Car Chat General discussion about Lexus, other auto manufacturers and automotive news.

Future of Lexus discussion 2013-2015

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-17-14 | 06:54 PM
  #136  
spwolf's Avatar
spwolf
Lexus Champion
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 19,951
Likes: 171
Default

Originally Posted by Glashub
I agree with you but how does one explain that there are 3IS 250's all over LA? They seem to be selling/leasing like hot cakes. Very few 350's. I wouldn't call it a blunder unless there was some way to determine if 3x as many IS 250's could've been sold with the 2.0.
price? they lowered the difference, but it is still significant.
Old 04-17-14 | 06:59 PM
  #137  
jennypenny's Avatar
jennypenny
Advanced
 
Joined: Jun 2013
Posts: 521
Likes: 12
From: Singapore
Default

Originally Posted by Fizzboy7
It's about time. Sending out the 3IS without this engine was a blunder.
Now, with the expected 2.0t output, this is going to infringe on the 3.5 motor. So, now the 3.5 needs attention next. I'm sure we'll be seeing updates to it in the next few years. Raise one bar and you have to raise the other to keep them apart (as other companies have already done).

So with the 2.0t coming into play, it makes me think if the GS will actually get a price cut. What do you all think? Lesser motor, lesser output, less speed should mean a lower sticker as it has in other cars, right?
blunder? dont think so, the Lexus V6 engines are extremely smooth and it is bullet proof.

yes, a turbo will be more powerful and more fuel efficient, but at the cost of higher maintenance and realibility.

3IS has an extremely good chassis that is can cope with an older engine.
Old 04-17-14 | 07:48 PM
  #138  
4TehNguyen's Avatar
4TehNguyen
Lexus Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 26,059
Likes: 51
From: Houston, Texas
Default

250 engine is that one that needed replacing, 350 engine is fine. I would rather have a NA engine not a turbo
Old 04-17-14 | 08:56 PM
  #139  
Fizzboy7's Avatar
Fizzboy7
Lexus Test Driver
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 9,756
Likes: 171
From: California
Default

It's not just my opinion. Much of the auto press has reviewed the new IS saying the 2.5 was behind or was the car's biggest drawback. Then to have such an all-new engine debut one year after the 3IS is released adds insult to injury. Bring your best package all at once to make the biggest splash and impact (first impressions are everything in this industry). One can only imagine how many more new IS's Lexus would be selling if it had the fresh engine with the corresponding raves and reviews. Why settle for good when you can settle for better? 3I is good. 3IS 2.0t is better. Lexus chose good instead of better.
Old 04-17-14 | 10:02 PM
  #140  
GFerg's Avatar
GFerg
Speaks French in Russian
CL Folding 25,000
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 13,303
Likes: 65
From: What is G?
Default

Not understanding the shock. GS200t would be replacing the GS250. Unless I read something wrong and the GS200t will be offered stateside??
Old 04-18-14 | 12:09 AM
  #141  
Hoovey689's Avatar
Hoovey689
Thread Starter
Moderator
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 42,323
Likes: 129
From: California
Default

Originally Posted by GFerg
Not understanding the shock. GS200t would be replacing the GS250. Unless I read something wrong and the GS200t will be offered stateside??
Yes the GS200t was discussed at the latest Lexus Dealers meeting (4/16/14)
Old 04-18-14 | 12:14 AM
  #142  
natnut's Avatar
natnut
Pole Position
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 2,602
Likes: 88
From: Singapore
Default

I always thought that there was too big a gap between the 250 NA and the 350 NA engines. It should have been 250 NA, 300 NA then 350 NA.

In a way, the 200t replaces the hypothetical 300 NA engine being that the prev gen GS300 had a 245hp 3L NA engine. The 250 NA segment will be completely abolished in the near future with the IS200t/GS200t occupying the segment previously occupied by the IS300/GS300 NA.

NA = Normal Aspirated
Old 04-18-14 | 01:02 AM
  #143  
jhs82's Avatar
jhs82
Lead Lap
 
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 758
Likes: 26
From: Sweden
Default

Originally Posted by Mr Bond
Ct 200t with 250-270 hp
Haha, I doubt it.

