Car Chat General discussion about Lexus, other auto manufacturers and automotive news.

environmentalists/politicians have ruined cars and aren't finished yet...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-11-14, 10:20 PM
  #31  
GSthe4th
Pole Position
iTrader: (1)
 
GSthe4th's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Ca
Posts: 391
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by LexFather
.

Companies have answered the challenge with the best cars we have ever seen from entry level cars to a Rolls Royce.
.
All of the other issues presented here aside, THIS is most impressive to me. Great point.
GSthe4th is offline  
Old 05-11-14, 11:21 PM
  #32  
bitkahuna
Lexus Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (20)
 
bitkahuna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Present
Posts: 74,848
Received 2,429 Likes on 1,592 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by GSthe4th
All of the other issues presented here aside, THIS is most impressive to me. Great point.
how so? we almost ALWAYS have 'the best cars we've ever had'. sure in hindsight we'll see that a period was bad in one way or another, but competition spurs new heights continually. we can look at the u.s. 'big 3' in the 70s as having gone through a really rough patch with the 'oil crisis' then, but what happened? the japanese came forth with civics, corollas, etc. to show the way. 'detroit' then responded, haphazardly, and in some cases terribly, but progress marches ever forward. if there are new govt regulations, companies can go away or choose to comply, and make the best of it. that's what companies do. that doesn't mean those govt policies are good.

companies come and go of course, but only govt wields monopoly power, often recklessly, and always with no idea of the unintended consequences.

coming soon, greater govt surveillance, tracking, and taxation of all automotive activity. think traffic cameras are bad? wait until you get a fine in the middle of nowhere.

but i look forward to a day soon though where cars drive themselves, and most of us are just passengers and there's no need to own one at all. the bureaucrats will have their controlled world, and people who still need to ride in cars won't care. some will still 'drive', if they can afford to or care to.

Last edited by bitkahuna; 05-11-14 at 11:24 PM.
bitkahuna is offline  
Old 05-11-14, 11:44 PM
  #33  
yowps3
Lexus Test Driver
 
yowps3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: NSW
Posts: 1,019
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Infra
This is such a short-sighted and narrowly-focused rant. Americans have been caught with their pants down several times now over the past 30 years when gas prices sharply spiked, and finally something has been down to curb the extreme disregard for fuel consumption. We have had a gas guzzler tax since 1978, and yet I hear absolutely no one complain about it... why? Because V8s have always been an upgrade from base engine, which means the tax was really a luxury tax, not a tax on fuel consumption, and therefore was wholly ineffective.

Does the federal government not exist to set fiscal policy, and secure liberty for its citizens? If so, then setting an energy policy to reduce the nations dependence on oil is well within scope. If affects not just the decisions consumers make in buying cars, but also the decisions cities make when building infrastructure. The repercussions of bad policy last for decades.

All you need to know about V8s you can learn from the GS430 vs GS350. Roughly same power, roughly same torque and nearly identical "pickup" or 0-60 or however you want to measure it. Here's the official side-by-side of their dynos



Who in there right mind thinks the V8 is better here? Now, of course it's older technology, and the 1UR is much improved, but let's not pretend that what is being mourned in this thread is newer V8s, but V8s like the 3UZ. We could talk about BMW's 4.0L V8, or the Mustangs 4.6L V8, or any number that are simply at par with modern V6s. This simple fact means that the death of the V8 being agonized over here is simply irrelevant! We have a replacement that performs better in every way.

What we really have here is an emotional argument about the nostalgia of feeling and hearing the V8 rumble wrapped up in a red herring of a post supported by zero facts about environmentalists ruining our fun because... I don't know, environmentalists are dumb.
Uhmm your comparing a motor from the 90s to a relatively newer one.
Compare the 1UR-FSE to the 2GR-FSE

And yes I have the IS350 and while it is fast and silky smooth, it doesn't have that "push into seat" feeling that you get with V8 that have less power than my IS350 V6
yowps3 is offline  
Old 05-12-14, 12:05 AM
  #34  
yowps3
Lexus Test Driver
 
yowps3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: NSW
Posts: 1,019
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by LexFather
I just did a quick search on Flagship V-8s..the numbers are quite astounding...

