Car Chat General discussion about Lexus, other auto manufacturers and automotive news.

Dodge Caravan gets the axe

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-07-14 | 01:17 PM
  #1  
FrankReynoldsCPA's Avatar
FrankReynoldsCPA
Thread Starter
Lexus Test Driver
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 7,184
Likes: 109
From: Las Vegas
Default Dodge Caravan gets the axe

I didn't see another thread on this yet, but if there is, feel free to delete/merge mine.

We've known for a while now that one of the twins was not going to survive, but it hadn't been settled which one. Looks like Fiat/Chrysler/Dodge has made up their mind.

The article mentions that they are taking Chrysler mainstream to replace Dodge, while Dodge is rotating into a sportier marque. It only makes sense that they then ditch the minivan and the mid-size transportation machine.

I hope they bring out some really exciting stuff.

Chrysler Group wants to expand its sales with new vehicles — including a plug-in hybrid minivan and a new small Jeep SUV — and a more aggressive effort to differentiate its brands.

Chrysler is dropping the Dodge Grand Caravan minivan and Dodge Avenger sedan, which it says compete too closely with the Chrysler Town and Country minivan and Chrysler 200 sedan.

From now on, the company said, Chrysler will be the mainstream brand that competes with Toyota, Chevrolet and Ford, while Dodge will be a sporty, performance-oriented brand designed to appeal to younger buyers. Chrysler's SRT performance brand — which includes the Viper sports car — will be consolidated with Dodge and considered the "halo" of the Dodge brand.

"Dodge is the American performance brand," Dodge chief Tim Kuniskis said. "This is not a new strategy. This is a purification of the brand."

The company revealed its future product plans Tuesday at an all-day event at Chrysler's Auburn Hills, Michigan, headquarters. Chrysler is in the process of combining with Italian automaker Fiat SpA. Outside, a new sign was unveiled, reading "Fiat Chrysler Automobiles."

Fiat completed its purchase of Chrysler in January. Shares of the combined company are expected to begin trading jointly on the New York Stock Exchange and in Milan, Italy, by Oct. 1.

Chrysler brand chief Al Gardner said Chrysler and Dodge had long suffered from an internal rivalry, with their minivans and sedans competing for the same customers. The company hopes to change that.

Chrysler will keep the Town and Country minivan, and will update it and add a plug-in hybrid version in 2016. Chrysler will also get a new compact car, the 100, which will compete with the Toyota Corolla, in 2016, and a full-size crossover to take on the Ford Edge and Nissan Murano in 2017. The crossover will also come in a plug-in hybrid version.

Dodge, which is releasing the sporty new Charger and Challenger sedans this year, will revamp the Dart small car and Journey crossover in 2016 to make them sportier. It's also planning a subcompact hatchback.

Dodge's U.S. sales will drop without the minivan. The company sold more than 124,000 Dodge Caravans last year. But it expects to make that up with its new vehicles. Chrysler's global sales are projected to more than double to 800,000 by 2018. That would bring the brand back to sales levels it enjoyed a decade ago, before the recession hit and it suffered from a dearth of new vehicles.

Chrysler Group says Jeep sales, which are expected to top 1 million this year, can grow to 1.9 million by 2018 with aggressive global expansion, particularly in Latin America and Asia. Jeep will also introduce new vehicles, including a compact SUV in 2016 — which will replace the Compass and Patriot — and the seven-passenger Grand Wagoneer in 2017.

Jeep currently makes vehicles at three plants in the U.S. By 2018, it expects nearly half of its total Jeep production will come from plants in Latin America, Europe and China.
http://www.foxnews.com/leisure/2014/...ntcmp=features
Old 05-07-14 | 02:16 PM
  #2  
Hoovey689's Avatar
Hoovey689
Moderator
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 42,327
Likes: 129
From: California
Default

Eh won't be missed IMO. More interested in this upcoming Chyrsler CUV. It's got to be better than the Pacifica
Old 05-07-14 | 06:49 PM
  #3  
mmarshall's Avatar
mmarshall
Lexus Fanatic
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 91,715
Likes: 89
From: Virginia/D.C. suburbs
Default

Originally Posted by BrettJacks

We've known for a while now that one of the twins was not going to survive, but it hadn't been settled which one. Looks like Fiat/Chrysler/Dodge has made up their mind.

