Scion could be repositioned below Lexus as a Premium brand
#1
Scion could be repositioned below Lexus as a Premium brand
Lentz Still Wants Scion to Become Small-Premium Brand
NEWPORT BEACH, CA – Toyota North America CEO Jim Lentz continues to advocate for Scion becoming a brand of small-premium cars.
“I still personally believe small-premium is the direction we should be going,” he tells WardsAuto in a recent interview here during a Toyota press event. “I think that (the) Toyota channel, itself, with vehicles like Yaris and other small, B-platform cars, can handle the lower end of the market. I think that C-platform premium small cars are probably the best place for Scion to be.”
The positioning also makes sense as Toyota’s Lexus luxury brand has said it won’t sell a model below $30,000, bucking the trend of other premium automakers offering models below that price point (Mercedes-Benz CLA, Audi A3).
However, Scion has said the upcoming production version of the iM concept displayed at the recent 2014 Los Angeles auto show will begin under $20,000.
“We’re still going after a younger audience. We still need that attainability factor,” Scion Vice President Doug Murtha tells WardsAuto in a separate interview in Los Angeles.
Murtha doesn’t disagree with Lentz’s desire for a small-premium model lineup, but says, “He may be having discussions at levels I’m not.” Also, Scion currently is planning for the ’17-’25 model years.
“If he’s able to somehow lobby to take the brand in a new direction, that’s probably a longer-term proposition than we’re looking at right now,” Murtha says.
The production version of the iM, a compact hatchback based on Toyota’s European Auris model, will be unveiled at the 2015 New York auto show in April and is one of three new models Scion is planning to launch in three years.
Murtha is mum on what the others may be but acknowledges the size of the brand’s lineup will be fluid, ranging from four to possibly seven nameplates.
Today, Scion offers five models: the iQ minicar, xD subcompact, xB box, tC coupe and the rear-wheel-drive FR-S sports car. Some of those models will depart, but Murtha won’t say which ones are on the chopping block.
His predecessor, Jack Hollis, told WardsAuto in 2012 the xB and xD would be discontinued.
When asked if he’s surprised by how successful Kia has been with the xB competitor Soul, Murtha says the Korean brand is targeting a different buyer than Scion’s xB, and applying a lot more marketing muscle, too. “They’re clearly investing in it in a big way,” he says. “They’ve positioned it competitively, to their credit. It’s a pretty good value in the market.”
Murtha is hopeful Scion will receive the necessary marketing dollars to launch the production iM and other future new models, although he’s not counting on a Kia-like budget.
“We’re going to expect we get the bump in our marketing budget, beyond just the sustainment level,” he says. “In a way, I’m not sure the Kia comparison is really fair because they are something closer to a full-line manufacturer.”
As for possible future segments, Murtha says green cars and a small pickup remain off the must-do list, either due to lack of desire among young car buyers or weak profitability.
Scion’s research continues to show that while young buyers have a strong interest in all things environmental, “as soon as you attach a price tag to it, they’re out.”
Sales of the relatively affordable Toyota Prius C subcompact to an older-than-expected buyer “just reinforces that end of the market isn’t demanding anything that’s not already available to them,” Murtha says.
The realities of the U.S. “chicken tax,” a stiff tariff slapped on imported light trucks, make a small pickup a no-go. All Scions currently sold in the U.S. are built in Japan.
“Unless we can create enough volume within North America to justify bringing production here, you’re going to face a 25% tariff bringing that in from anywhere overseas, and it’s impossible to make a business case for that.”
However, a light truck in the form of an SUV or a CUV is being considered.
“I wouldn’t rule out a utility vehicle, if I think there’s something appropriately Scion-esque,” Murtha says.
Scion still is aiming for 100,000 annual sales in the U.S., a volume necessary for the brand’s U.S. dealers to be profitable.
But sales this year have gone, disappointingly, in the opposite direction, Murtha says.
The 50,285 units sold through October are 14.8% below year-ago’s 59,030.
“I think we had hoped to begin re-engaging dealers before the new product arrived and hoped through some additional focus on their part, we’d be able to get some more out of what otherwise was an aging lineup, and I think some of those efforts didn’t necessarily pan out,” he says.
However, Murtha is confident Scion does have its dealer body’s “attention,” as they’ve seen coming new product and “realize if we don’t hit the ground from a standing start when those new products arrive, we’re not going to make the most out of them.”
“I still personally believe small-premium is the direction we should be going,” he tells WardsAuto in a recent interview here during a Toyota press event. “I think that (the) Toyota channel, itself, with vehicles like Yaris and other small, B-platform cars, can handle the lower end of the market. I think that C-platform premium small cars are probably the best place for Scion to be.”