The lowest power is the LS

LS-4.6 V-8-386hp-19 MPG Overall
750-4.4 TT V-8-440hp-20 MPG Overall
S500-4.7 V-8-449hp-20 MPG Overall
S8-4.0 T V-8, 520hp, 19 MPG Overall (this is just insane)

You want perspective? When I joined here I had a GS 400 over a decade ago...

GS-4.0 V-8-300hp-18 MPG Overall

So today an Audi S8 makes 220 more hp in a larger vehicle and gets 1 MPG more.

To me that is progress, not a reason to complain.

A 2000 C5 Corvettes gets 18 MPG, a 2014 gets 20 MPG.
A 2000 C5 Corvette made 345hp, a 2014 makes 445hp.

Not sure what the issue is?
Check out this video. The BMW has twin Turbo with more power and way more torque. Yet it had a hard time pulling the LS, and this was from a roll start where the turbo BMW had the advantage. If it was from dig than the LS460 would have dominated.

yowps3 is offline  
Old 05-12-14, 12:25 AM
  #35  
GSthe4th
Pole Position
iTrader: (1)
 
GSthe4th's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Ca
Posts: 391
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by bitkahuna
how so? we almost ALWAYS have 'the best cars we've ever had'. sure in hindsight we'll see that a period was bad in one way or another, but competition spurs new heights continually. we can look at the u.s. 'big 3' in the 70s as having gone through a really rough patch with the 'oil crisis' then, but what happened? the japanese came forth with civics, corollas, etc. to show the way. 'detroit' then responded, haphazardly, and in some cases terribly, but progress marches ever forward. if there are new govt regulations, companies can go away or choose to comply, and make the best of it. that's what companies do. that doesn't mean those govt policies are good.

companies come and go of course, but only govt wields monopoly power, often recklessly, and always with no idea of the unintended consequences.

coming soon, greater govt surveillance, tracking, and taxation of all automotive activity. think traffic cameras are bad? wait until you get a fine in the middle of nowhere.

but i look forward to a day soon though where cars drive themselves, and most of us are just passengers and there's no need to own one at all. the bureaucrats will have their controlled world, and people who still need to ride in cars won't care. some will still 'drive', if they can afford to or care to.
If the goal in life is not to "improve" constantly, then why live? Why expect to survive in such an industry? As you point out, to survive, you must push the limits, adapt, innovate, regardless of the situation handed to you. Many policy changes/mandates/laws/rules are not logical to the ones affected, trust me I am in healthcare at a large community hospital that serves mostly indigent patients. Who do you think dictates those changes? In the medical field, the strength is in the numbers, the empirical data that gives us evidence based medicine. Too often, government changes are experimental, forced through with no actual numbers to back it up.

The way I interpreted the line I quoted from lexfather relates to overall improvements from the "bottom" up. For example Kia and Hyundai, I can still remember laughing at the Rio and Sephia (I was just out of high school). Now look at their products. Sure I would not buy one, but improved they have. I have read arguments on here about the Hyundai Equus and what it represents. Look on their website and it advertises "429 HP V8 engine-more than Lexus LS 460." Does that mean LS owners will consider it? Most definitely not, but they are pushng the envelope. I was agreeing with that fact that the whole industry has been elevated, particularly from the bottom up, and leaving the political implications at the door. Hell, GM and Ford can be lumped into it as well. I never would have considered a Ford product 5-10 years ago. Now we are on our second vehicle, loving it. Regarding Lexus, look at the future of the "F," speculation on this forum projects greatness. It's new territory for them. Many other "luxury" brands are adapting and putting out vehicles for the "masses" as well as their original clientele. I look at the Audi RS7, and I am stunned by the numbers (MPG in light of the performance).

