Car Chat General discussion about Lexus, other auto manufacturers and automotive news.

Slow Down....Your AWD/4WD is NOT Invincible in Snow

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-13-14, 05:56 PM
  #16  
Aron9000
Lexus Champion
 
Aron9000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: TN
Posts: 4,592
Received 28 Likes on 27 Posts
Default

Another point nobody mentioned is the weight of these 3 row 4wd SUV's. Granted they might have the added grip of 4wd to get them going, but because of all that mass, they handle and stop way worse compared to somebody like myself in a 2wd Toyota pickup that weighs 2800lbs.

IE you get going too fast in a corner in that little truck, its much easier to countersteer, apply the brakes or throttle as neccesary, and get that little truck back in line. Go too fast in that corner in a 6000lb Suburban, its a lot harder to correct and stay on course because that 6000lbs wants to push you to that outside corner, or come around on you.
Aron9000 is offline  
Old 02-13-14, 05:58 PM
  #17  
SW17LS
Lexus Fanatic
 
SW17LS's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Maryland
Posts: 57,365
Received 2,741 Likes on 1,962 Posts
Default

LOL, hopefully there wasn't some poor SOB waiting for a bus in that spot
SW17LS is offline  
Old 02-14-14, 06:20 AM
  #18  
tex2670
Lexus Champion
 
tex2670's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Southeastern PA
Posts: 10,099
Received 9 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mmarshall
A major winter storm is currently affecting the southern and eastern parts of the country.....in the western parts of the D.C. area, one of the worst in four years. I've got some 12 inches, and drifting, on the ground at my house as I write this...I had to go out, start some shoveling, and make sure that my heat-pump compressor didn't get choked off by the deep snow.

Inevitably, however, in bad winter conditions (and, from local news reports this morning of vehicles that wind up in the ditch, this one seems to be no exception), there's always a hard-core group of SUV/AWD/4WD truck drivers who think that the laws of physics don't apply to them. They think that the all-wheel-drive nature of their vehicles somehow gives them a magic wand that they just wave, start up the engine, and drive like they were on dry pavement. In other words, their egos start writing checks that neither their brains nor their vehicles can cash.

Well, sorry, folks...it just doesn't work that way. Vehicles like these DO have some advantages in the slick and/or white stuff (and I'll get to those in a minute). But they are not a license to simply thumb your nose at slick conditions and pretend like they don't exist...as some of their drivers unfortunately do.

First of all, in general, AWD/4WD will help you get going from a standstill on slick surfaces or in deep snow/mud better then FWD or RWD, particularly with a high ground clearance....though the type of tires used can often make a difference. Dry-pavement, low-profile, summer-only performance tires or low-rolling resistance tires with hard rubber compounds used for high fuel-mileage, in general, don't work well on slick surfaces. Even AWD can be compromised with unsuitable tires for the conditions. AWD will also, in some conditions, improve sure-footedness in low-speed handling on slick surfaces (and I do mean low speed). AWD, in general will also help one get up hills and grades that would sometimes mean a RWD or FWD vehicle getting stuck on. And if your 4WD/AWD system allows you to start from a stop in second gear or lock the rear differential, then so much the better...but the differential should not be locked (or a part-time 4WD system used) on dry surfaces.

However, 4WD/AWD will NOT help you to stop any shorter, or prevent wheel-lockup from braking (that, of course, is the job of the anti-lock braking system on newer vehicles...and the tires only have so much available grip for braking, regardless of the drive system). Nor will 4WD/AWD allow you to barrel around sharp corners on slick surfaces like you were in a sports car or on dry pavement...this is a prime reason why so many of those vehicles wind up in the ditch. Again, the tires have only so much available grip for cornering traction regardless of the drive-system. The traction control and vehicle-stability systems in modern vehicles, of course, work with all types of drive-systems, but, again, aren't magic...they won't necessarily add any more grip to the tires than is available with the laws of physics.

So, in a nutshell, enjoy the added traction-capabilities and security of your AWD/4WD system the way they were designed and meant to be used, but KNOW THEIR LIMITATIONS.....an drive accordingly. That way, you probably won't end up embarassed and explaining to a local TV-reporter, on camera (and possibly to a cop), why your ego outran your capabilities.
People just don't have common sense. They don't even do basic things like clear the snow off of tail lights and headlights. I can't see your brake lights or turn signals when they are covered with snow--it takes 30 seconds to wipe the brush over your lights after you cleared the snow off the windows (HA--if people even do that!! Especially the rear window).

So--slow down because it's slippery? It's just too much to ask of people these days. I know its LEGAL to make a right on red, but it's not REQUIRED, don't you realize that when there's a driving snowstorm, it may be wise just to WAIT???