The article mentions that they are taking Chrysler mainstream to replace Dodge, while Dodge is rotating into a sportier marque. It only makes sense that they then ditch the minivan and the mid-size transportation machine.
I think they would have been better off axing the Chrysler Town and Country instead of the Caravan, for several reasons. First, the Caravan's sales, for years, exceeded those of the more expensive Town and Country. Second, when Kia introduces the new Sedona (we just had a thread on the new upcoming Sedona recently), the Caravan would be its most obvious competition in both size and price....the Sienna and Odyssey are both more expensive. Third, the Caravan nameplate was one of the original minivans when first introduced in 1984.....and bears one of the most successful nameplates in modern automotive history. When the original Voyager and caravan were introduced in 1984, the rest of the automotive industry was caught off guard, and everyone rushed to introduce competition.
Old 05-07-14 | 06:53 PM
  #4  
mmarshall's Avatar
mmarshall
Lexus Fanatic
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 91,715
Likes: 89
From: Virginia/D.C. suburbs
Default

Originally Posted by Hoovey2411
Eh won't be missed IMO. More interested in this upcoming Chyrsler CUV. It's got to be better than the Pacifica
IMO, it WILL be missed.....see my reply to Brettjacks, above. We'll have to wait and see for sure, but my preliminary view is that, after a string the last few years of VERY good marketing and product decisions at Chrysler, Fiat management may have blown it this time....along with the new Cherokee's front end.
Old 05-07-14 | 07:03 PM
  #5  
Hoovey689's Avatar
Hoovey689
Moderator
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 42,327
Likes: 129
From: California
Default

Originally Posted by mmarshall
IMO, it WILL be missed.....see my reply to Brettjacks, above. We'll have to wait and see for sure, but my preliminary view is that, after a string the last few years of VERY good marketing and product decisions at Chrysler, Fiat management may have blown it this time....along with the new Cherokee's front end.
I understand your point. The other side of this is, if Fiat really does want to change Dodge's image to a more sporting nature well then this is a good move. Would have worked well for Pontiac if GM had trimmed the fat so to speak before they let Pontiac go belly up and focused the brand on actual sport/sporty cars and not bagde engineered Torrents, SV Montana's ect.. Of course a lot can and will change in 5 years (Fiat just layed out a 5-year plan) and if they did mess up well they could always bring the Caravan back if they wanted.

Disagree on the Kia Sedona. This isn't like the first cheap Kia Sedona, this latest iteration competes with the Odyssey and Sienna on every front including price. I'm actually excited to see a comparison test

PS I don't mind the Cherokee front end
Old 05-07-14 | 07:12 PM
  #6  
corradoMR2's Avatar
corradoMR2
The pursuit of F
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 8,296
Likes: 297
From: Toronto, Canada
Default

Originally Posted by mmarshall
I think they would have been better off axing the Chrysler Town and Country instead of the Caravan, for several reasons. First, the Caravan's sales, for years, exceeded those of the more expensive Town and Country. Second, when Kia introduces the new Sedona (we just had a thread on the new upcoming Sedona recently), the Caravan would be its most obvious competition in both size and price....the Sienna and Odyssey are both more expensive. Third, the Caravan nameplate was one of the original minivans when first introduced in 1984.....and bears one of the most successful nameplates in modern automotive history. When the original Voyager and caravan were introduced in 1984, the rest of the automotive industry was caught off guard, and everyone rushed to introduce competition.
I agree on all points. This is shocking news and probably a huge mistake, yes regarding a minivan, even for us enthusiasts! It's a best selling minivan in Canada at 5-10K cheaper than the competition and I believe it's similarly at the top in the US.
Old 05-07-14 | 07:16 PM
  #7  
hypervish's Avatar
hypervish
Lexus Test Driver
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 5,700
Likes: 92
From: NJ
Default

