Honda CEO says we shouldn't expect any new sports cars
#31
Driver School Candidate
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: ca
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I, myself own a 2007 Accord and it is a very solid nice car. But as for the current Honda line-up, theres nothing really excites me. I often caught myself looking at cars from Ford, Chevy, Dodge and Hyundai that I never thought I would be doing before.
Like many others said in this thread, Honda needs to realize that Accord and Civic won't be keeping the customers for long as other manufacturers are pushing out more than just your average family commuting cars...
#32
Lexus Fanatic
Actually, IMO Honda is correct on this one. I don't see a NEED for Honda to go after the young, caps-on-backwards crowd. In fact, back when that crowd was running around in pastel-colored (aftermarket paint) and bolt-on-spoiler CRXs, Civic hatchbacks, Preludes, and two-door Accords, they weren't even buying NEW Hondas......prefering to customize/repaint older ones instead. So why spend time and money chasing a crowd that is not going to buy your products...or at least not buy them new? Honda has traditionally sold their products based on quality, refinement (except for road noise), reliability, and Swiss-Watch levels of precision assembly....those features can appeal to people of ANY age. Yes, they goof once in a while (like with the over-economized, El-Cheapo 2012 Civic), but they clearly recogniozed the error, and, in just one year, the 2013 Civic was MUCH better done.
#33
Actually, IMO Honda is correct on this one. I don't see a NEED for Honda to go after the young, caps-on-backwards crowd. In fact, back when that crowd was running around in pastel-colored (aftermarket paint) and bolt-on-spoiler CRXs, Civic hatchbacks, Preludes, and two-door Accords, they weren't even buying NEW Hondas......prefering to customize/repaint older ones instead. So why spend time and money chasing a crowd that is not going to buy your products...or at least not buy them new? Honda has traditionally sold their products based on quality, refinement (except for road noise), reliability, and Swiss-Watch levels of precision assembly....those features can appeal to people of ANY age. Yes, they goof once in a while (like with the over-economized, El-Cheapo 2012 Civic), but they clearly recogniozed the error, and, in just one year, the 2013 Civic was MUCH better done.
#34
Lexus Champion
Actually, IMO Honda is correct on this one. I don't see a NEED for Honda to go after the young, caps-on-backwards crowd. In fact, back when that crowd was running around in pastel-colored (aftermarket paint) and bolt-on-spoiler CRXs, Civic hatchbacks, Preludes, and two-door Accords, they weren't even buying NEW Hondas......prefering to customize/repaint older ones instead. So why spend time and money chasing a crowd that is not going to buy your products...or at least not buy them new? Honda has traditionally sold their products based on quality, refinement (except for road noise), reliability, and Swiss-Watch levels of precision assembly....those features can appeal to people of ANY age. Yes, they goof once in a while (like with the over-economized, El-Cheapo 2012 Civic), but they clearly recogniozed the error, and, in just one year, the 2013 Civic was MUCH better done.
#35
Lexus Test Driver
iTrader: (1)
I don't think that was the case for cars like the CRX, Civic hatch, or Prelude. These cars, along with Integras, were often first cars for young drivers and purchased new. Even if the parents purchased the car, I'm sure the child had a hand in choosing it and hence were a part of Honda's target market.
mmarshall, I think you don't realize how much money these young kids used to put into their Honda's back in the day. Honda's at the time were the cars to get and modify. Again, you had dealerships selling aftermarket parts right on the showrooms. Honda is no longer the have to have car to modify anymore so you don't that kind if stuff in dealerships anymore except for maybe Scion.
#36
Driver School Candidate
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: ca
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Actually, IMO Honda is correct on this one. I don't see a NEED for Honda to go after the young, caps-on-backwards crowd. In fact, back when that crowd was running around in pastel-colored (aftermarket paint) and bolt-on-spoiler CRXs, Civic hatchbacks, Preludes, and two-door Accords, they weren't even buying NEW Hondas......prefering to customize/repaint older ones instead. So why spend time and money chasing a crowd that is not going to buy your products...or at least not buy them new? Honda has traditionally sold their products based on quality, refinement (except for road noise), reliability, and Swiss-Watch levels of precision assembly....those features can appeal to people of ANY age. Yes, they goof once in a while (like with the over-economized, El-Cheapo 2012 Civic), but they clearly recogniozed the error, and, in just one year, the 2013 Civic was MUCH better done.
(Same goes to Toyota, they used to a similar lineup as Honda before releasing the FRS. They kept saying there is no market for compact sport and look at how popular the FRS and BRZ are today?)
It's undeniable that Honda makes good quality cars because like I have mentioned in my last post, I currently still own a 07 accord and it is very nice.
My question to you is, why is Honda not able to make some fun sporty cars while maintaining the same level of quality, refinement and assembling precision? They need those cars to win back the enthusiastic buyers like Toyota did with the FT86.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Hoovey689
Car Chat
20
04-26-12 12:44 PM
Hoovey689
Car Chat
39
12-23-11 11:34 AM