Car Chat General discussion about Lexus, other auto manufacturers and automotive news.

2014/2015 Mercedes-Benz C-Class Thread

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-24-13, 04:55 PM
  #256  
Motor
Lexus Champion
 
Motor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: CA™
Posts: 3,018
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Motor is offline  
Old 12-24-13, 06:19 PM
  #257  
Fizzboy7
Lexus Test Driver
 
Fizzboy7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: California
Posts: 9,747
Received 171 Likes on 102 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by SW13GS
From your other posts I don't see any circumstance where you would consider purchasing a C Class...so what do you care? Is only having AWD to start going to slow down C Class sales? No. It'll sell very well. You're not going to be one of those buyers, so why all the anger?
Excellent questions. Over the years, I've taken an interest in consumer groups, and this relates well to that. Forcing scores of people to dump $2000 of their hard-earned money is one of the bigger rip-offs to come along in a while. While I may not be purchasing a new C-class, others will be. Mercedes could have easily chose to release only RWD at launch... a spec that meets the masses needs more than any other spec. Instead they will be milking people who still want the car despite it's over-optioning. This type of business practice should be scolded and not brushed under the carpet.
Fizzboy7 is offline  
Old 12-27-13, 01:10 PM
  #258  
I8ABMR
Lexus Fanatic
 
I8ABMR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Waiting for next track day
Posts: 22,608
Received 102 Likes on 67 Posts
Default

like most , its getting bigger and more refined. I just wish the interior was a little brighter and less black everywhere
I8ABMR is offline  
Old 12-28-13, 07:40 PM
  #259  
Hoovey689
Moderator
Forum Moderator
Thread Starter
iTrader: (16)
 
Hoovey689's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: California
Posts: 42,312
Received 126 Likes on 84 Posts
Default I'm smitten.. Official AMG Aero Kit


Gallery:
http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2015-...exterior-pack/
Hoovey689 is offline  
Old 12-28-13, 11:17 PM
  #260  
RXSF
Moderator
Forum Moderator
 
RXSF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 12,057
Likes: 0
Received 74 Likes on 45 Posts
Default

love the chrome front lip
RXSF is offline  
Old 12-29-13, 12:48 AM
  #261  
Hoovey689
Moderator
Forum Moderator
Thread Starter
iTrader: (16)
 
Hoovey689's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: California
Posts: 42,312
Received 126 Likes on 84 Posts
Default

The competition has stepped up. This is a new realm where 320-340hp is the new norm and torque has risen to just as lofty numbers.

The U.S. market launches with two C-Class models: C300 4MATIC with a 2.0L turbocharged direct-injection in-line fourcylinder engine with preliminary power figures of 235 hp and 273 lb-ft of torque and a C400 4MATIC with a 3.0L turbocharged direct-injection V6 at 329 hp and 354 lb-ft of torque.
MBZ C400 3.0L Turbo 329hp 354lbft
Audi S4 3.0L Supercharged 333hp 325lbft
BMW 335i 3.0L Turbo 300hp 300lbft
BMW 335is 3.0L Turbo 320hp 332lbft
Jaguar 3.0L Sueprcharged 340hp 332lbft

Lexus IS350 3.5L NA 306hp 277lbft

Sadly the Lexus DI 3.5 must give way to a Turbo 6 that can't come soon enough. Parity must be made to be considered any real threat. The hp wars are alive and kicking
Hoovey689 is offline  
Old 12-29-13, 01:37 AM
  #262  
Fizzboy7
Lexus Test Driver
 
Fizzboy7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: California
Posts: 9,747
Received 171 Likes on 102 Posts
Default

Frumpy and dated taillights...
Attached Thumbnails 2014/2015 Mercedes-Benz C-Class Thread-tundra3.jpg   2014/2015 Mercedes-Benz C-Class Thread-tundra.jpg   2014/2015 Mercedes-Benz C-Class Thread-tundar2.jpg  
Fizzboy7 is offline  
Old 12-29-13, 07:41 PM
  #263  
RXSF
Moderator
Forum Moderator
 
