loaded Venza Limited or Acura RDX (fwd) with Technology package?
08-21-13, 07:45 PM
#63
Pole Position
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: California
Posts: 219
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Completely forgot to reply to this thread.
Nice pictures! I like the chrome finishes on the front grill and fog lights.
Is there any glare from sunlight when you look at Nav? ( I assume with the Nav set up like there might be glare from time to time. I remember it happening to one of the cars I test drove before, except the glare was more noticeable sitting in the passenger seat)
Nice pictures! I like the chrome finishes on the front grill and fog lights.
Is there any glare from sunlight when you look at Nav? ( I assume with the Nav set up like there might be glare from time to time. I remember it happening to one of the cars I test drove before, except the glare was more noticeable sitting in the passenger seat)
08-25-13, 11:57 PM
#64
Oops forgot to reply:
Yes sometimes there is glare, depending on the angle of the sun relative to the car. Didn't really bother me too much though. I haven't sat in the passenger seat yet when the car is moving so I can't say whether it's a problem for that side. I imagine it'd be the same. I haven't heard any complaints, though I'm not sure if they're paying attention to the screen anyway.
Yes sometimes there is glare, depending on the angle of the sun relative to the car. Didn't really bother me too much though. I haven't sat in the passenger seat yet when the car is moving so I can't say whether it's a problem for that side. I imagine it'd be the same. I haven't heard any complaints, though I'm not sure if they're paying attention to the screen anyway.
08-26-13, 09:06 AM
#65
Lexus Fanatic
Just test drove FWD RDX couple weeks ago for my friend who currently has 2012 RDX. The new RDX drives terrible comparing to the previous model, especially in FWD form. The acceleration is worse than previous 4-turbo was, and handling is awful. Also, not a fan of the new exterior. Not sure why they took a perfect small SUV and changed it to something much worse.
It had torque, but much of it came on with a rush, after a bit of turbo-lag. The interior, though not done with cheap materials, was not particularly impressive to look at. And the chassis/suspension was much too stiff for comfortable daily-driving.
08-26-13, 09:19 AM
#66
Lexus Champion
The old RDX, IMO, was far from perfect. It had torque, but much of it came on with a rush, after a bit of turbo-lag. The interior, though not done with cheap materials, was not particularly impressive to look at. And the chassis/suspension was much tthat Acura has found the market for this type of CUV.oo stiff for comfortable daily-driving.
It had torque, but much of it came on with a rush, after a bit of turbo-lag. The interior, though not done with cheap materials, was not particularly impressive to look at. And the chassis/suspension was much tthat Acura has found the market for this type of CUV.oo stiff for comfortable daily-driving.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Gojirra99
Car Chat
5
06-04-07 01:37 PM