I danced briefly in the debate forum on here. If you remember, I lean right and generally agree with conservative principles, but I love conversations with people that don't have the same views as me. I try to avoid politics on social media, it is more of face to face thing with me. It is near impossible to have a constructive debate with most people via the internet, in my opinion. PLus, it just takes too damn long. As far as what I bolded above, that is hardly supportable as it leads to abuses of power, etc. We have already seen this. Although I am from California, please don't get me twisted. Nothing is far fetched anymore in the apathetic times we live in. Along the lines of taxation, let's remove the property tax deduction, amend prop 13 (Ca specific), take away mortgage interest deductions...things that hit the pocket books hard....affecting car buying decisions. I almost forgot, no more deducting car tags either! Anyways, government intervention often fails when done on a larger scale. Just read the empirically inclined Thomas Sowell. Actually, youtube him.

The last bolded point is scary, because control is the goal. And I sense your sarcasm!

Last edited by GSthe4th; 05-12-14 at 02:30 AM.
GSthe4th is offline  
Old 05-12-14, 05:36 AM
  #36  
4TehNguyen
Lexus Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
4TehNguyen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 26,057
Received 51 Likes on 46 Posts
Default

once CAFE really starts kicking in, it will put the screws on sportscars. That wheelbase mpg formula they have is really biased against sportscars. Remember the last time in the 70s when strict requirements were put on cars, two decades of lackluster cars. Get the sportscar you want soon, the older cars will be more desireable just like before.
4TehNguyen is offline  
Old 05-12-14, 05:44 AM
  #37  
bagwell
Lexus Champion
 
bagwell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: The Woodlands, TX
Posts: 11,205
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by LexFather
You and others can hate the government and whatever is in fashion currently all you want but the facts are;

1.Car Sales are up
2. MPG is up
3. Power is up
4. Emissions are down
5. Car Company Profits are up
6. Consumer happiness is up
7. Quality is up
8. We have more high horsepower cars than ever before
9. We have more exotics than ever before
10. THE CAR WORLD IS NOT ENDING

The government challenged the car industry and they have come ROARING back answering confidently. We now have EVs, hybrids, plug in hybrids along with V-8s, V-10s, V-12s many that also include forced induction.
great post right there
bagwell is offline  
Old 05-12-14, 06:06 AM
  #38  
Och
Lexus Champion
iTrader: (3)
 
Och's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: NY
Posts: 16,436
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by bitkahuna
must be why the fact is that we're driving LESS and LESS.

http://usa.streetsblog.org/2014/02/2...riving-in-u-s/

must be why the fact is more and more millennials have decided they don't want a car at all, principally because they can't afford one or don't want to spend the exorbitant amount they cost.
They don't want a car, really? Seriously, used car prices are not much different than they were two decades ago, and lease rates are better than ever. It has nothing to do with cost of cars themselves, but rather that everything else is up - housing, fuel, parking, fines, etc. Baby boomers are ripping millennials off, and they simply can't afford cars on top of the rest of their expenses. But yeah, blame it on the environmentalists.
Och is offline  
Old 05-12-14, 06:44 AM
  #39  
bitkahuna
Lexus Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (20)
 
bitkahuna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Present
Posts: 74,848
Received 2,429 Likes on 1,592 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by GSthe4th
If the goal in life is not to improve constantly, then why live?
of course.

The way I interpreted the line I quoted from lexfather relates to overall improvements from the "bottom" up. ... I was agreeing with that fact that the whole industry has been elevated, particularly from the bottom up...
understood, but my point of this thread was not to say there is no innovation in the auto industry. there is tons. a LOT of it now though is just to comply with very heavy handed regulations. the european stupid pedestrian bumper height has changed the look of all vehicles. in the u.s. we have an idiotic mish-mash of policies across states by do-gooders requiring refiners to create DOZENS of different formulations of gasoline, and it's getting worse now with e85 too. this is HUGELY inefficient and costly to everyone. it's just plain stupid.

