarshall is offline  
Old 07-17-13, 10:03 AM
  #60  
SecPole14
Lexus Champion
 
SecPole14's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: I wonder why I live alone here...
Posts: 4,330
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by jbayse99
I can buy that for sure. The only problem is Lexus has never really had objective data in their favor. So, I guess you could say one small victory in the category of "feel". Now, time to address the many other deficiencies. Sales will certainly show how many entusiasts speak with their dollar.



The first part of what you are saying is exactly right- the current debate. Is the software of the BMW correct or not? It is subjective. I do know that BMW has come out with an update to the EPS steering system, which can changes the feel dynamics.

Although, your second point makes me think you never drove the 335i or don't know how to drive. I actually had a 2013 Mustang GT as well (grabber blue) until my wife got pregnant. I can't have a car with a 3-star rear crash test rating with kids, so, I got the next best alternative. I have never heard anyone say the 335i is too "heavy". Everyone states the feeling is too light and soft. However, most 335i don't have the DHP (dynamic handling pkg.)- kind of like most GTs don't have the Track Pkg.- they mostly have the Brembo pkg. The actual Track Pkg. with the diff is somewhat rare. The DHP completely changes the feel of the car. This is what most of the people on here can't seem to grasp. The 335i in the MT article I'm guessing had it with a hefty MSRP. The real argument should be, the DHP should be standard equipment on the 335i. My 335i handles every bit as good as my GT did. I take the same corners in the GT as I do in my 335i at the same speed limits. Obviously, it doesn't feel nearly as fast. I ran a 12.7 @ 112 in my GT with a crappy 1.95 60 foot with 28 psi.
That's right, insult my ability to drive.

At best, you're a joker. At worst, you're a troll. I'm putting you on permanent ignore list and would encourage everyone else here to do the same.
SecPole14 is offline  


Quick Reply: MT's "The big test" of IS350/335i/S4/S60/ATS



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:56 AM.