The positioning also makes sense as Toyota’s Lexus luxury brand has said it won’t sell a model below $30,000, bucking the trend of other premium automakers offering models below that price point (Mercedes-Benz CLA, Audi A3).
However, Scion has said the upcoming production version of the iM concept displayed at the recent 2014 Los Angeles auto show will begin under $20,000.
“We’re still going after a younger audience. We still need that attainability factor,” Scion Vice President Doug Murtha tells WardsAuto in a separate interview in Los Angeles.
Murtha doesn’t disagree with Lentz’s desire for a small-premium model lineup, but says, “He may be having discussions at levels I’m not.” Also, Scion currently is planning for the ’17-’25 model years.
“If he’s able to somehow lobby to take the brand in a new direction, that’s probably a longer-term proposition than we’re looking at right now,” Murtha says.
The production version of the iM, a compact hatchback based on Toyota’s European Auris model, will be unveiled at the 2015 New York auto show in April and is one of three new models Scion is planning to launch in three years.
Murtha is mum on what the others may be but acknowledges the size of the brand’s lineup will be fluid, ranging from four to possibly seven nameplates.
Today, Scion offers five models: the iQ minicar, xD subcompact, xB box, tC coupe and the rear-wheel-drive FR-S sports car. Some of those models will depart, but Murtha won’t say which ones are on the chopping block.
His predecessor, Jack Hollis, told WardsAuto in 2012 the xB and xD would be discontinued.
When asked if he’s surprised by how successful Kia has been with the xB competitor Soul, Murtha says the Korean brand is targeting a different buyer than Scion’s xB, and applying a lot more marketing muscle, too. “They’re clearly investing in it in a big way,” he says. “They’ve positioned it competitively, to their credit. It’s a pretty good value in the market.”
Murtha is hopeful Scion will receive the necessary marketing dollars to launch the production iM and other future new models, although he’s not counting on a Kia-like budget.
“We’re going to expect we get the bump in our marketing budget, beyond just the sustainment level,” he says. “In a way, I’m not sure the Kia comparison is really fair because they are something closer to a full-line manufacturer.”
As for possible future segments, Murtha says green cars and a small pickup remain off the must-do list, either due to lack of desire among young car buyers or weak profitability.
Scion’s research continues to show that while young buyers have a strong interest in all things environmental, “as soon as you attach a price tag to it, they’re out.”
Sales of the relatively affordable Toyota Prius C subcompact to an older-than-expected buyer “just reinforces that end of the market isn’t demanding anything that’s not already available to them,” Murtha says.
The realities of the U.S. “chicken tax,” a stiff tariff slapped on imported light trucks, make a small pickup a no-go. All Scions currently sold in the U.S. are built in Japan.
“Unless we can create enough volume within North America to justify bringing production here, you’re going to face a 25% tariff bringing that in from anywhere overseas, and it’s impossible to make a business case for that.”
However, a light truck in the form of an SUV or a CUV is being considered.
“I wouldn’t rule out a utility vehicle, if I think there’s something appropriately Scion-esque,” Murtha says.
Scion still is aiming for 100,000 annual sales in the U.S., a volume necessary for the brand’s U.S. dealers to be profitable.
But sales this year have gone, disappointingly, in the opposite direction, Murtha says.
The 50,285 units sold through October are 14.8% below year-ago’s 59,030.
“I think we had hoped to begin re-engaging dealers before the new product arrived and hoped through some additional focus on their part, we’d be able to get some more out of what otherwise was an aging lineup, and I think some of those efforts didn’t necessarily pan out,” he says.
However, Murtha is confident Scion does have its dealer body’s “attention,” as they’ve seen coming new product and “realize if we don’t hit the ground from a standing start when those new products arrive, we’re not going to make the most out of them.”
#3
#6
Some of those models will depart, but Murtha won’t say which ones are on the chopping block.
http://www.goodcarbadcar.net/2011/01...s-figures.html
The realities of the U.S. “chicken tax,” a stiff tariff slapped on imported light trucks, make a small pickup a no-go. All Scions currently sold in the U.S. are built in Japan.
Last edited by mmarshall; 12-06-14 at 12:32 PM.
Trending Topics
#8
So can it be done over time, or would Toyota be better offer introducing a new Premium brand? The way I see it, Current Scions should be Toyota badged anyway (they mostly are elsewhere in the world ). Toyota has an array of small efficient and relatively competitive models to fill in the lower ranks of the Toyota stable. A Premium entry would and as stated help Lexus maintain a more luxurious image. A Premium brand could bridge the gap between Toyota and Lexus thus allowing more exclusivity, better material grades.. FR-S/GT86 could be refocused to deliver a more refined experienced and cars to compete with the CLA, A3, 1-Series, ILX, Verano/Regal . Do I believe this will happen? Well right now it's kinda
#9
"Scion" doesn't sound expensive or sexy to me. They should just dump the brand, sell the models as toyotas and call it a day. And if they're wanting to make small premium vehicles, it doesn't help that Lexus just introduced the NX, that would have been better under the Scion brand for what they're wanting to do with Scion. Just makes no sense to me.
