Looking at a 1999 Mercedes SLK230
#1
Looking at a 1999 Mercedes SLK230
Hi guys, my friend is looking at this car. Its a 1999 with 56k on it. They are asking $4,900. I was just in need of some advice. Is the car reliable? Any major issues with this model? Anything to look out for? Thanks guys
#2
Driver School Candidate
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: ca
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Judging from the condition of the interior, it looks like it has 256k instead of 56k.. And the rear end looks too new for its age. It might be involved in an accident. (SLK logo location is also off).
This might be a mileage rollback and salvaged. stay away.
This might be a mileage rollback and salvaged. stay away.
#3
I've driven one a few times. Was not very impressed at all. That one was put up for sale in new condition for $7,000. That one looks like it's been through the ringer a few times. IMHO I would recommend to stay away.
#4
I just looked up some of the owner reviews on Edmund. A lot of owners have said the interior is painted on and over time the paint will peel off. Repainting the interior is pretty cheap or you could just take off all the painted altogether (than it would be a light black color).
#6
Can a digital odometer be rolled back?
Last edited by Vh_Supra26; 11-30-13 at 03:32 AM.
#7
Lexus Fanatic
iTrader: (20)
unless they had a big dog scratching and messing with the interior or something, i don't see how it got in such bad shape after only 56k mi.
Trending Topics
#8
Lead Lap
Do not buy this car. 1999 was exactly when MB cost cutting when into full force. Poor quality interiors, that kompressor engine may suffer from supercharger failure if not properly maintained, the convertible top pump may need to replacing, and watch for blown speakers. Some of these things are more age related, but still. I would avoid this, especially given that it's been rear-ended (think about all of the complex convertible gear attached to the trunk lid) and the fact that the interior looks way too worn for 56k.
#9
It could also be because the car is from Texas. It gets really hot down there and paint would peel faster than if it was from a northern state. Carfax is showing 50k with the last odometer reading.
#10
Do not buy this car. 1999 was exactly when MB cost cutting when into full force. Poor quality interiors, that kompressor engine may suffer from supercharger failure if not properly maintained, the convertible top pump may need to replacing, and watch for blown speakers. Some of these things are more age related, but still. I would avoid this, especially given that it's been rear-ended (think about all of the complex convertible gear attached to the trunk lid) and the fact that the interior looks way too worn for 56k.
He could just never put the top down
#11
Lexus Test Driver
Wow. I see a lot of people with good points.
Anyways, I am never been a person that trust in German Used car type of things. The only car that I would purchase used = Porsche.
The Major set back reasons are their parts...they are like non-existence, take forever to find one the older they are....the longer you take....the more expensive it is.
Not to mention how complicated they are to work on, or have them done at the shop....all in all....is a sink hole for the money. If you want MB or BM or Audi, lease it new....4 years full warranty.
That is why I am with Lexus, even a 2000 Lexus will last forever....parts are shared with Toyota.....easier to find, cheaper to maintain...etc
Anyways, I am never been a person that trust in German Used car type of things. The only car that I would purchase used = Porsche.
The Major set back reasons are their parts...they are like non-existence, take forever to find one the older they are....the longer you take....the more expensive it is.
Not to mention how complicated they are to work on, or have them done at the shop....all in all....is a sink hole for the money. If you want MB or BM or Audi, lease it new....4 years full warranty.
That is why I am with Lexus, even a 2000 Lexus will last forever....parts are shared with Toyota.....easier to find, cheaper to maintain...etc
#12
Wow. I see a lot of people with good points.
Anyways, I am never been a person that trust in German Used car type of things. The only car that I would purchase used = Porsche.
The Major set back reasons are their parts...they are like non-existence, take forever to find one the older they are....the longer you take....the more expensive it is.
Not to mention how complicated they are to work on, or have them done at the shop....all in all....is a sink hole for the money. If you want MB or BM or Audi, lease it new....4 years full warranty.
That is why I am with Lexus, even a 2000 Lexus will last forever....parts are shared with Toyota.....easier to find, cheaper to maintain...etc
Anyways, I am never been a person that trust in German Used car type of things. The only car that I would purchase used = Porsche.
The Major set back reasons are their parts...they are like non-existence, take forever to find one the older they are....the longer you take....the more expensive it is.
Not to mention how complicated they are to work on, or have them done at the shop....all in all....is a sink hole for the money. If you want MB or BM or Audi, lease it new....4 years full warranty.
That is why I am with Lexus, even a 2000 Lexus will last forever....parts are shared with Toyota.....easier to find, cheaper to maintain...etc
I would think Porsche would cost more to keep up with. But he already knows about German cars. He had an E39 for awhile.
Part issue fix
http://houston.craigslist.org/pts/4114910566.html
#13
Lexus Fanatic
I remember test-driving an SLK of that vintage...it was a lot of fun with the top down, but, of course, like most smaller 2-seat roadsters, cramped inside for larger persons. As far as reliability goes, electronics, of course, was and is a major issue with Mercedes products of that era. They also have interior hardware defects.