The Dodge Caravan can be had for as little as $17k out the door. I highly doubt they are going to meet that price point on the next T&C minivan. They are throwing away so many sales by axing the caravan.
Old 05-07-14 | 07:25 PM
  #8  
mmarshall's Avatar
mmarshall
Lexus Fanatic
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 91,715
Likes: 89
From: Virginia/D.C. suburbs
Default

Originally Posted by Hoovey2411
I understand your point. The other side of this is, if Fiat really does want to change Dodge's image to a more sporting nature well then this is a good move.
Dodge already has one of the sportiest images of any American-badged nameplate. Any more, and they'll be trying to compete with Porsche.

(Just being facetious, but you get the idea)


Would have worked well for Pontiac if GM had trimmed the fat so to speak before they let Pontiac go belly up and focused the brand on actual sport/sporty cars and not bagde engineered Torrents, SV Montana's ect..
Pontiac had already lost a substantial number of its customers to Chevy, precisely because of what you just mentioned.....not only classic badge-engineering, but also terrible marking ads on vehicles like the Montana and Torrent. The folding-hardtop convertible G6, granted, was an interesting design, and offered good security/weather-protection in a convertable at a reasonable cost. But it had a lousy interior, was poorly-built, and just never caught on like the competitor Chrysler LeBaron/Sebring convertibles did.....which, ironically, were not terribly well-built either.

Of course a lot can and will change in 5 years (Fiat just layed out a 5-year plan) and if they did mess up well they could always bring the Caravan back if they wanted.
Agreed....and that's a good point. As long as they keep the tooling and assembly-plant for the Town and Country, it wouldn't take much, if necessary, to de-content the vehicle and turn it back into a Caravan.

Disagree on the Kia Sedona. This isn't like the first cheap Kia Sedona, this latest iteration competes with the Odyssey and Sienna on every front including price. I'm actually excited to see a comparison test
Depends on what you mean by cheap. The first Sedona was, yes, inexpensive, but, IMO, not cheaply built.....and definitely more solid than the build-quality of the average Caravan/Voyager of that period.

PS I don't mind the Cherokee front end
I'll respect your opinion The rest of it is a pretty nice vehicle (I reviewed one)...but I'm not alone in thinking that the headlights are a little weird and alien-like. Most reviews have also zeroed in on that.
Old 05-07-14 | 08:18 PM
  #9  
Sulu's Avatar
Sulu
Lexus Champion
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 3,309
Likes: 31
From: Canada
Default

Originally Posted by mmarshall
I think they would have been better off axing the Chrysler Town and Country instead of the Caravan, for several reasons. First, the Caravan's sales, for years, exceeded those of the more expensive Town and Country. Second, when Kia introduces the new Sedona (we just had a thread on the new upcoming Sedona recently), the Caravan would be its most obvious competition in both size and price....the Sienna and Odyssey are both more expensive. Third, the Caravan nameplate was one of the original minivans when first introduced in 1984.....and bears one of the most successful nameplates in modern automotive history. When the original Voyager and caravan were introduced in 1984, the rest of the automotive industry was caught off guard, and everyone rushed to introduce competition.