#10
Scion is a waste of Marketing $$$$.......its a brand available only in the US.
I think Toyota/Lexus can cover the market for all car segments between $10k to 150k.
Lexus CT is proof it can sell luxury small cars, imagine if they put the new 2.0Turbo in it with AWD = perfect as CT F.
I rather Toyota have a true luxury high-end brand like VW's Bentley/Porsche/Lambo, BMW's Rolls-Royce, Fiat's Maserrati/Ferrari.
I know MB is now partnering more with Aston Martin.
As the wealth gap increases, there is a rising demand for more expensive luxury cars and exotics.
Toyota should take over an established brand that already has a strong history/heritage.
Aston Martin would of been perfect, maybe Lotus?
I think Toyota/Lexus can cover the market for all car segments between $10k to 150k.
Lexus CT is proof it can sell luxury small cars, imagine if they put the new 2.0Turbo in it with AWD = perfect as CT F.
I rather Toyota have a true luxury high-end brand like VW's Bentley/Porsche/Lambo, BMW's Rolls-Royce, Fiat's Maserrati/Ferrari.
I know MB is now partnering more with Aston Martin.
As the wealth gap increases, there is a rising demand for more expensive luxury cars and exotics.
Toyota should take over an established brand that already has a strong history/heritage.
Aston Martin would of been perfect, maybe Lotus?
Last edited by RNM GS3; 12-06-14 at 02:47 PM.
#11
Scion is a waste of Marketing $$$$.......its a brand available only in the US.
I think Toyota/Lexus can cover the market for all car segments between $10k to 150k.
Lexus CT is proof it can sell luxury small cars, imagine if they put the new 2.0Turbo in it with AWD = perfect as CT F.
I rather Toyota have a true luxury high-end brand like VW's Bentley/Porsche/Lambo, BMW's Rolls-Royce, Fiat's Maserrati/Ferrari.
I know MB is now partnering more with Aston Martin.
As the wealth gap increases, there is a rising demand for more expensive luxury cars and exotics.
Toyota should take over an established brand that already has a strong history/heritage.
Aston Martin would of been perfect, maybe Lotus?
I think Toyota/Lexus can cover the market for all car segments between $10k to 150k.
Lexus CT is proof it can sell luxury small cars, imagine if they put the new 2.0Turbo in it with AWD = perfect as CT F.
I rather Toyota have a true luxury high-end brand like VW's Bentley/Porsche/Lambo, BMW's Rolls-Royce, Fiat's Maserrati/Ferrari.
I know MB is now partnering more with Aston Martin.
As the wealth gap increases, there is a rising demand for more expensive luxury cars and exotics.
Toyota should take over an established brand that already has a strong history/heritage.
Aston Martin would of been perfect, maybe Lotus?
#12
"Scion" doesn't sound expensive or sexy to me. They should just dump the brand, sell the models as toyotas and call it a day. And if they're wanting to make small premium vehicles, it doesn't help that Lexus just introduced the NX, that would have been better under the Scion brand for what they're wanting to do with Scion. Just makes no sense to me.
#13
#14
Brands don't come from no where. They are the result of something tangible or emotional. Scion is nothing of both. Toyota is a powerful brand, so they would have no problem creating new brands backed up by Toyota brand (i.e. Lexus). But then the product has to follow. For example, if Toyota builds a presidential car under another new brand, in some years this brand could be on Maybach/Bentley/Rolls Royce level. Same goes for a Ferrari/Lamborghini rival brand. The problem is not Scion, but the strategic product segmentation. While all Toyota brands should be independent, they should still have a strategic positioning within the whole group (i.e. Daihatsu - low cost, Toyota - mainstream, Lexus - premium). This is important not to create any overlapping or dilution. However the whole branding strategy has to be revised in order to gain sustainable competitive advantage that will hurt most mainstream brands but also premium brands, where customer turnover will increase due to lack of differentiation. Premium brands are losing their position: that is fact. Lexus is protected from that due to their low sales and small portfolio. They have to take advantage from that situation. With regards to Scion, at the moment it has no positioning nor name, so it cannot be successful.
#15
One (possible) reason why Toyota didn't buy Proton is that, even as huge as the company is, they were somewhat short of cash after the large fines that the American government socked them with after the runaway-acceleration and throttle/floor-mat issues.