RXSF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 12,057
Likes: 0
Received 74 Likes on 45 Posts
Default

That is actually a sketch from really early on, that is not the official C class

The lights are pretty much direct from the S class, I think they look good
RXSF is offline  
Old 12-29-13, 07:58 PM
  #264  
hlee12
Lead Lap
 
hlee12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: il
Posts: 477
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

not the fan of the rear, but everything else looks good. this is a strong contender.
hlee12 is offline  
Old 12-29-13, 08:30 PM
  #265  
LexFather
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I love it…..
 
Old 12-29-13, 09:25 PM
  #266  
Hoovey689
Moderator
Forum Moderator
Thread Starter
iTrader: (16)
 
Hoovey689's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: California
Posts: 42,312
Received 126 Likes on 84 Posts
Default

Diesel Hybrid? Mileage champ?
Hoovey689 is offline  
Old 12-29-13, 09:25 PM
  #267  
hlee12
Lead Lap
 
hlee12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: il
Posts: 477
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Fizzboy7
Frumpy and dated taillights...
you are reaching.
hlee12 is offline  
Old 12-30-13, 12:21 AM
  #268  
Fizzboy7
Lexus Test Driver
 
Fizzboy7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: California
Posts: 9,747
Received 171 Likes on 102 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by hlee12
you are reaching.
I disagree. The shape of lights MBZ chose is a style that has come and gone in the last ten years. The current trend now is horizontal taillights (Audi, BMW, Lexus, Hyundai, VW, Honda, Nissan, Infiniti, Chevy, and most others). While new things start somewhere and no one has to follow others, picking up an old shape that was recently retired and used on some dumpy-looking cars/trucks (Tundra stepside) is not a wise move in my opinion. Even the refreshed E-class has the more in vogue horizontal taillights.
Fizzboy7 is offline  
Old 12-30-13, 12:47 AM
  #269  
TangoRed
Lead Lap
 
TangoRed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Washington
Posts: 4,585
Received 24 Likes on 18 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Fizzboy7
I disagree. The shape of lights MBZ chose is a style that has come and gone in the last ten years. The current trend now is horizontal taillights (Audi, BMW, Lexus, Hyundai, VW, Honda, Nissan, Infiniti, Chevy, and most others). While new things start somewhere and no one has to follow others, picking up an old shape that was recently retired and used on some dumpy-looking cars/trucks (Tundra stepside) is not a wise move in my opinion. Even the refreshed E-class has the more in vogue horizontal taillights.
The refreshed E-class has the exact same tail light dimensions as the 2010 model, so there's no change there. I agree the trend is certainly horizontal tail lights, but they don't lend themselves to the "regal" look Mercedes was trying to give the C-class (or the S-class, for that matter).

I'm not sure I follow you with the Tundra example anyways. You act as if dumpy-looking cars and trucks haven't used a horizontal tail light design either.
TangoRed is offline  
Old 12-30-13, 01:37 AM
  #270  
Fizzboy7
Lexus Test Driver
 
Fizzboy7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: California
Posts: 9,747
Received 171 Likes on 102 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by TangoRed
The refreshed E-class has the exact same tail light dimensions as the 2010 model, so there's no change there. I agree the trend is certainly horizontal tail lights, but they don't lend themselves to the "regal" look Mercedes was trying to give the C-class (or the S-class, for that matter).

I'm not sure I follow you with the Tundra example anyways. You act as if dumpy-looking cars and trucks haven't used a horizontal tail light design either.
You said it perfectly.... the lights are "regal." I don't know about the rest of you, but I don't want my sport sedan showing off "regal" features. That's soft and weak, like the rest of the back end. I'll leave it at that.
Fizzboy7 is offline  


Quick Reply: 2014/2015 Mercedes-Benz C-Class Thread



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:16 AM.