I agree but the Town & Country makes Chrysler more money than the Grand Caravan. All those "luxury" touches cost next to nothing but Chrysler can price them high to rake in the profits.
Old 05-07-14 | 08:27 PM
  #10  
S2000toIS350's Avatar
S2000toIS350
Pole Position
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,400
Likes: 123
From: IL
Default

Great news

That means fewer rusted minivans with broken tail lights going 50 in the left lane holding up traffic
Old 05-08-14 | 01:36 AM
  #11  
Fizzboy7's Avatar
Fizzboy7
Lexus Test Driver
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 9,765
Likes: 178
From: California
Default

Huge mistake. The GC is a bread and butter mainstay, that sells well and people rely on across mid-America. It is good, and could easily be better with more refining. Trying to re-invent an American brand is risky business that rarely works. They should focus on what already works, and perfect that while sprouting similar products that mesh with what people expect from the brand. Re-inventing the brand is a waste of time and not necessary. Dodge doesn't need to be something else it hasn't been... it just needs refining. That would be the cheapest way to higher sales and profits. No need to re-invent the company or wheel, but someone with a flamboyant European vision has to go and ruin it. First the weak Dart, now this.
Old 05-08-14 | 05:24 AM
  #12  
Ando's Avatar
Ando
Driver School Candidate
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
From: Jakarta
Default

I wish they axe Town n country instead of Dodge Caravan. To Dodge Caravan's credit, in the early 90s (I think) when they introduced the new stylish red Dodge Caravan, it was a huge hit and became THE benchmark of what a minivan design should be. It did have quality issues like all Dodge/Plymoth/Chrysler products. However, the design popularity led to the birth of Toyota Sienna and the 2nd gen Honda Odyssey.

When my family went to LA for vacation in the late 80s or early 90s, we rented a Dodge Caravan (the boxy one). Thank you for the experience, Dodge Caravan.
Old 05-08-14 | 06:29 AM
  #13  
tex2670's Avatar
tex2670
Lexus Champion
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 10,166
Likes: 11
From: Southeastern PA
Default

I have to trust that they know what they are doing, but focusing on "sportiness" didn't end well for Pontiac. At the end of the day, I just don't think there is a large enough customer base that cares about sportiness, as opposed to value. This means that the Chrysler brand is going to have to be all things to all people; starting with value at the economy car level with the new 100, to a family hauler Grand Caravan, to the near luxo with a tricked out 300.

And, are they telling me that Chrysler will not longer make "sporty" version of their models (top of the line 200 looks pretty sporty to me).

Good luck, Fiat.
Old 05-08-14 | 08:34 AM
  #14  
MPLexus301's Avatar
MPLexus301
Lexus Fanatic
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 9,044
Likes: 1
From: Friend Zone
Default

Originally Posted by tex2670
I have to trust that they know what they are doing, but focusing on "sportiness" didn't end well for Pontiac. At the end of the day, I just don't think there is a large enough customer base that cares about sportiness, as opposed to value. This means that the Chrysler brand is going to have to be all things to all people; starting with value at the economy car level with the new 100, to a family hauler Grand Caravan, to the near luxo with a tricked out 300.
This is my thought as well - it reeks of Pontiac. Make sports packages available on your mainstream cars and be done with it. "Sporty" doesn't justify the existence of an entire brand - history has proven that. The creation of the RAM brand was another blunder, IMO. Dodge should have stayed focused on trucks, SUVs and special projects like the Viper and Challenger. Scratch the crappy rebadged sedans, aside from maybe the Charger. This gives Chrysler breathing room and each brand a unique value proposition.

If Chrysler gets a CUV, I assume it's going to be based on the Grand Cherokee platform in some capacity. So we'll have Jeep, Chrysler and Dodge versions of the same vehicle, and who knows if it will be used by another brand for something different.

If you consider cars, trucks, SUVs and CUVs, I still think there's going to be too much overlap between Chrysler, Dodge and Jeep based on what we just heard about 5 year plans.
Old 05-08-14 | 09:10 AM
  #15  
FrankReynoldsCPA's Avatar
FrankReynoldsCPA
Thread Starter
Lexus Test Driver
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 7,184
Likes: 109
From: Las Vegas
Default

I assume they may offer a more de-contented trim on the T&C to fill the Caravan void.

I did drive an 08 Grand Caravan for work a couple years ago. It was a marked improvement over prior generations.



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:36 PM.