As far as what I bolded above, that is hardly supportable as it leads to abuses of power, etc.
... Anyways, government intervention often fails when done on a larger scale.
agreed.
bitkahuna is offline  
Old 05-12-14, 06:59 AM
  #40  
GSthe4th
Pole Position
iTrader: (1)
 
GSthe4th's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Ca
Posts: 391
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by bitkahuna
understood, but my point of this thread was not to say there is no innovation in the auto industry. there is tons. a LOT of it now though is just to comply with very heavy handed regulations. the european stupid pedestrian bumper height has changed the look of all vehicles. in the u.s. we have an idiotic mish-mash of policies across states by do-gooders requiring refiners to create DOZENS of different formulations of gasoline, and it's getting worse now with e85 too. this is HUGELY inefficient and costly to everyone. it's just plain stupid.
I understand! But the reason I picked that specific line out of his post was because regardless of all the obstacles thrown at them, they are answering the call, currently. He provided plenty of data. And I often agree with your posts as well.
GSthe4th is offline  
Old 05-12-14, 07:01 AM
  #41  
LexBob2
Lexus Champion
 
LexBob2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Illinois
Posts: 11,165
Received 139 Likes on 113 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by bitkahuna
of course.



understood, but my point of this thread was not to say there is no innovation in the auto industry. there is tons. a LOT of it now though is just to comply with very heavy handed regulations. the european stupid pedestrian bumper height has changed the look of all vehicles. in the u.s. we have an idiotic mish-mash of policies across states by do-gooders requiring refiners to create DOZENS of different formulations of gasoline, and it's getting worse now with e85 too. this is HUGELY inefficient and costly to everyone. it's just plain stupid.



agreed.
Heavy handed regs, stupid bumper regs, idiotic mish mash, do-gooders, just plain stupid. I'm sensing you don't like what's going on.
LexBob2 is offline  
Old 05-12-14, 07:38 AM
  #42  
Mr Bond
Pole Position
 
Mr Bond's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: europe
Posts: 366
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Since the day I took a short testdrive ( that was enough ) with a Tesla S P85+ , I realized that there is no need for a regular petrol/diesel engine anymore in terms of having fun or outstanding performance . I drive the IS 300h today and I will never go back to have a non-hybrid car, Im just waiting for Lexus/BMW/ Merc to make" their own Tesla S"
Mr Bond is offline  
Old 05-12-14, 08:18 AM
  #43  
Infra
Lexus Test Driver
iTrader: (1)
 
Infra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: TX
Posts: 1,091
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by yowps3
Uhmm your comparing a motor from the 90s to a relatively newer one.
Compare the 1UR-FSE to the 2GR-FSE

And yes I have the IS350 and while it is fast and silky smooth, it doesn't have that "push into seat" feeling that you get with V8 that have less power than my IS350 V6
I'm well aware of what I'm comparing, and if you actually read my post, you'll see that the mourning here is over engines like the 3UZ, not the 1UR. Engines like the 1UR were never cheap enough to be in a mainstream car. We're talking about the "base level" V8s that have been displaced by newer technology.

Secondly, that "push into seat" feeling you are missing is all in your head. It's from a torque curve that peaks out halfway up the engine band. It's been eliminated by variable intake timing & phasing, as well as direct injection. And just like I already said: your argument, and the argument you are supporting here, is all based in nostalgia and not the real world.
Infra is offline  
Old 05-12-14, 08:50 AM
  #44  
bitkahuna
Lexus Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (20)
 
bitkahuna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Present
Posts: 74,848
Received 2,429 Likes on 1,592 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by LexBob2
I'm sensing you don't like what's going on.
very perceptive.

Originally Posted by Mr Bond
Since the day I took a short testdrive ( that was enough ) with a Tesla S P85+ , I realized that there is no need for a regular petrol/diesel engine anymore in terms of having fun or outstanding performance.
are you going to buy one? of course the tesla is likely twice (or more) as expensive as your is300h so it should be good/better.
bitkahuna is offline  
Old 05-12-14, 11:04 AM
  #45  
Blackraven
Lexus Champion
 
Blackraven's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Makati, Philippines
Posts: 3,459
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

These eco-terrorists have also ruined F1.

From V12 to V10 to V8..........and now these lawnmower-sounding V6 turbo engine.

Seriously, these Greenpeace **************s deserve to be run over.............by a Range Rover Sport

Blackraven is offline  


Quick Reply: environmentalists/politicians have ruined cars and aren't finished yet...



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:00 PM.