I'm not afraid of driving in snow, but I avoid doing it, because there's just too many people out there without a lick of common sense.
tex2670 is offline  
Old 02-14-14, 06:48 AM
  #19  
bagwell
Lexus Champion
 
bagwell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: The Woodlands, TX
Posts: 11,205
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by tex2670
People just don't have common sense. They don't even do basic things like clear the snow off of tail lights and headlights. I can't see your brake lights or turn signals when they are covered with snow--it takes 30 seconds to wipe the brush over your lights after you cleared the snow off the windows (HA--if people even do that!! Especially the rear window).

So--slow down because it's slippery? It's just too much to ask of people these days. I know its LEGAL to make a right on red, but it's not REQUIRED, don't you realize that when there's a driving snowstorm, it may be wise just to WAIT???

I'm not afraid of driving in snow, but I avoid doing it, because there's just too many people out there without a lick of common sense.
yep, sad but true.....same way with wet weather here in Texas...no common sense.....
dumb motherfudgers will be right on my azz on a wet road...I'll hit the brakes to get them away from me.
bagwell is offline  
Old 02-14-14, 07:29 AM
  #20  
Lil4X
Out of Warranty
 
Lil4X's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Houston, Republic of Texas
Posts: 14,926
Received 12 Likes on 12 Posts
Default

In the blizzard of '71 in Amarillo I recall looking out my street level office window in downtown looking for the source of the whirring noise coming from somewhere out on the street. A huge, brand new Eldorado heaves into view with a little old gray-haired lady at the helm . . . slowly fishtailing northbound across three traffic lanes. Fortunately for her, the storm had begun at 3am on a Saturday morning so the only people out in this miserable weather had parked out of the bitter north wind on the east-west streets. IF you had to get out, all the local news organizations were recommending chains, and gas stations all over town had a line of cars waiting to get chains put on.

New luxo-boat with 500CID V8, 400bhp, and FWD . . . with chains neatly installed on the REAR wheels. Evidently not everyone down at the gas station was getting the word.
Lil4X is offline  
Old 02-14-14, 08:15 AM
  #21  
tex2670
Lexus Champion
 
tex2670's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Southeastern PA
Posts: 10,099
Received 9 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

And when you fly down the highway on a bright sunny day after a snow storm, without leaving extra room for the cars in front of you, when the highway is wet (or, at least you THINK it's wet) at 32 degrees, you get a major pile up:

http://abclocal.go.com/wpvi/story?se...cal&id=9432120

Keep in mind, this is Philly, not Atlanta. People here may not be as experienced at winter driving like in Syracuse or Boston, but it does snow here during the winter....
tex2670 is offline  
Old 02-14-14, 09:05 AM
  #22  
mmarshall
Lexus Fanatic
Thread Starter
 
mmarshall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Virginia/D.C. suburbs
Posts: 91,336
Received 87 Likes on 86 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Lil4X
New luxo-boat with 500CID V8, 400bhp, and FWD . . . with chains neatly installed on the REAR wheels.
You're kidding. That one makes my day. I would expect more intelligence than that from the Three Stooges.
mmarshall is offline  
Old 02-14-14, 09:13 AM
  #23  
mmarshall
Lexus Fanatic
Thread Starter
 
mmarshall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Virginia/D.C. suburbs
Posts: 91,336
Received 87 Likes on 86 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by SW13GS
Somebody needs to find mmarshall a sense of humor lol
Hey, that's not hard to find. Just watch any car or dealer-ad on TV.
mmarshall is offline  
Old 02-14-14, 09:41 AM
  #24  
oldcajun
Racer
 
oldcajun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: AZ
Posts: 1,419
Received 49 Likes on 34 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mmarshall
You're kidding. That one makes my day. I would expect more intelligence than that from the Three Stooges.
Mike,
Back then FWD was rare and most guys working at gas stations don't have a PHD. Surprisingly, this screw-up may have saved the little old lady a lot of pain. If you are only going to put chains on one axle, the rear is better. When I lived in Seattle, a neighbor had a front wheel drive Acura and put chains on the front only. He got up the hill fine, but the first downhill section he spun out and hit a pole. With traction on the front only, when he let up on the accelerator to slow for downhill, the car reacted like he had slammed on the brakes. Good traction in front and zero in the rear. If you are going to put chains (or snow tires) on a FWD, you must do all 4 wheels.
Steve
oldcajun is offline  
Old 02-14-14, 10:16 AM
  #25  
tex2670
Lexus Champion
 
tex2670's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Southeastern PA
Posts: 10,099
Received 9 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by oldcajun
Mike,
Back then FWD was rare and most guys working at gas stations don't have a PHD. Surprisingly, this screw-up may have saved the little old lady a lot of pain. If you are only going to put chains on one axle, the rear is better. When I lived in Seattle, a neighbor had a front wheel drive Acura and put chains on the front only. He got up the hill fine, but the first downhill section he spun out and hit a pole. With traction on the front only, when he let up on the accelerator to slow for downhill, the car reacted like he had slammed on the brakes. Good traction in front and zero in the rear. If you are going to put chains (or snow tires) on a FWD, you must do all 4 wheels.
Steve
Kinda like pulling on only the front brake on your 10-speed--right over the handle bars...
tex2670 is offline  
Old 02-14-14, 10:49 AM
  #26  
Lil4X
Out of Warranty
 