The CT is so far a hybrid only vehicle. It's more likely to come a CT 250h or 300h than a 200t.
But perhaps a 140t or 160t using the same technology as the upcomming IS 200t.
The germans use a lot of small displacement turbo engines, and they are the primary rival to the Lexus brand.
Old 04-18-14 | 03:32 AM
  #144  
Nights's Avatar
Nights
Pole Position
 
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 240
Likes: 0
From: NSW, Australia
Default

Originally Posted by Fizzboy7
It's not just my opinion. Much of the auto press has reviewed the new IS saying the 2.5 was behind or was the car's biggest drawback. Then to have such an all-new engine debut one year after the 3IS is released adds insult to injury. Bring your best package all at once to make the biggest splash and impact (first impressions are everything in this industry). One can only imagine how many more new IS's Lexus would be selling if it had the fresh engine with the corresponding raves and reviews. Why settle for good when you can settle for better? 3I is good. 3IS 2.0t is better. Lexus chose good instead of better.
The German competition regularly do that. Mercedes and BMW's engine/vehicle model are rarely in sync either. The C class in the last 3 generations have usually used carryover engines, and newer powerplants usually come in 2-3 years into the lifecycle of the newer model.

I think it's not optimal that Lexus is introducing the 2.0t into the IS in it's second model year, but I think it was unavoidable in that they wanted to get the IS out there, and obviously the engine wasn't ready. There's probably been a lot of work done on it to ensure the same reliability and smoothness standards that Lexus customers expect, and not have a repeat of the BMW turbo debacle. Not to mention, it's presumably the start of a new family of turbo engines to sit alongside the hybrid powertrains.
Old 04-18-14 | 05:40 AM
  #145  
QuentinB's Avatar
QuentinB
Pit Crew
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 111
Likes: 0
From: WV
Default

Originally Posted by Nights
The German competition regularly do that. Mercedes and BMW's engine/vehicle model are rarely in sync either. The C class in the last 3 generations have usually used carryover engines, and newer powerplants usually come in 2-3 years into the lifecycle of the newer model.

I think it's not optimal that Lexus is introducing the 2.0t into the IS in it's second model year, but I think it was unavoidable in that they wanted to get the IS out there, and obviously the engine wasn't ready. There's probably been a lot of work done on it to ensure the same reliability and smoothness standards that Lexus customers expect, and not have a repeat of the BMW turbo debacle. Not to mention, it's presumably the start of a new family of turbo engines to sit alongside the hybrid powertrains.
Note that it isn't the 2nd model year of the 3IS. Sept 2015 will be a '16 model; that would make the IS200t the 3rd model year.
Old 04-18-14 | 05:50 AM
  #146  
spwolf's Avatar
spwolf
Lexus Champion
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 19,951
Likes: 171
Default

Originally Posted by QuentinB
Note that it isn't the 2nd model year of the 3IS. Sept 2015 will be a '16 model; that would make the IS200t the 3rd model year.
and plus, 2.0t is released for complete lineup as soon as it is available. So I am not sure if some people think they should release every model at the same time, otherwise it will never match release dates.

If they could have released this 2.0t in 2013, they would have... but it wasnt ready and it is full of new tech that is premiering on Toyota's 2015 engines.
Old 04-18-14 | 07:59 AM
  #147  
RNM GS3's Avatar
RNM GS3
Lexus Test Driver
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 7,292
Likes: 72
From: New York
Default

When will the GS get an updated turbo 6?

Any chance for this generation or will it have to wait until the 5GS arrives?

Either way most likely GS will replace my current 5 but with the new engine it would be a certainty.
Old 04-18-14 | 10:38 AM
  #148  
rominl's Avatar
rominl
exclusive matchup
CL Folding 10,000
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 81,674
Likes: 191
From: Lovely OC
Default

Originally Posted by Hoovey2411
Yes the GS200t was discussed at the latest Lexus Dealers meeting (4/16/14)
another great piece of trusted info from hoovey!!!
Old 04-18-14 | 11:10 AM
  #149  
mmarshall's Avatar
mmarshall
Lexus Fanatic
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 91,620
Likes: 89
From: Virginia/D.C. suburbs
Default

Originally Posted by Fizzboy7
Much of the auto press has reviewed the new IS saying the 2.5 was behind or was the car's biggest drawback.
What do you expect the auto press to say? A lot of them (fortunately, not all...Motorweek seems to be one of the few exceptions) seem to think that anything without drag-strip 0-60 times or 1G handling belongs to Grandpa and Grandma.

I've often been asked, BTW, by friends and colleagues why I never wanted to actually join the automotive press. Bingo......among several, there's one of your main reasons.

Last edited by mmarshall; 04-18-14 at 11:15 AM.
Old 04-19-14 | 02:33 PM
  #150  
Pawel062's Avatar
Pawel062
Driver School Candidate
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
From: nj
Default

Any rumors of a manual coming out? I'm about to trade my is250 in for a manual s4 in the second half of the year due to Lexus' lack of anything manual. If there's something in the pipeline I might hold off.


Quick Reply: Future of Lexus discussion 2013-2015



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:38 PM.