Lil4X's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Houston, Republic of Texas
Posts: 14,926
Received 12 Likes on 12 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by oldcajun
Mike,
Back then FWD was rare and most guys working at gas stations don't have a PHD. Surprisingly, this screw-up may have saved the little old lady a lot of pain. If you are only going to put chains on one axle, the rear is better. When I lived in Seattle, a neighbor had a front wheel drive Acura and put chains on the front only. He got up the hill fine, but the first downhill section he spun out and hit a pole. With traction on the front only, when he let up on the accelerator to slow for downhill, the car reacted like he had slammed on the brakes. Good traction in front and zero in the rear. If you are going to put chains (or snow tires) on a FWD, you must do all 4 wheels.
Steve
Thankfully with residents who don't handle ice and snow too well, most of the Texas Panhandle between the Canadian River and the Little Red River that includes "greater" Amarillo looks pretty much like this . . .



Whut's a hill?
Lil4X is offline  
Old 02-15-14, 09:41 AM
  #27  
mmarshall
Lexus Fanatic
Thread Starter
 
mmarshall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Virginia/D.C. suburbs
Posts: 91,336
Received 87 Likes on 86 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by oldcajun
Mike,
Back then FWD was rare and most guys working at gas stations don't have a PHD.
I was working a very busy gas station myself back then (just out of high school). I had only a high-school diploma, much less a PHD....but it was common knowledge even among most non-car-enthusiasts that the Eldorado and Olds Toronado were FWD. And, with the large size, heavy weight (5000 lb.) and extreme front-end-weight bias of these cars, together with the softer rubber compounds of the period, they went through front tires (even with tire rotation) almost as quick as they did a full tank of gas.


Surprisingly, this screw-up may have saved the little old lady a lot of pain. If you are only going to put chains on one axle, the rear is better. When I lived in Seattle, a neighbor had a front wheel drive Acura and put chains on the front only. He got up the hill fine, but the first downhill section he spun out and hit a pole. With traction on the front only, when he let up on the accelerator to slow for downhill, the car reacted like he had slammed on the brakes. Good traction in front and zero in the rear. If you are going to put chains (or snow tires) on a FWD, you must do all 4 wheels.
Steve
For areas that regularly have hard-packed snow or ice on the roads, studded tires probably are best, but many localities have banned them. They are excellent on hard slipery surfaces, but tend to punch small holes in dry pavement. And, of course, it is impractical to put studded tires on and off the car every time it snows to keep them off the dry pavement.

You mention the problem of brake-activated rear spin-outs without chains on the rear. Back then (early 1970s), several large American luxury cars (even before Mercedes-Benz in the 1980s) offered anti-lock brakes as a factory option, but there were few takers.
mmarshall is offline  
Old 02-15-14, 01:17 PM
  #28  
VtotheJ
Lexus Champion
iTrader: (2)
 
VtotheJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: NY
Posts: 2,546
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

I beg to differ......LOL

VtotheJ is offline  
Old 02-15-14, 01:33 PM
  #29  
mikersoft
Lexus Test Driver
iTrader: (1)
 
mikersoft's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: VA
Posts: 1,135
Received 80 Likes on 58 Posts
Default

Then there's the exact opposite of the AWD/4WD "Invincibles", the people in those same vehicles that are way too cautious.

What's the point of an AWD vehicle with AT tires if you're still afraid to take a mildly snowy turn at more than .001 mph? I'm following in my RWD sedan (w/winter tires) trying to maintain my sanity. Grrrr! Just stay home till the snow melts

I should also mention that I grew up in Michigan & my first car was a huge RWD '73 Pontiac with a 455 CID V8, so I learned early on how cars handle in the snow

-Mike
mikersoft is offline  
Old 02-15-14, 05:55 PM
  #30  
LexFather
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Originally Posted by Och
And those of you with taller vehicles, please clear snow off the roof of your vehicle. So many times I see people in minivans/SUVs driving on the highway with a layer of ice on their roof, that flies off and can potentially hit other cars.
While I am nowhere near the snow I did have this happen before and it pissed me off. A huge chunk of ice/snow flew off the top of a truck and I had to swerve to avoid it. I've even heard of hit hitting windows and hurting people.
 


Quick Reply: Slow Down....Your AWD/4WD is NOT Invincible in Snow



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:46 AM.